What did I tell you? Never trust a fahkin’ scientist.
When a scientific dictatorship was first mooted over a century ago the great obstacle to “going beyond existing permissions” as supporters of global government coyly put it, in imposing authoritarian laws without having to seek the consent of voters was seen as the rights and freedoms enshrined in the US constitution.
Apparently those rights and freedoms are no longer seen as a problem because in February 2012 a group of American scientists called for the establishment of a global totalitarian government in which unelected academics would work alongside elected representatives to ‘engineer compliance with new social and behavioural norms’ the goal of which would be saving the planet from ecological disaster.
Read Ian Thorpe’s expose of a proposal to be published in March 2013 which proposes using scaremongering tactics to establish such a fascist regime.
Prominent American Scientists Call For Global Dictatorship Under UN Rule “To Save The Planet”
The Scientific Dictatorship
President Eisenhower warned against the dictatorship of a scientific elite in his farewell address in 1960. Authors like H G Wells and philosophers such as Bertrand Russell were predicting such a system if totalitarian global government was inevitable to maintain human progress late in the nineteenth century.
Transhumanism: The Elite Total Control Agenda
Robot lovers, indestrictible soldiers with no mercy or compassion, everlasting life for beings that are part human, part machine, genetically modified humans with supernatural strength and endurance competing in future ‘hungrer Games’ style Olympic tournaments: the plot of some dystopian novel? No, actual items in the elite’s agenda for total control
Freak Weather Events In USA Are Due To Geoengineering – We Can Expect The Same
American scientists, egged on by a psychopath President who boasts that he is good at killing people are pressing ahead with experiments in controlling the climate. They have no idea what the outcomes may be because as we know, mathematical models used to predict climate trends are hopelessly inaccurate. But when have scientists ever stopped to give a moments thought to consequences.
How academic debate is suppressed on science topics like Climate Change, GMOs, Pesticides and Toxicity of medicines
Intellectual intolerance and the supposed superiority of the scientific education have led not just to the politiciisation of science but to it’s being seduced by corporate money and political power. Science was ever fascism’s whore of course and the egos of scientists are easily bought. This has led to a very unhealthy emergence of dogmas and orthodoxies and an intolerance of the dissent that is essential if scientific research is to have any credibility.
Becoming Sceptical About Scepticism
There are a lot of people around the web who call themselves skeptics. They mostly seem to be focused on the argument between Biblical creationism and Darwinian evolution, are far from being truly skeptical or sceptical their minds are absolutely closed to any idea that challenge their own. Thus science, properly the territory of open minded enquiry, is taking on dogmas and finding fanatical followers as if it were a religion …
Living within the conspiracy
Slaves To The Machine
Don’t Call Me A Conspiracy Theorist
Greenteeth Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Writerbeat ] … [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [ It’s Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [Latest Posts] … [ Tumblr ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ]