Yesterday we saw on television news bulletins pictures of scientists jumping up and down, screaming and shouting and generally behaving they way we would expect from Liverpool football supporters if they heard Mario Balotelli had been transferred to another club.
What was the cause of this celebrationete? You might well ask.
It seems the pointy heads were worked up because they had landed a space probe, The Rosetta Mission, on the surface of a comet. Or maybe not, later news reports said the capsule had not attached itself to the surface of the comet, some even said it had bounced back into space again.
No matter, today we hear it is down once more. The scientists are in a somewhat calmer frame of mind though still ebullient.
Rosetta mission could unlock key to alien life,’ says lead Philae lander scientist
“For Jean-Pierre Bibring, the astrophysicist who has worked on the Rosetta mission for over two decades, the crucial question of our very existence could be found on that relatively tiny spot in the solar system.
“When you observe the solar system now, actually we do not understand why life started here. We are convinced that really the keys were in the origin of the system itself; the process that’s really governed the modeling of different pass-ways, Bibring said on Wednesday.”
“We are essentially convinced that these molecules, with their specific composition and structures, when they were fed in the oceans of the earth and possibly of other planets, were the missing link to the emergence of life, he continued.
Bibring extols the “beauty of the comet, saying it has the ability to preserve the composition of the ingredients out of which the entire solar system formed.” (Source)
There seem to be far more dogmas and established truths in that than the detached objectivity we expect from scientists.
While other scientists are chanting the “mantra “We will learn so much from this,” the way they do when asked what the moon landing actually achieved (forgetting that all we learned from putting men on the moon was that it isn’t made of cheese). Its the standard justification for flushing shitloads of taxpayers’ money down the toilet on pointless projects run by people who make no distinction between research ans science fiction of course. WTF possible benefit can there be in having another few thousand theories about the origins of life? They are emerging already.
Last April, NASA’s Kepler Space Telescope team discovered the first Earth-size planet orbiting a star in the “habitable zone” the range of distance from a star where liquid water might pool on the surface of an orbiting planet. (Really they observed a change in the radiated light from that star which suggested a planet sized object had passed between it and earth. As it would take our fastest spacecraft about 100,000 years to reach that star system we ain’t going to be finding our for sure any time soon.
Some scientists theorize that five stars in our galaxy have Earth-sized planets in the habitable or Goldilocks Zone.
Whether life could have formed in liquid water on one of these Goldilocks’ planets, or if it hitched a ride across the solar system on a comet, Philae potentially offers a key to the question of whether or not we are alone in the universe. What’s more, if life on Earth came from microbes that hitched a ride on a comet, then ironically, human beings would in fact be the alien life they have always been looking for.
I’m sure it will not dampen the excitement of science heads if I reveal that theories claiming the whole comet landing stunt was filmed in a Hollywood studio have already been posted on the internet.
The Truth Is Not Out There So Stop Wasting Our Money
New Physics Theory Proposes Time Is Disappearing From Our Universe.
Wormholes: The science behind Interstellar Travel
Infinity And The Myth Of Space And Time
Alien Life? Who Needs Lizard Men There Is A Universe Of Ideas Out There
Quantum Metaphysics or The God Experiments
Not Intelligent Design But A Designer Universe.
Before Big Bang – part 1
Science & Technology index