Over in the good ol’ US of A the ‘progressive liberals’ as that failed state’s authoritarian reactionaries like to label themselves, are getting their knickers in a right old twist about alleged ‘racist’ remarks made by the presumptive Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump who said something unforgivable about a Hispanic US federal judge. So what exactly was it he said about this bean – bandit judge that led intellectuals and academics to call for his murder?
In a nutshell, Donald Trump said U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, who recently ruled in a class-action suit against Trump University, is sticking it to him. And the judge’s bias is likely rooted in the fact that he is of Mexican descent.
Oh horror. He’s of Mexican descent, a fact which may have influenced his ruling. Trump did not call the judge a border – hopper, Chilli shitter, Latrino, spic, wetbac or scum sucking spawn of a pox whore’s scab louse. He simply told the truth, the judge is of Mexican descent. On the question of whether this influenced the judge’s ruling this blog could not possibly comment.
A few facts though. Firstly, Trump has a perfect right to express an opinion on the judge’s rulings and to question his motives. Secondly, according to reports from the courtroom there are solid grounds for believing Trump is right.
On May 27, Curiel, at the request of The Washington Post, made public plaintiff accusations against Trump University — that the whole thing was a scam. The Post, as Bob Woodward of Watergate fame revealed, has 20 reporters digging for dirt in Trump’s past.
So apart from stating the truth (which as we know, ‘progressive liberals’ fear and loathe, and with good cause having pushed the lying liar ‘Crooked Hillary’ as their candidate) what did Trump do to be smeared by the media mob as a “racist”?
He attacked the independence of the judiciary, they claim.
The judiciary is independent (supposedly, although the rent boy president Barack Obama does not think so,) but that does not mean that judges are exempt from the same robust criticism as politicians, bureaucrats, businessmen, bankers and us ordinary punters.
Apparently it is a politically incorrect hate crime to bring up the religious, racial or ethnic background of a judge, or suggest this might influence his actions on the bench. Which is a pity, because it more or less gives drug dealers, extortionists, gun runners and terrorists licence to corrupt members of their own ethnic community.
Pundits Said It could Not Happen: Trump Now Tied With Hillary In Latest National Poll
FBI Drops Hints They Are Ready to INDICT Hillary Clinton
Low And Middle Income Whites and Blacks Feel Threatened As Crime Soars Under Obama,
So Was What Trump Said On Abortion REALLY So Bad?
Ruling Elites In Panic: Trump Presidency Would End Their Golbal Government Dream
Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … Daily Stirrer …[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]