Maryam Adam and Behailu Kebede are listed as ‘fate uncertain’ on the Grenfell Tower safe/uncertain/dead list

Yet both spoke to the media after the fire.

After the fire - a Grenfell Tower interior
Sourse: The Daily Star

from The Tap

posted by Tapestry

At last I received confirmation that the 4th Floor of Grenfell Tower consisted of Flats 11-16, as I had guessed earlier, thanks to the appearance of a Google docs status report of the Tower listing all residents and their status – as either ‘safe’ ‘dead’ or unknown’.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Uwuk3m6haLU9DW5HsjR0uTMPEE5NBpyPaw_oYIsTkjY/htmlview

Thanks to David Mortimer of Milton Keynes

What caught my eye is the supposed fate of the Adam family of number 14, being listed as ‘fate unknown’. This would include both Maryam, the central figure of the media narrative, who says she was awoken at 1.50 am by a neighbour knocking on her door, and her brother, Yasin Adam, who also appeared in some alternative versions of the narrative, and possibly another person sleeping in the flat, described as ‘a friend of Maryam’s’.

The fact is that the last we heard of pregnant Maryam was she was leaving to go to hospital, although her interviews by media must have taken place subsequently to that. She says she saw the fire in the kitchen of Number 16 through the door, and said it was a very small fire. She is a crucial witness to this event.

She says in one version of the narrative (Metro and ABC.es) that the person who knocked her door was a tall white British male, who she clearly did not know. There are no pictures of her or her brother Yasin anywhere in the media, as I have seen. It is odd that such a key person to the story has no picture anywhere.

Behailu Kebede, in another version of the news narrative (Sun, Daily Mail), is described as the person who knocked Maryam’s door at 1.50 am. The fire started in his flat, number 16, of which he is the longterm tenant, just as Maryam is the longterm tenant of number 14. He too is a crucial witness, who has, so far, been described as staying with friends, and too shocked to be able to be interviewed. On the google document, he is now listed as fate ‘uncertain’. No one knows who compiled the list.

Which version of the narrative is the true one?

I conjectured that as we are being fed various versions of the narrative by the media, we should take one of the versions as more likely to be true – and the tall white British male one would seem more persuasive than the Behailu Kebede one to me. We might imagine that we are being fed different stories and the truth tried to spill out via ABC.es but that was overridden by the mainstream UK media narrative, which wants only listed tenants to be present in the narrative.

Either way this could all be cleared up simply enough if we could talk to Maryam Adam and Behailu Kebede. But where are they?

I also conjectured that if the fire was an Mi5 operation and was started and spread deliberately, these two individuals would be very unlikely to resurface, as they might unravel the narrative. The chaos agenda is running, and a big fire fits very well into that. As with 9/11, inconvenient witnesses to the truth are not required. The narrative must be defended at all costs.

That said, I could not help noticing that, in the safe/uncertain/dead list being assembled on google documents for the whole building, Maryam Adam is no longer referred to any more with her correct name, but now as ‘Adan’ – making her too a subject of name change and obfuscation (See my earlier posts). Both she and Behailu are surprisingly not listed as ‘safe’ but as ‘uncertain’. How come?

I hope I am wrong, and that these two individuals from the crucial 4th floor turn up later today. They quite clearly both survived the fire and could know a lot about what happened, and they could tell us all they know. It would set my mind at rest to hear them confirm the narrative we’ve been given. If they’ve disappeared without trace, that to me suggests something untoward has happened to them, and also that the main media narrative could very well be false. That would suggest arson.

One thought on “Maryam Adam and Behailu Kebede are listed as ‘fate uncertain’ on the Grenfell Tower safe/uncertain/dead list

  1. OK , well I knew Kebebe (his name is not Kebede ) way back when he first came to London , we all lived in Princess Beatrice House ,Finborough Road , Earlscourt for several years . He was a con artist then (1990) and he is likely still one now . Why was he given that property in the first place ? ( I do actually know how and it’s not what has been said publicly) Why was he allowed to rent the rooms in it out ? when the standard council tenancy absolutely forbids this . There were deliberate fires where he lived before Grenfell and he was always on the scene . How did he get his Grenfell tenancy . Who are this stream of people who he claims are his siblings and needs to be housed with them ? Who are the pair he claims are his parents ? He stated in 1990 that his parents had been murdered by the regime in Ethiopia.My next-door neighbor (Rose DeBarra) gave him £5ooo on the strength of those claims . Why were others of his social group saying on FB ” thank god they will never find out how the fire started ” they were also claiming that Bahailu lived on the first floor and had left and gone back to Addis years ago .Deliberate Disinfo , directed at the investigative journalists who were sniffing about . Why all these lies ? I know Bahailu and I know his mentality and that is if you don’t like it , break/otherwise destroy it , and you’ll be given another one . This worked well for Bahailu’s girl friend Genet who burnt out 2 rooms in PBH so that she would be given a flat/house and he also got a council flat , which he complained about after the refurb .In fact the windows where the fire “started” was what he complained about . I don’t think he meant the whole building to go up like a tinderbox, but I also don’t think it was a freak accident either . Why did he not have proper fire safety items , such as a fire blanket ,in the kitchen ? He was renting out rooms with communal kitchen , so he should have been complying with legislation. Als he didn’t (obviously ) pay tax on the rental income of the lettings ,SINCE 1995 . So how is he still walking the streets ? Who’s protecting him and why ?

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s