Since the early days on the old blog.co.uk platform we have from time to time raised the issues of Agenda 21 and Agenda 30, The New World Order, and the push for a global, authoritarian, socialist government. Any mention of these things in online forums is certain to get the author accused of being a conspiracy theorist, a right wing extremist, a nutcase, a young earth creationist and much worse.
The left wing trolls who throw out such accusations are either profoundly stupid, woefully ill – informed, or are being paid in some way for their efforts to suppress debate. Agenda 21 and Agenda 30 are long term plans for the implementation of global economic and social policies published by the United Nations in conjunction with left wing Think Tanks and as such are easily available in the public domain. And yet the globalist left dismiss them as “conspiracy theories,” and brand anyone trying to initiate discussion of plans that will affect the lives of every human being on the planet as a right wing nutcase.
Anybody far – left troll thinking of screaming “conspiracy theorist” because this topic is being raise should first note that both the links immediately below go to official United Nations web sides. It is easy to verrfy this so don’t try the usual leftie follow up of claiming they are documents posted on a fake news site by Russian agents.
That alone should make reasonable people wonder WTF it is about these documents that the global elite want to keep hidden.
When the issue came up on Quora, as well as the usual dismissals from unthinking idiots there was one excellent answer, the author of which invited readers to share his words as widely as possible:
Employed NOAA, FAU, Gulfstream trends, movements, thermoclin
Great question. It’s been kept deliberately out of the light. That may sound conspiratorial. But David Rockefeller, who had no idea he was being audio recorded, stated this:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, the NYT, Time Magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings, and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world govt. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries.”
David Rockefeller, in and address to the Trilateral Commission, June 1991.
This might sound a bit disjointed at first as Rockefeller is thanking the press for not exposing their plan for humanity in ushering in a one world state. But know this, a one world state is the primary goal of the Club of Rome, the trilateral commission and the UN.
Where does AGW (anthropogenic global warming) fit into to all this? Well, the Club of Rome, which is a collection of very powerful diplomats and world bankers including such current members of the Clintons, Mikhail Gorbachev, Tony Blair, George Soros, David Rockefeller, and Obama among numerous others, convened in the 70s to discuss the greatest threat to humanity. The club of Rome deemed overpopulation was the existential threat humanity would face within the next 50–100 years. In order to deal with this threat, they concurred that only a one world state would be able to mitigate this threat by some “very brutal and seemingly heartless decisions” as one club of Rome member put it.
How to achieve a one world state became the next issue and the club of Rome determined a crisis larger than any single nation could handle would fit this need. From there they moved to an environmental crisis which became, you guessed it, AGW.
“The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.”
Alexander King, Cofounder of the Club of Rome.
The UN overlaps with the Club of Rome in both ideology as well as members with some members holding concurrent membership while other UN members were former members of the Club of Rome. So the UN is an extension and the practical way in which the Club of Rome will achieve its agenda. Why the UN created the IPCC should give you pause to begin with given their original role as peacekeepers. There reach is growing, with the intent being that the UN will be the keeper of fossil fuels so to speak. They will oversee each nation’s allotment of emissions. Essentially controlling their GDP. Nations and their leaders will be pressured to keep their constituents within a relative standard of living and will trade portions of their own sovereignty for an increased allotment of emissions. As the UN is not truly worried about emissions, they’ll happily usurp national sovereignty for increased emissions as this is their end.
Have you noticed recently why nationalism, borders and boundaries are becoming dirty words of late when they were never so before? We are being conditioned to accept a globalist ideology, that the idea of a nation state is passé and will fall to the ‘more relevant’ world state. I would also point to the waves of tens of millions of immigrants as part of this agenda and it has been actively promoted by the elites as an attempt to undermine all cultural and national heritage so as to remove any point of common ground. It is a whitewashing of all the things that identify us as individuals as well as that which identifies us a collection of peoples who share a similar history so that when such things as nations and a shared heritage are gone, no one will bat an eye and there will be nothing to rally around as all such identities are gone. We are being lead to believe that national and cultural pride are an equivalence to all the isms that plague humanity. It is not the case and I’m not sure if the purveyors of it actually believe it to be so or have rather concocted the relationship to achieve an end. I suspect the latter although many have taken up this rhetoric unwittingly out of a misguided sense of virtue and righteousness. Nationalism is not an inherently bad thing, certainly it could be used as such as Hitler perverted it. But that very same nationalism became the rallying point when other nations had to defend against this perversion of nationalism. The ground swell of that nationalism in the US even surged well after the war and much was achieved because of it. So to condemn all because of the sake of the rare errant misuse of it is entirely overkill and seems rather a poor excuse meant to justify an end goal of disbanding the nation states. There are overwhelmingly more examples of the benefits of nationalism than there are the very few instances where it has worked towards ill affects. People will seek groups regardless of how well they manage to strip all commonality. If it’s not a nation state, it will be a trade block. Here again, that’s not necessarily a bad thing at all. Do you shun the Brit at your local bar because of nationalism? Or do you chat him up because you enjoy his accent and actually seek out a point of common ground with him? The latter in my case as it is in many others. I digressed more than I meant to but the point being that ending nationalism as an ideology is not being done out of a need to lift humanity to higher plane but rather because it is means to an end and nationalism is an impediment to that end rather than because it is innately bad. Although we’re being told as much by displaying a single misused example of it while they deliberately avoid referencing all the good it has done. See, Germany 1939–1944, nationalism bad, we must stamp it out entirely and ring in a one world state.
Agenda 21 is an extension of this overreach. Bush Sr signed onto this during his presidency and both he and Jr are very much globalists and have not only failed to halt it’s march but have actively aided in it.
Agenda 21 seeks to break up the world into blocks of trading constituents, North America, the Pacific Rim, etc. This isn’t conspiracy or fear mongering, it’s directly stated so in text of Agenda 21. We won’t be the good ole US of A but rather the Trading Block of North America. Sound familiar at all? The EU is meant to be one such quadrant, those Euros are so progressive, always a step ahead. How’s that working out for the wealthier nations of the EU? Now as a citizen of the Trading block of North and Central America not only do you need to carry and support the indigent of your own country but the entirety of all impoverished nations within your trading block. It doesn’t work out that everyone’s standard of living is brought up to that of your own but it’s an essential averaging of all the standards of living within your trading block. Thought Greece was an anchor on the EU? It’s 1st world relative to some of the Central American nations. Don’t misinterpret this, I’m all for lifting the standards of living of impoverished nations, but redistribution is not the manner in which that should be achieved for a host of reasons that are beyond the scope of this comment.
Agenda 21 is being enacted at present in Sonoma. county CA. Now, not in the distant future but present day. They’ve already received a 300 million federal grant to build massive human containment complexes near interstates in order to house us sheep in the intent to avoid further environmental stress. People will be told where they are able to live according to agenda 21. Forget beachfront, riverfront, even the suburbs will be a thing of the past. Think I’m being hyperbolic? Take a look at agenda 21, it’s absolutely chilling in its intent. I’ve read the entire document as everyone should at least know the highlights. But it’s being deliberately obfuscated when it is discussed and more often than not it’s omitted altogether. Glen Beck has dug up some of the highlights of agenda 21. He is an admirable human, he sought out corruption regardless of party affiliation and I strongly suspect he became a thorn to some very powerful people and he has since all but disappeared after reaching a crescendo of fame and followers, it was strange how quickly he fell out of favor. If you haven’t the time to meander through several hundred pages of the plan for humanity, there are YouTube videos in which local politicians and concerned citizens of Sonoma county are filmed in an open forum discussing the horrific intent of agenda 21. Many of the speakers are a bit droll, but the content is what’s important here. I’ll link one or two if I can find them. It should be everyone’s duty to at least have a minimum level of awareness of what the elites have planned for us all.
Accurate and very necessary information on the intentions of the high-level string-pullers sometimes referred to as The Illuminati while their grand plan for setting up a global regime have been dubbed The New World Order or NWO for short.
Even some ‘reasonable’ people are repeating the myth of overpopulation and the proposed solution of allowing tens of millions of third world economic migrants (NB not asylum seekers or refugees,) to flood into the developed nations. The purpose of these global government agendas – allied to the lie of climate change driven mass extinction – is to make it appear to the great majority of the world’s population that their only hope of preserving their homes and lifestyles is to surrender their civil and democratic rights and put their trust in a super – wealthy minority of the world’s population, who will of course retain their unfair share of land, resources, creature comforts (private jests, private islands, fuel guzzling limousines, and regular travel to in ‘exotic’ locations (whose attraction would be reduced if they all ‘upgraded’ to inner city status.)
It’s quite bizarre that people will buy the complete fiction of human-caused climate change but think that the NWO, one-world-government (global dictatorship), the depopulation agenda etc. are crazy ‘conspiracy theories’. How many times to members of this group have to blatantly announce their intention before the simple minded dupes who buy into the idea that elitists have our interests at heart when they talk about human rights, wealth distribution and so on.
The Davosocracy as I have called them in reference to the World Economic Forum held in the exclusive ski resort of Davos, Switzerland each January, (it’s really democratic, anyone can attend so long as they have £150,000 to spar for the price of a ticket,) have come out and openly stated their agenda, a world government working with global corporations to enrich us all but mostly themselves. So it is no no longer theory, let alone conspiracy theory, as there is documentary and witness evidence to support it.
People have been divided by political party’s for too long and it should be the globalists vs the rest of us as globalism is not in most of our best interests. You’re right, it will benefit only a small handful of elites. If they thought wealth disparity was bad now, wait until it’s only a small sect of elites and then the rest of us. I guess it’s all good if the vast majority of us have little.
Take a look at this YouTube video where the implementation of Agenda in Sonoma County 21, Ca is being discussed, or search “Sonoma country agenda 21 youtube” (not on Google, their sanitized search results filter out anything not favourable to the globalist agenda, A lot of it is quite droll but the content in there is very eye opening.
This information is very hard to come by and the average person tends to be both oblivious and confrontational when they hear the truth.