Wax My Lady-Scrotum Or I’ll Sue

This blog has always taken the line that tolerance can be taken too far, (and often is in loony – liberal dominated places like Canada and California where laws are being passed almost daily, with the aim of forcing sane people to tolerate the intolerable. The latest and one of the most grossly stupid examples from this is a story from Vancounver of a girlie man who get upset and litigious when beauty therapists who offer bikini line waxing among their services refuse to was his hairy lady – scrotum, (because in politically correct Canada women can have a scrotum and a dick and balls. It’s not about biology, it’s about feelings, right? Bizarrely (or maybe not, this in loony liberal Canada remember,) the courts are siding with this pathetic, attention seeking idiot, and imposing penalties on women who don’t want to handle this dick’s balls that are putting them out of business.

BTW the man, who calls himself Jessica identifies as a lesbian (i.e. he likes to poke women with his lady – cock.)

Women in Vancouver Lose Their Businesses as a Man Tries to Legally Force Them Into Waxing His LadyScrotum

written by Alex Parker for Redstate.com

In British Columbia, small businesses are facing a gender-identity discrimination lawsuit brought by a man named Jessica Yaniv.
Jessica considers himself a lesbian, and he’s brought over a dozen complaints against women in the Vancouver area who perform female Brazilian bikini waxing but refused to wax his furry female sources of semen.

Five women under the gun are being represented by the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms.

Very strange — women face the threat of being forced by the government to handle a man’s testicles.

Shouldn’t #MeToo have something to say about that?

Here’s the lesbian Jessica Yaniv, he’s a Lady remember … :

hes-a-laydee

Can’t say anything about a Trans – woman for fear of committing a hate crime of course, but the thread under this Twitter photo shows that before Jessica became such a convincing lady his record of interactions with women and girls (very young girls,) was interesting in a creepy way and gives an insight as to why he might be so keen to  use ladies ‘facilities.’

The JCCF’s president, John Carpay, says the victims of Jessica’s filings are mostly poor, ESL immigrants.

He also believes it’s likely multiple ladies’ve had to shut down their businesses as a result of the apparently-hairy-balled litigator.

That’s certainly the case of Brazilian immigrant Maria Da Silva — she testified Wednesday that she’s had to close up shop.

The girls who’ve declined to grab gonads have explained that they aren’t qualified to deal with the complexities of male genitalia.

Note to all men searching for scrotum service: If a technician tells you she can’t help because she doesn’t know how to properly rip the hair out of your sack, TRUST HER. That’s not something you want done by someone who doesn’t know what they’re doing.

MORE NEWS YOU WILL NOT FIND IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA
The Daily Stirrer
Greenteeth Digital Publishing
 

 

UK government rejects child slavery victims right to stay.

According to a report published on the hipsters; favourite news source, Buzzfeed, The UK Home Office rejected applications from hundreds of children trafficked to the UK between April 2017 and the end of 2018, having become victims of a modern slavery racket. BuzzFeed News claims the information was obtained through a freedom of information (FOI) request following a tip off.

Figures provided in the response reveal that a total of 310 applications for discretionary leave to remain were rejected by The Home Offie, along with 65 asylum claims, at around the same time as the government was embroiled in the infamous Windrush scandal. That episode of unjust treatmeny of people brought to the UK as children without going through the correct procedure led to a series of embarrassing reversals for the UK government on their “hostile environment” policies.

The FOI response from the UK Home Office reveals that Theresa May’s government approved only 16 out of 326 applications to remain in Britain made by children officially recognized as modern slavery victims. The immigration status afforded to those on ‘discretionary leave to remain’ gives people a right to a temporary stay in the UK if they have been the victim of extreme hardship.

The case of a Vietnamese child who, according to her foster father, had been the victim of gang-rape by her traffickers, is highlighted in BuzzFeed’s report. The girl had her asylum claims rejected, having fled Vietnam as a 16-year old, and was told she would be sent back to the country of her traffickers, just days after her 18th birthday.

Another case not featured in the Buzzfeed report but featured by this website a few years ago concerned a Romanian teenager who was sold to a trafficking gang by her alcoholic father. Having been repeatedly raped by her ‘owners’ to prepare her for a career as a sex worker she ended up in a massage parlour in the northern city of Leeds, where she was forced to serve up to twenty ‘customers’ a day but saw none of the money her activities earned.

On being rescued in a police operation, she was returned to Romania as an illegal immigrant, where she was returned to her father who, predictably, sold her to the traffickers again. Her story came to light when she was liberated for a second time. That time she was allowed to stay.

The people who campaign so emotively for open borders simply do not understand the realities of life in third world countries or even in the poorer communities of Europe and North America. Human rights are an unaffordable luxury for this who live at the margins of society, and while calls from the likes of Alexandria Occasio Cortez or Owen Jones to open our borders to the world’s poor, it is not a few thousand we are talking about but billions.

RELATED POSTS:
Scale of Modern Slavery in Britain Revealed in Shocking Report
Pregnant Victims of Modern Slavery left ‘Isolated’ in London
Big Brands, Big Meetings, Big Summits, but Modern Slavery Still Problem for UK
Slavery Was Evil When Used By Capitalists 200 years Ago But Lefties Are Happy To benefit From It Now

Don’t Support Child Slavery Avoid These 6 Chocolate Companies
Broken Societies

The Daily Stirrer – July 2019
Greenteeth Digital Publishing

To Boldly Go – The Infinte Insanity Of The ‘Progressive Left’

As the world celebrates fifty years since the moon landings, and the conspiracy theorists celebrate the biggest hoax ever (before climate change,) the progressive left in the USA have found cause to take offence at one of humanity’s greatest achievements / one of the deep state’s biggest psyops (delete as appropriate) …

Attacks on ‘white & male’ Moon landing proves no US achievement is too big for liberals to destroy

from RT

Attempts to diminish the triumph of Apollo 11 and to reassign credit don’t just taint the 50th anniversary of the moon landing, but presage the technological decline of the US if it persists with identity politics.

With the Founding Fathers now rarely mentioned in the media without side notes about their slave ownership, and the Betsy Ross flag is offensive to Colin Kaepernick and Nike, there is nothing new about liberal attempts to strike at the very heart of American identity.

But – leaving aside the conspiracy theorists – the moment Neil Armstrong stepped on the surface of the Moon on July 20, 1969 was objectively such a universal milestone that to qualify it seems a fight against human endeavor itself.

It would seem like the more logical route, for those who resent that this was a feat of white un-woke America, would be to try and diminish their role in favour of supposedly unsung heroes.

Hidden Figures, the Oscar-winning film from 2016 was the perfect archetype of this revisionist history, exaggerating and fictionalizing the role of a cadre of politically suitable black women, who did an entirely replaceable job and were no more important than thousands of others involved.

 

READ ALL

More from Greenteeth Digital Publishing
Greenteeth home
Daily Stirrer
Science and Technology Catalogue

 

 

The Cassandra of Brexit, or Master of stating The Obvious

In an article for today’s Daily Telegraph, Michael Deacon wrote:

This afternoon in Parliament, Sir Ivan Rogers sat before the Foreign Affairs select committee, dolefully outlining the myriad prophecies he’d made about Brexit. Sir Ivan used to be the British ambassador to the EU, but resigned in January 2017, after (accurately) predicting that Brexit would take a lot longer to resolve than Theresa May thought.

The committee listened as Sir Ivan trudged through his record of clairvoyance. According to him, he’d predicted Brexit a full 10 years before it actually happened (at the time, he was working in the City; when he told colleagues that Britain would leave the EU, “They thought I was mad”). Before the referendum, he said, he’d warned Government ministers that they needed to prepare for a Leave victory, but they didn’t want to know. He’d also predicted that triggering Article 50 would prove a mistake.

Clairvoyant or does he simply have the ability to state the blindingly obvious?

” he’d predicted Brexit a full 10 years before it actually happened”
Millions of us who were aware of the long term EU goal of full political integration of member states knew UK would have to leave the day John Major signed the Maastricht treaty.

“he said, he’d warned Government ministers that they needed to prepare for a Leave victory,”

Credit where its due, this was surprisingly prescient for a senior civil servant, but anybody aware of the national mood outside the M25 knew a Leave victory was likely, despite what the polls and pundits said.

“…resigned in January 2017, after (accurately) predicting that Brexit would take a lot longer to resolve than Theresa May thought.”

Again this would not have been hard to predict accurately vfor anyone familiar with the way the EU works. Yannis Varoufakis has been spelling it out to everyone who cared to listen for years. (Varoufakis’ book Adults In The Room tells how EU bureaucrats stitched up Greece when the Greeks tried to renegotiate the terms of their Eurozone membership.

” He’d also predicted that triggering Article 50 would prove a mistake (because it would unwittingly give the upper hand to the EU)”

He was not correct, the fundamental mistake was May’s commitment to not leaving without a deal. As Trump said, and any businessman will tell you, it’s impossible to negotiate a good deal if the other party knows you will not walk away without a deal.

So not quite such a dazzling record when put into perspective. It’s rather like somebody predicting Manchester City or Liverpool will win the Premier League in 2020

RELATED POSTS:

More on Brexit
The Daily Stirrer, July 2019
Greenteeth Digital Publishing

Finnish Climate Study Finds No Evidence That Humans Caused Climate Change

A team of Finnish climate researchers led by J. Kauppinen and P. Malmi of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Turku, have have published results of a project which found that the likely human contribution to a rise of 0.1°C in global temperatures over the past 100 years century is just 0.01°C. This is in direct contradiction of  the catastrophic global warming narrative built by research grant phishing Warmageddonist scientists and the bureaucrats of the  UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The UN has of course been making political use of Warmageddonist doom prophecies to advance its Agenda 21 and Agenda 30, both of which look like plans for global governance when subjected to critical scrutiny.

Kauppinen and Malmi write in their research analysis paper, dated June 29, 2019, that their research proves that GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 fail to calculate the instances of the low cloud cover changes on the global temperature. They claim this is why the models used to make the case for catastrophic warming give a minimal natural temperature change, assigning a substantial change to the contribution of the greenhouse gases in the observed temperature.

This is the reason why IPCC has to use a considerable adjustment of data to compensate for the too small natural component. Further, scientists drafting reports for the IPCC have to leave out the strong negative feedback due to the clouds. Also, this paper proves that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature.

Kauppinen and Malmi explain:
“The climate sensitivity has an extremely large uncertainty in the scientific literature. The smallest values estimated are very close to zero while the highest ones are even 9 degrees Celsius for a doubling of CO2. The majority of the papers are using theoretical general circulation models (GCM) for the estimation. These models give very big sensitivities with a very large uncertainty range. Typically sensitivity values are between 2-5 degrees.

IPCC uses these papers to estimate global temperature anomalies and climate sensitivity.

However, there are a lot of papers, where sensitivities lower than one degree are estimated without using GCM.

The basic problem is still missing experimental evidence of the climate sensitivity.

Low cloud cover controls practically the global temperature. It turns out that the changes in the relative humidity and in the low cloud cover depend on each other. So, instead of low cloud cover, we can use the changes in the relative humidity in order to derive the natural temperature anomaly. According to the observations, a 1 % increase of the relative humidity decreases the temperature by 0:15°C.

The IPCC climate sensitivity is about one order of magnitude too high because a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing in climate models. If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice. The major part of the extra CO2 is emitted from oceans, according to Henry`s law. The low clouds practically control the global average temperature.

the last hundred years, the temperature is increased by about 0:1°C because of CO2 therefore:

The human contribution was about 0:01°C.”

The J. Kauppinen and P. Malmi report is the latest of many reports from research projects which provide evidence to challenge the scare tactics pushed by the purveyors of the climate change hypothesis and politicians seeking to use the climate change scare to erode our rights and liberties.

The facts show the climate models that have been proven wrong at every step, the Earth’s climate is much more complicated than the algorithms that can be programmed into a computer application could deal with, simply because there are so many unquantifiable effects acting on the climate. The CAGWARTs (Carbon- driven Anthropogenic Global Warming Alternative Reality Trolls still haven’t raised teir heads from their computer screens long enough to work out why the satellite temperature data says, Earth hasn’t warmed in twenty years , why there is still snow in winter, cool spells in summer, why Polar Bear numbers are incresing and where the 50 million people who were due to be displaced by rising sea levels by 2015 have disappeared to, (clue: they’re not hiding under harry Potter’s cloak of invisibility.)

READ a translation of the whole report (.pdf)

RELATED POSTS:

EXPLORE RELATED POSTS:

Some clear thinking on climate change
Climate change: CO2 comparison
Climate effect of CO2 overstated
Climate and the IPCC Agenda

Brexit Party MEP blasts ‘Pointless’ European Parliament As A Charade

U.K. businessman and newly elected Member of the European Parliament (MEP) blasted the whole setup as an undemocratic charade only days after being sworn in. The Brexit Party MEP  attacked the European Parliament and asked whether it was fair to say the EU is a democratic institution. Speaking to The Daily Express, the First Property Group CEO claimed the EU Parliament served no purpose (an assertion many of us who follow EU politics have been making for many years, and admitted he was surprised at its lack of influence. Again this should not be a surprise to anyone who knows how the increasingly authoritarian EU works, but maybe Habib was being rhetorical as a way of raising public awareness of the way things are done in the brussels bureaucratic dictatorship.

Mr Habib was asked what fears had been confirmed when he became an MEP for the Brexit Party and entered the European Parliament for the first time. He said: “I had done a lot of reading, obviously, on the European Union on their structure and setup.

“But, I had never had any on the ground experience so this was my first interaction with the institution in a practical sense.

“What really struck me, irrespective of Brexit, whether or not you are a Leaver, Remainer, pro-EU or anti-EU, really they should abolish the EU Parliament.

“The EU Parliament serves no function

“There is no mechanism by which the European Union can be democratic until it has a total political union.

“So it might as well get rid of the charade of this Parliament.”

He added: “I think the Parliament is meant to give the EU an air of democracy but it doesn’t perform a democratic purpose.

“It has got no ability to initiate legislation, It has got no ability to move to have legislation repealed.

This blog, in our current and previous incarnations online have reported all this of course as we recorded the EU’s democratic deficit and chronicled the progress of a bunch of unelected bureaucrats as they tried to conquer Europe with regulations.

The European Parliament, the body to which we are allowed to elect representatives to look out for our national and local interests, is not able to propose, initiate, block or repeal EU laws and regulations (which you may remember are imposed on all member states. The elected body may suggest amendments to legislation, but it has no authority to act like a true legislator and its suggested amendments may be, and usually are, ignored.

Laws are drasfted and proposed by the EU Commission, a body comprising 28 unelected representatives, one from each member state – typically retired politicians or civil servants. The ultimate approval of legislation lies with the Council of the European Union – again, an unelected body of ministers whose voting rights are based on the size and population of the countries they represent.

The Council may block legislation but, since the requirement for unanimity to pass laws has been steadily replaced by qualified majority voting, even this chamber has great difficulty in acting as a check on the Commissioners.

MORE on Brexit and the EU

Assigned Reading For Those Who Would Stop Brexit

Some Questions And Answers On Brexit From Quora

Liam Fox Savages Labour’s ‘Betrayal’ Brexit Plan with UK in EU Customs Union

French police drag Yellow Vest “protesters” away from Bastille Day parade as they jeer Macron


Traditional celebration of Bastille Day turns violent  in Paris – picture: AFP

from Geller Report

France is breaking upHow long before these ‘celebrations’ are deemed too high a security risk to hold? And as Germany’s economy continues to tank, they will have less of a stranglehold over the EU.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel joined Emmanuel Macron for the traditional Bastille Day military parade in Paris, which this year honoured European military cooperation. As Mr Macron was riding by at the start of the parade, he was greeted by people in the crowds who turned their backs, booed and whistled. Before the parade, he delivered a message to the French people and said he wanted to highlight France’s “irrevocable commitment to consolidate French and European security”.

He said: “Never since the end of the Second World War has Europe been so necessary.

“The construction of a Europe of defence, in connection with the Atlantic Alliance … is a priority for France. It is the theme of this parade.

“Acting together and strengthening our ability to act collectively is one of the challenges that the European Intervention Initiative, along with other key European projects, wants to address.”

But some “Yellow Vest” protesters were detained near the Champs Elysees as they tried to stage a protest, according to French police.

READ ALL at gellerreport.com

RELATED POSTS:
France’s Yellow Vest Revolution
Yellow Vests versus Macrom
Residents Of Paris Suburb With Migrant Ghetto Feel ‘Abandoned’ as Crime Surges
Ghosts Of ’68 Threaten Macron’s Technocratic Dream.
France: Yellow Vests Rampage After Founder Arrested

Two Police Officers Escape Violent Death At The Hands Of Immigrant Mob On New Year’s Eve

Residents Of Paris Suburb With Migrant Tent City Feel Abandoned As Crime Surges

Catalogue of posts on France