Nations Rebel Against The UN Migration Pact

The UN’s Global Compact for Migration sets out nonbinding guidelines for an integrated approach to international migration. DW looks at the agreement and at why some nations are vehemently against it.

The text of the agreement was finalized by UN member states on July 13, 2018, without being offered for public debate and is scheduled to be adopted at a December intergovernmental conference in Marrakesh, Morocco.

The compact is based on the recognition that the entire world needs to cooperate if current and future massive migration flows are to be managed in a humane manner, while still taking account of the values of state sovereignty. This may sound innocuous enough but as is usual when international committees of unelected bureaucrats that aspire to become global governments are involved, the devil is in the detail, precious little of which has been reported by mainstream media.

Read more: Follow the money: What are the EU’s migration policy priorities?

Leaked Document: United Nations Says Immigration Is Always Good And Should never Be Restricted

Only days after the European Court Of Human Rights (ECHR) gave a judgement with effectively reintroduced the notion of criminal blasphemy to Europe, but only for criticism of Islam (you can say what you like about Judaism and Christianity, and the more hateful and threatening the better,) a news reporter for German independent TV station RTL reported on details leaked from United Nations document which reveals that corrupt bunch of Cultural Marxist paskudniaks plan to use immigration from third world shithole countries to destroy western civilisation. If you don’t believe me just read the subtitles of the embedded video.

This blog has been telling you for fifteen years we are at war, not with Russia, China or Iran as mainstream media would have you believe but with the ruling elites of our own nations.

The UN’s Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration marks the first time the world body has agreed on a list of global measures to tackle the risks and challenges involved in migration for individual migrants, and at the same time to maximize benefits for the countries taking in immigrants.

The agreement comes as huge numbers of people across the world, often driven by conflict and poverty, are leaving their countries of origin to seek refuge elsewhere.

But not all countries agree with the compact’s basic tenets and have been vocal in their opposition. Though some have already rejected it, he most significant player, the USA has not committed itself one way or the other. It is likely of course that President Trump has simply wanted to avoid this red herring from becoming a distraction in the run up to the mid – term elections in his country. Russia and China have also declined to reveal their positions as yet, but it is fairly certain thse two global powers will go their own way, and neither is keen on mass immigration.

Read more: Czech PM questions UN migration pact after Austria exit

Some resistance is coming from surprising sources, in Germany for example, where Hausfrau Volksfuhrer Merkel’s love of dark sskinned foreigners is even greater than her hatred of native Germans, independent media reports are ensuring Germans, who have already seen working class suburbs in theior cities turned into third world shitholes thanks to Merkel’s ‘open doors’ immigration policy, know exactly what the UN plan to use mass migration to destroy civilisation really means for them.

from Gates of Vienna

An RTL Commentator Utters Blasphemy Against the UN Migration Pact

RTL is the only major independent broadcaster in Germany. In the following clip from RTL, the commentator Jörg Zajonc expresses doubleplus ungood thoughts about the United Nations’ proposed migration pact.
Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:

Video transcript:

00:00   The U.N. Migration Pact, a wish-list detached from reality. Convolutedly
00:04   written, difficult to read and even more difficult to understand except for one claim:
00:08   Migration is good. It is always good and should never be restricted. Why?
00:12   No answer is given. The doubters are assured that it is just a consensus paper,
00:16   not legally binding. Officially that might be the case, but it IS binding — in a political and
00:22   moral sense. That can have legal consequences. That would mean anyone
00:26   can make a claim based on the Pact and take their case to court. What judge would
00:30   dare make a decision against the consensus? It comes from the U.N.
00:34   Additionally, it is noted in the pact that national laws should be taken into account,
00:38   but also encouraged that these national laws be adapted according to the interests
00:42   of the U.N. Then there’s the matter of “information”. There should be an open,
00:47   Fact-based discussion concerning this matter, but I ask how?
00:51   If the results are already established, the perception to be created should be more
00:55   realistic, humane, and more constructive. The media should involved in steering the
00:59   immigration. It says that — literally. And those who don’t play along, they will have
01:04   their financial support taken away. That’s written in there too!
01:08   There one thing that’s not explained in the Pact. If immigration is so great, then why
01:12   does it require a controlled information campaign or such a pact?
 

Austria’s Populist Leader On Migrant Pact Pullout: We are Only Committed to Our Own People

Austria’s populist Vice-Chancellor Heinz Christian Strache rejected criticisms of his country’s move to pull out of the UN migration pact from other EU leaders including the grandmotherfucker, Little Emmanuel Macron of France, the Irish poofter Leo Varadkar and EU Commission Predident Jean – Claude Drunkard, saying he and his party were only concerned with what is best for Austrians.

The leader of the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) said, “We are responsible to our Austrian population as government officials. Austrian sovereignty has top priority for us, this must be preserved and protected,” Kronen Zeitung reports.

Mr Strache added that the migration pact would also create a possibility that “people who are unlawfully coming to Austria are legally compliant.” Indeed, when details not yet released in the public domain are read it becomes clear the pact is intended as a charter for people traffickers that would impose an unbearable burden on the prosperous nations as illiterate, unemployable third world migrants flood into Europe and north America.

“In the government’s program, we have promised to stop illegal migration, to protect citizens’ safety, and to protect the borders,” Strache said, adding that voters would question the government’s integrity if they reneged on that promise by signing the pact.

When asked about other countries who have signed the pact Strache said, “We do not care how many states join and which do not. We are pioneers when it comes to ensuring the sovereignty and the self-determination of Austria, so as not to end up with foreign rule.”

The move was lauded by Europes other populist parties, including Germany’s Alternative for Germany (AfD) whose leader praised Austria and the United States which has not officially declared its position although it is easy to predict Donald Trump’s response. Hungary have also rejected the pact. AfD co-chair Alice Weidel said, “Germany must not sign this pact which is an incalculable risk to our country and to the whole of Europe.”

The rejection by Austria is likely to encourage other countries to resist UN bullying and reject the pact. Czech Prime Minister Andrej Babis has already revealed that he too does not support the pact and expressed his intention to pull the Czech Republic out of it as well.

“I do not like the pact,” Babis said and added, “There are issues that can be interpreted in various ways. I will be proposing to my partners in government that we act in the same way as Austria or Hungary.”

The poor countries of the world support the pact of course, nobody want to migrate to such shitholes anyway – apart from paedophiles maybe as most of these places have been bypassed by civilisation and have no laws against such vile practices. Of the civilised nations it seems the cheese eating surrender monkeys of France and the testicularly deficient Swedes and Canadians are keen, Germany’s Merkel is hanging on to power by her fingernails and support for this latest betrayal of civilised values would see her booted out of office, likewise Theresa May in Britain, the Poles, Italians and Australians are sound and Spain is looking for a chance to dump the loony left socialist government which in effect seized power in a bloodless coup.


EU Slams Austrian Exit From UN Migration Pact as Czech Republic Prepares to Bail Next

Following news that Austria would quit the UN Migration Pact, the Czech Prime Minister has revealed his nation is looking to pull out of the United Nations’ (UN) policy on uncontroled migration too, as the European Commission lambassted Austria for withdrawing earlier this week from the agreement which is loved by globalists and hated by sane people.

Andrej Babiš, who recently compared Europe to ‘Asterix’s besieged village in asserting that citizens in the bloc must “have the right to defend our borders, our lifestyle, our heritage and our culture” against mass, third world migration, indicated Thursday he would recommend the Czech Republic withdraw from the compact. When leaders euphemistically talk of mass migration what they really mean is the transporation of illiterate religious fanatics into the propsperous, civilized parts of the world.

“I don’t like the pact. It’s not clearly interpreted and it could be abused,” Babiš said of the agreement, which claims that mass migration is “inevitable, necessary, and desirable”, warning lawmakers the agreement was “not clearly worded and could easily be abused”.

“I will be proposing to my partners in government that we act in the same way as Austria or Hungary,” stated Babiš, noting that “the United States has pulled out … and Poland is debating it as well”.

Following Wednesday’s announcement that Austria’s conservative-populist coalition was pulling the country out of the ‘Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration’, citing concern that the agreement would lead to “a human right to migration”, the European Commission, a long time proponent of letting third world shitholes dump their gangsters, rapists, murderers, terrorists and general cunts, lashed out against the decision.

A spokesman for the unelected EU executive said: “We regret the decision that the Austrian government has taken. We continue to believe that migration is a global challenge where only global solutions and global responsibility sharing will bring results.”

Poland signalled its intention to leave the agreement last month, when Interior Minister Joachim Brudzinski said he recommended that Warsaw quit the globalist compact for security reasons, asserting that the government wants “Poles to be safe in their own country”.

Earlier this week it was reported that Croatia would also withdraw from the UN compact as the Balkan nation’s president, Kolinda Grabar-Kitarovic, said voters could “rest assured” that she would not be signing the declaration in Marrakech next month.

Hungary was the second nation to pull out after the U.S. — whose President Donald Trump characterised the compact as “no borders, everyone can come in!” — denounced the pact as a case of overreach by UN bureaucrats. The Visegrad nation slammed the “dangerous” UN document, of which it said “the thing looks as if it were copied” from open borders-backing billionaire George Soros’ blueprints for mass migration.

RELATED POSTS:

Worlds Biggest Luxury Liner To Be An Immigrant Hostel?
Ocean Gala, a luxury cruise liner which when launched was the world’s largest passenger ship will be converted into a concentration camp floating hostel to house Sweden’s third world migrants. The only thing that may derail the deal with US Shipmanagers for floating migrant accommodation, would be failure to find a berth in any of Sweden’s large deep water harbours. Sweden’s open doors immigration policy has led to …

Christians, Gays, Women Fleeing European Asylum Centres After Persecution By Muslim Men
In the case of Europe’s immigration crisis, much of the fear and loathing is being caused by Muslim males. Most Europeans do not have a problem with foreigners or dark skinned people who are willing to obey the laws and accept local customs and traditions. And one tradition we in the nations that emerged from European cultures is the common understanding that if a woman goes out alone, with arms and legs showing and face and hair uncovered, it does not mean she is up for having rough sex

Are The Ruling Elites waking Up At Last To The Problems Cause By Mass Muslim Immigration?
The WEF had been dubbed Bilderberg Lite, a meeting to which the public (assuming they can afford £$€stupid for a cup of very mediocre coffee) is talking about a different matter this time round. Europe’s immigration crisis and the similar though not so immediate problem in the USA, and the likely consequences for the economies of the developed world is top of the agenda.

Mainstram Media Finally wake Up To Migrant Crisis

In a move that will leave many of its shocked and disoriented, The Sun, the tabloid of tits and trivia today woke up to the immigration crisis that is threatening the social stability of European nations and reported some real news.

Anti Muslim Feeling Spreads Through All Levels Of German Society

We look first at the social problems Chancellor Merkel’s ‘Open Doors’ immigration policy is causing in Germany, and further down the page as the political crisis Mrs. Merkel appears to be creating for her government.

London gangs ‘pressuring 9yo girls into group sex’ – UK Home Office report
A new report from the UK Home Office, the government department that deals with law and order reveals that the street gang culture imported along with these illegal immigrants has led to girls as young as nine unlucky enough to live in areas ‘controlled’ by these gangs are being sexually exploited and forced to service multiple men, after being groomed to think such behaviour is ‘normal’.

Germans Demand Impeachment Of Hausfrau – Volksfuhrer Merkel
It has taken an example of lawlwss behaviour by recenltly arrived immigrants as gross as the mass rape and sexual assault riot in Cologne at New Year, 2016, to awake German anger at what their government, led by arch globalist Angela Merkel, is doing to the ancient cultures of the federal states that make up modern Germany.

Sharia courts creating dual justice system in UK?
As if we did not have enough immigration problems to deal with as the inflow of illegal immigrants (or refugees and asylum seekers as our ruling elites insist on calling them) shows no sign of slowing.
from RT.uk:

New Year’s Eve, Germany: 1,000+ Migrants Brawl, Rape, Sexually Assault, And Steal At Cologne Railway Station
Details of the sexual assaults and attacks on peaceful Germans by large gangs of migrants in Cologne in the early on the morning of January 1, are just now emerging. Not a word on this story was printed in mainstream European newspapers or reported in television and radio news bulletins.

Google, Facebook and Twitter Yield to German Govt Demand to Censor Anti-Migrant ‘Hate Speech’ (aka Free Speech)
Over the past couple of days we, and many other New Media outlets reported the horrific incident in Cologne, Germany at New Year, in which a crowd on male, recently arrived immigrants, all of Arab or North African appearance according to witnesses carried out a mass attack on German women who were simply trying to use the railway station.

German Anger Boils Over: Shots Fired At German Refugee Home; One Asylum Seeker Hit
Many may have forgotten because of all this – if only temporarily – about Europe’s biggest crisis at the moment: the onslaught by over one million refugees, who are desperate to escape from the political disaster that are the result of western interference in the domestic politics of middle eastern countries like broken states of Syria and Iraq.

Sweden’s Migrant Crackdown Could Spell The End Of Open Borders Across Europe

As we have reported many times over the past year, Sweden has been more hard hit by the crimes and lawlessness of illegal immigrants from primitive third world societies than anywhere else in Europe. Even the Sweden hating socialists cannot ignore the epidemic of rape crimes, assaults and the general contempt for Swedish society, law, culture and traditions that illegal immigrants from Africa and the middle east have expressed through their actions.

Even The Guardian Now Admits Immigration Depresses Wage Levels
The growth in wages for UK workers is set to remain stagnant, running parallel with inflation at just two per cent next year. This is due to the large number of migrant workers waiting to fill vacancies, as anyone with two or more functioning brain cells was aware and even the loony left newspaper The Guardian has now admitted.

EU Report Reveals Continent Being Changed By Migration
While political leaders and the mass media constantly preach of the economic benefits and cultural enrichment that sping from mass immigration,EU Report Reveals Continent Being Changed By Migration just a few days ago we reported a study that found the economic benefits are a myth and today a report published by the EUs in house statistical bureau reveals immigrants have an adverse effect socially and culturally.

London Cop Confirms Donald Trump UK Radicalisation Claims

When Donald Trump, currently frontrunner in the contest to be Republican Party candidate in the USA’s 2016 Presidential Election, in a campaign broadcast commented that Islamisation of the west has gone so far parts of London are so heavily populated with Muslim extremists there are now no go zones for police and emergency services, he was attacked by politicians and the mainstream media.

Postal Voting Has Given Us Third World Politics
For the first time I actually questioned whether I wanted to stay involved in politics. This wasn’t because I was depressed about the UKIP result and victory for Labour’s Jim McMahon (pictured above with Jeremy Corbyn), as I actually predicted that we would get around 25 per cent and finish second at the start of the campaign. It was because I witnessed an absolute affront to British democratic traditions.

Opposition Party to Sue Austrian Government Over Complicity In People Trafficking
We have reported previously that in their eagerness to complete the genocide of Europe’s white working classes, the political and business elites are prepared to make a mockery of their own laws. One way in which this has been done is by turning a blind eye to people trafficking so that the entry of illegal immigrants to Europe would not be slowed by national law. We can’t claim credit for the action reported here, we have very few Austrian readers, but it’s good to see oyhers are starting to think.

Autumn Gets More Interesting As Merkel Admists She May Have Caused balkans War.
The autumn of 2015 has been interesting with the escalation of the war against ISIS by Russian air Force jets and Iranian ground troops in Syria and Iraq, Europe’s migrant crisis pushing prosperous north European nations towards civil unrest, and the downing of a Russian airliner over Sinai by as yet unknown causes though western intelligence reports suggest a terrorist bomb was planted on board before take off. And it is set to get more interesting …

Sweden ‘Facing Collapse’ Thanks To Migrant Influx, Foreign Minister Warns
Sweden is on the verge of social and economic collapse due to the influx of migrants facilitated by the country’s ‘open doors’ immigration policy, the Swedish foreign minister has said. As 190,000 migrants so far this year alone pour into a country of ten million population, law and order is beginning to break down as the country plays witness to numerous arson attacks, stabbings and gang rapes, mostly committed by recent immigrants.

Swedish Government Review Of White Genocide (Immigration) Policy Concludes That Swedes Don’t Actually Exist …
… so its OK to give the country to a bunch of foreign terrorists whose medieval culture inclues stoning, raping and beheading women who are not servile enough, making a living from drug dealing, extortion, pimping, poncing and mugging.If you are Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Buddhist, atheist or pagan, there is no future for you in Sweden because the elite are fobidding the prosecution of Muslims for crimes that are not outlawed in Sharia law.

Another Question from Quora that attracted a must read answer

Barney Lane
Barney Lane, Pro-Europe, Pro-Brexit

I guess everyone has their own story. Here’s mine in a nutshell. I’ve described the personal journey in more detail in another answer.[1]

I used to be very pro-EU and Britain’s membership thereof. I graduated in economics and purposely chose a career that would use my academic credentials in a field with some involvement and influence in the development of EU policy.

Consequently, I am and have been since 1999, involved in EU regulation, law, economics and policy, in the telecoms industry. I have worked in that professional capacity — in consulting and industry — for 19 years. I’ll be going to Brussels for an important industry conference at the end of November and will write to my friends here in a blog post, as I did for the same event last year 🙂 [2]

I’d decided the EU wasn’t right for the UK, its institutions and its style of politics, some years before the term “Brexit” was invented.

In essence, it was seeing how business is done in Brussels, up close and personal. It’s hard to summarise in a few words but it’s essentially about how the game is played. It’s about their objectives, priorities, and the nature of the real power brokers.

Interestingly, my father had worked similarly closely with Brussels institutions as the UK Government’s lead trade policy representative in the 1970s and 1980s. We came to the same conclusions, quite independently, at different times.

If the term “Brexiteer” had existed in 1985, my father would have been one by then. John Major would have called him a “bastard”. I thought my father’s attitudes were awfully crusty, out of date and against a vision of internationalism that at the time, I thought was the way forward. I was happy to compromise my own country’s nationhood, in order to achieve the closest possible union with our neighbours.

It was my direct experience of the nature of that union that over a period of years, changed my mind. It’s really difficult to summarise years of career experience in a few words but here is a very basic summary of what changed it for me. Please note, for brevity’s sake, I have simplified a lot. The reality is more subtle and nuanced than it may appear from the below, though no less real.

How business is done. The EU’s integrationist agenda reigns supreme. You have to understand this before you understand anything about how to get things done in Brussels. All other concerns are subservient. If there’s a way the EU can seize more power by means of a Directive, it will. And it will do so regardless of whether the consequences are good or bad.

Some people think major cessions of powers are only agreed in Treaties. Not so I’m afraid. They come at us left right and centre, all the time, via Directives and Regulations, which the EU is constantly passing. The UK has to implement them. It has no choice.

The concepts in every Directive originate mainly from within the EU Commission. The process is rather opaque. Once finished, the draft Directives are handed to a rapporteur group within the EU parliament, which is led by an appointed MEP. They are supposed to take soundings from affected parties. I have frequently asked for a hearing by rapporteur groups. I have never received a reply.

Once the rapporteur group has done its report, the draft Directive passes from the EU Parliament to the Council of Ministers. In theory, member state government representatives are supposed to represent their country’s interests. In reality, the only people who carry much power are the rotating presidency and the Commission. The Directive eventually gets railroaded through in an all-night session following a lavish dinner and piss-up. Any fundamental objections are bought off by a bit of weasel wording and everyone ganging up on the outlier until they’re forced to give in. By 5am they will give in because they are too exhausted to maintain resistance.

The recent lobbying success I’m most proud of came at the stage when a key Directive was being considered by the Council of Ministers. It was about something particularly egregious that at the last minute had been stuck into the draft Directive by the Estonian Presidency, following pressure by the German government. The amendment was only a subtle change in wording but it HAD to go.

I got everyone in my team to write to the telecoms minister in their respective countries, objecting to the last-minute change in the strongest possible terms. Every telecoms minister wrote back to my colleagues saying they agreed. The amendment got the kibosh. And thank goodness for that. It was the most absurdly self-serving try-on imaginable, by the German government.

I beat the German government. That’s cool. But it was the exception that proved the rule. (Actually it was the stupidity of the proposal that lost rather than anything that won).

Who calls the shots. The ones calling the shots are the ones that play the game. They are, admittedly simplying:

  • the big corporates with huge lobbying budgets that prepare massive events at grand venues, stroking the egos of the Commissioners. They include a keynote speech by the Commissioner, followed by an arse-kissing speech by the corporation’s CEO praising the ground he walks on and lauding in religious terms, the EU’s fine vision and moral mission
  • governments who are willing to play the game. These are the ones that buy into the EU’s integrationist agenda and work hardest behind the scenes, to promote it. Conceding your country to irrevocable subservience to the EU’s mission buys you the right to a bit of horse-trading here and there, on other things

If you don’t play the game, you and your views are demoted. The British just don’t play the game like this. It’s fundamentally not within our culture to do so. Our entire system of governance is based on the idea of transparency, accountability, delegated authority and limiting the role of vested interests. This is why it’s so difficult for many British people to understand how the EU really works.

If you tell a British company it should bet the farm on twisting the EU Commission’s arm to change its standards to disqualify rivals, it just won’t. It seems wrong. We win or lose fair and square.

We do not buy into the EU’s religiously-inspired integrationist agenda and never have. At the start of my career, I was told that in order to get the EU Commission’s attention on an idea, you must sell it as a method for the Commission to spread its tentacles further. But it’s hard for us to do that because we don’t fundamentally agree with it. It’s like asking a vegan to tuck into a 3 Kg sirloin steak.

These cultural and behavioural traits disqualify us from having much of a say at any stage in EU policy development.

The one nuclear option we have — the veto — is steadily being diluted by qualified majority voting. The veto must be used sparingly as it has strong repercussions. Remember the row and the anger that ensued when David Cameron vetoed the EU’s budget proposal? This was a prime example of why the veto is almost never used.


Now in British political terms, the above is equivalent to:

  • all policy originating from the Civil Service, there being no politically-elected government with any practical ability to initiate policy
  • the Civil Service having an agenda that’s primarily about growing its own power, at the expense of any other priority
  • having no ability, political or otherwise, to change what our Mandarins are doing, in any direction save that which increases their power still further
  • Mandarins behaving in a way that becomes increasingly, visibly and unashamedly authoritarian, with every year that passes.

It doesn’t seem a particularly ideal way to develop law, economics and policy, does it? When there’s a single agenda that dominates all other concerns, you’re going to get some pretty bad decisions. That should be obvious.

The EU’s policy failures were outlined with great clarity by Roger Bootle in his book “The Trouble with Europe”.[3] I recommend a read. They were also outlined by some economists in a report, ironically commissioned by the EU to celebrate its success.[4]

When I read Bootle’s book I almost cried. It was so on the nail as to be almost disconcerting.

Bootle, the authors of the report mentioned above and I (as well as a number of others) have one thing in common. We are economists who’ve seen close-up and understood intimately how the EU works. We’ve seen its failures in detail and called them out. It’s not for nothing that economically speaking, the EU has for decades been the worst performing economic bloc in the entire world.

Now, one cannot be too naive or purist about this. There is no perfect system of governance. Ours is far from perfect. There are multiple comprises, large and small that need to be made to get things done. I therefore recognise that the EU form of governance is a plausible one for people who are aligned with its objectives and methods.

But we, the UK, are just not.

If someone else had written the above in the 1990s and I read it, my pro-EU former self would probably have said, “yeah well, I still think we should persevere with the EU”. I’d have discounted the arguments that the differences between us were so fundamental that we couldn’t make it work. I’d probably have argued, “yes but through experience we can learn to become a bit more like them to get results, and perhaps they might adjust things a bit to accommodate different styles such as ours. Let’s learn to play the game!”

I definitely wouldn’t say that now though. One has to face up to the fact that the nature of the relationship we have with the EU has fundamental economic, political and cultural challenges. If you have to change to make a relationship work, the relationship is wrong. As they say, the personal is the political.

Footnotes

[1] Barney Lane’s answer to What influence did the Remain or Leave campaigns have on your Brexit vote? If there had been no campaigning, would your vote have been different?

[2] Barney’s blog

[3] Why the EU isn’t Working, How It Can be Reformed, What Could Take its Place: Amazon.co.uk: Roger Bootle: 9781857886306: Books

[4] http://ec.europa.eu/economy_fina…

 

End Of EU? Italy defies Brussels sanctions threat today, refuses budget change

ITALY’S Eurosceptic government is showing its teeth by defying the European Commission’s order to submit a new budget after Brussels rejected its budget proposal. The Lega Nord / Five Star coalition Government will today present the same measures despite the threat of harsh sanctions.

will present its new budget proposal on Wednesday following a request by the European Commission to rethink some key economic measures non-compliant with European guidelines. Brussels demanded that Rome come up with a revised version within three weeks worthy could face fines up to £3billion (€3.4bn).

But Italy will not budge on its plan to increase its deficit to 2.4 percent, which contravenes EU fiscal rules that are designed to protect the Eurozone. Italy’s projected GDP for 2019 is expected to be £1.67trillion (€1.87trillion), according to Trading Economics. When the single currency system was created it was known than nations including Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece could not possibly sturvive economically with such a restriction on their financial autonomy. Germany and France however, were were determined to push ahead with their plan to create The Fourth Reich, by unifying the EU’s member states politically they ignored all warnings of the consequences of financial integration.

If the Italians ignore Brussels and run their deficit of 2.4 percent then their deficit comes to £40.01billion (€44.88billion). But the eurosceptic Government coalition of Matteo Salvini’s Lega and Luigi Di Maio’s Five Star Movement is proving defiant and has announced it will not change its plans in order to put the interests of Italian people ahead of Germany’s Euromaster race ambitions.

The disputed budget includes a new basic income plan and the scrapping of a key Brussels enforced austerity law introduced in 2011.  These are very left wing ambitions for a government Brussels propagandists and mainstream media like to describe as far right.

In addition, the Government has promised tax cuts for self-employed professionals introducing a so-called Flat Tax of 15 percent for any registered self-employed citizen within a list of limited professions.

The tax cuts are aimed at increasing the personal spending of the country to avoid an increment of VAT proposed by previous Governments.

 

Barmpot Sinead O’Connor Converts to Islam, Becomes Shuhada’ Davitt


Sinead O’Connor

One hit wonder and general barmpot has once again given us all a belly laugh with her bizarre antics.

Sinead who scored a worldwide hit with her 1990 single “Nothing Compares 2 U” has undergone a public conversion from Catholicism to Islam, sharing her progress to the Twitter platform, reports The Irish Post.

Writing online, the musician announced that she had converted to Islam, chronicled getting her first hijab, and posted a video of her singing the Islamic call to prayer.

Shuhada’ also posted an image in imitation of the Nike tick logo which implored followers to “wear a Hijab. Just do it.”

The Irish Post reports:

Irish singer Sinead O’Connor has revealed she has renounced Catholicism and
converted to Islam, taking the new name “Shuhada’ Davitt”.

O’Connor, who last year changed her legal name to Magda Davitt, said she had ditched the Catholic Church for good in a message to fans on Twitter.

The 51-year-old was previously ordained a priest by a breakaway Catholic sect, the Irish Orthodox Catholic and Apostolic Church, in the late 1990s.

Original boggartblog has this message for Sinead. Once upon a time your craziness was amusing love, now it’s just boring. Put a bag over your head if you like but shut the fuck up. Just do it.

Daily Stirrer

Science Wins – Trump Administration Proposes Transgender Policy Based On Biology

The Trump administration has committed the unforgivable sin of being sensible. In a move guaranteed to trigger thousands of lefties and send snowflakes into meltdown, The White House has proposed the idea of recognizing “sex” as “biological sex” for purposes of Title IX, according to a draft memo leaked to the New York Times.

This seemingly innocuous proposal has sparked a firestorm with hate speech spewing from the mouths and through the fingers of university brainwashed idiots and their even more idiotic professors and lecturers as they leap to the decence of terminally confused individuals who believe people with testicles can be women and people with ovaries can be men.

First, a brief background.

Title IX prohibits discrimination “on the basis of sex” in federally funded programs. It was passed in 1972 as part of the Education Amendments Act to ensure that women have access to educational programs equivalent to men’s programs.

In 2016, in a blatant act of executive overreach, the Obama administration issued a guidance letter reinterpreting “sex” to include sexual orientation and gender identity. The letter required schools to “‘treat a student’s gender identity as the student’s sex for purposes of Title IX.” This drastic reinterpretation was done without an act of Congress or even the normal rule-making process for regulations. In other words the president who told Americans they must believe ‘the science’ on climate change, even though its conclusions are very dubious, was telling them in matters of biology they must inore thousands of years of scientific evidence and follow the diktat ofchicks-with dicks (like his ‘wife’?) or men who think having their dicks lopped off makes them women.

So ‘the science is settled’ on carbon dioxide, but not on what defines us as men and women. Well if certain rumours about Obama are true, there might be room for doubt in his case, but obviously Donald Trump has a better grasp of science.

Obama’s blurring of the lines that separate men from women spurred a frenzy of disputes over trans-sanity students claiming access to spaces restricted to the opposite sex—bathrooms, locker rooms, showers, dormitories, sports teams, and so on.

Then, in 2017, the Trump administration rescinded the Obama guidelines. But it left unclear just what the law does require. Hence the administration’s current effort to provide a clear, uniform definition of the term “sex.”

The memo suggests that “the sex listed on a person’s birth certificate, as originally issued, shall constitute definitive proof of a person’s sex unless rebutted by reliable genetic evidence.” In this way, sex will be determined “on a biological basis that is clear, grounded in science, objective and administrable.”

Who could object to science and objectivity? Lots of people, apparently, and most of them are among the demographic that claims to ‘believe’ in science and reason (the trouble with reason, I always find, is that it’s so irrational. The New York Times reported the story with the overheated headline “Trump Administration Eyes Defining Transgender Out of Existence.”

The New York Times reported the story with the overheated headline “Trump Administration Eyes Defining Transgender Out of Existence.”

Actually, no. The administration is merely saying that Title IX does not apply to trans people. No one is being defined “out of existence.” There are lots of laws that do not apply to you or me, and that fact does not deny our existence.

Jonathan Weisman, deputy Washington editor of The NYTlikewise indulged in histrionic overstatement, tweeting, “The Trump Admin has a new definition of sex that would render 1.4 million transgendered people legally nonexistent.”

Not exactly. The administration is saying that discrimination “on the basis of sex” means biological sex, not gender identity. Trans people still enjoy all the ordinary protections of other citizens, including the Bill of Rights and all other constitutional rights.

George Takei, the “Star Trek” actor, tweeted, “The Trump administration is trying to make trans people disappear by defining gender as only male and female, determined by genitalia at birth.”

Come back to earth, Mr. Takei. The administration is not trying to make people “disappear.” The fact is that Title IX was originally intended to apply to biological sex — which, by the way, is established not at birth but long before birth. Most parents use ultrasound to discover their babies’ sex before they are born.

Planned Parenthood panicked, tweeting, “This is horrifying. These inhumane, cruel, and discriminatory policies are dangerous.” (Ironic, considering that words like “inhumane” and “cruel” describe what Planned Parenthood itself does — tearing apart tiny babies.)

 

If we ignore the dramatics and the hissy fits of the Gay BLT lobby, the current administration is seeking to correct the Obama administration’s overreach. The lawmakers who passed Title IX in 1972 did not mean sexual orientation and gender identity. They wanted to protect women’s rights. Period. Including women’s rights to have periods withouty being sneered at by leering men. Privacy.

Ironically, Obama’s reinterpretation had precisely the opposite outcome. It undercut women’s rights by reducing biological sex to a social construct.

Trans ideologues claim what counts are not objective facts based on irefutable scientific evidence but subjective feelings although,  scientific evidence shows that in the great scheme of things an individual’s feelings are no more significant than a gnat’s fart in a hurricaneim. They insist that people with penises and prostate glands are “women” if they feel like women. Or that people with uteruses are “men” if they feel like men. That’s why we see misleading headlines like “Man Gives Birth to Healthy Baby” (in reality, a woman living as a man (with a facsimile willie) whose ovaries and womb is still intact). We should perhaps tell such people to go and fuck themselves. Watching the outcome could be hysterically funny.

If we can no longer define women by objective, scientific criteria, then we can no longer legally protect women as a class, which renders feminism redundant (this blog has always said feminism is a synonym of stupid,) and throws into chaos most of the equality laws passed in the lest few decades. We cannot legally protect a category of people if we cannot identify that category. This was proved in a recent case with came to court in England, of a ‘transgender’ man who by claiming that on the basis of his feeling he is a woman was sent to a women’s prison, where he was soon arrested on several charges of rape and sexual molestation. He may have ‘felt’ like a woman but he looked like a man (an ugly man at that, and he raped like a man by forcing himself on his victims and penetrating them.

An individual’s feelings are important, but the law must apply to all equally, and therefore it must be based on scientific facts, not the half arsed whims of politically correct idiots..

RELATED POSTS:

Gay Rights Lobby Calls for Ban on LGBT Therapy After Finding Hundreds of Health Workers Believe in a Cure
The Daily Stirrer has noted many times that sheeple on the left of the political spectrum get very confused on finding not everybody agrees with their world view. but rather than accept they are bigots they turn on those who dissent. No surprise then that gay activist working in the NHS are turning on African, middle eastern and east Europan colleagues who believe homosexuality is a sin.


Bakery Sued For Refusing to Produce Pro-Gay Marriage Cake

A Belfast bakery has been threatened with legal action after its owners refused to accept an order for a cake with the words “support gay marriage” on it. Ashers Baking Company staff at first accepted the order but it was later reviewed by the owners who deemed the cake against their Christian beliefs.

Nonconformity and Freethinking Now Considered Mental Illnesses
We’ve been here before of course, shrinks and head quacks are now trying to say everything you do can be interpreted as a sign of mental illness. Its starange but the sickets, most dysfunctional people I’ve met have been psychatrists and psychologists – perhaps they want to make the rest of us as crazy as they are

How the gay-marriage campaign has unleashed a bureaucratic assault on people’s identities
Do gooders, progressives and bleeding hearts hurl hatred at those who question gay mariage. But these politically correct fools have as usual wallowed in their own self righteousness too long without thinking of the social consequences of this law which will devalue mainstream society to set up the gay community as a precious little elite

Homosexuality: As a liberal society we have a duty to tolderate, not celebrate
Even though the government has accepted a very limited definition of same sex marriage the gay lobby keeps raving on about the greates non issue of all time. But in a free society should we be subjected to bullying if we do not show enough enthusiasm for homosexual and lesbian relationships? When did indifference become a hate crime?

Gay and same sex marriage: The Bigotry And Intolerance Of Those Who Describe Themselves As The Liberal Left
With same sex marriage made legal in Britain we face the same kind of witch hunts against businesses that do not want to deal with beareded queens in bridal gowns as the liberal bigots and gay nazis are launching in the USA. As many of us new media common sense merchants predicted, once the principle was accepted in law, nobody would be allowed to opt out of supporting these bullies.

Primary School Teacher Forced Out For Teaching It’s OK To Be Gay
The thought police are well and truly embedded in the education system, the legal system, government and public services, everywhere you look in fact. Their dovtrines of multiculturalism and diversity and they sacred cows of human rights ad equality are suppressing freedom of speech and thought. But what do the politically correct thought police do when two of their sacred cows come into conflict …

Overeducated Elitist Snobs Go For World DominationWe have written many times with tongues in our cheeks of The New World Order but what are we talking about. Is it a conspiracy theory like The Illuminati, are there shape shifting lizards involved. We wish, but sadly it is just a concensus political movement that blurs the lines betwen old parties but hardens those betwee the political, academic and financial elite and the lowrer orders. Find out how it operates below …

These stupid laws insult the public and threaten free speech
When the law forbids us to insult or offend somebody, to insult or offend a religion, race, skin colour or sexual preference, free speech and other important democratic rights are under threat. When the law then goes on to say that anyone accused of these offences has no right to defend themselves and the word of the accuser is sufficient evidence on which to obtain a conviction then we have abandoned justice and are ruled by fascists.


Identities On ParadeEvery day we hear stories of the idiocies perpetrated by the Politically Correct Thought Police who in their zeal for being fair to ethnic, gender and sexual minorities only succeed in being unfair to everybody. This story of a Britisht army military tribunral and a case of discrimination against a woman soldier it is hearing reaches unprecedented levels of stupidity even for the Politically Correct idiots.

The Equalities BillThe Equalities Bill, passed by the previous Labour government before they were ejected from power becomes law today. This farrago is typical of the imbecilic mindset of the self righteous hypocrites who style themselves the progressive left. Presented as a law in support of equality in the workplace , in this era of pandemic joblessness and perpetual financial crisis it is nothing but an attack on the businesses that provide the real, wealth producing, revenue generating jobs in the private sector.

Is Criticising Black Gang Culture Racist

In Britain and America the left are always ready with the knee jerk reaction, crying raceism whjenever there is an opportunity. But do the facts justify the hysteria or is there more racism among poor black communities than mainstream society?

Broken SocietiesAn appraisal of Coming Apart: The State of White America 1960-2010 by Charles Murray. inequality is a very hot topic, Murray is one of the few people looking at it from a conservative point of view, which is strange when one looks at what is most likely causing this divide. Policically nations have never ben more polarised with conservatives and liberals both convinced the other is evil, while the gap between rich and poor widens, the middle class disintegrates and the working class becomes a state dependent underclass.

Liberal BigotsProgressive liberals, or the progressive left, or Trotskyites as the politically correct core of the Labour, Geen and Lib Dem parties would call themselves are quick to accuse their critics of being intolerant bigots. But take a closer look at the state of politics in Britain and you see it is not conservative, old Labour or classical liberals who are bigots but the neo facsists who want to impose their warped views on us by law. …

Equal Rights Campaigners Not Christians Are Imposing Their Belief On OthersWhen head of the Euality and Human Rights Commission Trevor Phillips speaks we should termble. This nasty little race hustler is the de facto head of the thought police and sees his job as to stamp on racism, sexism, homophobia and anything else he and his cronies decide they are not going to tolerate. It is all in the name of tolerance of course, or divesity as Phillips would say. But how does telling people what they can and cannot think promote diversity?

Gay Marriage Row Set To Erupt AgainLed by that evil little crypto – Nazi Peter Tachell they Gay lobby are turning up the whineometer to extra loud as they once again demand that gays be given the same right as the rest of us enjoy, the right to marry. You might think gays already have the right to marry, after alo Hello Magazine is full of pictures of trud burlsar and rug muncher coulpes getting hitched every week. Sadly civil ceremonies are not enough for some …

http://greenteeth.blog.co.uk/2014/05/12/what-a-gay-day-as-the-wonderful-larry-grayson-used-18430863/
the hate and hypocrisy of the left
liberal nazis
the flight from freedom
Thumpa and The Tyranny Of Human Rights
Hypocrites and CHIMPS
Bitter Fruit

 

Syria; U.S.Still Only Pretends To Fight ISIS

by Moon of Alabama

The U.S. occupation force and its Kurdish proxy SDF in northeastern Syria are supposed to fight the Islamic State in its last hold out northeast of Euphrates. But the operations against the handful of towns ISIS (grey) still holds – launched only after long and unexplained delays – shows little progress. Last week it received a serious setback.

Red = Syrian Arab Army; Yellow = U.S./SDF; Grey = ISIS
biggerAfter several days of sandstorms (vid) hindered U.S. air support, ISIS counterattacked on October 11 against the U.S. led SDF. Suicide bombers blew up SDF checkpoints as ISIS broke through the lines. It retook several villages and on October 12 raided a refugee camp for local civilians that the U.S. coalition had set up near Al Bahrah (on the upper left of the map). Some 130 refugee families with about 700 persons were taken prisoners and brought to Hajin, a small city at the northern end of the ISIS held area.

Through local tribal elders ISIS requested to negotiate with the U.S. coalition about an exchange of prisoners. It also demanded medical and food supplies in exchange for 90 captured women it had isolated from their families. The request was rejected. ISIS now threatens to kill ten of the abductees per day unless its demands are fulfilled.

Read all – Moon of Alabama >>>

Another Grooming Gang Gets Sent Down In Yorkshire

103925253_huddersfield_grooming_gang_1

Under hate speech laws we are not supposed to mention the ethnic origin of the convicted men, but you get the message from this picture (Source: Yorkshire Post)

We seem to have been reporting the activities of gangs of Muslim and Pakistani men who  have groomed and sexually abused under age and often vulnerrable girls under the noses of police and local authority care services for ever. Surprisingly it is only four years since the story broke.

At that time we were writing that the problem was deeply embedded in the social structure of immigrant communities, we knew the first prosecutions were only the tip of the iceberg, and as predicted the cases keep coming. It is indicative of the incompatibility of  cultures between Europe and the remote parts of the Indian sub continent.

In the latest case twenty men have been found guilty of being part of a grooming gang that raped and abused girls as young as 11 in Huddersfield. The Yorkshire Post reports the men were convicted of more than 120 offences against 15 girls.

Victims were plied with drink and drugs, a familar pattern of behaviour in all these cases, and then “used and abused at will” in a seven-year “campaign of rape and abuse” between 2004 and 2011.

At Leeds Crown Court, the ringleader, Amere Singh Dhaliwal, 35, was jailed for life with a minimum of 18 years.   Other members of the gang were jailed for between five and 18 years but the court heard many perpetrators have never been identified. Details of the men’s convictions and sentences can only now be published after reporting restrictions on a series of trials were partially lifted.

During the three trials, jurors heard how the men – who are all British Asians mainly of Pakistani heritage – preyed on young, vulnerable girls, one of whom was described as having the mental age of a seven-year-old.

The men, all from Yorkshire, went by nicknames including “Dracula” – which Nahman Mohammed was known as. Mohammed Imran Ibrar was known as “Bully”, Abdul Rehman was nicknamed “Beastie”, while Nasarat Hussain was known as “Nurse”.

Jailing 16 of the men earlier this year, Judge Geoffrey Marson QC said: “The way you treated these girls defies understanding; this abuse was vile and wicked.

RELATED:
Child Abuse, Rotherham
National child abuse scandal
Child abuse, Rochdale