Is Criticizing Islam Extremist?

The allegedly conservative UK think tank, The Henry Jackson Society,  named American  anti-Sharia campaigners Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer in a list of people promoting “extremism”, placing the pair alongside radical pro-Sharia Islamic fundamentalists like Zakir Naik.

The think tank, long noted for it’s wavering commitment to true conservatism in the face of attacks on free speech by the extreme left, denounces Geller and Spencer as Islamophobes in a new report, titled “Free to be Extreme.” According to a disclosure  the report, it was commissioned and funded by left wing extremists and anti – free-speech social media company Facebook.

The report calls for closer collaboration between the British government, which has passed draconian laws against “hate speech” in the past two decades, and social media companies such as Facebook which has demonstated that its corporate policy decrees only with Europeans are capable of uttering ‘Hate Speech.’.

The report is clear that its aim is to provide a framework for “restricting expression.”

It states: “restricting expression may be required to fulfil the aim of governments and institutions to balance toleration, protection, and freedom in liberal democratic societies.” But what has toleration to do with Islam or far – left ‘progressivism” which are the most intolerant religion amf political philosophies on the planet.

In addition to naming a number of Islamic extremists, the report also identifies Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, who are both critics of Islamism, as potential “extremists.” The report’s evidence for this includes Geller “displaying an offensive of Prophet Mohammed online” and Spencer’s argument  “that all schools of Islam teach warfare against non-Muslims, and that Islam is inherently violent.”

What a slimy, weaselly word ‘potential’ is especially when it is used to prevent crime by incarcerating ‘potential’ criminals before they have committed a crime. A state that uses such techniques in its legal system can only be described as fascist.  Throughout the civilised world, one of the founding principles of justice is the presumption of innocence. Facebook, however, is already on record as having declared its ambition to suppress any opinion or idea its far left extremist founder Mark Zuckerberg does not like.

It may seem to some that in the Henry Jackson Society’s opinion, flouting Islamic blasphemy laws about depicting Mohammed and criticizing Islamic doctrines about war could be enough to make you an “extremist.” It seems to us that conservative intellectuals can be bought as cheaply as left wing pontificators, climate scientists and politicians.

<a href=””&gt;

Jess Phillips Labour Leadership Bid Struggling. Stop Starmer Campaign Needed?
Jess Phillips makes a point (Picture: Shutterstock)

Reports coming out of Labour Party HQ suggest Jess Phillips was struggling to stay in the Labour leadership race on Monday night after the most likely union to back her opted to support “Sir” Keir Starmer, enabler of rape gangs, friend of terrorists and millionaire lawyer, instead.

USDAW, the shopworkers’ union, declared their support, stating that Sir Keir was “someone who can persuade voters that they have what it takes to be a prime minister”, and supported Angela Rayner as its deputy leadership candidate. Well if USDAW think being a smarmy, oily, slippery – toungued, self – serving, wank – stain are the qualities needed to become Prime Minister, Labour are in deeper shit than even their harshest critics suspected. Let’s not forget “Sir” Kier is not even a proper lawyer, he’s a “human rights” lawyer who got rich arguning the case for terorists and hate preachers to be allowed into Britain in cases head by fer – left activist judges who had already decided their verdict before any evidence was presented.

The USDAW nomination leaves three of the big five Labour unions left to nominate a candidate, with Unite and the CWU expected to back Rebecca Long-Bailey (Becky from accounts,) and GMB expected to choose between Lisa Nandy and Sir Keir.

Monday’s USDAW committee decision puts Sir Keir into the final round of the contest, where members and registered supporters will vote directly for their preferred candidate.

Without union backing, Jess Phillips and Emily Thornberry will now the support of five per cent of local Labour groups (CLPs) to demonstrate they have the support among the membership. Lady Nugeee (to give Thornberry her proper title,) is dead in the water, or on the sand like a big, flabby beached whale perhaps, and Phillips, despite some of her whacko pronouncements, is seen as a moderate by the ‘woke’ millennials of Momentum.

In the local associations they will both face strong resistance from Momentum, the grassroots Corbyn-supporting campaign group which has organised effectively to back its candidate in previous leadership contests.
This is disappointing news, while I do not agree with much Jess Phillps says, she is at least entertaining and has more personality that the other four put together. All would be absolute disasters as Prime Minister of course, but Labour should reject Starmer as potentially more catastrophic for the party than Corbyn & Co.

All it would need to plunge s Sartmer – led party into the depths of destruction is for some rogue MP to find the testicular fortitude to drag up Starmer’s record as Director of Public Prosecutions and the fact that it was on his watch the edict went out to police forces and prosecutors to back off investigating the notorious Asian grooming gangs in order to avoid increasing inter – racial tensions.

Sarcasm and invective aside, one thing I do support Jess Phillips for is her superior understanding of the nature of Labour’s core vote. While the other candidates are content to refer to “the working class” as if there is a great mass of bovine cud – chewers just waiting to be told what they think by far – left intellectuals who claim to speak for “the working class,” but have never done a day’s real work in their lives.

Jess Phillips alone of the Labour leadership candidates has recognised the scope of working class diversity, and that should be to her credit, although given the level of contempt The Inner Party (h/t George Orwell) shows for the average working class person,  the gap between voters and the political elite is only going to get wider.

Child abuse Rotherham
Chind abuse nationwide
Lanour’s racist future
Labour leadership: Bring on the clowns
Left wing intellectuals have always despised the masses
Labour Leadership Contest: Bring On The Clowns
LABOUR’S SHAME: Brown’s Government ‘Urged’ Police Not To Investigate Muslim Grooming Gangs
Liam Fox Savages Labour’s ‘Betrayal’ Brexit Plan with UK in EU Customs Union

“Hard” Of Hearing? PornHub Being Sued By Deaf Man For Lack Of Subtitles

At last, the pushback against the angry, offended snowflakes of the ‘woke’ left is starting to yield stories worthy of the early days of Boggart Blog

We read today that sex supermaket site PornHub is being sued by Yaroslav Suris, who has filed a lawsuit claiming that its lack of PornHub’s lack of subtitles for the hard of hearing is discriminatory.

Suris’ bone of contention is that the website violates his rights under the Americans With Disabilities Act, according to showbiz gossip site TMZ, which broke the story.

The plaintiff claims that the deaf and hearing impaired can’t understand the audio tracks of videos on the website and claims that some of his favorite titles – with names like “Hot Aunt Babysits Disobedient Nephew,” “Sexy Cop Gets Witness to Talk” and “Daddy 4K — Allison comes to Talk About Money to Her Boys’ Naughty Father” – are difficult to follow.

We beg to differ. PornHub is what it is and dialogue like:
“AH OOH UH URRR OH YEAH, AAAAARRRGGGGGHHHHH UH UH UH” should not be difficult to lip read.

On the other hand (oops, pardon,) PornHub could argue that Mr Suris has spent so much time watching it’s content he has ended up visually impaired and so would not be able to read the subtitles.

While we Brits may joke about stories like this and reduce Mr Suri’ complaint to adolescent humour, the American legal system being what it is, we think he has a case and will have no difficulty getting it up before the courts.

German Green Party Will Pay For Prostitutes For Migrants Needing “Sexual Assistance”
Texas Robot Brothel Outlawed By City Council
Greenteeth sex catalogue

Quitaly Back On As Salvini Prepares To Take On The EU

While the bureaucraps of Brussels were still congratuating themselves on brokering the stitch up that forced Matteo Salvini’s Lega (League) party out of Italy’s governing coalition, mainstream media barely bothered to cover the news that Lega won the state elections in Umbria towards the end of October 2019. Thus the story that should have had Europhiles like Emmanuel Macron and Guy Verhofshit crapping themselves as Boris Johnson finally saw off efforts by EU fanatics in the UK and Eurofederalists in Brussels to stop Brexit, was barely noticed.

Lega and the Brothers of Italy and Forza Italia took at whopping 53% of the vote, with Lega taking 37%, a result from which the Eurocrats should have learned that although their backroom deal overturned the result of Italy’s democratic election and put two EU supporting parties that are actually on opposite sides of the political fence together in a minority government that cannot govern, the rebel Matteo Salvini and his anti – establishment party are more popular than ever with voters.

Matteo Salvini meets US Secretary of Stat,e Mike Pompeo, though not in power Salvini is recognised as Italy’s de facto leader

The real importance of the result in Umbria is that it demonstrates Lega’s ability to turn a stronghold of the centre – left Democratic Party (PD) against history.  PD had held Umbria for over fifty years until last October, now they are also rans.

The result showed that even though Salvini is no longer in government in Rome, his popularity, far from diminishing, has increased. The Umbria result back up conclusions from  polling and confirmed that standing up to Brussels has seen Lega strengthen its position as the dominant party in Italy. Current polls have Lega commanding 31-33% of the vote, remarkable in a country with more than ten political partioes capable of winning seats in its national assembly.

Another interesting, (and disturbing for Brussels,) aspect to the story, however, is the surging popularity of far right group The Brothers of Italy (FdL) who are picking up disaffected Forza Italia voters and held them for months now, continuing to hold a solid 10%. Mainstream media have habitually referred to Lega as far right nationalists, just as they have tried to taint Germany’s AfD, France’s Rassemblement National, The Sweden Democrats, Austria’s Freedom Party and the UK’s Brexit Party with the same labal in the hope offalsely linking them to The Nazis.

Overall  the ousting of Salvini and Lega from the ruling coalition has backfired. When coalition partner in the Eurosceptic government, Five Star Movement (M5S) agreed to a deal brokered by EU officials to form a coalition with the fanatically Eurofederalist and notoriouslu corrupt PD,  M5S’s slide in the polls, and in the actual election in Umbria has accelerated. Remember, M5S was formed to stop PD from holding onto power, ending corruption in Italian politics and challenging the establishment on EU membership and continued use of the euro as Italy’s currency. It isidely recognised by economists and financiers across the democratic world that Italy’s being forced by Brussels to join the single currency has trashed the always volatile financial situation of the world’s eighth largest economy.

Making that deal with the establishment like that has alienated a lot of M5S’s base and it’s support is now threatening to collapse below the all-important 16% level, which once breached to the downside opens the door for someone else to gain dramatically.

And that is the backdrop against which the PD/Five Star Movement (M5S) government is dealing with.

Lega is currently polling higher than PD/M5S together nationally. And with a state election  due in Emilia-Romagna on January 26th it looks as if things are likely to get even more tense in Rome. As the Financial Times reported in a recent article, Salvini and Lega have already made serious inroads in the traditionally left wing area.

Giorgio Bennetti, a 35-year-old sweets seller with a stall in Ferrara’s centre, believes that many voters are willing to switch to the right to express a general political dissatisfaction. Local issues, such as the collapse of the Ferrara savings bank — 130,000 investors lost their savings — have also given voters reason to want to punish the PD, which was in charge both locally and nationally when the rescue happened in 2015.

“This is a protest vote; people don’t believe that the left is working for them any more,” Mr Bennetti says. “My grandmother used to say that people have no problem changing their shirts from red to black if they need to.”

But taking advantage of a similar public mood to that which  took Donald Trump to the US Presidency in 2016 and Boris Johnson’s Conservatives to a super-safe majority in the UK last month, nominally right-wing candidates have become the champions of domestic working middle class by sensing that the public is sick of politically correct stupidity and virtue signalling.

In Italian political terms, the former Communists in Emilia-Romagna now firmly trust Salvini to protect their futures and the jobs rather than traditional centre left parties, but also they trust Lega to protect and preserve Italian culture and Italian identity.

Current polling for the state election in Emilia-Romagna  has Lega with 31% of the vote, a massive 12-point rise over the last election while PD has lost even more down 20 points.

France catalogue
Europe catalogue
And the next to leave the EU? Quitaly
Italy PM Giuseppe Conte resigns, launches blistering attack on deputy Matteo Salvini
Latest EU Attack On Italy’s Salvini Shows The Elite Are Scared
Italian Elections: It is the EU, Not Russia, Who is the Meddler
The EU can go and F*** itself!’ Politician’s Outburst Rallies Support In Italy

Is Greta Thunberg Great? Umm, Maybe Not

Don’t you get sick of hearing people blethering about how great Greta Thunberg is, how she has raised awareness off the climate emergency and what wonderful speeches she makes and what wonderful articles she writes.

Such scaremongering might convince gullible millennials, power seeking politicians politicians ready to jump on any bandwagon, and virtue signalling media luvvies, but ordinary punters have realised they’ve heard all this shite before – several times. And yet snow is not a thing of the past, polar bears are not extinct, global temperatures are not soaring and the 50 million refugees who were displaced from their homes in low lying lands by 2015 must be huddled under Harry Potter’s cloak of invisibility because nobody has seen them.

Nothing is great about Greta, she is very obviously a puppet being used by a group of people whose political aganda has nothing to do with saving the planet and a lot to do with enslaving the planet. The popular names for these people include globalists, international socialists and cultural Marxists, and their aim is to cause the collapse of the global economy so it can be replaced with their vision of a socialist utopia, a world run by a hierarchy of bureaucratic committees, a world where there is no such thing as democracy or individual freedom.

They though the doomsday scenario predicted by the Anthropogenic Global Warming hoax would be enough to scare people into submission to the extent that we would surrender individual and national sovereignty to technocrats. Unfortunately the predictions of catastrophe failed to be realised, snow is not a thing of the past, low lying nations have not been inundated by rising sea levels, temperature are not soaring globally and the predicted 50 million refugees displaced by climate change before 2015 are obviously hiding under Harry Potter’s cloak of invisibility, because nobody has seen any of them. On top of that the “climate science” we had been told was unquestionable, when subjected to scrutiny failed at the level of basic arithmetic. These supposedly infallible “experts” did not know how to calculate a simple average.

Naturally the credibility of the environment lobby collapsed, and seeing their bid for global power evaporating faster than a raindrop in the Sahara, the cultural Marxists resorted to emotional blackmail, using a physically immature – Greta (17) looks several years younger than my 13 year old granddaughter and reportedly has problems relating to emotional development as well.

Using Greta to front the latest push in the climate catastrophe scam is very like the scam employed by left wing media in a bid to bully Europeans into demanding the borders be opened to let in hundreds of thousands of economic migrants incorrectly described as refugees. They carefully posed the corpse of a small child on a Mediterranean beach and claimed this was a fate shared by many “refugee” children trying to get to Europe “to seek a better life.”

It turned out the kid was the child of a criminal who had taken his son along for a joyride on one of his people trafficking runs.

The Greta Thunberg hoax will be similarly exposed, in fact the process has already begun. The girl’s father (an actor) and other far left activists involved with her campaign have been revealed as being responsible for the highly articulate posts this otherwise taciturn and anti – social child is alleged to have written and posted online.

Sorry Greta fans, but you will have to prepare for disappointment. Carbon Dioxide is not causing environmental problems, burgeoning human population and an economic model base on infinite growth of consumption are.


Climate change lies
Climate refugees
Is Hatred Of Greta Thunberg Justified
Greenhouse Gas Facts – Not For The Thunberg Cult

Asian grooming gang given free pass to rape; police officers told ‘find other ethnicities’ to investigate – detective.

A report published today, authored by child protection specialist Malcolm Newsam CBE and former senior police officer Gary Ridgway, comes following the reopening of an investigation into the death of 15-year-old Victoria Agoglia, who – after years of abuse and days after she was injected with heroin by a 50-year-old man – died in hospital of an overdose in 2003.

The inquiry was launched off the back of allegations made by former GMP detective turned whistleblower, Maggie Oliver, whose revelations about orders “from the top” to cover up the organised and systematic abuse of young girls by gangs of men of predominantly Pakistani and Bangladeshi ethnic and cultural origins, led to the drama documentary  Three Girls, being made by The BBC and screened in 2017.

As a detective, Oliver investigated countless gang crimes, shootings, kidnappings, rapes, domestic murders and witness intimidation. But when she tried to raise the issue of the grooming gangs and their abuse of under – age and often vulnerable girls her bosses turned on her and she was (rather predictably,) accused of racism and hounded out of the job. She said that she felt “vindicated” by the report which highlights failings by the police, social services and the political establishment in their duty to protect the victimes of these crimes..

Commenting on suggestions that the grooming activities of gangs in migrant communities is still going on and is still being ignored in the name of “multiculturalism and diversity, Oliver said: “Girls are lost to the wind. What has been the cost of all these lives? We will never be able to put a number on how many lives have been and are being lost or ruined.

“I want the law changing so there can be retrospective accountability for people whose duty it is to protect the vulnerable. It’s knowing and deliberate dereliction of duty by those who were involved, they should be charged with gross misconduct – it’s criminal – where is the accountability?

“I was face-to-face with 15 years of misogyny – ‘stupid woman, she’s become too emotionally involved’ The authorities involved are very powerful and tried to control the dialogue.

In evidence to the investigating panel responsible for producing the report, a Detective Superintendent indulged in Orwellian evasions, emphatically denying that concerns about creating further community tensions influenced any investigative decisions in goormig gang cases, but contradicted himself by the impact on race relations of prosecuting migrant men [for sex crimes against British women,] “clearly had to be considered” by senior officers in the command group.

Further daming evidence on the police cover up is cited by the report when it quotes an unnamed GMP detective constable, involved in the arrest and jailing of one child sex offender, who was not of Asian heritage.

It quotes him as saying: “What had a massive influence on this case was the offending group were predominantly Asian males but we were told to target other ethnicities.”

Operation Augusta was set up in 2004 and uncovered the systematic exploitation of looked after  children mainly in the care system in the city of Manchester and around the Rochdale area.

Interestingly one of the people involved ‘at the top’ in this cover up was the Director Of Public Prosecutions at the time, Sir Kier Starmer, from whom the order to take a soft line with the immigrant gangs allegedly came, is now a candidate for the leadership of the Labour Party and hopes to become the UK’s Prime Minister in the future. What kind of a regime do we thing such an unconscionable streak of sewer slime would run?

Keighley MP Anne Cryer on Asian paedophile rings

Child abuse gangs Rotherham

Child abuse gangs national problem

Child abuse gangs Rochdale

The Daily Stirrer – January 2020

London gangs ‘pressuring 9yo girls into group sex’ – UK Home Office report

Sus Sexit? Queen agrees to a transition period for Harry & Duchess of Meghan

Boggart Blog and other Greenteeth Digital Publishing websites do not often report on the Royal family, the main contributors are reluctant Royalists because, as editor Ian puts it, when yu think of the havoc ‘President’ Thatcher or ‘President’ Blair could have caused without the restraining effects of The Crown it shows how valuable The Monarch can be without their actually doing anything.

But as there is a major crisis going on, we thought we’d better stick our oar in along with the rest.

Senior members of the Royal Family are holding emergency talks on Monday to discuss the future of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex after the couple caused the crisis when they announced last week that they would step down from their roles as front line of the family.

The Queen at Buckingham Palace with Grandsons William and Harry and sons Charles and the paedophile prince (allegedly) Andrew Source: Zero Hedge

Prince Charles cut short an engagement in Oman and flew back to attend the conference, held at Sandringham, the Queen’s private estate in Norfolk. Also in involved will be the Queen, William, and Harry and various aides and constitutional experts, while The Duchess of Meghan is expected to join them via a video link from Canada, where she is flew las week with young Archie, having insulted The Queen, The British nation and The Duchess of Kate and pissed off all the people in Britain that her arrogant, self – righteous, attention seeking attitude and her blatant invocation of the race card when she wasn’t getting what she wanted had not already pissed off.

An insider has told The Times that the pair both feel “tethered” by their responsibilities, which incuded the onerous duty of being expected to be nice to common people. The source added that the couple regarded themselves as having been pushed away by what they saw as a bullying attitude from the Duke of Cambridge. These claims have been strongly contested by sources close to the Cambridges, as well as some close to Prince Harry.

“She wants to leave,” the source said of the duchess. It is well known this Californian airhead and third rate actress believed she would be granted the title “Princess,” despite being told that as a divorcee that would not be the case.

Poor dear, someone should have told her the British monarchy is real life not fucking Disneyland.

“Harry has been under intense pressure to choose. It is sad. He loves the Queen. He loves this country. He loves all his military stuff. I think it will genuinely break his heart to leave. I don’t think that’s what he really wants. I think they want some halfway house.” –The Times

Phil The Greek is reported to have advised his grandson, “It is perfectly acceptable to step out with actresses but one does not marry them.”

Couldn’t have put it better.

Prince William, meanwhile, has expressed “sadness” over the strained relations between House Cambridge and House Sussex, telling the Times that the royal family was no longer “a team.”

“I’ve put my arm around my brother all our lives and I can’t do that any more; we’re separate entities,” William – the Duke of Cambridge, reportedly told a friend.

Harry says they want to be financially independent and no longer wish to receive taxpayer money. Possibly unconnected but Harry was seen touting his wife’s talents as a voiceover artist (voicing a Princess character maybe,) to Disney CEO Bob Iger.

Observers say the couple is likely to generate income from a UK trademark from their brand, ‘Sussex Royal,’ which they applied for in June – along with sponsorships and speaking tours.

According to the Times, senior royal officials – including secretaries, press advisers and Sir Michael Stevens who handles royal finances, have been locked in talks for two days to work out various solutions to discuss on Monday.

The alternatives will cover central issues such as how much work the couple will carry out for the royal family and where they will live.

The Sussexes hope to divide their time between Britain and Canada but their current residence, Frogmore Cottage, Windsor, is among the topics on the table. The residence was controversially renovated for at least £2.4 million at taxpayers’ expense. The couple are said to be prepared to give that up, although it is possible that they will remain there but pay a commercial rent.

The question of how much royal work they carry out may have an impact on the extent to which the Prince of Wales continues to fund them with the money he receives from the Duchy of Cornwall. –The Times Some reports suggest Prince Charles is determined to cut the purse strings. Some sources maintain Charles advised his son against the marriage, not because he disliked Megan but because he doubted that an actress from ‘woke’ California would cope with the constraints of life as a member of the Royal family.

Latest reports from the Royal household suggest that following  “constructive discussions,” the Queen has agreed to a “period of transition” for Harry and Meghan.

“Although we would have preferred them to remain full-time working Members of the Royal Family, we respect and understand their wish to live a more independent life as a family while remaining a valued part of my family,” wrote the Queen, acknowledging that her grandson and his wife want to live more independent lives, according to the Washington Post.


ABC TV News Covered Up Evidence On Paedophile Epstein, Whistleblower Former News Anchor Claims

When the furore about the convenient death of billionaire paedophole Jeffrey Epstein died down after the alleged sex criminal was found dead in his cell in a New York remand centre, many of Epstein’s rich and powerful friends who had been ferried by private jet to sex parties on his private Caribbean Island must have heaved a sigh of relief.