World War Three For Dummies (and Dhimmis?)

If you have up to now been one of those people who shouts “CONSPIRACY THEORY” whn someone uses the phrase ‘New World Order’ reading this piece will have you begging the Conspiracy Theorists to save you arse.

World War Three For Dummies

Powerful elites and influential think tanks forecast a coming period of American aggression. Zbigniew Brzezinski speaks for the Globalist faction of the western PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) in ‘The Grand Chessboard’, a book in which he openly advocates for bolder American action in dominating the Eurasian land mass.

During this same period, the ‘neo-conservative’ faction of the PRC, represented by people like Robert Kagan, William Kristol, Paul Wolfowitz and Dick Cheney, begin agitating for America to overthrow any government in the Middle East that stands in the way of Israel’s domination of the region. To that end, Kagan and Kristol had founded a group called PNAC (Project for the New American Century).

The two overlapping factions are often ‘on the same page’, and yet often at odds too. Globalists are generally more focused on surrounding and subverting the Russia-China bloc, ultimately creating a ‘unipolar world’ (New World Order). The neo-con Zionists are generally in agreement, but their main emphasis is to help Israel to expand its territory and develop into the dominant regional power in that area of the world.

Think of these factions as competing ‘Mafia’ families. They are still part of the same overall power structure, but with competing interests at certain times and in certain areas.

Read all World War Three For Dummies at Red Ice Creations

RELATED POSTS:
Currency Wars
China plans new currency to replace US dollar

So Who Practices The Politics Of Evil

I’m always gobsmacked at the number of UKIP Haters and Leftie Screechers in blogs and comment threads (mostly comment threads ~ left wing bloggers usually tent to have a little more intelligence) who insist on comparing UKIP to that American phenomenon The Tea Party, a phemonenon because while it does not actually exist as a political organisation in the way that our Labour, Conservative, UKIP, SNP and Green Parties exist (I don’t think we have any other true political parties :> ) the Tea Party holds a powerful grip on the left wing mindset.

Tea Party this, Tea Party that, these distinctly unoriginal thinkers grizzle, echoing each other until Owen Jones dictates the next meme for them. The strange thing is, these people, like America’s illiberal and intolerant ‘liberals’ are quite convinced their autoritarian ideology represents all that is good and just in society and set themselves up as defenders of the freedoms of anointed minorities while damning mainsteam society.

Let’s take a look at how American democrats, having hypocritically accused Republicans (referred to as The Tea Party) of electoral fraud, terrorism, anarchism and arson (?) for the crime of opposing the ‘liberal’ agenda, have been caught red handed promoting the politics of hate, printing lies about opponents (we know all politicians tell lies, by lying about opponents personal lives in print is so utterly beyond stupid only self righteouss zealots would try it) and committing blatant electoral fraud themselves. To set the scene take a look at this snippet from online news site the ironically named TPNN, which reports on the battle on Taxas between whhelchair bound Republican Greg Abbott and his Democrat opponent Wendy Davis, nicknamed Abortion barbie for her plastic looking fearures and obsession with pushing abortion as the preferred means of birth control:

“Democrat Wendy Davis’s empty wheelchair ad against her disabled Republican opponent, Greg Abbott, represented a new low in gutter politics. Davis even doubled down on her despicable ad, even defending it in the face of extreme bipartisan criticism.

“As bad as Abortion Barbie’s ad is, she may have just outdone herself with this tweet from her official Twitter account on Monday, which accuses Greg Abbott as being against interracial marriage, an obvious desperate ploy to deceive minorities into voting for her.

“But there’s just one tiny, little problem which annihilates Davis’s charge. Abbott’s wife, Cecilia, is of Hispanic heritage, the granddaughter of immigrants from Mexico. Abbott IS in an interracial marriage, and Davis knows it.

GOTCHA!

The next story is from my fiend, US Political journalist Renee Nal, look at it and ask yourselves can the people who attempt such things be sane:]

“After being accused of “photoshopping” the featured image which illustrates that newly-elected Governor Greg Abbott’s name was missing from a voting machine in Bexar County, Texas, San Antonio voter Jade Stanford is vindicated, as reported at MySanAntonio

“Bexar County also made the news after Democratic Party Chairman Manuel Medina admitted to creating a political ad referring to the Tea Party as “radical terrorists.

“Medina, of course, is only following in the footsteps of prominent Democrats who have referred to the Tea Party as radicals, anarchists, extremists, terrorists, unbiblical, legislative arsonists, committing jihad, have bombs strapped to their chests, committing extortion, taking hostages, want to “tear down the house our founders built,” want to “blow up the global economy,” and are “holding a gun to the head of Americans.”

“As reported at the Brenner Brief, voting machines across America experienced “calibration” issues which changed Republican votes to the respective Democrat candidates across the country. In tight races in particular, a few faulty machines could sway an election.”

Read more at http://www.brennerbrief.com/developing-greg-abbotts-name-missing-ballot-bexar-county-texas/#uR4TWe5egAyXJUJs.99

Read all …

For the record Abbott won without raising a sweat.

UPDATE from Renee

UPDATE: Bexar County acknowledges Greg Abbott’s name WAS missing from ballot machine, blames a ‘glitch’

“Woman accused of altering the image: ‘It wasn’t Photoshop, it wasn’t botched, it was real.'” [Read more]

RELATED POSTS:


Is voting redundant
British Democracy In Terminal Decline – Voting Is Redundant And Civil Liberties Are So Last Year

Gallup: 58% of Americans Want a Third Party.

How to win elections and influence people (Source)

On September 24th, a Gallup poll reported that, “A majority of U.S. voters, 58%, say a third U.S. political party is needed because the Republican and Democratic parties ‘do such a poor job’ representing the American people.’”

In other words: Ever since the American public started to learn in 2003 that George W. Bush had been lying about his being in possession of conclusive evidence that Saddam Hussein was building a new stockpile of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), American public sentiment switched drastically from belief that the two major “Parties do an adequate job,” to belief that “A third party is needed.”

We have to warn them they will be sorely disappointed. We had a third party and what a load of shits they turned out to be as soon as they had a sniff of power. Now we have a fourth party with a fifth on the rise, and we are hoping UKIP and the Greens are not corrupted by corporate money as easily as the Liberal democrats were.

So George Orwell Was Right Then

George Orwell said many memorable things and some of his comments on the fascist nature of socialism, big government control of media and the suppression of free speech now seem almost supernaturally prescient. Here’s one of that is particularly germane in the light of a news item in today’s American news (though as us libertarians would expect, it warrants hardly a word in mainstream media):

“Journalism is reporting news somebody does not want reported, everything else is public relations.”

And why is this particularly significant today?

from Jon Rappoport’s Blog

‘Ajit Pai, an FCC commissioner, has blown the whistle on a government plan to put federal monitors in newsrooms.

The plan is billed as a study, to determine how major networks assemble their stories—and also as a teaching program to show newspeople what stories are vital and critical, and what stories aren’t.

The Orwellian op even covers newspapers, to which the FCC has no regulatory connection. Pai writes in the Wall St. Journal:’

Read all: Government monitors in newsrooms – Jon Rappoport

obama statsi

RELATED POSTS:
Agenda 21
Barack Obama’s Big Brother Nation
The Importance Of Free Speech
Extended Europe

Obama’s Big Brother Is Watching You

Beyond Orwell’s Worst Nightmare says the headline and it truly is.

orwells big brother
Picture source: talesuntangled

from Global Research:

“In his recent speech on NSA reforms, President Obama cited as precedent Paul Revere and the Sons of Liberty, who patrolled the streets at night, “reporting back any signs that the British were preparing raids against America’s early Patriots.” This was a weak effort to find historical support for the NSA spying program. After all, Paul Revere and his associates were patrolling the streets, not sorting through people’s private communications.”

In order to get better contextual references, The Emperor Obama should have considered how the American revolutionaries had reacted to searches conducted by the British before the revolution. The British used “general warrants,” which authorized blanket searches without any individual suspicion or clear identification of what the colonial authorities were snooping for.

In a petition to King George III in 1774, The American Colonial Congress protested against British officers’ unlimited power of search and seizure. The petition complained that the power had been abused “to break open and enter houses, without the authority of any civil magistrate.”
Read More

When leaders of the Revolution later drafted the Bill Of Rights, the Fourth Amendment was a prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures, they were attempting to ensure that our country would not become a police state.

Obama is citing the Founding Fathers of the American nation as justification for his administration’s behaving like the people they were rebelling against.

I’m not siding with the American insurrectionists however. If they had just toughed it out and helped us bring the plundering Hanoverians to heel or even restore The Plantagenet dynasty (OK, they were wankers but they had a great name) the instead of the Jug Eared Jihadist America now has as it’s leaders, they could have had a loveable little old lady and her tree hugging, half wit son who is good for a laugh if nothing else.

Leftie Bashir’s Hypocritical Sexist Hate Attack

Over the weekend, former newsreader and woman hater Martin Bashir(remember his baiting of Princess Di?)trashed American republican airhead Sarah Palin for comments she made to CNN’s Jake Tapper show comparing the results of the national debt to slavery.

Bashir made the same comparison in 2011, however, regarding his distaste for traditional marriage.

After being challenged for using the metaphor, Palin told Tapper in part that she meant the term as

“…being beholden to some kind of master that is not of your choosing. And, yes, the national debt will be like slavery when the note comes due.”

Her comments were reminiscent of when, in 2006, then-Senator Obama referred to the national debt as a “hidden domestic enemy,” or when then-Senator “Stupid Joe” Biden (the one who plagiarised Neil Kinnock’s speeches) referred to the national debt as a “fundamental threat to our economic well being and the global economy,” or when Khmer Rouge sympathiser Harry Reid declared that the national debt would “weaken our country” as reported at Liberty Unyielding.

As reported by Tommy Christopher of Mediaite yesterday, Bashir said on Friday that Sarah Palin was a “resident dunce” and lamented that her remarks were

“scraping the barrel of her long-deceased mind, and using her all-time favorite analogy in an attempt to sound intelligent about the national debt.”

Bashir further referred to Palin as a “world class idiot, (it takes one to know one I guess)” and ranted,

“it’s hardly surprising that she should choose to mention slavery in a way that is abominable to anyone who knows anything about its barbaric history.”

Obviously the fuckwit Bashir does not know anything about the history of slavery or he would know that it has been with us since the very earliest beginnings of civilisation and is still widespread in Africa, South East Asia and the Middle East while only the ignorant, racist, barbaric pale skinned races have banned it.

For the record, thanks to the double standards of leftie hypocrites like the cupid stunt Bashir, who insist that in the name of diversity and multiculturalism we must respect alien cultures by turning a blind eye to the wealthy Arabs, Asians and Africans who openly keep household slaves in Britain, Europe and the USA.

Ironically Bashir himself used the slavery comparison in 2011, when Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum “signed a pledge on upholding traditional marriage.” Scott Whitlock of Newsbusters reported on Bashir’s comments at the time, quoting Bashir as saying,

“Did two Republican hopefuls really sign a pledge suggesting a return to the days of slavery?”

On Friday the hypocrite Bashir launched an astonishing and blatantly sexist (where would lefties be without double standards)personal attack on Mrs Palin during which he read an account of a slave being forced to ingest feces as a punishment, and suggested that Palin be subjected to similar treatment for her comments. He said,

“When Mrs. Palin invokes slavery, she doesn’t just prove her rank ignorance. She confirms if anyone truly qualified for a dose of discipline from Thomas Thistlewood, she would be the outstanding candidate.”

Using the sexist hate merchant Bashir’s own criteria, he should be the one sucking up shit.

Republicans in the USA have called for Bashir to be deported. Boggart Blog says “No way, we don’t want the little scumsucker back here.”

MORE FROM THE GREENTEETH STABLE

Boggart AbroadDaily Stirrer homeBoggart-Eft at Blogster Greenteeth BitesBoggart BlogGreenteeth LabyrinthIan at WikinutAuthorTold By An IdiotGatherBubblewsAuthorsdenScribdLittle Nicky Machiavelli
Ian Thorpe at Facebook


By TwitterButtons.net