Global Warming Nutters To Protest In Record Cold Temperatures

You have to smile at the science worshippers and climate change Warmageddonists, they are so detached from reality that if the ice caps were advancing through Europe and North America they’s claim it was caused by global warming. They just don’t do real world evidence.

This story is a prime example of how these deluded OCD bell – ends have raised congnitive dissonance to an art form:

After a record – breaking cold summer across much of the United States, in mid – Spepember snow lies on the ground in seven US states as advocates of inventing scare stories as an excuse to impose punitive taxes on the lower classes (the unwashed idiots who wave placards and chant, “tax the rich, tax the rich,” haven’t noticed the leaders of their movement are all billionaires or multi-millionaires) gather to demand a United Nations response to “global warming” (“Tax the poor in rich countries, tax the poor in rich countries;)

Oregon usa 12 September 2014
A scene in Oregon (well South of London) 12 September, 2014

“Global Warming” (tax the poor) Activists Plan March Amid Record Cold Temperatures.
from Patriot Rising

Later this month, activists are planning a march in New York City for “global warming awareness,” even though the northern U.S. is reeling from record cold temperatures.

Called the “largest climate march in history” by organizers, the “People’s Climate March” will occur on Sept. 21st, a few days before the United Nations will attempt to draft a “global warming” treaty on the same level as the controversial Kyoto Protocol.

“The Secretary-General has asked leaders to announce significant and substantial initiatives to help move the world toward a path that will limit global warming,” states a U.N. press release.

Yet, in contrast to that rhetoric, ice cold temperatures are shattering records across the U.S. and Antarctica’s sea ice is expanding at a record pace.

Typically, when the irony of protesting against runaway warming while the nation shivers in unusually low temperatures is pointed out to the Warmageddonists they reaction can be summed up as saying, “You shouldn’t take any notice of the weather, if the science says its hot outside then get your kit off and slather on the factor 25.”

The words mad and scientist have always belonged together.


German Solar Energy Industry Crashes As Government Ends Subsidy
We are learning from German business news websites that Germany’s solar industry has crashed and burned after the government drastically cut its subsidies. Piere Gosselin, writing in No Tricks Zone reports:

Climate Change: Study shows carbon dioxide dangers are OVERSTATED
That old demon Carbon Dioxide is in the news again today, not because the scaremongering science screechers have come up with a new lie to sell their ‘tax-the-rich’ globalist agenda but because yet another group of sensible scientists have found that carbon Dioxide levels in the atmosphere are overstated. Hardly a surprising result when you consider the global figure is derived from measurements taken on the slopes of Mauna Loa, an active volcano in Hawaii.

UN IPCC Climate Change Report Will Warn Of ‘Severe, Pervasive’ Effects Of Global Warming
After various leaks of draft version showed the latest IPCC Climate Change report had at last admitted that the real world behaviour of the global climate showed the mathematical modelling based scaremongering of the climate science lobby to be at odds with the real world evidence, the final published report seems to have been rewritten line by line by the Warmageddonist lobby.

Submerged forests’ drowned by ancient climate change revealed by 2014 storms.
Here’s yet another smack in the mouth for those smug, condescending scientists who talk down to the rest of us. Far from being a new thing, climsste change was affecting the environment at the beginning of the Bronze age. How many fossil fuel burning power stations did the beaker people have then, and how many Chelsea tractors were tearing up and down the ridgeways?

Greenpeace in climate change fraud
Climate crisis? Global cooling is moke likely than global warming
Climate change – the long cold winter of global warming
Warmageddonists can’t explain what happened to the 50 million missing refugees
Climate chance scare part of global totalitarian agenda
Climate change crisis index

Pentagon wrestles with bogus climate warnings as funds shifted to green agenda

Catastrophe capitalism
Picture source: News room Panama

You gotta laugh. In a bitter humourless way of course because interest we have to pay on the money our governments have been borrowing to fund this kind of politically correct crap is bleeding us dry.

from The Washington Times
(reproduced under Creative Commons licence)

While The Emperor Obama was busy destroying democracy this weekend by announcing that he will not need the approval of democratically elected representatives to close down coal fired power stations because he has granted himself the kind of executive powers enjoyed by Caligula and Nero, others have been hard at work exposing the climate change scare for the scam it was.

Ten years ago, the Pentagon (?) paid for a climate study that put forth many scary scenarios.

Consultants told the military (?) that, by now, California would be flooded by inland seas, The Hague and Amsterdam would be unlivable, the architectural treasure of Venice wouls be lost, polar ice would be mostly gone in summer, and global temperatures would rise at an accelerated rate as high as 0.5 degrees a year.

None of that has happened.

Yet the 2003 report, “An Abrupt Climate Change Scenario and Its Implications for United States National Security,” is credited with kick-starting the movement that, to this day and perhaps with more vigor than ever, links climate change to national security.

The report also became gospel to climate change doomsayers, who predicted pervasive and more intense hurricanes, tornadoes, floods and droughts.

“The release of this report is what likely sparked the ‘modern era’ of security interest in climate affairs,” said Jeff Kueter, president of the George C. Marshall Institute, a nonprofit that examines scientific issues that affect public policy.

“It was widely publicized and very much a tool of the political battles over climate raging at the time,” said Mr. Kueter, who sees as “tenuous” a link between U.S. security and climate change.

Doug Randall, who co-authored the Pentagon report, said, “Even I’m surprised at how often it’s referred to.

“I think it did have an impact, for sure, in getting people talking and seeing the connection, which at that time was harder for some people than it is today,” said Mr. Randall, who heads the consulting firm Monitor 360.

Some critics say such alarmist reports are causing the Pentagon to shift money that could be used for weapons and readiness. It is making big investments in biofuels, for example, and is working climate change into high-level strategic planning.

There is no exact budget line for climate change. The Government Accountability Office in 2011 documented a big increase in federal spending, from $4.6 billion in 2003 to nearly $9 billion in 2010.

Sen. James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma, the top Republican on the Senate Committee on Armed Services, has been the chief congressional critic of the Pentagon’s financial commitment to climate change. He said biofuel projects should be left to the Energy Department.

“The president’s misguided priorities with our national security can be seen in the $1 trillion defense cuts he has put into motion since taking office and then using the limited defense budget to support his green agenda,” Mr. Inhofe said in a statement to The Washington Times. “His green spending in the defense budget is based on the belief that climate change is the ‘new weapon of mass destruction.’ In the meantime the president has loosened sanctions on Iran, [which] has maintained their resources to develop and launch a nuclear weapon — the real weapon of mass destruction.”

Predictions vs. reality

The 2003 report was produced by a consulting firm, then called the Global Business Network, for the Pentagon’s office of net assessment. It is a driving force to allocate money to counter global threats — in this case, climate change.

Continue reading

So the question we should be asking is WTF has that cash swallowing area of government, the military do do with climate change. are the Russians, Chinese and Iranians throwing water filled condoms at us or something?


What if man-made climate change is all in the mind?
Climate change is a theory for which there is “no scientific proof at all” says the co-founder of Greenpeace

Winter Deaths: Annual Fear And Panic campaign begins

Official government scaremongers and Big Pharma vaccine pushers yesterday began the annual campaign to convince us all that if we stop thinking and do what the government and the medical whores working in Big Pharma tell us we will be immortal. The opening shot of the campaign was the release of official figures revealing ‘winter deaths’ rose 29 per cent to 31,000 last year – the highest level since 2009.

The Office for National Statistics said cold weather (Global Warming shills NB, last year was the coldest since 1962)and the flu were responsible for most of these and said the majority of the winter deaths over the 2012-2013 winter involved over 75 year-olds.

So pretty soon I will be getting my annual bombardment of letters and phone calls reminding me I am due for my annual ‘refresher’ flu jab.

Refresher my arse. I’ve never had a flu jab. I have never had flu and that’s how I want it to stay so why would I let Big Pharma squirt flu bugs into me?

For global warming freaks again, if you want to see a genuine hockey stick graph, just take a look at how the death rate from all causes shoots up once people pass age 75.

Britain’s biggest pensioner organisation, the National Pensioners Convention, described the figures as a “national scandal”. Dot Gibson, NPC national secretary said: “Making sure older people have got a well insulated warm home and the income to pay the fuel bills isn’t green crap. It’s what a decent society should do.

Hmm, yes, but my Dear Old Mum and all her friends seem to manage quite nicely and not all of them have three kids who say, “Never mind the expense Mum, if you are cold turn up the heating and send me the bill.”

“How can colder Scandinavian countries avoid this annual toll while we simply wring our hands? The Government needs to roll out a more effective programme to insulate homes, build more sustainable properties for older people, raise the winter fuel allowance and tackle the excessive profits of the big six energy companies.”

Ed Matthew, of the Energy Bill Revolution, said the Government should be “ashamed” and stepped up calls for Ministers to use the billions of pounds of tax collected from household energy bills each year to insulate homes of vulnerable people.

And in that final comment above we see, in all its glory, the cuntiness of do gooders who work in the charity sector. The government is responsible for individuals, the government must find unlimited funds to support this amorphous group, ‘vulnerable people’.

The thing is old people sometimes have strange obsessions, like they feel they have to subsidise their alcoholic kids or feed and care for ninety seven cats or dogs. They have enough money to care for themselves but choose to spend it in other ways.

What should we do?

If old people were given human sized hamster wheels to run round they would not die from hypothermia and could generate electricity to light the lights and boil the kettle (to make cup – a – soups) to keep them warm. Simples.

Apart from that, after two decades of being brainwashed daily with the global warming propaganda crap pumped out by the Climate Science Cunts Club, people have come to believe that we are living in an era of sub tropical temperatures as far north as the Arctic Circle (repeat the lie often enough etc.) and have forgotten how to react to cold weather.

If your house is not well insulated (and can there me any house in Britain that is not on the verge of collapse under the weight of extra insulation installed as a result of government initiatives over the past twenty years,) we need to remember as we enter an era of global cooling to dress appropriately for winter conditions. There are parts of England where people have forgotten what an overcoat is, and I’m not talking about Newcastle where people are so hard they just don’t care. Look at news coverage from a commuter station in the south east in winter, you will not see one person wearing a heavy coat, with scarf and gloves.

Lay the blame totally on the pointless Green Crap agenda supported by the LibLabCon trick, a massive exercise in shovelling money into the pockets of their greedy corporate donors.

Tax revenue that could have gone to dealing with the real problems of real people has been pissed into wind by these idiots and the corporate whores we are obliged to call climate scientists. Research grants and subsidies have been doled out to con artists in “The Green Economy” and used to create ‘green jobs’ for tax avoidance specialists in the financial sector.

Now after a mutual masturbation session in Warsaw, we learn we are to flush a further £1,500,000,000 down the green toilet on top of the existing £3,000,000,000 in “Climate Aid”, we already get stung for. ALL of this money is spent on jollies for politicians, bureaucrats and ‘scientists’. Just think how much good four and a half billion could do at home, providing care for the needy and infirm, alleviating the need for benefit cuts, helping councils keep business rates down so local shops could survive, and building the kind of sheltered accommodation older people need when eventually they cannot care for themselves properly.

Vote for anyone except the LibLabCon Corporate Alliance. They work for the bastards who want to steal your money.

The elite just do not care about ordinary people!

Dr. Offit, Vaccine Pusher in Chief is exposed as a liar.
Are Hospitals A Good Place To Die? NHS mismanagement raises embarrassing questions

We’re All Dooomed, I Tell Ye, Doomed.

Remember Global Warming and “The science is settled, we’re all doomed?”

Well guess what:

Euro – media conceded the mathematical models of reality were wrong, global warming has ended


From online science mag

Global Warming Less Extreme Than Feared

“” When the researchers at CICERO and the Norwegian Computing Center applied their model and statistics to analyse temperature readings from the air and ocean for the period ending in 2000, they found that climate sensitivity to a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentration will most likely be 3.7°C, which is somewhat higher than the IPCC prognosis.

But the researchers were surprised when they entered temperatures and other data from the decade 2000-2010 into the model; climate sensitivity was greatly reduced to a “mere” 1.9°C.

Professor Berntsen explains the changed predictions:

“The Earth’s mean temperature rose sharply during the 1990s. This may have caused us to overestimate climate sensitivity.

“We are most likely witnessing natural fluctuations in the climate system – changes that can occur over several decades – and which are coming on top of a long-term warming. The natural changes resulted in a rapid global temperature rise in the 1990s, whereas the natural variations between 2000 and 2010 may have resulted in the levelling off we are observing now.”

(end extract)

So why have people in politics like Barack Hussein Obama and the twunts attending the World Economic Forum in Davos this week been prating on about “Anthropogenic Global Warming” and the need for Carbon Taxes to combat its catastrophic effects”?

Are the just trying to deflect attention from the state of the global economy, the effects on society of overpopulation and de – industrialization and the growing realization that we are at war with Islamic fanaticism?

Or is it because they have appointed this man as their chief scientific adviser.

Crippling Fuel Prices Caused by Tax Increases Over The Past Ten Years“>

Economic Insanity: We Spend $11 million to create each green job

After 19 years marriage a Belgian discovered his wife was a man

The man, only named as Jan, married Monica, his family’s former au pair in in 1993 despite legal difficulties raised by the Belgian immigration authorities.
But it was only in recent weeks that he discovered that his wife was a man.

“I feel I’ve been assaulted,” he told the Het Nieuwsblad newspaper.

“I brought her to Belgium. That was not easy. The Belgian courts had serious doubts about the authenticity of her birth and her identity papers, but eventually they accepted it anyway. I thought she was an attractive woman, all woman. She had no male traits.”

Jan, 64, said that he and his wife had decided not to have children because he had two by his previous marriage and she fooled him by pretending to menstruate, using sanitary towels, “to conceal the truth.” Did he not wonder why they used so much tomato ketchup at certain times of the month?

“Even during sex, I never noticed anything,” he said.

What? Not even the tiniest little thing?

Lib Dems Die – not with a bang but with a politically correct gesture

So what was the “issoo” that got the Lib Dems excited yesterday.

(Let’s play the Hong Kong Fooey game here, thouse of you who were or had kids in the early 1980s.)

Was it the debt crisis?

Was it climate change?

Was it jobs and unemployment?

Was it inflation and rising fuel costs?

Well was it gender free passports for sex change people?
Maaaaaaybe ……

Yes, in what will surely become the benchmark case of political death by politically correct gestures the Lib Dems let the country know they are far more bovvered about the feelings of trannies who want to travel abroad without immigration officials yelling “Heyyyyy everybody, thees one use-ed to have a deeek,” than about any of the very real crises we face.

Boggart Blog advises the Lib Dems to wrap up their operation now as they are out of touch with reality. As for trannies who want to tavel abroad, forget it, especially if you are the lorry driver in a frock type who has no idea how to apply make up, walk in high heels or even put a wig on straight. You are not going to fool anyone.

We Were Right Again – Immigrants Are Keeping British People Out Of Jobs

US Military Goes To War With Climate Sceptics

A hedline in the Guardian says the US Military (the world’s biggest user of fossil fuels, is going to war with climate sceptics.

(read full story)

This means all the climate science fans will be killed by friendly fire.

The Truth About Wind Turbines
Wind Turbine Scam
Food crisis – We Are All Going To Starve Says Tax Eaters
New Report That Proving The Planet Is Not Warming Proves The Planet Is Warming Say Climate Scientists

Now We Know – Conservatives Do Not Want To Win.

Plat the video for this, Conservative Contender at the Greenteeth Labyrinth web site.

Some of us were not surprised by the poll published today that shows the Conservatives lead over Labour is down to 2%. We have suspected for a long time something like this would happen. When Boggart Blog asked Mr CAmeron for his reaction on seeing the poll resaults he said “It felt as if I had been kicked in the bollocks.

What destroyed the Tory lead of course is the campaign slogan they used to launch their election campaign last week, “Vote For Change.”

The slogan is obviously borrowed from Barack Obama so no Brownie points for originality. And the punters are sick of all the talk of change when change only ever means things get worse.

Ah well, plus ca change, plus c’est le same old shite as they say halfway across the Channel. Last time of course the meme chose Labour because they promised change and what we got was precious little change out of a Trillion pounds spent on Private Finance Initiatives.

Cameron hopes to emulate Obama who swept to power on a promise to change America (and a tidal wave of Arab oil money).

Well it took American’s about twelve minutes to see through Obama and we Brits, traditionally more sceptical and firmly grounded in reality have bettered that by seeing through The Boy David before a vote has been cast.

The Conservatives are authors of their own misfortune however, their performance while Brown has been hunkered in the foetal position sucking his thumb and whimpering “Mummy,” has been so lacklustre and inept those few voters who ever had any confidence in them have lost it. Ironically a private poll commissioned by the Conservatives showed the party would now have one foot in Downing Street if they had kept William Hague as leader.

And what a contest the election would have been then.

Laydeeeeez an’ Gennelmen, Your main fight tonight, for the heavyweight political championship of Grrrrrrreat Brittttain, on my right in the blue corner, the Yorkshire /Bruiser, William “Forty Pints” Hague and on my even further right in the red corner The Scottish Psycho Gordon “Gi’ ‘em one wi’ the heid” Brown.

Finding out that Hague could have been a contender is doubly ironic because the signs are the Conservatives are not eager to win an election and whoever leads them will be pressured to throw the contest.

But why? What do Central Office know that we don’t?

Positive Reinforcement As A Tool For Behaviour Change, An Assessment

When I worked in education the prevailing ideology was positive reinforcement, i.e. not telling the kids that anything was not good enough, not up to scratch, less than their capabilities or god forbid, wrong! but searching out the good things and praising them for these.
So when the kid who has spent all lesson texting under the desk on his mobile and consequently hasn’t got a clue how to set out his addition sums in columns, hundreds, tens and units; instead of explaining to the child that he needs to listen otherwise he is never going to understand anything, teacher has to look for something good to say e.g.
“Well, it’s good that you have started writing today at the front of the book:”

or “You’ve written your nines beautifully!”

or “This is a really good sentence, you’ve used a capital letter! We were doing maths, sorry!!!! numeracy, but I have to say that is a really good sentence.”

And of course this positive reinforcement applies particularly to behavioural issues. So the kids who come along to school, hang their coats up, put their lunchboxes in the proper place, come into the classroom and settle down relatively quickly get a word of praise from the teacher.

Meanwhile the naughty kids, sorreeeee! the kids who sometimes do naughty things, always label the action never the child: run into the cloakroom, pull somebody else’s coat off the peg and put it in the boy’s urinal, leave their own coat on the floor, get the fizzy drink out of their lunchbox and then proceed to hit the little girl with rampant eczema with the lunchbox, charge into the classroom and clamber over the tables to get to their place, shaking their fizzy drink as they go, start an argument with the clever but sensitive boy about the chair he is sitting on, before opening the fizzy drink so that it sprays all over the hapless child and then start shouting that the teacher hasn’t called thier name out on the register, get hauled out to the front of the class, presented with an “I Did Good” sticker and told how much better they were than yesterday. At this point, objective achieved; getting a sticker, because at the end of term the kids with the most stickers get taken for a treat, the local bowling alley for instance; the child reverts to his/her normal pattern of behaviour.

In all the school’s I taught in, over all those years, I only ever witnessed one child whose behaviour improved through positive reinforcement, and I first encountered him in nursery, so it could conceivably have just been an age thing or perhaps a more settled home life that caused the change from disruptive, foul mouthed little bastard to quiet, polite eight year old.

I’m sure that as they got older some children will have changed, indeed my daughter now knocks about with a young man I taught several years ago who had the most volatile temper and would kick off about almost anything but who now apparently is really nice and has learned that when he feels he is losing his temper the best thing to do is get away from other people and simmer down in private.

Well surely I can’t be the only person in education who noted this, can I?

And you’d think that the powers that be would have had oodles of professional think tank people saying that the only way people change permanently is if they want to change, no amount of bribery will do it on a permanent basis if the will isn’t there.

So now we have the latest Government scheme to reduce obesity. Lardarses are going to be given supermarket vouchers and gym membership to encourage them to exercise and eat healthily. Meanwhile those of us that do eat reasonably healthily, I may live in South Yorkshire but Jamie Oliver would be right at home in my kitchen, and take regular exercise will just be left to our own devices, no help with my gym club membership which I have solely for the opportunity to plough up and down the swimming pool two or three times a week without encountering dippy old bats standing in the middle having a long chinwag with the person they haven’t seen for, oh, twenty minutes.

Nor will they be stumping up a proportion of the annual golf and tennis club subs.

But if I stop doing the exercise, and start having five pieces of chocolate and crisps everyday, topped off with a couple of litres of cider, then once I hit the magic 15 stone official obese line I should be quids in, literally.

There is another fatal flaw in the government’s cunning plan, once the fatties start shedding the pounds the incentives will stop, as if they think well these people are discovering the joys of walking up five flights of stairs instead of taking the lift, whilst weak with hunger, so they will just carry on doing it without any incentive.

This Governmnet is bloody bonkers!

Child protection – more politically correct mayhem