The role of cosmic electric currents in earth’s climate

<b>by <a href=”http://tapnewswire.com/2017/01/the-role-of-cosmic-electric-currents-in-earths-climate/”>Tapestry</a></b&gt;

If you’ve been following the growth of the Electric Universe movement, you know that this growth is due largely to the power of a new paradigm to explain things left unexplained by conventional theory. The greatest surprises of the space age are not surprises to researchers exploring the role of the electric force across the cosmos. Nor is it surprising to see the electric force at work close to home, both in the sculpting of planetary surfaces and in the evolution of life on earth. In particular, two resources have proven most helpful in orienting newcomers to this large subject:

The Beginner’s Guide to the Electric Universe introduces the behavior of charged particles—or plasma—in space. The plasma environment of the Earth, the Sun, distant stars, and galaxies now challenges the “gravity-centric” dogma of 20th-century astronomy. The new picture of space adds an indispensable component: the role of cosmic electric currents.

The Essential Guide to the Electric Universe takes the intermediate reader into the spectacular complex of electric currents, magnetic fields, and associated electromagnetic radiation that define so much of our celestial environment. In the space sciences, gravity alone is no longer king.

Supplementing this foundational material are two regular features at Thunderbolts.info—”The Picture of the Day” (TPOD) and periodic science articles called “Thunderblogs,” highlighting the essential place of electrical knowledge in 21st-century science:

“Drought to Deluge” by Stephen Smith is the theme of the TPOD Pick of the Week. In this selection, he asks: Does the Earth-Sun connection play an electrodynamic role in “climate change”? As we take up climate issues in the near future, the electrical Earth-Sun transactions will emerge as a critical topic.

Yes, Andy Hall is back. In his latest Thunderblog, “<a href=”https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/2017/01/20/the-maars-of-pinacate-part-one/”>The Maars of Pinacate, Part One</a>.” Andy describes a volcanic field deemed “the most wasted of wastelands.” It seems this feature cries out for an electrical explanation.

<b><a href=”https://www.thunderbolts.info/wp/”>Read more on this topic at The Thunderbolts Project >>></a></b>

<b><u>RELATED POSTS:</u></b>
<a href=”http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-scalar-waves.shtml”>Tesla’s scalar waves hold many secrets</a>
<a href=”http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-beam-me-up.shtml”>Science: Beam me up Spotty – science for nerds</a>
<a href=”http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-cern-con.shtml”>CERN cosmic breakthrough – science of con?</a>
<a href=”http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-consciousness-brain.shtml”>Consciousness and the brain</a>
<a href=”http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-determinism-materialism.shtml”>Science: Determinism and materialism falllacies</a>
<a href=”http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-gravitational-waves.shtml”>Are gravitational waves fact or science fantasy?</a>
<a href=”http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-gravity-con.shtml”>Newton was wrong – the earth suck, or something</a>
<a href=”http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-infinity-space-time.shtml”>Space, time, infiniity and other science fallacies</a>
<a href=”http://www.greenteethmm.com/science-space-universal-mind.shtml”>Space, time and the universal mind</a>
<a href=”https://originalboggartblog.wordpress.com/2015/11/14/us-congress-passes-bill-allowing-colonization-of-space-20783304/”>US Congress Passes Bill Allowing Colonization Of Space</a><br />
<a href=”https://originalboggartblog.wordpress.com/2013/03/02/space-mining-a-reality-by-15583950/”>Space Mining A Reality By 2016?</a>
<a href=”https://originalboggartblog.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/latest-ufo-sighting-the-retoun-of-turd-nine-from-outer-space-5560717/”>Latest UFO sighting? The Return Of Turd Nine From Outer Space</a>
<a href=”https://originalboggartblog.wordpress.com/2007/11/09/life_on_mars3270996/”>Life On Mars ( space technology )</a>
<a href=”http://edbutt.blogspot.co.uk/2015/12/chinese-lunar-rover-finds-no-evidence.html”>Chinese Lunar Rover Finds No Evidence of American Moon Landings</a>
<a href=”http://edbutt.blogspot.co.uk/2015/03/nasa-engineer-admits-they-cant-get-past.html”>NASA Engineer Admits They Can’t Get Past Van Allen Belts</a>
<a href=”http://edbutt.blogspot.co.uk/2010/08/boggart-blog-secret-ufo-files.html”>The Boggart Blog Secret UFO Files</a>
<a href=”http://www.wikinut.com/beyond-big-bang%3a-the-idea-of-an-infinite-universe-is-fashionable-again./10qhmwip/x5im9_27/”>Beyond Big Bang: The Idea Of An Infinite Universe Is Fashionable Again</a>
<a href=”http://www.wikinut.com/quantum-metaphysics-or-the-god-experiments/kklenw1i/2elo-7mk/”>Quantum Metaphysics or The God Experiments</a>
<a href=”https://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewpoetry.asp?id=320849″>Time Travellers</a>
<a href=”https://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewpoetry.asp?id=209540″>Let Us Seek New Journeys Together</a>
<a href=”https://www.scribd.com/document/132458458/Science-and-Reality”>Science and Reality</a>

Elsewhere: [ <a href=”https://originalboggartblog.wordpress.com/”>The Original Boggart Blog</a>] … [ <a href=”http://www.dailystirrer.com/”&gt; Daily Stirrer.shtml</a> ]…[<a href=”https://littlenickymachiavelli.wordpress.com/”>Little Nicky Machiavelli</a>]… [ <a href=”http://www.authorsden.com/ianthorpe”>Ian’s Authorsden Pages</a> ]… [<a href=”http://bollocksallbollocks.blogspot.co.uk/”&gt; It’s Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks</a> ] [<a href=”https://www.scribd.com/ianrthorpe”>Scribd</a>%5D…%5B<a href=”http://www.wikinut.com/author~wgmhih/Ian-R-Thorpe/”>Wikinut</a>%5D … [<a href=”http://edbutt.blogspot.co.uk/”&gt; Boggart Abroad</a>] … [ <a href=”https://greenteeth.wordpress.com/”&gt; Grenteeth Bites</a> ] … [<a> Latest Posts</a> ] [<a href=”https://www.flickr.com/photos/61274520@N00/with/16869298039/”>Ian Thorpe at Flickr</a> ] … [<a href=”http://www.greenteethmm.com/latestposts.shtml”>Latest Posts</a>] … [ <a href=”https://www.tumblr.com/blog/boggart23″>Tumblr</a&gt; ] … [<a href=”https://www.minds.com/basil_hallward/blogs”>Ian at Minds</a> ] … [ <a href=”http://www.authorsden.com/visit/viewblog.asp?authorid=3523&#8243; target=”_blank”>Authorsden blog</a> ] … [<a href=”https://dailystirrer.wordpress.com/”>Daily Stirrer Headlines</a>]<br />
[ <a href=”https://www.facebook.com/ian.thorpe.961″>Ian at Facebook ]</a>

Here’s A Snippet From A Brilliant Article On Climate Change

Those building the biblical Tower of Babel, intending to reach heaven, did not know where heaven was and hence when the project would be finished, or at what cost.

Those setting out to solve the climate change problem now are in the same position. If we were to spend 10 or even 100 trillion dollars mitigating carbon dioxide emissions, what would happen to the climate? If we can’t evaluate whether reversing climate change would be value for money, why should we bother, when we can clearly identify many and better investments for such huge resources?

The forthcoming Paris meeting on climate change will be setting out to build a modern Tower of Babel.

READ FULL POST at Standpoint Magazine

The science STILL isn’t settled …

RELATED POSTS:
Climate Conference Agreement My Arse: Germany To Build Forty New Coal And Gas Power stations
Climate Predictions, Economics and Realities
Paris Climate conference: Scientists Debunk Global Warming Scaremongering

Boggart Abroad posts on Climate Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Authorsden blog ]

It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions

Time to bring a recent post of ours to this dying blog platform, mainly because The Independent ran a story today about climate scientists (remember that discredited bunch of crooks and liars) claiming that climate change / global warming is steaming ahead much faster that even their most doom laden, mathematically modelled predictions have ever suggested.

Well climate scientists have never knowingly told the truth about anything. So here’s a link to a site that tells it like it is, without adjusting the data or placing the data gathering equipment in pizza ovens.

from The Daily Stirrer:
As the climate change scare becomes more and more exposed for the money making fraud it always was, they green weirdie beardie, rope sandal wearing tree huggers get more hysterical and stupid in their arguments that we must all return to medieval lifestyles, the billionaires like Al Gore who hope to profit from it keep flogging the dead horse and the angrier and more vicious the left wing hate mobs become in their witch hunts.

More >>>
It Looks As If Carbon Credits Scam Has INCREASED CO2 Emissions

Majority of Climate Scientists Don’t Agree with ‘Consensus’ – Dutch Scientific Study

Interesting to note that the ‘97% consensus’ figure was arrived at by assuming all the reports that did not state specifically that climate change is NOT caused by Carbon Dioxide were assumed to agree that it is.

We have been told ad nauseum by the Warmageddonist lobby that 97% of ‘climate scientists’ agree with the United Nations position that runaway global warming (which is responsible for the overnight frosts we are getting in July here in norther England) is cause by Carbon Dioxide emissions from human activity.

The 97% consensus was of course a fictional device dreamed up by the owners of the dishonestly named Skeptical Science website and has been demolished many times by simple examination of the facts.

You can always spot science frauds and wankers of course, they spell skeptic with a k because they think it is more scientific (Helpful info: skepticos (Greek) – one who doubts; scepticus (late Latin) – one who questions official dogma.

The Skeptical Science wankers are wrong on all counts, there is no conceivable meaning or inflection of either that could be interpreted as meaning ‘one who professes an absolute belief in globalist propaganda and denies all evidence presented to challenge that propaganda.

Thus we expect Skeptical Science will soon be orchestrating hate mob attacks (similar to those used by the Spanish Inquisition in their campaign to root out heresy) in order to discredit the Dutch researchers who have carried out a survey of over 6000 climate scientists and found that over half disagree with the alleged consensus and the 43% who agree with the IPCC do not go so far as to blame carbon dioxide specifically but limit themselves to saying such warming as was seen between 1950 and 1996 was caused by ‘human activity’ (which could include but is not limited to prodigious shagging leading to a population explosion in third world countries, deforestation, geoengineering projects and intensive farming methods involving feeding cows farty food.

The study, by the PBL Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency (pdf – read online or download), a government body, invited 6550 scientists working in climate related fields, including climate physics, climate impact, and mitigation, to take part in a survey on their views of climate science.

Here’s more on that research project

Scientists investigating melting Arctic ice are being assassinated, Cambridge University professor claims

Cambridge Professor Peter Wadhams has made the astonishing claim that three scientists investigating the melting of Arctic ice may have been assassinated within the space of a few months.

Professor Wadhams who has previously been criticized by leaders of the green movement for allowing his paranoia to stray into alramism, said he feared being labelled a “looney” over his suspicion that the deaths of the scientists were more than just an ‘extraordinary’ coincidence (feared? I’d say he had proved it beyond reasonable doubt).

He insists his colleagues, one of whom was in a collision with a lorry while another fell downstairs while the third was stuck by lightening, could have been murdered and hinted that the oil industry or else sinister government forces might be implicated.

Murdered by lightening strike? Surely that would be a bit difficult to arrange, even for the CIA

The three scientists he identified – Seymour Laxon and Katherine Giles, both climate change scientists at University College London, and Tim Boyd of the Scottish Association for marine Science – all died within the space of a few months in early 2013.

Prof Wadhams said that in the weeks after Prof Laxon’s death he believed he was targeted by a lorry which tried to force him off the road. He reported the incident to the police.

Asked if he thought hitmen might have been behind the deaths, Prof Wadhams, who is Professor of ocean physics at Cambridge University, told The Telegraph: “Yes. I do believe assassins possibly murdered them but I can see that I would be thought of as a looney for believing this.

“But it’s just very odd coincidence that something like that should happen in such a brief period of time.”

He added: “They [the deaths] were accidents as far as anybody was able to tell but the fact they were clustered like that looked so weird.”

Asked who might have wanted them out the way, he replied: “I can only think of the oil lobby but I don’t think the oil lobby goes around killing people.”

The Daily Telegraph among others ran the story and the final comment published before the thread was closed as commenters demolished washams’ credibility and threw his sanity into doubt was this from Feminist_Future

It isn’t just anybody making these claims.

It’s a Professor at Cambridge University.

If any of the posters below has even one-tenth of the intellect required to become a Cambridge University Professor, I’d be amazed.

Well all your favourite blogger can say to that is I am amazed that a person as evidently dumbed down, brainwashed and conditioned to authority worship as Feminist Future can find the intelligence to hit the right keys so we must assume her comment was intended to read something like “Yarrrghurrum fladibuffle nugum pharlibut rijubum glar” but benefits from the ‘moneys writing Shakespeare’ equation. For myself I can honestly say I have never met a university professor who could be accurately described as intelligent. They are big on book learning (which can be acquired by rote) but short on life experience, a combination which results in an absence of practical skills.

Scientists setting off to study the arctic should forst read up on Norse myth they they would understand the risks involved with pissing off Ymir and his ice giants. Don’t fuck with the ancient gods, they can be nasty bastards as the picture shows.


Ymir, god of the arctic waste and leader of the ice giants (source)

"Punish Climate Change Liars" Demands Climate Change Liar

It is now, as of this month, eighteen years and four months since a year on year global increase in average tempersature was recorded and eight years and 11 months since Warmageddonist author Mark Lynas called for international criminal tribunals before which people guilty of being accused of “Climate Denial” (has anyone ever denied the climate?) would be subjected to show trials, found guiklty of being accused and sentened to death by cruel and unusual medieval tortures (OK I may be exaggerating a bit but you get the idea. And if you don’t, you will after reading the next few paragraphs

“I put [their climate change denial] in a similar moral category to Holocaust denial – except that this time the Holocaust is yet to come, and we still have time to avoid it. Those who try to ensure we don’t will one day have to answer for their crimes,” bleated the self rightous Lynas.

It is now two years and six months since Professor Richard Parncutt demanded that “climate change deniers” should be executed, writing: “In this article I am going to suggest that the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for influential GW deniers.

“I have always been opposed to the death penalty in all cases. […] Even mass murderers should not be executed, in my opinion. […] GW deniers fall into a completely different category.

“I don’t want to be a saint. I would just like my grandchildren and great grandchildren, and the human race in general, to enjoy the world that I have enjoyed, as much as I have enjoyed it. And to achieve that goal I think it is justified for a few heads to roll.”

But the Arctic ice cap, which we were told would disappear by 2011 is expanding rather quickly, Polar Bears, which we have been told were on the verge of extinction, are actually increasing in number and mistaking climate scientists sent to hassle them for free lunches courtesy of the Warmageddonist lobby. We were told that by 2013 there would be 50 million refugess, displaced from their homes by rising sea levels as melting ice caps flooded low lying areas. So far no refugees displaced due to global warming have been reported.

Global temperature shows no signs of warming, so advocates of man made global warming show no signs of thinking that perhaps, just maybe, those with a different opinion ought to be allowed to live, let alone be free to express their opinion.

The latest example of climate fascism comes from Adam Weinstein, writer and  self styled “poet laureate” at the Gawker online magazine . This clown has now joined the chorus, suggesting that climate change “liars” ought to be arrested and punished (h/t WUWT).

“Let’s make a clear distinction here, the self righteous Weinstein bleats, “I’m not talking about the man on the street who thinks Rush Limbaugh (a right wing radio shock jock) is right, and climate change is a socialist United Nations conspiracy foisted by a Muslim U.S. president on an unwitting public to erode its civil liberties,” he says.

“You all know that man. That man is an idiot. He is too stupid to do anything other than choke the earth’s atmosphere a little more with his Mr. Pibb burps and his F-150’s gassy exhaust. Few of us believers in climate change can do much more—or less—than he can.”

(Here Weinstein shows up what a repugnant, snobbish, superior, consescening, partonizing arsehole he is, he despises the man on the street, on whom he looks down from his ivory tower.

He continues, “Nor am I talking about simple skeptics, particularly the scientists who must constantly hypo-test our existing assumptions about the world in order to check their accuracy. That is part and parcel of the important public policy discussion about what we do next.”

No, Mr Weinstein says he is talking about “Rush and his multi-million-dollar ilk in the disinformation business,” rich people, presumably men, who use their power and wealth to “deny people the tools they need to inform themselves, to protect themselves against a scientifically proven threat to life and limb,” because they (the deniers) “have their heads jammed in the sand… or in a barrel of money.”

In other words anyone who disagrees with Mr. Weinstein’s opinion is an idiot. Well that attitude is about par for the course among American ‘liberal’ fascists.

Those people who do hold a differing opinion, Weinstein would like to see arrested, punished, and stopped. “Those denialists should face jail. They should face fines. They should face lawsuits from the classes of people whose lives and livelihoods are most threatened by denialist tactics,” he insists.

And so we see yet another ‘liberal’ intellectual return to the causus belli of modern liberal fascist, the urgent need to abolish free speech.

He bases his calls for fascistic action against global warming sceptics on a claim by the World Health Organisation that 150,000 people a year die thanks to climate change. But Eric Worrall, writing at Watts Up With That replies that the claim does not stand up to scrutiny.

Worrall draws attention to the fact that even the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which began to pump out the climate scaremongering back in 1990, “has failed to establish a link between CO2 and extreme weather.”

Moreover,  it is a well established biological fact that Carbon Dioxide is essential to the growth of vegitation, through the process of photosynthesis plants absorb energy from the sun and carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and convert it into tissue, outputting oxygen as a bonus.

I an always surprised as the number of people claiming to be ‘scientists’ in internet comment threads who appear to be blissfully unaware of this bascic biology lessoon. Perhaps they are all mathematicians and believe the universe and everything in it is made out of numbers and equations. Well mathematics is not a real science and people who believe the universe is made out of numbers are as deluded as the young earth creationists they despise.

The increases in CO2 that have taken place since the commencement of the Industrial revolution have actually been beneficial to the human inhabitants of earth. Crop yields have risen and satellites have recorded a greening of the planet in the region of 1.5 percent a year thanks to the fertilisation effect of higher CO2 levels.

RELATED POSTS:
America and UK Lead the World in Climate Scepticism
Several times now it has looked as if the climate chance scare was over as the enthusiasm of climate scitentists for changing real world data to fit in with the predictions of their mathematical models has been exposed. But as the scare was never about the environment, but was a scam to redistribute wealth from rich to poor countries, the politicians are throwing their propaganda budgets behind it again.

Vancouver Sun Interview With Award winning Physicist and Climate Change Sceptiv Freeman Dyson

Anti-Science – The Church Of Scienceology’s Latest Pejorative Term For People Who Think And Question.

We are not the only web site to take exception to accusations of being anti – science and all the other pejorative terms used by the Church Of Scienceology disciples to deflect criticism from independent minded people who are smart enough to ask Cui Bono? Which corporate business benefits.

IMF Attempts to Hide True Cost of Renewables
A new report ffrom the International Monetary Fund (IMF) claims Fossil fuel companies are benefiting from a global subsidy of £3.4 trillion a year. The figure dwarfs that of government handouts aimed at encouraging investors to put money into unprofitable renewable energy sources such as wind turbines. Total subsidies for renewables are stated to amount to £77 billion a year.

Global Warming Think Tank Brings Balance to Climate Science Debate

from my Facebook post

At a now defunct site named Gather, friends Graham , Vic, Kelli, and others not present here as far as I know, were often the targets of attempted bullying for our efforts to present a balanced view of the global warming debate in the face of a tsunami of government – watermelon (green on the outside, red on the iside) propaganda from a particularly obnoxious bunch of Warmageddonist zealots.

Well now they are getting their come uppance, we all agree the climate changes, we all agree we should look after the planet, but we sceptics were right, the whole carbon Dioxide driven Anthropogenic Global Warming scare was a scam to enable left wing government to tax their people to penury while obscenely rich bastards go obscenely richer by trading carbon credits and picking up subsisdies for not generating green electricity.

Anyone wishing to grovel will be graciously acknowledged.

Here’s a taster then follow the bold link to the full post:

The Royal Society has misrepresented current thinking on climate change by presenting new theories as established facts and leaving out evidence that doesn’t support man made global warming dogma, a group of climate scientists has claimed.

In December, the Royal Society published a Short Guide to Climate Science, which it presented as a definitive guide to all things climate science. It asks and answers 20 questions, some of which display clear bias within the phrasing of the question, such as “How do scientists know that recent climate change is largely caused by human activities?” and “Climate is always changing. Why is climate change of concern now?”

In response, the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) has produced The Small Print – What the Royal Society Left Out, in order to bring balance to the evidence base. It takes the Royal Society’s original 20 questions in turn and present a “fuller picture” on each.

Warmageddonists will claim of course that GWPF are ‘not proper scientists. But don’t proper scientists present ALL the evidence to back up their conclusions? So what does that make those research grant phishing cerry pickers at the Royal Society?