BBC Marginalises Truth Tellers

Its good to see the left in disarray and various left wing propaganda merchants at each others throats.

For the second time this month (and it’s only the 8th today) The Guardian is attacking those cover up kings at the BBC.

Jimmy Savile advertizes Stoke Manderville Hospital, from where he operated a brothel for celebrity necrophiliacs and famous people who like to have sex with basket cases (image source)

from The Guardian:

Nobody from John Humphrys in the morning to Evan Davis at night dares mention the tide of scandal that is swamping the BBC. It undermines their reporting of every abuse whistleblowers reveal. It reinforces the dirty common sense of British life that you must keep your head down and not tell the truth if you want to keep your job.

The scandal is simply this: the BBC is forcing out or demoting the journalists who exposed Jimmy Savile as a voracious abuser of girls. As Meirion Jones put it to me: “There is a small group of powerful people at the BBC who think it would have been better if the truth about Savile had never come out. And they aim to punish the reporters who revealed it.”

Jones was one of the BBC’s best investigative producers. He had suspected that Savile was not the “national treasure” the BBC, NHS, monarchy and public adored, ever since he had seen Savile take girls away in his car from an approved school his aunt ran in the 1970s. He broke the story which showed that Savile was one of the most prolific sex abusers in British history, and handed the BBC what would have been one of its biggest scoops. If it had run it. Which, of course, it did not. The editor of Newsnight banned the report. Thus began a cover-up which tore the BBC apart.

Read full article at Guardian online

While it is satisfying to see the walls of fortress Establishment crumbling, what is really irritarting at the moment in the number of libertarian bloggers (people who really should know better) clinging to the “move along now, nothing to see here, it all happened a long time ago so there’s no evidence.”

Well yes, right, let’s be a nation of smug, prissy, bourgeois twats like the 1950s and early 60s Britain I grew up in. Never talk about anything embarrassing, just pretend it didn’t happen.

Well no thanks because right up to recently the rich and famous were literally getting away with murder, their peers would close ranks and protect them. Look at the case of Lord Lucan, murdered their working class nanny having mistaken her for his wife, but his friends (as they admitted a few years ago) obstructed the murder investigation and helped him get away. We can only hope he lived out his years in abject misery.

Much the same happened with Savile, the paedophile, necrophile, crippleophile, retardophile, everyfuckingthingelseophile, glorified DJ and professional weirdo. The BBC covered for him for years. When I was doing bits of broadcasting for BBC local radio in the 1980s it was well know you didn’t leave the kids who volunteered as runners etc. alone with Savile. His proclivities were a running joke, sick I know but as he was so well protected by senior management it was impossible to do anything other than mock him.

Everyone knew. And as for the smug twats who now say, “There’s no evidence,” there is actually plenty of evidence that complaints about the pervy old bastard (and good old Uncle ‘two little boys’ Rolf, and Sturart Hall were simply ignored by those creepy, self righteous, self satisfied Marxist shits at the BBC, you know the ones, they want to import more foreign paedophiles to ‘culturally enrich’ young girls who are living in council care homes and who want to tell us all what we can and cannot think.

It’s time we rebelled. A vote for Lab, Con or LD is a vote for paedophiles, for cover ups, for accepting the fact that the government does not give a shit about the masses, so long as enough votes can be bought with state benefit payments to preserve the status quo.

RELATED POSTS:
Free Speech: Reporters Without Borders unblocks access to censored websites
It is surprising in view of what we now know about the collaboration between internet technology corporations and government security agencies that many people still think og the internet as a bastion of freedom. This page shows how easy it is for governments and corporations to censor web content.

Advertisements

Don Hale: Leon Brittan’s fingers were in everything relating to the Westminster child abuse scandal.

Don Hale after overturning a miscarriage of justice in The Bakewell Tart case (image source)

Don Hale, former editor of The Bury Messenger, close friend of (Baroness) Barbara Castle and eventual exposer of a miscarriage of justice in the ‘Bakewell Tart’ case has been frustrated by official efforts to keep the lid on the Westminster Paedophile Ring case and the role played by former Home Secretary Leon Brittan in covering up allegations of child abuse in which senior politicians, judges and civil servants were named as abusers.

Now that Brittan is dead he is no longer protected by British libel law, and Hale has been talking to US online news site The Daily Beast.

Previously Mr. Hale has alleged that former future Prime Minister Brittan was actively involved in a cover up of child abuse by a paedophile ring including prominent Westminster MPs.

In the Daily Beast interview he returns to the subject of a dossier on the abuse handed to him by Labour peer and then Cabinet Minister Barbara Castle, and later seized by Special Branch officers. The newsman says the content of that dossier was suppressed by Brittan. He says the then Home Secretary “was mentioned in everything you picked up, his fingerprints were over everything, he was the instigator”.

Brittan who passed away in January following a long battle with cancer had for several years faced growing questions over what he knew about allegations that a network of paedophiles had operated in Westminster during the 1980s.

He admitted receiving a file from Geoffrey Dickens, then a Conservative MP, regarding the allegations but insisted that he had acted properly in passing the documents over to officials for examination. A review in 2013 supported his claims. The dossier however had been lost.

Hale’s latest allegations put the spotlight back on Westminster as the scandal continues to grow. Days after Brittan’s death, Labour MP Tom Watson who has been pivotal in bringing the case back into the public domain said he spoke to several people who claim they were raped by the late politician. One male victim was a child when he was allegedly raped by Brittan.

“Many have urged me over the past two years to reveal allegations against Brittan using parliamentary privilege,” Watson told The Daily Mirror. “This allows MPs to say things that are not subject to libel laws. Some will ask why I’ve waited until his death to speak out. The reason is simple. I didn’t want to prejudice any jury trial he might one day face.”

It is unfortunate that many authority worshippers on both the right and left have now decided to take the like that “it was all a long time ago and there is now no reliable evidence on which to prosecute the accused, let’s just forget it.

While it’s true that a fair trial would be difficult, it is not so much the named individuals, who are mostly very old, sick men, who are on trial but the establishment, the culture of closing ranks and covering each others’ arses when difficult questions are asked, and the question of whether we want to be ruled by an unaccountable elite.

Boggart Blog says it is the British political system that is on trial. And its conviction and execution for treason are long overdue.

Maggie Thatcher’s Willie

Jeremy Thorpe Jeremy Thorpe – No relation

Sensational New Westminster Child Abuse Claims: Mrs. Thatcher’s Willie Ordered The Cover Up

Every Woman should have a Willie, Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher once famously said. Maggie’s Willie was William Whitelaw, Home Secretary in her government and old Iron Knicker’s most loyal supporter.

Now Police are launching a probe into the most sensational claims yet to surface in the VIP child sex abuse ring scandal. It has been alleged that Whitelaw ordered police to scrap an inquiry into MPs involvement.

Detectives are beginning an investigation into claims that former Conservative Home Secretary ordered police to abandon an active investigation into the VIP paedophile ring alleged to have operated in Westminster from the 1980s.

Whitelaw allegedly ordered senior Metropolitan Police officers to scrap a year-long investigation into a paedophile ring that was suspected of abusing 40 children, the youngest of whom was six. Whitelaw’s alleged intervention, surely a prima facie case of perverting the course of justice, happened in 1980 after a newspaper report revealed crown prosecutors were looking at 350 possible sex abuse offences, including allegations it ‘obtained young boys for politicians, prominent lawyers and film stars’.

The story, which was first published on July 7, 1980, that year in the London Evening News revealed police had put evidence in front of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) against several, possibly as many as twelve men who could face trial for procuring boys for immoral purposes and for sexual offences against boys.

And while we are on the topic of senior politicians’ involvement in sex scandals can I just remind readers that former Liberal Leader, rent – boy user and dog killer Jeremy Thorpe is no relation. I have traced the family back eight generations and found that while he is one of those effete, dodgy, silk pajama wearing East Anglian Thorpes, our branch of the clan are solid, reliable Northern Thorpes (from south Durham and Westmorland originally). Nothing soft about us. We don’t wear silk pajamas, we wear the uncured skins of Woolly Mammoths we have strangled with our bare hands.

Child sex abuse inquiry in crisis as victims walk away

Storm coulds gather over Westminster as anti – establishment mood gathers momentum

In yet another blow to the credibility of the establishment, the proposed inquiry into the alleged cover up of the crimes of paedophiles high up in the political, legal, media and business world appears to be falling apart because of repeated attempts to pack the inquiry with establishemt figures.

Alleged victims of abuse involved in the historic abuse case currently being investigated by MPs and police have advised Home Secretary Theresa May, that they are ready to withdraw support from the Government’s child sex inquiry. Twenty-three individuals, some of whom claim as children they suffered serious and prolonged abuse at the hands on senior Members of Parliament, Senior Civil servants and other high ranking figures in the public sector, sent Mrs May a letter claiming the inquiry is “not fit for purpose”.

The threat comes ahead of a meeting between Mrs. May and her advisers and representatives of victim support groups for child sex abuse survivors on Friday which could lead to the inquiry being further undermined. Already the inquiry has been delayed twice when people appointed to lead it, Baroness Butler-Sloss and Fiona Woolf were revealed to have business, social or political links with people named among the alleged abusers.

The chief executive of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood (NAPAC), Peter Saunders, said his group would withdraw support for the inquiry if Mrs May does not pledge to give it statutory status, which would vastly increase its powers to subpoena evidence.

“We are the largest survivors’ group and we have some very significant concerns about this inquiry,” Mr Saunders said.

“Mrs May has said she is willing to meet us about our requests but if she says no we will probably walk away.

“I am not hopeful that we will get what we want.

“The Home Secretary has said she is willing to consider granting the inquiry statutory status at some point in the future but that she will not do so at this stage.

“We think this is wrong – it’s a deal-breaker.”

The withdrawal of NAPAC and other support groups would be a major blow to the credibility of any inquiry.

Read more in the Westminster Paedophile cover Up Scandal

Westminster Paedophile Cover Up: This Is Hot Stuff

I’m on my teeny weeny notebook today because I’m out of the house all day, so this will be brief but cannot go without being recorded on Boggart Blog.

As you know we’ve been following the paedophile scandals from when the first stories about the depravity of a certain DJ / TV Presenter who ‘did a lot for charidee though he didn’t talk about it’ (but made sure everyone else did.

We were one of the first blogs to name Leon Brittan in connection with the allegations and throughout our concern with the case has not been about the abuse. Appalling though that was, others have commented on it. Boggart Blog’s concern has been about the way this story has been covered up by the elite, evidence has been destroyed and certain people have conveniently disappeared of died in suspicious circumstances that were never properly investigated.

Well after months of mounting pressure from alternative media and certain mainstream new organisations (kudos The Sunday People, The Daily Mail and The Daily Mirror, good to see the rest are on the case at last) the story is getting very hot now. Thirty years too late for justice but not too late to smash the corrupt political and legal establishment.

from Breitbart London:

A former cabinet minister was photographed in a sauna with a naked boy at a hotel that is now believed to have been the centre of the Westminster paedophile ring, an MP has claimed. The photo formed part of evidence amassed by the former owner of the Elm Guest House in West London but has since been lost, according to Tory MP Zac Goldsmith.

Mr Goldsmith, who is the son of the billionaire financier Sir James Goldsmith, made the claim in a House of Commons debate on historic child sex abuse. He claimed he had become aware of “horrific events” at Elm Guest House because it is in his constituency of Richmond Park, West London.

The hotel was raided in 1982 and the owner Carole Kasir was convicted of “running a disorderly house”, which is a typical charge made against someone who owns a brothel. She had claimed she was unaware that the sexual conduct taking place was abusive, and claimed to be willing to give evidence in any case against her former customer. This led a number of child protection experts to demand action at the time, but these were ignored.

Goldsmith told the House of Commons: “We now know that there have been systematic cover-ups. Powerful people have done terrible things and they have been protected. [Continue reading]

RELATED POSTS:
Cover ups, child abuse and the elite – 10 articles
The Rochdale Grooming Scandal
Rotherham child abuse: Rape, forced prostitution and muder. Police and local authority ignored paedophile gang
Another racially sensitive paedophile scandal covered up in /birmingham
14 Somali Men Convicted of Raping and Pimping Underage Girls In Bristol
New Allegations – VIP paedophile ring ‘abused teenage boy INSIDE Buckingham Palace and Balmoral Castle’

Covering Up The Cover UP

So the cover up inquiry into the lost dossier on paedophiles in parliament allegedly handed to former Home Secretary Leon Brittan by the late Geoffrey Dickens MP and subsequently lost by Home Office staff (Brittan’s name figured in the list of kiddie fiddlers named by the dossier allegedly) has concluded that there is no proof the file was deliberately destroyed and therefore we must accept there was no cover up, neither this nor any previous or future government is, was or ever will be involved in wrongdoing of any kind and bloggers who keep asking awkward questions can fuck the fucking fuck off.

These conclusions have naturally aroused some sceptical responses,and not only from the blogosphere. Even some sections of the normally servile mainstream media are gobsmacked at the blatancy of the cover up.

But the story has raised one laugh for me. In the comment thread on the report carried by Breitbart London, which contained this composite picture of Dickens and Brittan …

Geoffrey Dickens Leon Brittan
Geoffrey Dickens (left) and Leon Brittan (image source)

… somebody tagged as Englebert has commented:

“Is Leon Brittans face real? It looks like he’s wearing a mask made from bits of dead people.”

Read full story and comment thread at Breitbart, London

RELATED POSTS:
Westminster child abuse and murder claims ‘tip of the iceberg’ in scandal, Home Secretary May warns
Birmingham Child Abuse report awaited
Cochdale Child Abuse Case posts
Rotherham child abuse case posts
The New World Order Paedophile Who Used His Status To Dodge Justice
Why do the political left love paedophiles so much

UK Health Watchdog: Studies Show Mobile Phones Do Cause Brain Tumours

first Published in The Daily Stirrer:

One of the reasons we set up The Daily Stirrer is because we, the founding old gits, were aware that many very big and ongoing stories that should have been making headline news were simply not being reported in the mainstream print and broadcast media. As long ago as the early 1980s I was doing a little broadcasting work with BBC radio, you could call it amateur broadcasting, I did get paid a little but was not doing it for money, they day job paid very well,) and at that time everybody in the BBC knew of the concerns about  the paedophile presenter Jimmy Savile’s sexual peccadillos. I say ‘concerns’ because it amounted to more than rumours. Stuart Hall who was with BBC North West was also a notorious sex pest and yet nothing was done about either, which was the focus of most comment among BBC people.

These were other stories that circulated for years but were kept out of the headlines by the establishment cover – up machine. The Pakistani grooming gangs springs to mind because of recent publicity. Not all were about sex however. One of the biggest stories that was dismissed as a ‘conspiracy theory’ by sneering scientists and self styled experts in the establishment press was the alleged link between heavy mobile phone use and increased risk of developing brain tumours. The decadence and corruption in the system has, like a stage four cancer spread everywhere.

Over the past last two years, following publication of metastudies like World Health Organisation’s International Agency For Research On Cancer report on the effects of radio frequency electromagnetic waves (.pdf) there is new evidence that mobile phones use can be dangerous to our health. A less technical summary of that is available from Cancer Research UK. Wireless phones, even those DECT systems you use with your landline so you can wander around with the handset, emit radio-frequency electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs) when in use. For a long time the media and scientists in the pay of telecommunications companies insisted there was no risk. They lied, as we have come to expect with everything.

Other studies carried out in the United Kingdom, Scandinavia, Italy and Israel have produced similar results, showing increased incidence particularly of giloma and acoustic neuroma in people who have been intense users of mobile phones over long periods.

The Daily Stirrer might stir things up but we don’t go in for scaremongering so let’s be clear now, so long as mobile phones are used sensibly there is very little risk. People who keep calls brief or use an earpiece so the device is not pressed against their skull are almost certainly safe (individuals have different levels of susceptibility to radio frequency energy), the risk is to those who are constantly on their mobile phone. Radio activity (yes your mobile phone is radio active as is your wi fi router and the kids remote controlled toys and almost everything, even bananas (A Banana A =Day Is More Dangerous Than Fukushima). Its very technical but a short sharp zap of radiation is less dangerous that prolonged, low level exposure. So keep your calls brief and well spaced out.

Other studies published over the last decade and met with similar disinterest from the media have shown an association between long-term mobile and cordless phone use with giloma and acoustic neuroma. In October 2013, Powerwatch, a United Kingdom–based watchdog focused on the health risks posed by electromagnetic fields, reported that two new research articles provide further evidence of mobile phone use as a cause of increased brain tumors.

The first paper showed that RF-EMF exposure from mobile (and cordless) phones should be regarded as a class 1 human carcinogen (cancer-causing agent), as defined by the WHO’s cancer research arm. The second the relationship between use of mobile phones over 10 years and the development of malignant brain tumours. The studies’ authors concluded that current exposure guidelines are in urgent need of revision.

I have always been aware of the risks having worked for nuclear power organisations in the 1980s and cellphone network companies in the 1990s. In the nuclear industry I learned something of how radiation affects human tissue, and in the cellular telecomms business it was hard to get away from health warnings about the dangers of prolonged exposure to electromagnetic fields as they were plastered over most pieces of equipment. Those items on my CV enabled me to join up the dots and see the picture the corporate bosses were paying their tame science tits to obfuscate.

I do wish the science academy would stop lying on behald of their corporate buddies though, it gets really tedious having to say “I told you so.”

RELATED POSTS:
Wi-Fi Radiation Warning By Lloyd’s of London – After Industry Denied The Risks
Canadian school boards and school medical health officers have been notified by their government’s Education Department that insurers Lloyd’s of London has excluded from school insurance cover any liability for injuries, “directly or indirectly arising out of, resulting from or contributed to by electromagnetic fields, electromagnetic radiation, electromagnetism, radio waves or noise.” …