An adult migrant has been sentenced by a Swedish court to a mere three years prison time for repeatedly raping an 11-year-old girl and twice making her pregnant. In addition to the three-year prison sentence, the Swedish court also ruled that the migrant would be deported but would be able to return to Sweden after 10 years.
The man, whose ethnic origin, birth nation and religious background have not been releassed by the authorities, is reportedly in his twenties, and embarked on an abusive sexual relationship with the child im the summer of 2018, repeatedly raping her throughout the summer months after convincing her it was normal for girls of her age to have sex with adults, according to Nyheter Idag.
It wasn’t July of 2019, that the migrant was finally arrested by police although his illegal relationship with the girl had been reported almost a year earlier. In September 2019 Swedish prosecutors finally charged the man with four counts of rape. The court found him guilty of three.
During the time she was being raped, the child victim fell pregnant twice. Swedish media has not been able to determine whether any of the pregnancies were taken to term. However, SVT did report that medical evidence that the rapist was the father on both occasions.
Despite the rapist denying having known the girl’s age, the Blekinge District Court found the migrant guilty and sentenced him to three years in prison. Thank’s to the polititocally correct Swedish government’s policy of hhandling migrant crime with kid gloves only two years will be served. The court also ordered the migrant rapist to pay damages of 22,000 euros and expelled him from Sweden for ten years. And in view of Sweden’s open doors immigration npolicy what’s the betting he’ll be back and raping again within six months
As we’ve said before, this blog started out as a social and political satire publication. Then about 2010 maybe, the virtue signalling of the political left and progressive liberals became so insane it was beyond sanity. This story illustrates how far beyond sanity we have travelled.
Church of England bishops (who else could be so far out of touch with reality?) are leading a campaign calling on the government to take a toughen up its position on on knife crime, in the wake of a massive upsurge in knife attacks and violent crime since the police were ordered to prioritise the investigation of ‘hate crime’ over pursuing real criminals. One of their suggestions is banning pointed kitchen knives. The suggestion has been met on social media with some confusion, and a lot of jokes.
Church leaders, with support from police, psychiatrists and politicians, penned an open letter to the government, arguing that domestic knives should be redesigned with rounded tips to reduce the number of life-threatening stabbing injuries being inflicted bt thugs with hunting knives, combat knives and machetes. They reportedly argue that pointed blades aren’t even needed in this day and age, given that we have forks to eat with. The useless old farts have obviouslt never skinned a rabbit or gutted a fish.
The absurdity of banning a common kitchen implement was pointed out by bemused netizens, particularly as the proposal comes after police recently announced that they will no longer post images of seized knives “to help reduce the fear of knives,” and as the Home Office uses takeaway packaging to basically tell people that stabbing is bad.
WTF? DON’T THEY UNDERSTAND THUGS THINK BEING BAD IS KOOL, SO TELLING THEN STABBING IS BAD WILL ONLY ENCOURAGE THEM?
Despite such highly effective crime-fighting tactics, the government seems to be having little actual effect on violent knife crime rates if official statistics cab ve believed, and efforts to ‘reach out’ to young criminas appears to be failing to reduce crime or assure the public that the problem is being dealt with.
Many Twitter users were baffled by the suggestion of a pointed kitchen knife ban, wondering if it’s some sort of joke, while others highlighted the fundamental futility of the idea by noting how easy it is to find an alternative sharply-pointed weapon, or to make one.
Some weighed in with creative alternatives to food preparation, should you find yourself bereft of a pointed kitchen knife.
And commenters across the pond were less than impressed with the ‘banning pointy knives’ proposal, with one saying: “When you Europeans get high and mighty about America’s guns and tell us we need to be more like you… this is what comes to mind.”
Video maker Amazing Polly investigates Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of crooked billionaire Robert Maxwell and long term girlfriend of suicided paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, Ghioslaine’s sisters and their family links to other crimes and scandals.
Returning to Epstein-related investigations, I look at Christine and Isabel’s multiple software ventures. I go beyond Magellan and look deeper at the Chili@d/FBI story and bring you some deeper information. more.. There are links here to the NSA, CIA, Intel, Microsoft, Google and many more. I don’t know if back-doors or other vulnerabilities were installed with the software.. but what if they were? – Amazing Polly
Wow this should be fun. Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine’s dear old dad was one of the biggest corporate crooks throughout the 1960s, 70s and 80s.
He finally disapoeared while cruising on his private yacht after the scandal of his plundering his media corporation’s pension funds to finance one of his crooked deals. His body was recovered but pathologists were unable to agree a cause of death.
Could the fact that he had a lot of dirt on the wealthy, powerful people who were at some stage involved in his dodgy schemes have had anything to do with it I wonder?
Let’s be realistic, when news broke that convicted paedophile and serial sex offender Jeffrey Epstain had been found dead in his prison cell having committed suicide while awaiting trial on further charges of having sex with and procuring for sex girls and boys under the legal age of consent, and trafficking under age people around the world for the purpose of prostitution, we all thought the “suicide” bit was FAKE NEWS.
When you consider that among Epstein’s known associates who had travelled on his “Lolita Express,” the private jet that ferried the rich and famous to Epstein’s private island in The Caribbean for “house parties,” included former U.S. President Bill Clinton, the second son of Queen Elizabeth of England, Prince Andrew, top civil rights lawyer Alan Dershowitz, former U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, actor Kevin Spacey and a host of wealthy and prominent figures from politics, business, law, entertainment and media, there were a lot of people who stood to lose both money and resputation if their names came out in a court case involving sexual misdemeanours. Now do you still believe the official narrative about Epstein hanging himself in prison?
Apparently Epstein’s defense team, the lawyers who would have tried to argue his case don’t buy the suicide narrative either. Reports are circulating that one of the lead lawyers voiced deep skepticism that Epstein hanged himself, while addressing a final hearing in a Manhattan US District Court on Tuesday, which was held to formally dismiss the charges as is typical in U.S. law when the accused is deceased, but also to still allow the testimony of crime victims to be heard in public.
Defense lawyer Reid Weingarten told Judge Richard Berman during the hearing that Epstein’s injuries were“far more consistent with assault”than suicide, especially the broken bones in his neck discovered during the autopsy after he was found dead in his jail cell on Aug. 10. It was previously revealed that Epstein’s defense attorneys had successfully lobbied for him to be taken off suicide watch on July 29, about a week before he was found dead in his cell, according to ABC News.
“Weingarten cited the defense’s own medical sources. Broken bones were found in Epstein’s neck during an autopsy after he died Aug. 10,” reports CNBC. “Such fractures are more common in cases of strangulation than in hanging.”
Weingarten told the court that Epstein didn’t appear suicidal during discussions with his lawyers and interactions the evening before his apparent early morning hours death. “We did not see a despairing, despondent, suicidal person,” the lawyer said.
Tuesday’s hearing was held to allow about 20 female witnesses, many choosing to remain anonymous, to tell the court and the world what happened to them at the hands of the wealthy sex predator and human trafficker.
Judge Berman wrote of the hearing, “The Court believes that where, as here, a defendant has died before any judgment has been entered against him, the public may still have an informational interest in the process by which the prosecutor seeks dismissal of an indictment.”
It would also appear, to Boggart Blog and The Daily Stirrer contributors that material seized from Epstein’s properties while he was held on remand contains, if reports are accurate, sufficient evidence to open investigations leading to the prosecution of several high profile Epstein associates. Ironically, this week’s District Court hearing marked the close of the federal criminal case and provide an excuse the sweep the whole sordid affair under the carpet, given Epstein’s “conveniently-timed” death.
Volvo CEO Hakan Samuelsson sent shockwaves through his country and the EU today when he said the Swedish car company company may have to consider moving its headquarters elsewhere. Volvo, he said, struggles to attract foreign specialists due to the lack of public security caused by the government’s failure to address the country’s soaring crime rate which is linked to mass immigration and the government’s refusal to deal with so called ‘no – go areas’ for police and energency services in Swedish towns and cities.
In Gothenburg, where the Volvo headquarters is located there have been gun battles in the streets between criminal gangs from rival immigrant communities vyinf for control of the lugrative drugs, sex and contraband trades. Human trafficking has also been a problem in Sweden that has not been dealt with because politically correct politicians, knowing the perpetrators were non – European, were reluctant to act for fear of ‘raising inter-racial tensions.
Speaking to the daily Svenska Dagbladet, Samuelsson lamented the fact that the auto manufacturer has been gradually losing its appeal to foreign tech experts and engineers, as well as top managers. The problem, according to him, partly lies in the fact that the specialists are reluctant to move to Sweden’s second largest city because of the high rate of violent crime.
“We are building cars, we cannot solve this problem,” Samuelsson told SvD. “Yet, one can still point out that this problem does exist.” Among the other issues he mentioned were the lack of affordable housing and schools. Part of th far – left government’s crazy immigration policy has been to give priority to immigrants, refugees and asylum seekers when allocating social housing, which has predictably resulted in a housing shortage.
The Volvo CEO mentioned that the company might seriously consider moving its headquarters out of Sweden if the situation does not change. He hastened to say that Volvo is not currently planning such a move, but he would not completely rule it out in the future.
Samuelsson’s words provoked an angry reaction from Gothenburg police chief Erik Nord, who dismissed them as “unfair.”
The general situation in the city is not that bad, he said, explaining that something that is seen as “normal” elsewhere somehow gets “undeservedly great attention” in Sweden.
However it is Police Chief Nord who is being unfair, like all government employees he is trying to pretend that the problems Samulesson highlighted do not exist. That they receive more media attention in Sweden than similar problems elsewhere is probably because until Sweden embarked upon its ‘open doors’ immigration policy, happily admitting criminals, fugitives, political agitators, terrorists and member of gangs involved in human trafficking, drug and gun running and modern slavery, it was probable one of the most orderly, law – abiding and safe nations in which to live.
Residents of the Swedish city of Oskarshamn will now have the option to be accompanied by armed police officers while out jogging.
The above comments made by a police inspector mirror a report from 2016 which acknowledged for the first time that the stratospheric rose in rape and other sex crimes was linked to the country’s policy of accepting all – comers, including hundreds of thousands of undocumented travellers, to claim residency, asylum or refugee status. The report also revealed that close to half of women in Sweden felt “very unsafe” at night alone in Swedish cities. According to the report, conducted by newspaper Aftonbladet, a further 43 per cent felt uncomfortable in Swedish cities even in the daytime.
The issue has been particularly bad in heavily migrant-populated suburbs many of which have been designated no-go zones due to lawlessness among the migrants. Though Sweden was never quite the socialist utopia it is often presented as by leftist media figure, when this reporter worked there arounf twenty years ago it was one of the safest places in Europe. Now many of the cities and large towns are torn by turf wars between crime gangs from various ethnic groups vying for control of the drugs and sex trades.
A survey conducted by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå) claimed that around half of the residents of problem areas were too afraid to leave their homes in the evenings. As Sweden’s violent crime rate has increasingly become the centre of national attention, more and more unorthodox solutions to the problems have been proposed. Last month, members of the Moderate Party even proposed deploying the military in no-go Muslim areas to aid police.
A new law suit filed in the USA complains that Google is helping the U.S. government circumvent constiutional protections in order to conduct warrantless searches on citizens. The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) has formally accused Google of scanning billions of personal files of users at the request of the U.S. government. EPIC recently filed a “friend of the court” brief alleging that Google is helping the U.S. government conduct warrantless searches by scanning user files in search of potentially illegal content or evidence of crimes.
The new suit came in response to United States v. Wilson, a case in which it was shown Google scanned billions of users files in an attempt to identify images of children reported as lost or missing by the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC). After scanning images contained om users computers, Google contacts law enforcement agencies with information on individuals who have images that may show missing children. Unfortunately this entire process happens without permission from users or a warrant issued by a court, and without reasonable grounds to suspect the individuals whose files are accessed of involvement in any crome. EPIC’s brief argues that “because neither Google nor the government explained how the image matching technique actually works or presented evidence establishing accuracy and reliability, the government’s search was unreasonable.”
EPIC claims the situation allows law enforcement oficers to ignore civil rights protections against unreasonable search and seizure of property and conduct warrantless searches with help from Google.
“If, for example, police officials would like to examine the digital files of certain suspects, they can simply turn to Google, which will do all the searching for them – and without the time, expense or hassle of getting a warrant for this search,” CPO Magazine reports. “For police departments, warrantless searches of digital material would be one way to make their criminal investigations much easier.”
This particular case centres on a new Google algorithm that scans files to locate a specific image using image matching. Previously, the NCMEC was required to provide Google with image hashes, used to identify a unique image without showing the actual image. However, Google’s new algorithm uses image matching instead of image hashing. EPIC said the “lower court made a key mistake” by confusing file hashing with the more personal method of image matching.
EPIC’s concern centers around the ways this technology might be used to target citizens for their religious or political affiliations, or even for viewing content security sgencies disapprove of. Remember, the US Govertnment under the Obama Administration, the UK Government under both Labour and Conservative Administeatuions, the German Government and the French government have all seriously considered crominalising the viewing and discussion of content questioning climate change, vaccine programs, military interventions in sovereign nations and criticism of Islam. After the shooting in Christchurch, New Zealand, (March 2019,) officials threatened jail time to any New Zealand citizen in possession of the shooter’s livestream video. With Google’s current policy, what’s to stop New Zealand’s law enforcement from asking Google to search user files for a copy of the banned “hate content”?
If Google continues to show the world they respect neither privacy laws or users’ civil rights, why are so many people still not only using the tool but waxing lyrical about how it has improved our lives? The realities are that Google’s search technology made it a lot easier to hide information governments or tech companies do not want you to see, and that corporations will work with governments to erode privacy—and thus, freedom — so long as they know huge numbers of people around the world will still believe what they are told to believe and carry on using the services of corrupt and totally self interested corporate entities.