Bill To ‘Stop Arming Terrorists’ Gets Only 13 Supporters
In a rare outbreak of common sense, a bill barring the US Federal Government from giving money and weapons to child murdering terrorists like the head amputators, slave dealers and human organ noshers of ISIS and Al Nusra (Barack Obama’s beloved ‘moderate rebels’,) garnered hardly any support from either the Democratic Perpetual War Party, or the Republican War Is Good Business Party.
The bill, introduced by Rep. Gabbard Tulsi [D-HI] and maverick Republican senator Rand Paul in the upper house was supported by only 13 members of the US House of Representatives and currently has zeroi support in the Senate.
Given the history of the American empire and its fostering of terrorist movements across the globe, and the generosity of the military / industrial complex to those politicians who serve their interest well, it should come as no surprise that the overwhelming majority of politicians would refuse to sign on to a law that requires them to forego that generosity by stopping the ‘ Arming of Terrorists.’
H.R.608 – Stop Arming Terrorists Act was introduced on January 23 of this year but has only recently been voted on. There are no strings attached, its a simple “We will no longer do this” proposition and its sponsors are a mix of Republicans and Democrats — highlighting that it transcends party lines.
“For years, our government has been providing both direct and indirect support to these armed militant groups, who are working directly with or under the command of terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda and ISIS, all in their effort and fight to overthrow the Syrian government,” Gabbard said in an interview earlier this year.
The text of the bill is simple. It merely states that it prohibits the use of federal agency funds to provide covered assistance to: (1) Al Qaeda, Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), or any individual or group that is affiliated with, associated with, cooperating with, or adherents to such groups; or (2) the government of any country that the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) determines has, within the most recent 12 months, provided covered assistance to such a group or individual.
It is of course a violation of the United Nations charter for any member nation to intervene or take sides in civil disputes and conflicts in any other sovereign states. The USA has consistently ignored this provision almost from the day the United Nations opened for business.
The only thing the bill does is prohibit the US government from giving money and weapons to people who want to murder Americans and who do murder innocent men, women, and children across the globe. Given its rational and humanitarian nature, one would expect representatives to be lining up to show their support.
After nearly 5 months since its introduction, only 13 of the 535 members of Congress have signed on as co-sponsors. What this lack of support proved is that the federal government is deeply involved in funding terror and has no intention of ever stopping it.
ISIS a US creationRumours have been rife for almost a year that ISIS/ISIL/ whatever you want to call them, the Islamist rebel group who have taken control of large areas of Syria and Iraq with the intention of setting up a new Islamic Caliphate, were actually set up by United Staes CIA agents with the aim of overthrowing secular Muslim dictators and helping the US ally Saudi Arabia impose theocratic rule throughout the Arab lands. A new leak proves that once again the ‘conspiracy theorists’ were right.
Iran’s Ayatollahs save SyriaPutin and
Now That Russia’s Putin and Iran’s Ayatollahs Have Neutralised ISIS in Syria the focus of terror shifts to Turkey, the NATO members that, with the fuill knowledge of the USA ans European powers has been helping ISIS in its bid to overthrow the Assad regime.
Treasure “Trove” Of ISIS Documents Detail Secret Oil Trade With Turkey
We detail the route by which ISIS transports illegal, undocumented crude to Turkey via Zakho-based smugglers and how that crude ends up at Ceyhan where tanker rates seem to mysteriously spike around ISIS-related oil events. All of this, we suggested, was done with the help of the Turkish government up to and including Erdogan’s son Bilal who owns a shipping company
USA Extends Drone war To Africa
So why we wonder is the USA taking its drone war against the third world into deepest, sub Sahran Africa? There cannot be any reason for it, the cited aim of neutralising Boko Haram is not valid because boko Haram are not a standing army but a guerilla force that strikes and then melts away into the civilian population.
EU Bosses Fear Brexit Domino Effect
European leaders met for the first time today to discuss the deal reached over changes to the conditions of Britain’s membership of the European Union. Public opinion in member states has led to fears that an out vote may prompt other EU member states to follow Britain’s lead.
Turkey Blames Kurds, Assad For Terrorist Attack, Vows Swift Response
Yesterday came the first terrorist attack on Turkish soil. As this blog predicted President Erdogan of Turkey is blaming the Kurds and President Assad of Syria for yesterday’s bomb blast in the Turkish capital which killed and injured many people.It was predictable would the attack would be blamed on Assad and the Kurds, thus giving the nutter Erdogan an excuse to intensify his actions against Assad and the Kurds
US Allies Now Fighting CIA-Backed Terror Groups In Syria
The idea that ISIS has very close links with the USA has gone beyond conspiracy theory, or anti US propaganda, the proof is out there. We have previously reported on the US government’s links to ISIS and revealed the vital role of NATO member Turkey in supporting the terrorists in their campaign which aims to create an Islamic Caliphate stretching from the Mediterranean Sea to the Persian Gulf
My friends and I have been telling you since the US led coalition invaded Afghanistan in 2001 that the USA’s perpetual war on terror was not about making the public safe and secure but instead about corporate profits and political power.
Crazy Obama Administration Claims It Brought Peace And Security To Syria In 2015
As fighting intensifies between ISIS, The Assad regime and its Russian, Iranian and Chinese allies and the FUKUS axis (France, UK, US) with support from Turkey as that rogue state wages a genocial campaign against the Kurds, the increasingly insane warmongers of the Obama administration is telling US voters they have brought peace and security to Syria Fortunately for Americans with enough nous to question the official narrative, new media is getting the truth out to ever increasing audiences.
Is The World Turning Against The New World Order Elitists 2015 looked like being a good year for the ‘New World Order’, the year the banksters and international psychopaths succeeded in provoking a global conflict as the final step to the establishment of a global government. Thanks largely to Vladimir Putin, and in a small part to the incessant questioning by new media we know know which NATO country has been acting as middle man for the powers that sponsor regime change, where the money that keeps the ISIS show on the road is coming from, and who our real enemies are …
Here at last is the story behind the shooting down of a Russian military jet by Turkey’s air force. It will also answer questions about how ISIS can afford all those Toyota pick up trucks, but it is not pleasant reading for people in the west who just want to hear that the good guys are winning
Leaders of the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) have made astonishing claim that Prime Minister Teresa May’s move to call an early General Election in June this year was done to pre-empt a series of by-elections that could be called following a police investigation into alleged electoral fraud. Accusing May and the Conservative government she leads of “putting party before country”, UKIP front man Paul Nuttall appeared to suggest an electoral fraud scandal and the ensuing disqualification of sitting members of The House of Commons could rob the government of its slender majority in parliament.
Mrs. May strongly denied she would call a snap election after being chosen, unopposed, as the Conservative leader following the resignation of David Cameron after he was humiliated when the country voted to leave the EU (Brexit). After parliament approved the invocation of the Article 50 Bill with a massive majority, with many of the unelected members of the House of Lords, along with a large section of Labour MPs, the Scottish Nationalists and Liberal Democrats along with a rebel faction in her own party promising they would prevent Brexit going ahead (in defiance of the democratic will,) The Prime minister today claimed she had “reluctantly” changed her mind.
Her U-turn also comes exactly a month after reports suggested Conservative Party figures were fearful of a series of by-elections that could be called after up to 20 of their MPs were alleged to have broken electoral law in the 2015 campaign, mostly in seats UKIP had a good chance of winning.
More than ten police forces have referred cases to the Crown Prosecution Service and lawyers are now considering whether to charge the MPs or their agents after a year long investigation.
“…The prospect of a slew of Tory-held by-elections caused by the seeming systematic breach of electoral law at the last election, predominantly in places where UKIP were pressing the Conservatives hard” could have influenced the decision to hold an election now, suggested Nuttall in a press statement.
Deputy UKIP leader Peter Whittle also said the decision was “utterly cynical”, adding: “But we’re having [a general election] now and my party is actually quite excited about it.” Speaking on the BBC’s Daily Politics, he said there was “no question” the Tories were acting out of self-interest.
With a referendum in Italy, ostensibly on constitutional reforms but perceived as a referendum on the leadership of the ruling elite, looming in November and the anti – globalisation, pro sovereignty Five Star Party growing in popularity all the time. Should the constitutional changes be voted down, and the against campaign is showing a comfortable lead in opinion polls at the moment, it will put a Quitaly in-out referendum, similar to the so called Brexit vote that kick off the process of Britain leaving the European Union, at the top of the agenda.
US Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton launched a hysterical, irrational attack, filled with half truths and blatant lies, against the most prominent figure in the campaign to get Britain out of the EU (Brexit), UK Independence Party leader Nigel Farage, during a speech at a rally today. Mrs Clinton, responding to Farage’s address to a large and enthusiastic audience at a Donald Trump rally, may have been rattled at the prospect of having such a hihly effective campaigner in the rival camp …
Brussels went too far, they crossed the line in moving from an economic union to a political pan – European political empire. In the end it was a race as to which member state would quit first, Britain, Natherlands, Denmark or Italy. In the event it is Britain.
Is Brexit A Harbinger Of Doom For The ‘Experts’
The Brexit vote, the decision by a democratic majority in Britain to leave the European Union has sent shockwaves around the world. Not only does the EU now face a tsunami of departures, the usurpation of democracy by ‘experts’ ( technocrats ) has been challenged and exposed as a sham.
Unless the testicularly deficient politicians stand up for their nations he only thing that will halt the European Union’s push beyond Europe’s geographical borders to incorporate Asian, middle eastern and north African nations is war. Power is addictive and the bean counters of Brussels have ambitions far beyond Europe.
The Hypocrisy and Snobbery Of The Remain Campaign And The Antidote
When I had to defriend a Facebook contact because she was arguing in favour of the EU, it was not simply because I support Brexit that I had become pissed of with her, it was the snobbish and condescending way she dismissed supporters of LEAVE and their case. People are entitled to their opinion on the European Union, but they should check the ‘facts’ they post in support of their arguments.
After my short intro is a savage indictment by Brexit supporting Labour MP Kate Hoey of the way the Labour Party has abandoned the working class and is now trying to betray the party’s proud heritage and its roots in the industrial areas by taking Britain into an undemocratic, corporate controlled, capitalist friendly, elite dominated globalist control freak project.
Few of you were aware probably that there is an EU referendum vote in The Netherlands this week. As usual with anything negative about the EU barely a word has been printed in the topic in mainstream media and the silence from our notionally unbiased national broadcaster The Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) has been deafening.
Europeans want us British to lead them out of Europe. Don’t be fooled by project fear, the European Union (aka the Euronazi Federal Superstate) is falling apart. There will not be chaos if we leave, there will be chaos if we stay.
Brexit would be the best result of Britainâ€™s in / out referendum for both Britain and the EU i a Belgian professor who heads up the European Institute at the London School of Economics (LSE) has said.
OK, I know a lot of you think Boris is most accurately described by a word many people find offensive, but heâ€™s put together a very good argument here on why we must leave the EU. Published in part here under â€˜fair useâ€™ terms and conditions, in the public interest …
David Cameron, who was apparently up all night trying to make other European leaders understand why his country needs a better deal in order to poersuade the prople it is a good idea stay in the EU. Unless Cameron gets what will enable him to sell the idea of surrendering national sovereignty to a Federal European Superstate ruled by a committee of unelected bureaucrats in to the British public he will not campaign for the UK to remain in the bloc
Austrian Chancellor Werner Faymann said at the E?U summit on British membership terms that the European Union wants to reach an agreement with the United Kingdom, but it is not prepared to compromise the banking union (financial integration) or the further integration of monetary union (UK being forced to abandon the pound join the Euro?) to achieve this goal.
Cameron’s EU Deal Worthless. It Can Be Vetoed In European Parliament?
Opinion polls show Britain is evenly divided on the question of whether to leave or remain in the EU, though it has been suggested up to 10 million other voters, many of them women, have yet to make a decision. How they cast their vote will shape the future of the world’s fifth largest economy and the EU itself. But what is really at stake is more important than economics …
It is generally accepted now that the alleged chemical weapons attack in Syria was a false flag and a number of possible reasons why Washington would engineer a stunt by the Islamists they have supported and supplied for four years in Syria (the same head amputating, human organ noshing, sex slave owning savages as Barack Hussein Obama beloved ‘moderate’ rebels) at a time when the rebels are on the back foot and President Assad’s forces, assisted by Iranian ground troops and Russian air support are within reach of defeating ISIS in Syria.
The one that most closely represents my view is that the atrocity was a diversion designed to shift attention away from the far worse atrocity in Mosul, Iraq, where a US led coalition is killing far more women and children every day as they indiscriminately bomb and shell rebel held parts or Iraq’s second largest city. Another is that the so called ‘Deep State’ in Washington, frustrated so far in their attempts to fabricate evidence of corrupt links between Donald Trump and Russia is now trying with some apparent success to manoeuvre him into being another warmongering puppet as Obama and George W Bush were.
Yet another (and the last one we will cover in this article is the scandal of an Obama administration White House staffer ordering the security agencies to spy on Trump and his team during the election campaign. A thorough investigation into the Obama administration’s surveillance of Donald Trump’s headquarters throughout the presidential campaign has led to the Wikileaks bombshell that Susan Rice, former Obama’s security adviser being outed as the official behind the spying which Obama claims he “knew nothing about” (his fallback position when a scandal threatens to touch him).
Rice’s revealing the names of Trump associates is evidence of an Abuse of Power. Predictably,the leftist media is circling the wagon-aiding and abetting a cover up of Susan Rice’s actions to divert attention from surveillance scandal that dwarfs Watergate while simultaneously closing ranks around Obama.
What Rice did was completely out of bounds and the cover up and media defending her is typical behavior from the radical left, should we just ignore it?
The part of the facts many people miss is her job was as a manager, a director who told others to conduct investigations and compile information, not herself. So why would a person that high up on the totem pole be doing an investigation only on Trump people?
Most reasonable observers believed or at least hoped that the nation would finally be spared having to listen to the Clinton and Obama administrations’ go-to liar after last November’s election. In the normal course of events, National Security Advisor Susan Rice would have simply packed her bags and vanished into well-paid obscurity at a “progressive” university or think tank. But it was not to be.
The woman who has been blamed with some accuracy for more fiascos than most can count is still with us. She first publicly demonstrated her bad judgment as far back as 1996 when as the Clinton National Security Council’s senior director for African affairs, she successfully urged the Clinton White House to refuse a Sudanese offer to turn al Qaeda’s Osama bin Laden over to the United States. Bin Laden had helped engineer the first World Trade Center bombing and, but for Ms. Rice, would have been taken down before he and his buddies finally brought the towers down eight years later.
No doubt gaining prestige for this sage advice, Ms. Rice steadily rose to become what passes for a foreign policy superstar in the Clinton and Obama world, finally ending up as President Obama’s national security adviser, where she worked internally to weaken this country’s support of Israel and was constantly available to heap praise on her boss and his accomplishments. She was selected by the White House communications team after the terrorist attack in Benghazi to falsely blame a hapless filmmaker for the debacle lest Mr. Obama’s re-election narrative that he had the terrorists on the run be jeopardized. It was then that Ms. Rice came into her own as a liar.
Utilizing talking points put together and given her by Obama aide Ben Rhodes, she took to the Sunday talk show circuit, appearing before every camera she could find to declare the filmmaker the villain while insisting that the White House and Mrs. Clinton were blameless. It wasn’t until Judicial Watch went to court to get copies of the Rhodes emails ordering her to lie to protect her bosses that the public began to appreciate her talent for telling whoppers.
Ultimately, her tour de force on Benghazi and later public claim that Army deserter Bowe Bergdahl was a hero captured by the enemy on the battlefield rather than the deserter everyone in the administration knew him to be cost her the job at the top of the foreign policy ladder. Chosen as Mrs. Clinton’s successor as secretary of State, Ms. Rice was forced to withdraw rather than face confirmation hearings in the Senate.
Now with the revelations earlier this week that it was she who “unmasked” the names of Trump associates overheard in conversations with foreign nationals picked up by U0.S. intelligence during the Trump campaign and transition, the lady is at it again. At first she claimed she had done nothing unusual, not realizing her actions were coming under scrutiny. Then she admitted that, yes, she had increased her requests to the intelligence agencies as the campaign heated up and through the transition, and that she was aided in her efforts by none other than her old friend and co-conspirator, Ben Rhodes. Once it was revealed that she was collecting data on the future president, she admitted the “unmasking,” but assured everyone that, as she told reporters, she had “leaked nothing to nobody.”
The only people who took her at her word were Clinton and Obama apologists who would, if called upon, praise the bright sunlight at midnight. Don Lemon and others at CNN immediately dismissed the facts revealed as “fake news” designed to malign Ms. Rice and the Democrats in an effort to divert attention from the Trump administration’s many sins and failings. The public isn’t buying it, knowing that being fooled once by a serial liar might be blamed on the liar, but anyone who could be fooled twice, three times or more by the likes of Ms. Rice can blame only themselves.
Those familiar with the way she went about collecting information on her boss’ political enemies know that she and Mr. Rhodes were running an unprecedented effort to politically weaponize the powerful tools put into the hands of the government to fight terrorism and turn them on those with whom they disagree. Michael Doran, a former National Security Council (NSC) senior director, was shocked at the enormity of what they had purportedly done, telling a reporter they had accessed “a stream of information that was supposed to be hermetically sealed from politics and the Obama administration found a way to blow a hole in the wall.”
Mr. Doran’s shock was echoed in the words of retired Col. James Waurishuk, former NSC aide and deputy director of U.S. Central Command, who told the Daily Caller, “This is really, really serious stuff.”
Indeed it is, and though Ms. Rice has dodged questions about whether she’ll willingly testify before congressional investigators on what she did, she should be required to do so if she has to be dragged up there kicking and screaming while being reminded that lying under oath is different from lying in front of a television camera.
Death Of Democracy: Why We Can’t Get The Government We Deserve And Vote For.
In every election campaign, in the UK, USA, Canada, Germany, France etc. politicians spout about delivering ‘change’. And yet every government we elect, no matter what label they wear or what coulour the use on campaign materials, seems just the same as the last, making the same promises and mistakes. Ever wondered why?
Just as was predicted, based on the fact that accusations came from high-ranking people in the US Democratic Party, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes confirmed on Sunday that no evidence of collusion between President Trump’s campaign and Russia has been forthcoming from members of the Democrat National Committee (DNC) or members of Hillary Clinton’s campaign team. Likewise, mainstream media organisations such as CNN, the New York Times and The Washington Post have offered nothing to back up reports of links between the Trump campaign and The Kremlin.
Maverick journalist Glenn Greenwald, who left a lucrative career with liberal media publications to form The Intercept and do the job political journalists should to by calling the powerful to account sums up the farce well, given the way these Russia conspiracies have drowned out other critical issues being virtually ignored under the Trump presidency, it’s vital that everything be done now to make clear what is based in evidence and what is based in partisan delusions. And most of what the Democratic base has been fed for the last six months by their unhinged stable of media, online, and party leaders has decisively fallen some way short of the truth or even a distant relative of the truth. Greenwald writes:
From MSNBC politics shows to town hall meetings across the country, the overarching issue for the Democratic Party’s base since Trump’s victory has been Russia, often suffocating attention for other issues. This fixation has persisted even though it has no chance to sink the Trump presidency unless it is proven that high levels of the Trump campaign actively colluded with the Kremlin to manipulate the outcome of the U.S. election — a claim for which absolutely no evidence has thus far been presented.
The principal problem for Democrats is that so many media figures and online charlatans are personally benefiting from feeding the base increasingly unhinged, fact-free conspiracies — just as right-wing media polemicists did after both Bill Clinton and Obama were elected — that there are now millions of partisan soldiers absolutely convinced of a Trump/Russia conspiracy for which, at least as of now, there is no evidence. And they are all waiting for the day, which they regard as inevitable and imminent, when this theory will be proven and Trump will be removed.
Donald Trump’s presidency is proving quite odd in many ways and a lot of this is due to Trump’s eccentric style of doing politics. But a break from the old ‘playground squabble’ standard of debate in which personalities dominated because both sides offered almost identical policies (defined for them by vested interests,) is what Americans voted for and if The Democrats want to effectively oppose Trump, rather than whining because he once said ‘pussy’ or screaming that he should be impeached because he is a Russian agent, they have to remove the Washington establishment old guard, The Clintons, Obama, Pelosi, Warren etc. and bring in some people who are able to understand the concerns of the majority of working Americans and drop the politically correct bullshit.
America’s Colour Revolution? Soros And The Clintons Ready To Lead.
We know already that the mobs protesting against Donald Trump’s victory in the US Presidential Election are being funded and organised by ‘philantrhopic’ groups sponsored by the billionaire trouble maker and Marxist activist George Soros, in fact the tactics hve a lot in common with the ‘colour revolutions’ seen in former Yugoslavia, Georgia, Ukraine, Kyrgyzstan, Belarus, Moldova and most recently the Arab Spring countries.
The Birth Of Cultural Marxism Ever wondered when and where the idiotic pseudo -philosophies of hippys and the idiotic and divisive politically correct dogmas of the modern left were born. The Social justice Warriors (aka ‘liberals’ or progressives’ though they are really neither of these things but instead are moralistic authoritarians who hate free speech and personal liberty and support censorship, government control of media and criminalisation of dissent.
Clinton E-mails Show When Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton Allowed George Soros To Dictate Foreign Policy
A set of e-mail messages included in the latest batch of Hillary Clinton documents released by Wikileaks (the September 2015 State Department dump) show that while Secretary of State of the United States, Mrs. Clinton received direct orders on U.S. foreign policy from the Hungarian-American billionaire George Soros, who has made a fortune out of manipulating markets (and trashed the economies of several third world countries in the process.)
Whatever political colour they paint themselves, the establishment stick together and whenever the peasants are revolting by exposing the scandals of elitist lawlessness they close ranks and cover up the most heinous crimes. It is therefore newsworthy when a member of the establishment attacks another, as US Senator Rand Paul has done, accusing Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton of crimes including perjury, fraud, theft, corruption, conspiracy.
Democracy Murdered In France
I’m hearing very disturbing news from the French regional elections, predicting that the Front National, comfortable winners in last week’s first round of regional elections, hasve been routed in all regions. For that to happen, and to happen through a massive increase in turnout, suggests electoral fraud on a hughe scale. Or has France joined Britain in adopting the Islamic version of democracy, which is one man one vote, one Imam one thousand votes.
Who Runs America, The White House Or The Shadow Government?
Reports of President Barack Obama’s meeting with Russian leader Vladimir Putin at the G20 summit over the weekend do not look right in the context of yet another blitz of provocative rhetoric from The Pentagon and the Department of Defence towards Moscow. In view of the USA’s constant push towards all out war with Russia, one has to ask who is in control: Obama or the generals?
Donald Trump is portrayed as a clown by mainstream media and his combover is the silliest I have ever seen. Still, he’s a billionaie so I don’t suppose he gives a flying fuck what The Daily Stirrer thinks of him. Not that we think he is all bad, anyone who attacks Obama’s global naziism trade deals, TTIP and TPP mush have some good points.
US Presidents Of The Past warned Against Secret, Shadow Government.
By now it should be obvious that peacemake, joybringer and putative aquatic pedestrian Barack Hussein Obama was never really in charge of the US Government. Whatever Obama said would happen, all the American government’s policies ensured the opposit would happen. The embedded article thows some light on how the US government really works
The American Political System Is “Not A Democracy Or Constitutional Republic” – Thiel The state of democracy in the USA has become a hot topic of conversation in American business circles in recent years. While President Barack Hussein Obama, not so much a man as an ego on long skinny legs, has increasingly been inclined to rule by executive order in the manner of a despot or tyrant, even Obama’s fiercest critics have to admit the American electoral system seems increasingly capable of delivering only political paralysis …
The left’s hysteria as their grip on power evaporates is wondrous to behold. With only irrational hatred to attack their opponents now the Marxist and socialist ideologies have failed, the latest target for their hate are that ill defined group, populists.
from Associated Press, Paris:
In Donald Trump, Europe’s populist leaders think they have found a champion.
The opening salvoes of Trump’s presidency, most notably his ban on immigration from seven Muslim-majority nations, are being gleefully milked by anti-Muslim lawmaker Geert Wilders in the Netherlands and other populist leaders in Germany, Italy and elsewhere who want to roll back the European Union and stem the influx of migrants and refugees.
Ignoring the anti-Trump protests, the wide criticism and legal challenges that have erupted over the new U.S. president’s ban, populists in Europe argue that Trump is proving that immigration can be stemmed, even stopped. They see a quick and decisive leader — and their latest weapon with which to attack the European governments and institutions they accuse of being soft on immigration. (Read more >>>)
Don’t you love the way this term ‘populist’ is being used by the Left to deride their ideological opponents. Originally, before it was hijacked by academics, lawyers, professional classes and neo – nazi capitalist billionaires the left was the populist movement.
Now, according to these wannabe elitists, any indigenous European who wishes to preserve their national identity, historical continuity and cultural heritage, is an evil, racist, bigot. And any politician who dares to represent them, is a shameful populist.
Seeing as parties on the Liberal Left are losing so much support all over the west by going out of their way to alienate their core vote, shouldn’t we start calling them the ‘Un-populist Left’? Or as they are not very bright perhaps we should keep it simple and just go for ‘Wankers’
The left, founded on the premise of championing the masses, has now turned anti-people, anti-liberty, anti – free speech and anti-sanity. Virtue signalling on social media seems to take precedence over listening to the concerns of the mass of people whose votes can carry the election. It is unbelievable how many people a trappreed by these new fascists, Britain’s Labour Party, the US Democrats, France’s Socialists etc. believing such groups speak for people in or seeking ordinary employment. These parties now have more in common with the kind of socialism represented by Hitler’s National Socialists or Mussolini’s Fascists than with the early campaigners who put their lives on the line to win a right to vote for the working classes. by camouflaging themselves as democrats, liberals, social democrats or socialists, they are for real quite the opposite as their efforts to suppress dissent and abolish the right to free speech reveals.
Hillary Clinton – her happy smiling face will charm voters (Image Source)
Hillary Clinton is expected to announce her anointment as US President Select candidacy for the US Presidency at noon today, which although as I write, the clock shows 3:15 pm, as I am in England the harpy’ Clinton’s announcement at noon US East Coast time means the news is still a couple of hours away.
Will Hilly be a good president. Well the current US President was chosen on the basis of his skin colour rather that his track record and a lot of Americans seem to be convinced that now they’ve had a black president, the next one must possess or have possessed at some time, tits.
I wonder how many American voters think it would be a good idea to have a president who has more functioning braincells than they have tits or testicles as the case may be. Not that I’m enitely convince Obama or his predecessor ever had a full set of testicles.
Here’s a rundown of the qualities Hillary would bring to the Presidency, from The Onion:
Here are some key things to know about the first Democrat to declare her candidacy…
Campaign Slogan: “I deserve this Campaign Strategy: Overwhelming tide of inevitability Spouse: Former Arkansas attorney general William Jefferson Clinton Wingspan: 7 feet, 6 inches Ideal Running Mate: Primary opponent who knows how to gracefully step aside when the time comes
Biggest Scandals: Deaths of four Americans at Benghazi, use of private email account for government emails, choice of Nina McLemore dress at a 1998 presidential function Grandchildren: One, but pushing Chelsea for one more before Iowa caucus Stance On Abortion: Supports a woman’s right to choose for her husband’s mistress Birthplace: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming Number Of Times Teeth Gritted To Date: 489,346 Things She Personally Understands As A Grandmother: Hope, faith, future, education, children, all that crap Greatest Fear: Charismatic young senators from the Midwest Number Of Big Macs That Fit In Mouth At One Time: 2 Biggest Challenge: Not completely blowing it.
Transexual ex rent boy to run for US Presidency? (Image source)
The good ol’ US of A, the land of opportunity where anybody can become President, they used to boast.
It’s still true to some extent. In the 21st century anybody can become President so long as they have multiple anointed minority status (like being a black, drug using ex – rent boy from a one parent family), or have House of Saud, the Saudi Arabian monarchy, as a backer.
Otherwise forget it, unless you are the child of a billionaire family who is the sibling or spouse of a former President named either Bush or Clinton.
Enter Hillary Rodham Clinton. And though Rod ’em should perhaps have been her hubby’s name, Hillary’s family, the Rodhams, are bilionaires. Hillary is a Democrat, but that’s not the only thing she has in common with Barack Obama.
No, she’s not a trannie who used to be a rent boy. Nnnnnooooo, she’s not a drug user. Nnnnnnnnnnnoooooooooooooooooooo, she’s not a closet Muslim – and neither is he, allegedly. The other thing she and Obama have in common is a belief they can change the rules on a whim.
When it comes to where Hillary Clinton gets her campaign money, the putative 2016 Democrat presidential front-runner has made her position clear: what difference does it make?
The Clinton Foundation certainly doesn’t think it makes any, since the giant nonprofit silently removed its rules forbidding foreign governments from making donations. Now, the fundraising arm of Bill and Hillary, Inc. can watched the money keep rolling in. (Echoes of Eva Peron)
According to the Wall Street Journal, “the foundation has raised at least $48 million from overseas governments since 2001. And some of this money comes from worrying sources.
For instance, one of the biggest donors is Saudi Arabia (sic), whose Shariah-on-steroids government has donated no less than $10 million of that total.
Another donor is a specific Canadian government agency interested in promoting the Keystone XL pipeline. While the Keystone XL pipeline is no doubt a beneficial project, it certainly creates the image of a conflict of interest, if not a quid pro quo relationship.
And then there’s another donor, Qatar. The small Arab nation has faced numerous human rights violations charges over its use of de facto slave labor in preparations for the 2022 World Cup, which it will be hosting (H/T Washington Free Beacon).
Of course, the Clinton Foundation denies any connection to whatever campaign Hillary may be planning. “The Clinton Foundation is a philanthropy, period, Clinton Foundation spokesman Craig Minassian said. (Well he would, wouldn’t he?).
But if that were truly the case, why would there have been any need to suspend foreign donations while Hillary Clinton was the secretary of state in the first place?
America’s extraordinary rendition site in Chicago
Whistleblower Exposes USA regime’s torture of it’s citizens. Just a couple of days ago we picked up a story from one of our favourite Whistleblower sites about a US Government Homeland Security site in Chicago where very strage things were going on. Our report compared it to The Ministry Of Love in Gorge Orwell’s novel 1984.