Transgender bullying is scaring respectable old organisations into silence

For years Katie Alcock had helped that pillar of middle class Britain, The Guide movemeny run Brownie and Girl Guide groups in her hometown, Lancaster. Then suddenly she was fired. The reason given in a statement by Girlguiding
(the trendy new name for the modern, gender – fluid Girl Guides was that Dr. Alcock,who in her day job in a lecturer and researcher in developmental psychology at Lancaster University, was she had violated its policies on equality and diversity.

Her offence was to suggest that science is correct and fashionable virtue signalling wrong, that people born male who simply say they must be accepted as real women because they feel female inside, should not automatically be welcomed by a female-only organisation and, for instance, share tents or bathrooms with adolescent girls. Remember, these biologically male women need not have surgically reconfigured genitals, we are required to accept that chicks-with-dicks are not likely to behave any differently in communal showers that girls who are born girls.

In any other context, Alcock’s views would be seen as plain old fashioned common sense. But when it comes to transgenderism, common sense has been thrown out of the window. Read her account of the incident HERE

Organisations like Girlguiding must now have policies safeguarding the rights of transgendered girls in interactions with real girls. We all know adolescent girls can be absolute bitches and capable of being unspeakably cruel if, for example, the new girl has to get her dick out while on a camping trip, and that those whose male anatomy gives them the potential to be a threat to those girls cannot be trusted in one on one situations (adolescent boys are notirious for misreading signals, cn we reasonably expect adolescent chicks-with-dicks to behave differently. In a sane world, Girlguiding would stand squarely behind Alcock.

So why, when the interests of transgender people are invoked, does Girlguiding operate a different standard? Why not organise joint camping trips with the scouts and arrange acommodation so boys and girls share tents and shower facilities in the name of diversity?

Girlguiding is not alone in this insanity however. Universities, local councils, the BBC, and charities are among organisations where women and who question badly thought out, scientifically incorrect, politically correct policies intended to promote transgender equality fear to express their opinions because to question the extreme left line would be career suicide.

A common concern is that measures intended to protect people born male who now identify as women or vice versa will have consequences for services and opportunities previously reserved for people born with biologically female bodies. Because there is no getting away from the science, women and men are physically different. We have already seen evidence of this unfairness to biological women in sport, where transgenderd weight lifters with typically male upper body strength (and typically male wedding tackle,) have anihilated the competition in womens’ events.

The question of toilets comes up with depressing frequency in this debate too. Many organisations are introducing “gender neutral” bathrooms, or designating women’s toilets as “gender neutral” to spare transgender people the awkward choice of risking ridicule by use the facility that aligns with their physical sex or their professed gender or a kneee in the bollocks by using the womens’ facilities.

It is all being done in the name of transgender ‘rights. ‘But what about women who aren’t happy sharing such private spaces with biological males? Or who worry that opening facilities and services formerly reserved for women to male-born transwomen (who are not surgically altered or even receiving hormone therapy is unfair on women who, according to feminist orthodoxy, have faced a lifetime of social and economic sexism? What about their rights. Where is the fairness in stripping a group of their right to the privacy of gender – segregated facilities in order to grant a small but completely unreasonable minority the privileges they demand.

There has already been a case in Britain of a convict who in his male persona was a convicted rapist, successfully convincing the authorities that he ‘felt he was a woman’ to obtain a transfer to a women only prison, where within a few months he was arrested and sent for trial on several counts of rape and sexual assault against female inmates.

And then there is Canadian the case of Jessica Yaniv, who has sued several beauty therapists to financial ruin because they refused to give her a bikini line was on her female cock and big, hairy ball sack.

RELATED POSTS:
Oxford Academics Turn On Gay BLT Propagandists For Pushing Unscientific Claims
Equality Institute: Don’t Say ‘Pregnant Women’ as ‘People of All Genders Can Fall Pregnant’
Far-Left Group Successfully ‘Bullies’ Newspapers Over Migrant, Transgender Stories>/a>
Sex Ed: Pupils To Be Taught Boys Can Have Periods Too
Oxford University transgenger row
Transgendered Ladies First
<a href="http://www.dailystirrer.com/2019-august.shtml/The Daily Stirrer – August 2019

You Couldn’t Make It Up

A few days ago this blog reported on the case of Vancouver man Jonathan Yaniv, who identifies as Jessica and wears little girl style party frocks. In politically correct Canada this is sufficient for him to be legally recognised as a woman.

Revelling in his new, legally but not visually affirmed feminine identity Jessica, who in his male persona as Jonathan is a convicted sex offender, has been harassing female beauticians who refuse to give him a bikini like wax job because – well in short he doesn’t have a bikini line, he still has his big, hairy old male dangly bits. And some ladies in the beauty business do not wish to handle such ugly things.

OK, so why am I repeating all this when it was reported last week? Well, because today I came across this news item at Press For Truth:

“’Jessica’ Yaniv UNHINGED! Press For Truth ASSAULTED At Tribunal Hearings!!! Jonathan Yaniv (who goes by the name ‘Jessica’) wants to FORCE other women to legally have to touch his genitals. While covering the tribunal hearings Dan Dicks of Press For Truth politely requested an interview but was met with an aggressive reaction which led to an assault.”

The whole story is beyond sanity of course, but what is so brilliant here is that the online news site reporter sent to cover the story of the man who wanted a bikini line wax on his cock and balls is called Dan Dicks!

You couldn’t make it up.

And for all you red blooded men out there, here’s another look at the lovely Jessica who, I’m sure you will agree, looks as feminine and alluring as a spotted dick pudding.

hes-a-laydee

RELATED POSTS:

13-year-old fights school policy allowing ‘trans girls’ into girls’ changing room
February 7, 2020 (Paul Smeaton, LifeSiteNews) – A 13-year-old UK girl is taking her local council to court after it issued guidance that would allow boys who identify as “transgender girls” to access girls’ bathrooms, changing rooms, and dormitory rooms on student trips.
The guidance was issued last year as part of the Oxfordshire County Council’s “Trans Inclusion Toolkit for School 2019” project.

 

Church Of The Bell End

You have to sympathise, even as you permit yourself a prurient snigger.

The elders of the Christian Science Church in Dixon, Illinois were so keen to show their respect for God’s creation they had their new Church building designed around an old oak tree that grew on the site.

The best laid plans of mice, men and Christian Scientists gan aft agley however, especially if the architect you hire is a bit of a dick, and now the church building is complete, the design has provided a lot of laughs amongst online communities. In pictures from Google Earth, you see, it looks like a limp knob.

Representatives say they intend to give the penis shaped building a “fig leaf” as soon as possible. So we will only get a laugh in the winter? No wonder this picture has gone viral on the internet.

church of bell end

Interestingly, the Christian Science creed teaches “love, growth and spiritual healing” based on teachings from the bible and the writings of founder Mary Baker Eddy. The church also has the slogan “rising up” as its motto.

Perhaps they should do a deal with the Catholics and get a “Church Of Our Lady” built next door. That might help thinks rise up a bit.

Darwin Awards? This Guy Is A Contender.

This ought to be a Stupid Criminal Of The Week Post but while what the man did was incredibly stupid I’m not sure it is criminal.

Arizona Man Accidentally Shoots His Penis Off – from A P

A Phoenix man accidentally blew his dick off in a supermarket parking lot, after he tucked his girlfriend’s “pink pistol in the waistband of his pants.” According to a stone-faced police officer on the scene in this ABC15 report, the gun then accidentally discharged, sending a bullet directly through his penis and through his left leg.

One of the inalienable rights American males will lay down their lives in defence of is their right to own and carry guns. We think the Bill Of Rights should be amended to legally empower every American male over 18 to give the gene pool a quick scrub by castrating himself. It’s their God-given right!

A Bit Of A Prick

Phillip Seaton, a 64 year old American has taken a doctor to court after his his entire penis was surgically removed without consent being obtained, during what should have been a routine circumcision.

Mr. Seaton woke up at the Jewish Hospital following the circumcision procedure in October 2007 to find not his foresking missing as he expected but his entire chopper chopped off.

Seaton, a lorry driver from Shelbyville, Kentucky, had been advise to have his foreskin removed to solve an inflammatatory condition. Surgeon, John Patterson, said a full knobectomy was necessary because the medical team discovered a rare and deadly form of penile cancer while performing the operation.

Lab tests later proved that Seaton had a type of cancer known as squamous cell carcinoma.

Mr Seaton’s lawyer, Kevin George, argued in court that as the situation was not an emergency as the cancer was not immediately life threatening the patient and his family should have been allowed to get a second opinion or at least given a chance to say goodbye. Mr. Seaton was never given the chance to descide if he would rather live in an emasculated state or die with his dick attached.

Attorney George told the court: “My client’s anger is justified because Dr Patterson his truncated his todger without asking; without giving him a choice; without giving him the opportunity to check around and talk to other people and find out the phsychological effects of living without a willie.”

In court, the amputee told jurors of the initial moment after being told his penis had been removed.

“I pulled the dressing up, and I didn’t see nothing. Then I came out of the restroom and I said I’m getting the hell out of this damn hospital.” As you would. In a drsssing gown. Without your dick.

Now Mr Seaton and his wife, Deborah, are seeking unspecified damages from John Patterson for “loss of service, love and affection”. Dr. Patterson told a Boggart Blog reporter, “What has the guy to complain about, that cancerous cock would have had to come off sooner or later. I think he’s being a bit of a prick about the whole business.”

Genital Profiling – We’re mad for it…

A couple of weeks ago French MEP and No 1 political hottie Rachida Dati, confused “inflation” with “fellatio” live on TV. Now it’s Brice Hortefeux’s turn. France’s answer to Theresa May committed his own Freudian slip while defending his country’s police force against the charge of ethnic profiling. Speaking on RTL’s “Le Grand Jury”, he momentarily confused “empreintes digitales” – fingerprint databases – with “empreintes génitales”. Well you don’t need to be a fluent French speaker – to recognise that’s something else entirely.

What a dick – or c***.

Now if it was Rachida who wanted to gential profile us most blokes would be well up for it.

racida_dati_afp