Picture: Rolling Stone
The phrase “My Body, My Choice” ought to make a inspirational rallying cry to motivate resistance to the assault on individual freedom that ha now beein going on all around the world for six months, as day after day the scaremongering propaganda from governments and agencies of the wannabe global government, the United Nations has piled scare story on scare story to inflate the treat posed to humanity by a relatavely trivial virus of dubious origin that allegedly escaped from a biological research laboratory in central China. My body, my choice, conveys an essential truth that applies to all of us in the liberal democracies and that we understand: “I have the right to claim sovereignty over my own body claim my own body and what is done to it.”
Why, then, are we being bullied into believing that when it comes to vaccinations during a declared pandemic (which bizarrely does not meet any of the traditional criteria for declaration of an epidemic,) are we now being told, “The government and the World Health Organisation will decide what is done with your body.”?
The vaccine has been the point of this pantomime since the first cases imn Europe and the USA were reported in February. Information leaked then suggested a vaccine would be ready in a matter of weeks which could only have been the case had vaccine developers known in advance what was coming. Unless, as many dismissed by deep state propaganda as “conspiracy theorists” have speculated, the purose of the vaccine is not to prevent a disease which will not harm 95% of us, but to enable a track and trace system that will destroy the last few sheds of privacy we enjoy. In other woerds the vaccine will not be about what’s it does (nothing,) but simply that you have been vaccinated.
There is a mass ‘disinformation’ war going on over vaccines right now. UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock has forbidden the media from printing any detrimental effects of vaccines in UK. This will intensify with increased media propaganda over the next few months.
It’s interesting they’re suggesting this magical vaccine will most likely reduce symptoms but not prevent or cure the ‘virus’. By definition a vaccime does not cure a disease, nor alleviate symptoms, it gives immunity aganist the disease. So what we will be offered is not a vaccine, which is unsurprising as no vaccine has ever been successful against an RNA virus, the simplist form of organism recognised in biology.
This is all just a smokescreen and propaganda.
The WHO will undoubtedly promote these vaccines as their investors are big pharma and their biggest donator is Bill Gates, whose vaccines, like the computer operating systems sold by his software company, are not fit for purpose. (Ask the government of India why they closed down Gates’ mass vaccination programs.)
We are told the wonders of modern science have made development of cOVID – 19 vaccines possible in an enormously truncated timeframe. If this is so, why have the same wonders of modern science not yet managed to produce a successful vaccine against influenzaq or the common cold as both these infections produce the same antibodies as all other strains of coronavirus.
The Covid vaccines are not about health. Their about control and profit.
It’s going to be impossible to get vaccination made mandatory but governments all over the world will try and get businesses, shops, airlines etc to implement no travel unless you can prove you’ve had it. From the perspective of governments this about total control over its citizens. They can track us now through smartphones, financial records, passports, internet use. If they link administration of the vaccine to a smartphone app (with those who don’t have a smartphone to remain under permanent lockdown,) every detail of our lives, movements, associations, purchases, leisure habits, everything, will be recorded.
Many people, especially criminals have fake passports, pay as you go phones and pay cash. By making vaccinations compulsory and doing away with cash they have
complete control over every aspect of your life.
This is why they are willing to destroy economies and why there’s no political opposition as the opposition parties in the political duopolies of Europe and North America would do exactly the same if in government.
It doesn’t effect any politician as they will sail off into the sunset after this with their big fat pensions.
Over 50 percent of the Covid deaths were from nursing homes in the US- rates higher than this elsewhere. Those from the nursing homes who died were already susceptible to ANY infection (remember 18/19 had near record low mortality rates) as they all had 2 or more serious co-morbidities. AND it was irresponsible, I would argue criminal, policy changes that hastened he death of these fragile people. We need investigations on this not partisan hackery.
As for the other 45% virtually ALL had pre-existing conditions and most also 65 plus. Stanford study (and anyone who is paying attention knows this) that <45 have effectively ZERO chance of dying from C19. And also WAY lower than the flu for those between 45-65. Only the ALREADY susceptible die from C19 unlike many other infectious diseases. We are not dealing with a health problem we are dealing with the corporate slaughter of our economies and rank political opportunism
Average age of “Death by Covid”: Austria 80+ years Source EMS;Canada 86 years Source HCSC;England 80+ years Source NHS;France 84 years Source SPF;Germany 82 years Source RKI;Italy 81 years Source ISS;Spain 82 years Source MDS; Switzerland 84 years Source BAG;United States 80 years Source CDC; Sweden 86 years Source FOHM
For anyone to think in terms of a “global pandemic” st to wipeout half the planet's population when age of deaths from the disease exceed average human lifespan while very few young healthy people are affected requires a high level of stupidity of a very sophisticated type of dishonesty.
Another of the ideas dismissed as a conspiracy theory by politicians, pundits and mainstream media is the suggestion that an agenda to murder elderly people is in play. I was astounded to read the remarks attributed to England’s deputy Chief Medical Officer Jonathan Van-Tam, who in an article for The Times titled Coronavirus for older people before Christmas. It appears that the plan, not surprisingly, is to vaccinate elderly people first. Van Tam goes on to say that because this demographic is most likely to die from coronavirus it should be accepted that the vaccine will forego the normal safety checks to be given to them i.e. it’s a trade off between (avoidable) deaths from a dodgy vaccine and likely deaths from coronavirus.
So the UK Government is openly admitting that any vaccine will not have undergone safety validation as per a normal development protocol, and that elderly people (and ultimately others presumably) will be openly and knowingly exposed to the risk of having untested toxic shite pumped into their arms. Is that even ethically acceptable?
It’s worthwhile to read, or re-read, the basis on which the WHO declared a “global pandemic.” CLICK HERE the short, 4 page report on this. The report is from early March, and upon reading it I had to shake my head in disbelief. They aren’t even making up scary scenarios or alarming accounts, that comes after their declaration proving how they manufactured a narrative. In fact while reading this I kept waiting for the indicators, the evidence in the report that there was something that should cause alarm.
WHO could not define a pandemic if it were ran up to them and pulled their collective pisser.
They cannot define a diagnosis of Covid19, so they have forged death certificates all over the globe through using patsy third parties. Enormous numbers of deaths deemed Covid19 deaths were not anything of the sort.
There is no global pandemic, there may have been mass infection of humans with some sort of coronavirus, but that has been endemic for decades, in fact we all carrry various types of coronavirus and many other viruses, they remain dormant until the host’s immune system is compromised and then attack (clever little buggers,) so it is not certain how a virus spreads from person to person. The top 50 staff at WHO should be put in prison for life if they challenge that statement, since they would be wilfully committing criminal lying to pursue an autocratic agenda utterly disocciated from medical need.
The PCR tests for SARS-CoV2 are unreliable and do not indicate any sort of disease severity nor viral load. They are not a disease diagnosis, they merely detect some viral nucleic acids. And if the tests were poorly designed (which is not the case, they were simply not designed as a diagnostic test for the presence of a pathogen,) they detect multiple forms of coronavirus, 99% of which will not cause Covid19.
People have to stop assigning any credibility to the Establishment, a nebulous entity only interested in maintaining its grip on power by any means..