It’s Not Euthanasia, Its Terminal Sedation OK!

I. love the cirumlocution. Terminal Sedation “My client did not murder Mr. Victim, M’lud, he merely terminally sedatet the man by hitting him in the face with a shovel.”

France’s Parliament yesterday held the first stage of a debate on a bill aimed at allowing doctors to keep sedate terminally ill patients with increasing does of drugs until death comes, amid national debate about whether to legalize euthanasia.

The proposed bill — backed by the Socialist government — stops short of recommending lethal injections and avoids the terms euthanasia or assisted suicide. Well terminal sedation is so much more user friendly.

Prime minister Manuel Valls praised “a reform that proclaims the right to die peacefully, in dignity and without suffering,” in a speech at France’s lower house of Parliament.

The measure would give people “the right to deep, continuous sedation until death” but only when their condition is life-threatening in the short term. Give a patient enough sedative of course and their condition will in the short term become life threatening.

It would also force doctors to follow end-of-life instructions whether they are expressed by the patients themselves or written in advance, if they are no longer able to express their will.

The further left you think you are, the further right you are.

I often write sarcastic blogs about the self righteous leftie whose wailing and gnashing of teeth over the most trivial issues (e.g. equal rights for goldfishes)deafens them to the arguments of more realistic commentators.

I’m sure these people hate me (in fact I know they do because several of them have told me so) for reminding them that the further to the left they think they are, the closer to Hitler’s Nazis they actually are, but to be hated by people like the stupid bitch who once told me that ten year olds John Venables and Robert Thompson, the killers of two year old James Bulger should not have been punished because “they were only babies and did not know what they were doing” is actually something of a triumph.

The full details of little James’ death (he was two remember, really a baby)have never been published because even the tabloids considered the systematic torture and terrorising of the child Venables and Thompson kidnapped for the pre meditated purpose of harming him was to horrific.

I have not seen the forensic report but have seen a resume of it, to say the people who inflicted such horrors did not, at age ten, know they were doing wrong requires a level of delusion usually only found in psychotic dictators like Joe Stalin, Adolf Hitler, Pol Pot and Idi Amin, or in sadistic serial killers, people so insane they can justify anything to themselves.

Not long ago, when I was slating the neo Nazi ravings of economist Paul Krugman who was recommending that political leaders of all nations sell their people into slavery to the bankers by abandoning economic discipline and just borrowing infinite amounts of fiat money.

“But you can’t criticize Krugman, he won a Nobel Prize for Economics someone told me. Yeah, and Barack Obama won a Nobel Prize for being a black, crack addicted rent boy, and Leymah Gbowee won one for being African, The European Union (EU) won one for shafting Greece, Portugal and Ireland, and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons won one for simply existing while having totally failed to eradicate chemical weapons.

So what of this great economist Krugman, what magical solution does he offer for the world’s ills, apart from selling ourselves into slavery?

Paul Krugman said back in February this year that in order for the collectivist welfare state (his words, not mine) to run smoothly higher taxes and death panels will be mandatory.

Don’t believe me? Are you gnashing your teeth and wailing, “But Krugman could not say that, he’s in favour of bearded queens in bridal gowns, he’s a good person”, here is is straight from the Nazi’s mouth as it were.

So there you have it,death panels, euthanasia, bureaucratic dictatorship, the left’s favourite economist places them right alongside Adolf Hitler and Joe Stalin whose track record for killing his own people made Hitler look like a novice.

Krugman made his comment at a time when the existence of death panels were steadfastly denied by Democrats and before Obamacare was brought to its knees by the pathological ineffectiveness of the state.
Is this what the people whose sacrifices we will commemorate on November 11 gave their lives for. Elitism, dictatorship and death panels.

Here’s a post from blogger Bill Todd who lives in The Phillipines (but not in a Typhoon affected area) talking about how shocked he is now that the mandatory euthanasia element of Obamacare is out in the open to find how many “liberals” support it.

The act does not state plainly of course that the government has granted itself power to order the termination of certain people or groups. What it does provide for is the setting up of panels to make a decision based on financial considerations about the level of care a person is entitled to. This would include the withdrawal of care in some cases. While the law does not state when these panels will be empowered, governments do not grant themselves powers unless they intend to use them. More on this

The only good news is the Obama Administration is having trouble finding people willing to serve on an Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB) for Obamacare (death panel) as The Daily Mail reports here.

Even the Democrats are turning against the Death Panels (as Sarah Palin dubbed them)or Independent Payment Advisory Boards, the sanitized title Obama’s politcally correct arse kissers supporters insist we must call them because The Chosen One, the peacemaker and joybringer would never kill people, oh no, those stupid Pakistanis, Yemenis and Afghans just got in the way of drones that had been sent to wipe out non-human targets. Political news website The Hill reports ObamaCare ‘death panel’ faces growing opposition from Democrats and joined Republicans in voting to repeal the bill. Unfortunately the Democrat controlled Senate refuse to consider the repeal issue.

Clearly then while Obama’s fascists still claim the Affordable care act (Obamacare) does not contain the words “death panels” it is a case of “a turd by any other name would smell as shitty.”

Those American Democrats who do acknowledge parts of the act could be interpreted as giving power of life and death over some patients to panels of bureaucrats, this is not like euthanasia as the intentions are benign. Well it was with the best of intentions that the notorious Liverpool Care Pathway was set up and that led to old people starving or dying of thirst in British hospitals because nurses had been ordered to withhold treatment.

And Hitler’s Aktion T4 programme which established death camps for the old, disabled and chronically sick was presented as a new way of caring for and rehabilitating invalids.

And Eugenics itself, the elimination of blacks, gays, gypsies, dwarves and people with congential defects actually looks quite inoffensive and well intentioned on paper. Of course words like camp and concentration are never mentioned in the paper plan. I don’t know what words the nazis used but it was probably “Government sponsored secure recreational facilities for member of minorities.”

Remember Schumpeter’s warning: Capitalism contains the seeds of its own destruction, socialism always leads to fascism.

GM babies? How About The Frankenstein Lobby Try A Bit Of Honesty And Call It Eugenics
As the British Parliament debated legalising the use of techniques to create three parent babies and the dishonest champions of scientific fascism claim is is a perfectly safe development to remove faulty genes from humanity and in no way similar to programs with the same aim carried out in Nazi Germany, we challenge them to be honest and admit what they propose is Eugenics, a morally repugnant quest to create a master race. And all three main political parties support it.

New World Order’s Pope Calls For Oligarchic Collectivism
In the first encyclical of his Primacy Francis, the New World Order’s Pope proved what many had suspected, that the ousting of conservative Pope Benedict was a fit up. By claaing for a new world order, global redistribution of wealth (from the por and middle income to the banks and corporations) and oligarchic collectivist global government, Francis revealed himself to be The New World Order’s hireling