Dearth Of Intelligence Online

Sometimes it is difficult, as we peregrinate around the web, to avoid plunging into the depths of despair.

Today I came across a nice little piece of satire on Minds.com from a member posting as Feministwit. The name along should tell most people this is a satirical blog.

Today’s post read:

As we take a look back at 2018, we can see a lot of progress. Other than Fox News, nearly every tv network is left leaning, with nearly all journalists openly left. Nearly all Hollywood entertainers espouse Liberal ideology. And several alt right commentators got banned from social media or otherwise silenced. Those that have tried to find platforms on alternative social media sites have been harassed, and in some case, those entire sites have had their revenue stream taken away, silencing thousands more. Those of us on the left have significantly moved closer to having complete a total control over all expression and public discord.

And once we finally have complete control over all speech, only then can we end fascism.

So far so good. but then came the comments. Not only were there people who did not get the joke, some actually fired of angry spiels about the stupidity of left wingers who believe such stuff. The internet really does have a lot to answer for. Let’s hava vada:

RAZINGCANE Jan 2, 2019, 3:25:13 PMedited

IF you’re a feminist what the fuck are you wearing skirts for, toots? And what the fuck is a “feminist” in a gender neutral world? A dinosaur??? or an anti-social fossil?? “As we take a look back at 2018, we can see a lot of progress. Other than Fox News, nearly every tv network is left leaning, with nearly all journalists openly left. Nearly all Hollywood entertainers espouse Liberal ideology.,,,”  This comment went on in the same vein for about a thousand words …

 

See original post and comment thread

Snowflake Special: Snowflake Professor blasts students for walking out of patronising lecture.

by Arthur Foxake
Story is a bit out of date but I sent it to drafts instead of live posts.

Students Walk Out of ‘Patronising’ Sexual Consent Class

We have been planning to start a run of posts on the plague of special snowflakism currently suppressing free speech and attacking the individials right to hold opinions that diverge from the dogmas of politicall correct fascism. Better late than never, so brace yourselves snowflakes, we’rew going to give you a rough ride.

In October 2016 the ‘Women’s Officer’ (Mother Hen) at the University of York labelled students “dangerously naive” after they responded to the imlementation of sexual consent classes, walking out en mass because they felt they were being “patronised”.

Students Union officers argued the “gender neutral” lessons were necessary to protect first-year students’ “physically and mental wellbeing”, following the nationwide moral panic concerning a supposed campus “rape crisis”. This rape crisis is not like the rape crises in Sweden and Germany where victims are gang raped by immigrants of a certain religion and lef bloody and broken, not is it like the mass rape cases in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, Birmingham and many other large town where young girls living in council; care were targeted by men of a certain religion and used as sex slaves. No, some of these university rapes involve young women going to be with men, having sex and then any time from the morning after up to several months later deciding they did not want to do it after all. Needless to say these stupid slappers are supported by feminist groups.

Around a quarter of the 5,000 youngsters summoned defiantly decided to leave the event, arguing that they did not need the lecture or wish to be framed as “potential rapists” by the feminist Women’s Officer.

“We’re Women’s Officers at the University of York. Earlier this year, we were elected after a cross-campus ballot in which we pledged to run consent talks. On Tuesday 27 September, we did just that”, wrote furious Student Union official Lucy Robinson, responding to the protest.

“If you’ve eaten a lasagne, would you automatically consider yourself an expert on Italian cuisine? Probably not. So why then, do we assume that 18-year-olds are experts on sexual consent, just because a number of them will have had sexual experiences?” she argued. Some one should have told her, “Calm down dear, Italian cuisine is a tad more complex than sexual consent.” In fact the act of eating a lasagne may render one knowledgeable about the item you have just eaten, but not knowledgeable on all Italian cuisine. Osso buco, Spaghetti alle Vongole , Cioppino or Chicken Cacciatorere all very different things to lasagne, just as missionary position, blow job, tie and tease or a bit of mild S & M are all different types of sex (and just don’t go anywhere near The Dutch Reverse Steamboat).

Third-year activist Ben Froughi did not agree. He distributed flyers outside the event, informing students that they had no obligation to sit through the classes, and encouraging them to take a stand. Quite right, if she says yes you are OK to keep going until she says no. On the other hand she cannot reasonable claim rape if she only says, No, stop! after you have stopped.

“When handing out the flyers to the final group of the day, one fresher stood beside me and shouted towards the group waiting to enter, ‘We don’t consent to consent talks!’ which got a laugh,” Mr. Froughi told York’s student paper Nouse.

Screen Shot 2016-10-01 at 17.23.31

“Consent talks are patronising; if students really need lessons in how to say yes or no then they should not be at university”, he argued.

“There is no ‘correct’ way to negotiate getting someone into bed with you. In suggesting that there is consent talks, perhaps most damaging of all, encourage women to interpret sexual experiences that have not been preceded by a lengthy, formal and sober contractual discussion as rape.

“Consent talks propagate the backward message that all women are potential victims and all men potential rapists”, he said.

However, the National Union of Students (NUS) guidelines state that universities have a duty to tell freshers the legal definitions of rape and sexual assault, citing wolf-whistles, heckling and jokes about rape as common examples of harassment. Well yes, but where does wise advice stop and self righteous stupidity start? In California there have been moves by the politically correct clueless cunts who run the US state to make men obtain written consent before they get down to serious business. This only made California and the politically correct paskudniaks who run the state governmen an even bigger laughing stock than when they tried to extend full human righs to goldfishes.

The National Union of Students commissioned a report in 2014 claiming that one in five students will experience some form of sexual harassment during their first week of term.
The stats were widely discredited, however, when it was revealed that to the warped, bigoted misandrious mindset of fat, ugly lezzas feminists “unwanted sexual advances”, such as asking a girl to dance, or offering to buy her a drink were classed as harassment .

York’s Feminist Students Union has hit the headlines before after they banned events marking International Men’s Day less than 24 hours after a male student at the University killed himself.
Around 200 staff, students and alumni described the idea of “equality for everyone” as “misogynistic rhetoric” and argued that a Men’s day was wrong “because women are structurally unequal to men”.

Well yes girls, you are structurally unequal to men because we are genetically programmed to take the bullet or blade, fight the monster or swin across the raging torrent to save your lives, so shut the fuck up or in future buy your own drinks and fight your own monster. Oh and if you decide to do a bit of prick teasing for fun, you may be lucky and only encounter gentlemanly types, but don’t always rely on a good outcome.

RELATED POSTS:

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [ It’s Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [Latest Posts] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]
[ Ian at Facebook ]

The Liberal Demotwats

The Liberal Democrats or Lib Dumbs as they are unaffectionately known, having spent 50 years banging the drum for feminism and calling for summary justice and instant, painful death for any man who looks at a woman and raises an appreciative eyebrow, are currently tearing themselves apart over whether it is OK to be a sex pest if you are a senior Liberal Democrat.

The Senior Liberal Demotwat in question is Lord ‘Fatty’ Rennard, not an elected MP but a campaign strategist who many credit for the Lib Dems climbing from ten MPs to a peak of over 60. This is not quite fair as most of the Lib Dems advance from The Liberal Party ragbag of mavericks, nutters, equal rights whiners, and natural dissidents (a faction in which I was included for many years) to a bunch of CHIMPS (Completely Hopeless In Most Political Situations (h/t Chris Spivey – and let’s all try to get that acronym into the dictionary, it’s brilliant) who aspired to rule the nation while showing themselves to be a bunch of lying, cheating, time – serving cocksuckers who in a sane world would not be allowed within a million miles of power.

lib dem election strategistThe Lib Dems campaign strategy wizard Lord Rennard (allegedly)

All current mainstream political parties are dependent of hypocrisy of course, Conservative and Labour have been at it for years. Conservative hypocrisy I find less repulsive because it goes: “We hate you common little oiks but don’t mind pretending we care until we are re – elected. Labour hypocrisy involves pretending to care and wanting to make everybody equal, so long as voters accept that on the Labour farm, some of the animals are more equal than others.

In the late 1980s the most hypocritical and elitist fringe of Labour split off to form the Social Democrats. Their version of hypocrisy went: “We really really do care about you and want everybody to see that us guilt tripped elitists care, so you common little people must accept that intellectually you are infants and not capable of running your own lives. you must therefore be grateful when we patronise you.

That is the kind of hypocrisy the social Democrats, on merging with The Liberal Party, gave to the new party, the Liberal Deomtwats.

The Rennard scandal, which now threatens to derail Nick Clegg’s leadership, is a prime example of Lib Dem hypocrisy.

Quite recently the party has another hypocrisyfest typical of the politically correct left when they refused to sack Portsmouth South MP Mike Hancock, allegedly a serial groper. Portsmouth City Council / Mike Hancock

Now I personally don’t think what Rennard or Hancock allegedly did constitutes major crimes, they deserved a slap on the face from the ladies concerned and a slap on the wrist from the Party whips (such an unfortunate term in cases like this) but while Michael Le Vell, William Roach, Rolf Harris, Dave Lee Travis and others go on trial for similar offences to those mentioned in the allegations against Hancock and Rennard, not only do the politicians get a free pass to Pervesville, their oh-so-politically-correct party did not even ask them to resign over what, if the Lib Dems had any credibility left, they must surely regard as a crime on a par with genocide.

But Liberal Democrats have no credibility. As mentioned I used to be a member of The Liberal Party when it was the traditional home for freethinkers, mavericks and non conformists. But that great tradition of liberalism went out of the window when the part leadership sniffed a bit of power. Now the elitists dominate, the eccentrics have gone (to the blogosphere, the greens or UKIP – who are far more liberal than any party of the LibLabCon coalition.

You want to know what the Lib Dems stand for these days (apart from equal rights for sex pests and paedophiles that is?) Here’s a quick summary of the Lib Dicks main policy initiatives..

Liberal Democrats support immediate entry to the Euro currency.
Liberal Democrats want to let 58,000 criminals out of jail to serve their sentences in the comfort of their own home.
Liberal Democrats want an amnesty for all Illegal Immigrants and Unrestricted Immigration.
Liberal Democrats want Unilateral Nuclear Disarmament.
Liberal Democrats want Wind Turbines to be the sole means of keeping electricity and the lights on. No Nuclear, Gas or Coal fired technology.
Liberal Democrats want to make Drug taking legal.

NB Liberal Democrats broke their manifesto Pledge on a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, broke their pre election pledge on University tuition fees and have supported many Parliamentary bills that go against their published policy. This would be acceptable on grounds of expediency if they were not so fond of getting oin their moral high horse.

In other words they are the anti – British party, the party most eager to take us into a Federal European superstate (and get themselves cushy jobs in the perves and peedos paradise that is Brussels?)

Liberal Democrats say one thing and do another – and then blame The Tories or Labour. They are the most dishonest party in British Politics. Ah well, as the late, great Bernard Levin one said, “The least amount of power leads to the greatest desire to abuse it.

RELATED POSTS:
Von Rompuy Pumpy wants to shaft you through the back door
Boggart Blog Outs Paedo Politician
Why Do The Left Love Paedophiles
The New World Order Paedopolitics, politicians,

All Animals are Equal, But Some are More Equal Than Other

So Harriet Harperson thinks that men are no good.

Well I have to relate this little incident, it ranks along there with us girls not being able to read a map (I can cos I’m a tomboy); not being able to tell our left from right, and not being able to go to the toilet on our own when we are out at night.

At the petrol station yesterday with BBC. A woman stops her Audi at the pumps and retrieves a jerrycan from the boot. She then spend a good few minutes trying to get the top off before looking around desperately, her eyes finally alighting on BBC.

Over she trots and politely asks if he can help her get her top off, on the gerrycan that is, it wasn’t Jordan for heaven’s sake.
BBC takes the jerycan from her and with a deft flick of the wrist unscrews the can in about two nanoseconds.

So Harrriet, you may think you can run the country better but how would you get the marmalade on your toast without a chap to undo the lid for you?