The ‘Hunger Stones’ Crush Climate Change ‘Warmageddon’ Scaremongers.

Authored by Martin Armstrong via ArmstrongEconomics.com,

Every time during the past twenty years when there has been a spell of unusually hot weather, the Global Warming fanatics have come crawling out from under the stones they hope wil protect them from the rampant sun’s merciless rays, screaming, “We told you so, you horrible climate deniers, the earth is being fried because you insist on driving cars, heating your homes, cooking you food and earning a living. And while they blether incoherently and unscientifically about carbon dioxide and human activity they continue to ignore history. The extreme heat in Europe this year is part of well (if unusually documented) irregular cycle.

Swings from extreme heat to extreme cold have been going on throughout recorded history. They have been recorded by medieval monks, renaissance era scholars, enlightenment era scientists and since the medieval era at least, by people with club hammers and stone chisels. One of the most unusual but irrefutable sets of historical evidence we have, and which is ignored by climate change scaremongers are known as the Hunger Stones.

Pictured above is a Hunger Stone from 1616 which has been exposed by the low level of water in the Elbe River.

Such events have been recorded when drought has resulted in the low level of water in the Elbe river.

The above scene is at Decin, in the Czech Republic. Throughout the centuries, there have been cycles of extreme heat followed by extreme cold (e.g. so called the mini ice age, when the River Thames in London froze each winter for several years and Londoners held ‘frost fairs’ on the ice).  Such fairs were also common in Europe where continental weather effcts generally make the winters colder than Britain’s

The hot, dry weather in Europe has, for the recorded time in over a century, exposed  the Hunger Stones that have been used for centuries to commemorate historic droughts which warn of their consequences when you see these stones again.It might be unwise to infer anything from this gap, given Europe’s political history in the twentieth centure it’s possible droughts occurred at times when people in Germany and central Europe faced bigger worries than drought.

The Hunger Stones are visible this year in the Elbe a major river which rises in the Czech Republic and flows west through Germany. There are more than a dozen Hunger Stones that serve as records of previous droughts establishing that the extreme heat and drought of this year is by no means unique to history.

The various Hunger Stones record droughts droughts that resulted in crop failure and famine on the stones dated 1417, 1616, 1707, 1746, 1790, 1800, 1811, 1830, 1842, 1868, 1892, and 1893, which covers a period of 476 years, which would take us from the end of the ‘medieval warm period’ to the end of the nineteenth century.You may remember in one of the most notorious global warming frauds, Professor Michael Mann, creator of the now ridiculed ‘hockey stick graph’ erased the medieval warm period from history.

Basing his calculations on tree ring data from bog oaks, tree trunks preserved in peat bogs, which he claimed showed no unusual climate trends in the medieval warm period (which lasted several hundred years,) because the tree rings in preserved oaks pulled from north European bogs showed average or less than average growth. Mann only succeeded in proving he is either dishonest or stupid. Cool weather is not the only cause of poor growth rates as any gardener or a novice biology student could tell you. Hot, dry weather will adversely affect growth as will any unusually dry period. Trees and plants need carbon dioxide, oxygen, temeratures in the right range, and water to grow.

Some scientific types have already noted that if we look at the above drought data it produces a gap average of 39.6 years.This only proves that scientists, like Michael Mann are idiots and wankers. A quick glance at the data would show there’s no regular pattern there. An intelligent person would immediately understand this is not a scientific record and the data is probably incomplete.

It is worth noting that two drought years used to obtain that average, 1892 and 1893 are back-to-back. It’s highly unlikely there were two separate droughts,  it probable there was ab extended dry period. In fact, additional evidence that is being ignored by the Global Warming crowd who seem intent upon leading society to its doom by ignoring the past entirely and persuading governments we must suck every molecule of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere (thus making the existence on Earth of carbon based life – forms – i.e. everything including us,) impossible.

 

Scientific American Article Counsels People to ‘Chill Out’ over Global Warming

The usual hysteria which seems to inform any writings from the scientific community on climate change seems to have cooled significantly in recent months. Doomsday scenarios predicting the catastrophic effects of global warming are being dismissed as the work of research grant phishing frauds who cite output from mathematical models which use ‘adjusted data’ to perform their calculations. The ‘scientists’ involved in this scam are working for disaster capitalists who hope to profit from hugely costly schemes to mitigate the non – existent effects of marginal increases on atmospheric carbon dioxide. Their predictions are false and the human race will be able to accommodate whatever “climate change” throws at us, claims an unusually level – headed essay in Scientific American.

The essay, penned by John Horgan, the director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of Technology, analyzes two recent reports by “ecomodernists” who reject climate scaremongering look at the issue of climate change from the perspective of humanity’s ability to cope with it, in radically new terms.

One of the reports, titled “Enlightened Environmentalism” by Harvard iconoclast Steven Pinker, urges people to develop a logical perspective on climate, especially in the context scientific and technological benefits industrialization has brought.

Pooh-poohing “the mainstream environmental movement, and the radicalism and fatalism it encourages,” Pinker argues that humanity can solve problems related to climate change the same way it has solved myriad other problems, by harnessing “the benevolent forces of modernity.”

Separating himself from environmentalists who seem to think our salvation lies in medieval technologies such as windmills, Pinker asserts that industrialization “has been good for humanity.”

“It has fed billions, prolonged lifespans, reduced extreme poverty, and,through mechanisation and automation has feed the majority of people from a (short) lifetime of backbreaking, soul – destroying labour. All of this contributed to the emancipation women, and the availability of education to children form even the poorest backgrounds. It has allowed people to read at night, travel freely, stay warm in winter, see the world, and multiply human contact. Any costs in pollution and habitat loss have to be weighed against these gifts,” he says.

And just as human ingenuity has allowed us to overcome countless obstacles in the past, he notes, it is more than reasonable to suppose it will do so in the future as well.

I do not take such a rosy view, while medical science, technology and civil engineering have greatly increased longevity they have also caused new problems to replace those they solve, problems such as the population explosion in the third world and its attendant humanitarian crises, which we seem unable to propose any effective solutions to.

The other report cited by Horgan is arecent article by Will Boisvert titled “The Conquest of Climate,” which contends that the “consequences for human well-being will be small” even if human greenhouse emissions significantly warm the planet.

Boisvert, no “climate change denier,according to his track record has beendescribed as a “left-wing environmental expert, is ” yet he calls on warmageddonists to step back from doomsday forecasts that are unlikely to resemble with what will actually happen through the remainder of this century and beyond.

The report ridicules a 2016 Newsweek article predicting “Climate change could cause half a million deaths in 2050 due to reduced food availability,” which forecast the effects of climate change on agriculture, while failing to note that the study actually predicts much more abundant food availability in 2050 thanks to advances in agricultural productivity. These advances will “dwarf the effects of climate change,” he contends, and the “poorest countries will benefit most.”

In this case Boisvert is likely to be as far off target as those he criticizes, there are serious doubts about the claims of biotech companies about the assumed benefits of genetically modified seed, but like Pinkers, Boisvert tries to factor in what climate alarmists ignore: the capability of human beings to react to changing scenarios in remarkably ingenious ways.

He is correct however, in reminding his readers that: “Throughout history humans not only weathered climate crises but deliberately flung ourselves into them as we migrated away from our African homeland into deserts, mountains, floodplains and taiga.” To underline his point he notes the remarkable ingenuity shown by the Inuit in adapting to a hostile environment.

Greens, liberals and socialists have been getting their knickers in a twist over the impending disaster of climate change for twenty years and yet to date none of their predictions have come true. Polar bear numbers are increasing, the northern ice cap and Himalayan glaciers are still with us and the fifty million refugees displaced from their homes by rising sea levels are presumably hiding under a gigantic version of Harry Potter’s cloak of invisibility. The current climate change “crisis” that has just isn’t that big a deal, Boisvert argues and empirical evidence backs him up. It is merely the “latest episode in humanity’s ongoing conquest of extreme climates,” which will likewise “amount to just another problem in economic and technological development, and a middling-scale one at that.”

While sceptics and realists will welcome this departure from the usual climate change doom – mongering in Scientific American, establishment climate alarmists will undoubtedly be chagrined by the fact that both reports are published in the now discredited yardstick of scientific integrity, peer reviewed academic journals, will seek to discredit the reports, knowing they could affect not only the funding they depend on, but the ideologically driven left wing political programs they seek to impose on the world.

After all, if the world is not under imminent peril from climate change, who will listen to—and fund—the prophets of doom, or the Cultural Marxists’ demands for an authoritarian global government to save the planet.

RELATED POSTS:

Trump Announces US To Quit The Paris Climate Accord
Fulfilling another campaign pledge, US President Donald Trump yesterday announced the U.S. would withdraw from the Paris climate pact and that he will work to renegotiate the international agreement in a way that treats American workers better. “So we are getting out, but we will start to negotiate and we will see if we can …

German Scientist Confirms Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed ‘climate deniers’ have been telling you for years …

German Scientist Confims Climate Change Ia A Politically Motivated Scam
Even as the inbred idiot Prince Charles was babbling to a hand picked audience about the skid marks in his underpants being caused by Climate Change, a somewhat more scientifically literate person, Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert, a retired geologist and data computation expert, has confirmed what those of us dubbed ‘climate deniers’ have been telling …

Obama’s Climate Change Hypocrisy – The Arrogance Of The New Patricians
It is customary for US Presidents, when they leave office either having served two terms, been defeated in an election, or of their own volition, to fade quietly into the background. This is largely good manners, for an ex President to appear to be trying to intervene on political issues and influence events or public …

Big Business Joins Climate Change Scaremongers
The Paris summit on climate change approasches, which means the tree hugging fascist tendency are turning up the volume to eleven again. Trouble is they cannot produce a shed of evidence to back up their wild claims of imminent catastrophe because global warming only exists in their mathematical models, in the real world it is not happening/

Confusion Reigns As Paris Climate Conference Draws Near
The carbon dioxide driven climate change scam is back on the agenda as yet another monstrously expensive and fossil fulel gobbling jolly for politicians, scientists, freeloaders and general wankers gather to eat, drink, talk a lot and do nothing about a problem that exists in mathematical models but not in the real world.

Volkswagen Emissions Scandal – Is It The Tip Of The Iceberg?
The real problem here is that, driven by the hysterical warnings of self interested pseudo-scientists, politicians have set unachievable targets for reducing emissions while demanding that national economies keep growing.

Climate Denial Finally Pays Off
This blog has always been sceptical of the scientific case for climate change. And we admit that NO we are not climate scientists, NO we have not published research papers in ‘peer reviewed’ science journals. Of the three main contributors (all retired or semi retired) one is an engineer who still lectures in engineering and …

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax VIDEO
Nobel laureate Ivar Giaever’s speech at the Nobel Laureates meeting 1st July 2015. Ivar points out the mistakes which Obama makes in his speeches about global warming, and shares other not-well known facts about the state of the climate.

Charlotte Church blames Syria’s brutal civil war on CLIMATE CHANGE (not ISIS, Assad or Obama)
Last Nights QT: Stephen Kinnock, Leanne Woor (obscured) Charles Moore, David Dimbleby (host) Charlotte, Stephen Crabbe (Image source) Classical singer turned left wing fuckwit showed exactly what is wrong with the left on Question Time last night Climate change played a role in Syria’s conflict, according to Charlotte Church. Speaking as part of the panel …

The Pain In Spain as Green Energy Policy Fails

You will not find anything in mainstream media, either print or broadcast, about the failure of the green energy initiatives that have left Spain in dire economic strais or Denmark in the dark. Bizarre, as other governments are pressing ahead with plans to make us reliant on these crackpot schemes and intellectual wanks of mad scientists …


Climate Scientists versus Free Speech and Freedom Of Information

This week four groups, whose boards represent a distinctly liberal world view and who oppose scrutiny of taxpayer-funded science by academics, asked the University of Virginia to disregard its agreement before the court with American Tradition Institute to provide the records of former climate scientist Dr. Michael Mann, which belong to the public. The groups, led by the far-left Union of ….

Ever Changing Ocean

The scientists warn us climate change will cause massive extinctions, species will be destroyed, nations will die, the oceans will swamp huge areas of land as sea levels rise and lots of scaremongering stuff like that. But life in the seas has survived much worse catastrophes, much more violent changes than anything we puny humand can conjure up. It is a measure of the arrogance of humans in general and scientists in particular to imagine we puny humans could destroy the planet.also availabe HERE

Climate Change and the Population Explosion
In all the debates about climate change and the effect of carbon dioxide emissions on the environment there is one issue that has a huge bearing on humanity’s relationship with our planet that neither politicians nor scientists will discuss. Population growth. So a philosopher has to step up to the mark and ask why people are encouraged to have children when we face so many population related problems?

Here’s A Snippet From A Brilliant Article On Climate Change
Those building the biblical Tower of Babel, intending to reach heaven, did not know where heaven was and hence when the project would be finished, or at what cost. Those setting out to solve the climate change problem now are in the same position. If we were to spend 10 or even 100 trillion dollars …

The Great Wind Turbine Catastrophe

Because of failure to invest in new coal and nuclear powered generating plants to provide the electric energy we need Briain now faces a serious shortfall in electricity supply as old stations, already well past their planned lifespan are forced to close. Seduced by the voices of academics and the science lobby, the government seems foolishly determined to rely on wind turbines for future electricity needs.


Lib Dem Energy Minister Wants You To Sit In The Dark While Foreign Billionaires Steal You Money

The Energy Secretaru Ed Davey, one of the most senior Liberal Democrats in the Coalition government has banned Conservative junior minister John Hayes, a new face in the Department of Energy, from making remarks about the spread of wind farms after he told newspapers …

Majority of Climate Scientists Don’t Agree with ?Consensus’ – Dutch Scientific Study
Interesting to note that the ‘97% consensus’ figure was arrived at by assuming all the reports that did not state specifically that climate change is NOT caused by Carbon Dioxide were assumed to agree that it is. We have been told ad nauseum by the Warmageddonist lobby that 97% of ‘climate scientists’ agree with the …

Obama Administration To Tell Americans, ‘We’ll Decide What Kind Of Car You Can Drive’

A report curculating around American news blogs has some bizarre possibilities as you can see by following this link:

Global Warming Omnibus page
Our shorter posts on global warming, climate change and all the fake science and bogus predictions that have helped Al Gore and others to make billions and propelled the world towards a global authoritarian government. This huge page has an active contents list and works like a kindle ebook.

"Punish Climate Change Liars" Demands Climate Change Liar

It is now, as of this month, eighteen years and four months since a year on year global increase in average tempersature was recorded and eight years and 11 months since Warmageddonist author Mark Lynas called for international criminal tribunals before which people guilty of being accused of “Climate Denial” (has anyone ever denied the climate?) would be subjected to show trials, found guiklty of being accused and sentened to death by cruel and unusual medieval tortures (OK I may be exaggerating a bit but you get the idea. And if you don’t, you will after reading the next few paragraphs

“I put [their climate change denial] in a similar moral category to Holocaust denial – except that this time the Holocaust is yet to come, and we still have time to avoid it. Those who try to ensure we don’t will one day have to answer for their crimes,” bleated the self rightous Lynas.

It is now two years and six months since Professor Richard Parncutt demanded that “climate change deniers” should be executed, writing: “In this article I am going to suggest that the death penalty is an appropriate punishment for influential GW deniers.

“I have always been opposed to the death penalty in all cases. […] Even mass murderers should not be executed, in my opinion. […] GW deniers fall into a completely different category.

“I don’t want to be a saint. I would just like my grandchildren and great grandchildren, and the human race in general, to enjoy the world that I have enjoyed, as much as I have enjoyed it. And to achieve that goal I think it is justified for a few heads to roll.”

But the Arctic ice cap, which we were told would disappear by 2011 is expanding rather quickly, Polar Bears, which we have been told were on the verge of extinction, are actually increasing in number and mistaking climate scientists sent to hassle them for free lunches courtesy of the Warmageddonist lobby. We were told that by 2013 there would be 50 million refugess, displaced from their homes by rising sea levels as melting ice caps flooded low lying areas. So far no refugees displaced due to global warming have been reported.

Global temperature shows no signs of warming, so advocates of man made global warming show no signs of thinking that perhaps, just maybe, those with a different opinion ought to be allowed to live, let alone be free to express their opinion.

The latest example of climate fascism comes from Adam Weinstein, writer and  self styled “poet laureate” at the Gawker online magazine . This clown has now joined the chorus, suggesting that climate change “liars” ought to be arrested and punished (h/t WUWT).

“Let’s make a clear distinction here, the self righteous Weinstein bleats, “I’m not talking about the man on the street who thinks Rush Limbaugh (a right wing radio shock jock) is right, and climate change is a socialist United Nations conspiracy foisted by a Muslim U.S. president on an unwitting public to erode its civil liberties,” he says.

“You all know that man. That man is an idiot. He is too stupid to do anything other than choke the earth’s atmosphere a little more with his Mr. Pibb burps and his F-150’s gassy exhaust. Few of us believers in climate change can do much more—or less—than he can.”

(Here Weinstein shows up what a repugnant, snobbish, superior, consescening, partonizing arsehole he is, he despises the man on the street, on whom he looks down from his ivory tower.

He continues, “Nor am I talking about simple skeptics, particularly the scientists who must constantly hypo-test our existing assumptions about the world in order to check their accuracy. That is part and parcel of the important public policy discussion about what we do next.”

No, Mr Weinstein says he is talking about “Rush and his multi-million-dollar ilk in the disinformation business,” rich people, presumably men, who use their power and wealth to “deny people the tools they need to inform themselves, to protect themselves against a scientifically proven threat to life and limb,” because they (the deniers) “have their heads jammed in the sand… or in a barrel of money.”

In other words anyone who disagrees with Mr. Weinstein’s opinion is an idiot. Well that attitude is about par for the course among American ‘liberal’ fascists.

Those people who do hold a differing opinion, Weinstein would like to see arrested, punished, and stopped. “Those denialists should face jail. They should face fines. They should face lawsuits from the classes of people whose lives and livelihoods are most threatened by denialist tactics,” he insists.

And so we see yet another ‘liberal’ intellectual return to the causus belli of modern liberal fascist, the urgent need to abolish free speech.

He bases his calls for fascistic action against global warming sceptics on a claim by the World Health Organisation that 150,000 people a year die thanks to climate change. But Eric Worrall, writing at Watts Up With That replies that the claim does not stand up to scrutiny.

Worrall draws attention to the fact that even the UN’s International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which began to pump out the climate scaremongering back in 1990, “has failed to establish a link between CO2 and extreme weather.”

Moreover,  it is a well established biological fact that Carbon Dioxide is essential to the growth of vegitation, through the process of photosynthesis plants absorb energy from the sun and carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and convert it into tissue, outputting oxygen as a bonus.

I an always surprised as the number of people claiming to be ‘scientists’ in internet comment threads who appear to be blissfully unaware of this bascic biology lessoon. Perhaps they are all mathematicians and believe the universe and everything in it is made out of numbers and equations. Well mathematics is not a real science and people who believe the universe is made out of numbers are as deluded as the young earth creationists they despise.

The increases in CO2 that have taken place since the commencement of the Industrial revolution have actually been beneficial to the human inhabitants of earth. Crop yields have risen and satellites have recorded a greening of the planet in the region of 1.5 percent a year thanks to the fertilisation effect of higher CO2 levels.

RELATED POSTS:
America and UK Lead the World in Climate Scepticism
Several times now it has looked as if the climate chance scare was over as the enthusiasm of climate scitentists for changing real world data to fit in with the predictions of their mathematical models has been exposed. But as the scare was never about the environment, but was a scam to redistribute wealth from rich to poor countries, the politicians are throwing their propaganda budgets behind it again.

Vancouver Sun Interview With Award winning Physicist and Climate Change Sceptiv Freeman Dyson

Anti-Science – The Church Of Scienceology’s Latest Pejorative Term For People Who Think And Question.

We are not the only web site to take exception to accusations of being anti – science and all the other pejorative terms used by the Church Of Scienceology disciples to deflect criticism from independent minded people who are smart enough to ask Cui Bono? Which corporate business benefits.

IMF Attempts to Hide True Cost of Renewables
A new report ffrom the International Monetary Fund (IMF) claims Fossil fuel companies are benefiting from a global subsidy of £3.4 trillion a year. The figure dwarfs that of government handouts aimed at encouraging investors to put money into unprofitable renewable energy sources such as wind turbines. Total subsidies for renewables are stated to amount to £77 billion a year.

Global Warming Think Tank Brings Balance to Climate Science Debate

from my Facebook post

At a now defunct site named Gather, friends Graham , Vic, Kelli, and others not present here as far as I know, were often the targets of attempted bullying for our efforts to present a balanced view of the global warming debate in the face of a tsunami of government – watermelon (green on the outside, red on the iside) propaganda from a particularly obnoxious bunch of Warmageddonist zealots.

Well now they are getting their come uppance, we all agree the climate changes, we all agree we should look after the planet, but we sceptics were right, the whole carbon Dioxide driven Anthropogenic Global Warming scare was a scam to enable left wing government to tax their people to penury while obscenely rich bastards go obscenely richer by trading carbon credits and picking up subsisdies for not generating green electricity.

Anyone wishing to grovel will be graciously acknowledged.

Here’s a taster then follow the bold link to the full post:

The Royal Society has misrepresented current thinking on climate change by presenting new theories as established facts and leaving out evidence that doesn’t support man made global warming dogma, a group of climate scientists has claimed.

In December, the Royal Society published a Short Guide to Climate Science, which it presented as a definitive guide to all things climate science. It asks and answers 20 questions, some of which display clear bias within the phrasing of the question, such as “How do scientists know that recent climate change is largely caused by human activities?” and “Climate is always changing. Why is climate change of concern now?”

In response, the Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF) has produced The Small Print – What the Royal Society Left Out, in order to bring balance to the evidence base. It takes the Royal Society’s original 20 questions in turn and present a “fuller picture” on each.

Warmageddonists will claim of course that GWPF are ‘not proper scientists. But don’t proper scientists present ALL the evidence to back up their conclusions? So what does that make those research grant phishing cerry pickers at the Royal Society?

Another Kick In The Bollocks For Warmageddonists And CAGWARTS*

* CAGWARTS – Carbon – driven Anthropogenic Global Warming Alternative Reality Trolls.

global warming science

I’ve had many arguments with the Warmageddonists, the people who have been saying that the ‘scientific consensus’ had agreed if we did not shut down all coal, oil and gas related activites (that is, just about all human activities except unprotected sex and sleeping) the earth was going to turn into a giant furnace and we would all burn.

Those of us audacious enough to ask when this was going to happen felt the horizon shifting. When the scaremongering first started, the deadline for frying was “after dinner”. Then it go to “Tomorrow …… or the day after tomorrow perhaps,” then “next year”, “before 2050,” and eventually “soon.”

Don’t you love that scientific precision.

The reason the Warmageddonists and CAGWARTS could not give a sensible answer of course was that the scientists were studying computer models of reality and worse, they were changing the fictitious data they put in when the algorithms did not give the answer they wanted. In the real world, rather than warming like a fire someone has dumped a few gallons of petrol on, the earth ws warming a tiny little bit, just as it always has.

What’s more while the Warmageddonists screamed “the science is settled” and insisted that “97% of scientists agree global warming is happening faster than the models predict and will wipe out man, beast and beetroot if we do not stop living NOW!

There was no such scientific consensus, the study cited as proof of it had falsified the figures by looking at a lot of climate studies and simly assuming any that did not specifically state climate change was NOT being caused by carbon dioxide emissions from human activity agreed with that proposition that it was.

In fact most of those studies did not even look for causes but at likely effects.

The purported but ridiculous derogatory term “climate deniers” was invented to belittle people intelligent enough to question the dodgy science on which the Warmageddon scare was based, although none f the sceptics had ever tried to deny that there is a climate (there are in fact many, depending on what part of the world you are in).

But all the while as the Warmageddionists screamed “scientific consensus and demanded a one million per cent tax be put on everything their puritanical left wing prejudices dictated was not polititically correct, sensible researchers were looking at many possible causes of the changes in climate that have happened in cycles for billions of years. Like this one:

Scientists: Orbital Variations Main Cause of Climate Change

Global warming theorists have taken yet another hit with a new study out of Denmark which demonstrates that variations in Earth’s orbit are the primary causes of climate change, and have been for at least the last 1.4 billion years.

Scientists from the University of Southern Denmark and the China National Petroleum Corporation investigated marine sediment from the Xiamaling Formation in China and determined that the sediment shows evidence that “the same orbital forcing that caused the climate to change 1.4 billion years ago is the underlying force behind global warming today,

The research, published in PNAS (Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United Stastes Of America), states: “There is a wealth of evidence pointing to dramatic short-term climate change on Earth over the last few million years. Much of this climate change is driven by variations of Earth’s orbit around the Sun with characteristic frequencies known as Milankovitch cycles.”

The fact that the research has been published exposes the lying nature of the Warmageddonist lobby. They have always argued that no respectable scientific journal would publish any research that did not support the consensus because “The Science Is Settled”.

RELATED POSTS:
Fellow Slams The Royal Society as Nothing But a Lobby Group for Climate Change.
Thanks To The Dishonest Climate Scientists, the Public Doesn’t Know Water Vapor Is Most Important Greenhouse Gas.

Climate change is a theory for which there is “no scientific proof at all” says the co-founder of Greenpeace

What if man-made climate change is all in the mind?

Climate Lies Ombibus Post

The Climate Bollocks Of Bill Nye The Stupidity Guy

Earth’s CO2 Levels Pass Global Warming ‘Milestone’, Nothing Happens – Daily Caller.

Insane Science Pushing The Earth Towards Ecocide.

Climate Change: Study shows carbon dioxide dangers are OVERSTATED

Scientists Try – And Fail – To Explain Why Global Warming Has Stopped

The Ice Age Cometh

Global Warming my arse: Record low temperatures have frozen the sea causing waves of slush to break on the shotes of Nantucket Island – a very temperate 41 deegrees north  (image source)

Had some heated arguments with the Warmageddonists and science worshippers here and elsewhere about the mathematical model version of the earth’s future versus the picture we draw from studying the real world evidence.

As usual the lefty nut jobs used the word ‘science’ a lot (and in completely the wrong context), claimed that ‘evidence’ genterated by computer models of the climate that were fed adjusted temperature data were infallible whereas data gathered from real world observation could not be relied on, they accused those of us who questioned their certainties of murdering children and when we pointed out that their attacks of researchers whose findings contradicted the orthodox message that unless massive taxes were imposed on carbon based fuel, the ice caps would melt, rising sea levels would swamp much of our agricultural land and zillions of people would be fried. The North pole would be ice free by 2012 and snow would be a folk memory.

None of it has happened of course, in fact the opposite seems to be happening. The scientists and mathematicians (two professions that make bankers, lawyers and used car salesmen look positively angelic) keep on lying of course, insisting their mathematical models are right, the pack ice in northern water that is currently imprisoning several ships is the result of catastrophic global warming and that the white stuff that is piled to record depths in parts of America and Europe, and lying a couple of inches deep outside my house in Lancashire is really just an illusion.

Meanwhile, here’s the latest on Global Warming from THE REAL WORLD:

North Pole Frozen Solid – South Pole Re-Freezing

So much for “global warming”, and so much for the “melted” North Pole, and “melted” South Pole.

Clearly, the North Pole is at 100% ice pack from Canada to Russia. Ice reaching as far south as Nova Scotia … reaching out into the Atlantic fully surrounding Svalbard, almost reaching ICELAND!!!

The icepack can be seen growing BEYOND the arctic circle at this point, reaching out into the North Atlantic.

Meanwhile, we have new reports coming in on the East coast of the United States that “strange frozen waves” of slush water are hitting the shores of areas as far South as Massachusetts.

Read full article

I suppose the Warmageddonists and science worshippers will claim that when they said The North Pole would be ice free, they meant ‘scientifically ice free’ which as those who understand science know means something very different from ‘devoid of ice’.

The Climate Bollocks Of Bill Nye The Stupidity Guy

Steven Goddard, a blogger who likes to burst the bubbles of pomposity that science worshippers surround themselves with has an excellent blog post in which he takes issue with US TV presenter and Z list celebrity Bill Nye The Science Guy (who is not actually a scientist but a fanboy, his professional qualification is in engineering).

Nye is one of those arrogant clowns who thinks by calling himself a scientist he is qualified to pontificate on anything that falls withing the spectrum of natural or applied science. Unfortunately he does not know much about anything except how to suck up to the establishment by spreading the ‘liberal’ propaganda.

It seems Nye has been pontificating about one of his favourite topics, sucking up to Barack Obama climate change. He posted this picture

jackson hole ski slopes 2015

with a comment that due to global warming the ski slopes in Jackson Hole (Wyoming USA) were bare this year, there had been no snow. Unfortunately the picture did not show the Jacson Hole ski slopes. Steven Goddard did, he posted pictures of shitloads copious amounts (science fanboys get tetchy when I use informal language) of snow with the comment:

Those aren’t the ski slopes Bill. The ski area has received more than 20 feet of snow already this winter and the snow is almost nine feet deep.

See the Full Post HERE

Just to underline how lacking common sense Nye’s enthusiasm for ‘science’ has made him, the picture he showed of bare slopes were at Jackson Hole but were on the leeward side of the mountains. I wonder if he knows what leeward means.

A big part of Bill Nye’s success is that he has learned to please Amercia’s liberal bigot audience through an ability to say the stupidest things without the slightest hint of embarrassment or even awareness that just because a thing is ‘on message’ does not mean it is right.

Another total arse, David Suzuki, (who also claims he’s ‘a scientist’) recently said it gets warm inside your car when the sunlight hits your windshield because there is carbon in the glass. The moron was trying to link raised temperatures inside the car to how global warming works FFS.

Nobody knows how they’re able to spout such idiotic bollocks with apparent total serousness. Some say it is the superpower liberal celebs have. We think their superpower is to make the people who claim to be the more educated section of American society and possess a monopoly on goodness and truth happily swallow such unmitigated shite and beg for more because it is what they want to hear and the political left, in Europe as well as the USA have always had an allergic rection to thinking.

And because we know the science fanboys will claim the real shot of Jackson Hole is ‘just a publicity shot’ (and because we like snow pictures) here a shot of a skiier at the resort posted on nationalgeographic.com a couple of days ago.

Cool.

RELATED POSTS:

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
We said it was a scam, now a United Nations official has admitted the whole climate change scare was really about destroying capitalism. But what doo the elites plan to replace it with, A Corporaite Global Dictator ship in which the world is run by unelected bureaucrats selected from withing a small, elite class? Actually we predicted that as well.