Globalisation, Davosocracy and The Peoples’ Pushback

French writer and political philosopher Renaud Camus, who found fame (or notoriety perhaps,) as the first academic to propose the theory of the “Great Replacement (link goes to French language video),” aired his thoughts to news reporters about the wave of riots and civil unrest that has rocked France over the past two months, giving his opinion that the recent “Yellow Vest” protests are a grassroots reaction against the Davos elite who view working people as worthless “human Nutella.” (i.e. cheap, low grade products.)

Mr Camus warned there might be more substance to the Gilets Jaunes (Yellow Vests) movement, which organised the protests and, according to polls, is supported by 77 per cent of French people , than just dissatisfaction over a rise in fuel taxes, saying it was really about a “lack of respect by governments for the prople,  being treated by managerial politics like an object, a simple product.

“A product, a producer, and a consumer all at once, a thing, a number, not a human being,” Camus said, echoing his view that the elite do noy see the masses as people, individuals with ambitions, concerns and their own intelligent view of the world. This attitude, he claims, is how elitists justify to themselves the destruction of communities as entire industries have been relocated to low labour cost economies, leaving behind what is usually described as ‘the gig economy,’ but which some have described as the ‘waiters and bartenders economy,’ because of the low quality and often part time work available to people rendered redundant as work has migrated east and south, while low skilled, poorly educated multitudes have migrated north and west.

Excoriating the globalist elites, whom Camus refers to as the “Davocracy,” an allusion to the annual World Economic Forum meetings in the Swiss town of Davos, where the rich and powerful arrive in their private jets to meet, enjoy fine foods, rare wines and high class prostitutes and make decisions like the one that is leading to the replacement of educated, intelligent Europeans who ask difficult questions with uneducated, illiterate third world immigrants who can easily be bought with free stuff, Camus claimed the global elites were advocates of the “Great Replacement” saying they supported “the change of people and civilisation for the sake of the industry of man, the economic system which produces the Undifferentiated Human Matter, the human Nutella, spreadable at will.”

Harsh words from Camus, but they contain more than a grain of truth one suspects.

The theory of the Great Replacement, which Camus states. not only refers to mass migration but to the easy and efficient interchangeability of goods as well as peoples (aka the throwaway society,) has been referred to by several prominent French figures including the Mayor of Béziers Robert Ménard, the Archbishop of Strasbourg Luc Ravel, and conservative politician Nicolas Dupont-Aignan.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has also made numerous references to a replacement of European people through migration, and has been widely attacked for his views by Cultural Marxist leaders leaders such as Barack Obama, Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron.

More recently, the French department of Mayotte, an island off the coast of Africa, highlighted the “replacement” of their indigenous peoples due to wave upon wave of illegal migrants in recent years. The first European outpost to be totally swamped by illegal immigrants might have been the Italian island of Lampedusa, had the nationalist coalition of Lega and Five Star not dealth a crushing defeat to the neo – liberal consensus parties of the Italian establishment in last years election.

It is happening in mainland France, Germany, Britain, Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium, and Spain. Only Italy, Hungary, Austria and Poland have so far shown and will to resist.

The developed world’s political and business elite, who roll up every year to attend the annual World Economic Forum (WEF) jamboree in Davos, Switzerland, are actually beginning to admit their push for globalisation and open bordershich with the help of leaders like Angela Merkel, Barack Obama, François Holland and hs successor Emmanuel Macron, have contributed to the worldwide populist backlash and the rejection of the mass integration and multiculturalism project, the aim of which was to create a global monoculture.

Harvard professor and former chief economist of the International Monetary Fund Kenneth Rogoff told Bloomberg that following WEF 2016 he “started to grow concerned” then-candidate Donald J. Trump would be elected president of the U.S.A. because the consensus among attendees of the elite gathering Mr. Trump could not possibly win.

“A joke I’ve told 1,000 people in the months since attending that years World Economic Forum is that the conventional wisdom of Davos is always wrong,” wisecracked the former IMF chief who is scheduled to attend Davos again this year along with some 3,000 other members of the political, business, media, and academic elite, most of whom are the same people that so confidently agreed Trump could not win the 2016 Presidential election.

“No matter how improbable, the event most likely to happen is the opposite of whatever the Davos consensus is,” he added.

Davos also failed to predict the rise of populism in Europe, Italy’s rejection of constitutional change that led to the resignation of Prime Minister Mattheo Renzi, or the UK voting to leave the European Union (EU) which Forbes described as the “populist revolt against Davos Man”.

“Davos Man” was coined by political scientist Samuel P. Huntington who described “these transnationals” as “[having] little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the elite’s global operations”.

One of the eight Oxford University academics set to attend the meeting, Ngaire Woods, dean of the Blavatnik School of Government, said, “There has to be some humility. For 30 years the elite have said, ‘We’re managing globalization, and we’re making it work for everyone’.”

“They cannot just keep repeating that,” added the frequent Davos visitor.

However, WEF founder Klaus Shwab has alleged that globalisation was an “easy scapegoat” for world angst, and argued that populism wasn’t the answer, saying, “We cannot just have populist solutions”.

With populism high on the agenda at Davos, one of the sessions will include a panel of psychologists offering thoughts on “cultivating appropriate emotions in a time of nationalist populism”.

Managing Director of the IMF Christine Lagarde, who was found guilty by French courts in December 2017 of criminal negligence in a case concerning the misappropriation of funds, said she wanted to “rehabilitate the appearance of globalism”. She said she wanted a “move toward globalization that has a different face, and which is not excluding people along the way”.

Lagarde will be chairing a session at Davos entitled: “Squeezed and Angry: How to Fix the Middle Class Crisis” along with hedge fund billionaire Ray Dalio. Days before the EU referendum vote, the French lawyer belittled Brexit voters by implying they were small-minded, called for a “united Europe”, and launched a report claiming a ‘Leave’ vote would lead to half a million job losses.

Also anticipated to attend the exclusive conclave is billionaire open borders activist and founder of the Open Society Foundations George Soros, who admitted involvement in engineering Europe’s Migrant Crisis, called national borders “an obstacle”, and has financial ties to the W. K. Kellogg Foundation.

Other notable attendees include a dozen members of the European Commission including Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström, who responded,“I do not take my mandate from the European people” when asked a question by a poverty campaigner regarding the unpopular (and now abandoned,) Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) deal between America and the EU, which was opposed by millions of Europeans.

The World Economic Forum (or the junior Bilderberg Group as some call it) held their annual jolly conference at the exclusive Alpine resort of Davos-Klosters where it will cost you €20 (about$22) for a cup of coffee because the locals have to keep chavs out somehow. Two thousand five hundred politicians, celebrities, and business leaders from all over the world gather every year for this “Bilderberg style” meeting. The delegates include 53 people who own as much wealth as the poorest half of the world’s population and representatives of over 1,000 of the multinational corporate businesses all of which are on record as supporting global government and open borders.

One of the most significant discussions held at this year’s Davos powerfest concerned the growing disconnect between middle and working class citizens and the power elites. Everywhere in the world one looks, citizens no longer trust their governments or the legal, medical and academic professions, the science & technology community, finance and the mainstream media:

“If this growing disconnect between governments and citizens is not fixed rapidly, there can be no legitimate, accountable and trusted global cooperation, problem solving or governance.” – WEF Everybody’s Business Report.

And so what have they done? In collaboration with Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Amazon and other internet giants our governments and business elites have embraced the idea of using censorship to suppress ideas and opinions which challenge the official narrative. A UK government promotion, The Integrity Initiative has been exposed as working to ensure any item expressing support for the Assad regime in Syria, or criticising military interventions aimed at effecting ‘regime change’ are made invisible by blocking them in internet searches, ‘shadow – banning’ the content posted by certain organisations and individuals and rather than promoting the truth, which in the case of Syria is that bad as the Assad regime may be, what would replace them, as ISIS have shown, would be even worse, actively suppressing accurate reporting in the public domain and replacing it with politically convenient misinformation.

In their minds of course, we the punters are far too stupid to see through such a ruse and will accept what we are being told and allow the globalisation project to continue unchecked.

RELATED POSTS:

Global collapse
The global corporatocracy
Sweden The Latest Domino To Fall ToAnti – Globalism Pushback?
The globalisation of serfdom
Global trade crash
Is Europe Waking Up To The Threat Of Globalism Posed by Secret Trade Treaties
Living within the conspiracy
The New World Order (catalogue)
New World Order omnibus
UN Migration Pact: Which Governments Are Prepared To Sell Out Their People?
New World Order’s cashless society
DC Leaks Expose George Soros Manipulating Elections
New world order is an old idea
Free trade conspiracy
Global government on the y
Corporate monopolyu men
Corporate globalism a threat to individual freedom
Chasing Bubbles
The Wisdom Of Crowds
https://edbutt.blogspot.com/2017/04/the-rise-of-populism-explainer.htmlThe Rise Of Populism: an Explainer
Macron May Trigger EU Wide Crisis With Yellow Vest Crackdown
After Triggering Mass Migration Crisis Germany Is Now Bribing Refugees To Leave

On Fake News And Where It Originates From

It should be well established by now that this blog opposes globalisation and supports small government and individual liberty. It should also be well established that the mainstream media and social media organisations like Facebook and Twitter, controlled by the globalist banking cartel, have dedicated themselves to suppressing what they call ‘Fake news’, which has never been properly defined but which according to mainstream media and social media is anything that dissents from the globalist narrative.

So here’s a little snippet that shows where fake news originates and gives us a clue as to the agernda of those behind it’s use in propaganda.

“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a …….WORLD GOVERNMENT ”

David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June, 1991.

RELATED:
Liberal News Site BuzzFeed Pilloried On Social Media After Fake News ‘bombshell’ on Mueller & Trump

Since Trump’s vicory in the 2016 election wild accusations that he collaborated with the Russian government have been flung about none of which have been supported by a shred of credible evidence. This week the strongly liberal buzzfeed online news site ran a story that Trump ordered his lawyer to lie to Congress, left leaning media went into meltdown …

 

‘He’s as popular as a rattlesnake in a lucky dip’ Fury as Blair orders Brexit POSTPONEMENT

In an incendiary speech, the former Labour prime minister claimed the UK could negotiate a new membership deal with a reformed EU that could address the concerns of Leave voters by tackling “the issue of immigration decisively”.

Blair, who was on the global banking cartel’s payroll when whe was UK Prime Minister, is obviously labouring under the misapprehension that he is still a powerful figure in European politics, rather than a widely despised has been, has been intent on raising tensions in the Brexit debate by likening anti-globalisation political movements across Europe and the US to the rise of the Nazis and other extremists in the 1930s.

In fact is is globalism that resembles Naziism, Hitler was often quoted as having said, “The Third Reich will rule the world for a thousand years.”

Blair’s latest call for halting or delaying Britain’s departure of the EU was firmly rejected by Downing Street last night. Theresa May’s spokesman said: “The Prime Minister has been clear that we are leaving the EU and that will take place on March 29 2019.

And Mr Blair’s latest intervention in the debate about Britain’s European future, on the eve of an EU Council summit in Brussels where Theresa May will discuss progress in the Brexit negotiations with the 27 other EU leaders, provoked a furious backlash from Leave-backing MPs.In an incendiary speech, the former Labour prime minister claimed the UK could negotiate a new membership deal with a reformed EU that could address the concerns of Leave voters by tackling “the issue of immigration decisively”.

He also risked raising tensions in the Brexit debate by likening anti-globalisation political movements across Europe and the US to the rise of the Nazis and other extremists in the 1930s.

His call for delaying Britain’s departure of the EU was firmly rejected by Downing Street last night.

The man is an idiot. Throughout the attempts to negotiate an exit deal that will benefit all parties, the EU negotiating style has been characterised by a refusal to concede ground on any point.

Theresa May’s spokesman said: “The Prime Minister has been clear that we are leaving the EU and that will take place on March 29 2019.

Mr Blair’s latest intervention in the debate about Britain’s European future, comes on the eve of an EU Council summit in Brussels where Theresa May will discuss progress in the Brexit negotiations with the 27 other EU leaders, and has provoked a furious backlash from Leave-backing MPs while attracting little support from Remainers. In fact one Remain supporting MP said, “He’s as popular as a rattlesnake in a lucky dip.”

 

RELATED:

More Brexit posts

Globalisation

The Global Warming Scam Was Never About The World Getting Hotter

So as the politicians gathered in Lima fly in their favourite chefs, sommeliers and prostitutes halfway round the world in fossil fuel gobbling, CO2 belching private jets, to ensure the great and good are kept in tip top shape for solving the world’s problems (like how can the elite scam more money from the poor) Boggart Blog would like to take this opportunity to remind our readers what the climate conference is really all about:

from Newsbusters, November 18, 2010

If you needed any more evidence that the entire theory of manmade global warming was a scheme to redistribute wealth you got it Sunday when a leading member of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change told a German news outlet, “We redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy.”

Such was originally published by Germany’s NZZ Online Sunday. Here’s the translation.

(NZZ AM SONNTAG): The new thing about your proposal for a Global Deal is the stress on the importance of development policy for climate policy. Until now, many think of aid when they hear development policies.

(OTTMAR EDENHOFER, UN IPCC OFFICIAL): That will change immediately if global emission rights are distributed. If this happens, on a per capita basis, then Africa will be the big winner, and huge amounts of money will flow there. This will have enormous implications for development policy. And it will raise the question if these countries can deal responsibly with so much money at all.

(NZZ): That does not sound anymore like the climate policy that we know.

(EDENHOFER): Basically it’s a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization. The climate summit in Cancun at the end of the month is not a climate conference, but one of the largest economic conferences since the Second World War. Why? Because we have 11,000 gigatons of carbon in the coal reserves in the soil under our feet – and we must emit only 400 gigatons in the atmosphere if we want to keep the 2-degree target. 11 000 to 400 – there is no getting around the fact that most of the fossil reserves must remain in the soil.

(NZZ): De facto, this means an expropriation of the countries with natural resources. This leads to a very different development from that which has been triggered by development policy.

(EDENHOFER): First of all, developed countries have basically expropriated the atmosphere of the world community. But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy. Obviously, the owners of coal and oil will not be enthusiastic about this. One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with environmental policy anymore, with problems such as deforestation or the ozone hole.

For the record, Edenhofer was co-chair of the IPCC’s Working Group III, and was a lead author of the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report released in 2007 which controversially concluded, “Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations.”

As such, this man is a huge player in advancing this theory, and he has now made it quite clear – as folks on the realist side of this debate have been saying for years – that this is actually an international economic scheme designed to redistribute wealth.
– See more at: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2010/11/18/un-ipcc-official-we-redistribute-worlds-wealth-climate-policy#sthash.BTpDbYoa.vbr6p8jO.dpuf

(h/t Disqus commenter foxoles)

RELATED POSTS:

Globalization and the Return To Serfdom
When the power elites promise something that will benefit people everywhere it can be taken what the world will get is the opposite. Thus when we were told globalisation would make everybody more prosperous, abolish poverty and narrow the gap between rich and poor, only a fool would have failed to recognize what was on offer comprised a return to medieval poverty and servitude for the masses while the rich became richer.


What Will It Take to Get You to Swallow GMO and Nanotech Foods?

Are you one of these “new technology rejecters”? Apparently you will be given such a label soon if you don’t want GMOs or nanoparticles in your food, just as those who ask can the 1.6% contributed by human activity of the carbon dioxide that makes up 0.025% of the atmosphere really be the sole cause of the changes in our climate which has been constantly changing for millions of years before men first stood erect.

Insane Science Pushing The Earth Towards Ecocide.
At the Daily Stirrer we have suspected it for a log time, science is insane, a game for the ethically challenged and sociopathic to compete to be first to develop a new plague, or a death ray, or to trash the enviromnent in pursuit of political power or corporate profits for their paymasters. There’s even a name for what they are doing now, Ecocide.

Earth’s CO2 Levels Pass Global Warming ‘Milestone’, Nothing Happens – Daily Caller.
After two decades of panic stricken scientists and screeching lefties wailing about the catatrophe that would ensue once the concentration of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere passed 400 parts per million, that figure was reached in December 2014.

Disappearing borders

Ghengis Khan was the father of globalisation, say academics meeting in China to mark the 800th anniversary of the founding of the Mongol empire.
“Civilisations became linked,” Hao Shiyaun, of the Academy of Social Sciences told the China Daily.
“This is what globalisation features..disappearing borders.”

Ah, like the border between China and Tibet that diappeared?