Finnish Climate Study Finds No Evidence That Humans Caused Climate Change

A team of Finnish climate researchers led by J. Kauppinen and P. Malmi of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Turku, have have published results of a project which found that the likely human contribution to a rise of 0.1°C in global temperatures over the past 100 years century is just 0.01°C. This is in direct contradiction of  the catastrophic global warming narrative built by research grant phishing Warmageddonist scientists and the bureaucrats of the  UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The UN has of course been making political use of Warmageddonist doom prophecies to advance its Agenda 21 and Agenda 30, both of which look like plans for global governance when subjected to critical scrutiny.

Kauppinen and Malmi write in their research analysis paper, dated June 29, 2019, that their research proves that GCM-models used in IPCC report AR5 fail to calculate the instances of the low cloud cover changes on the global temperature. They claim this is why the models used to make the case for catastrophic warming give a minimal natural temperature change, assigning a substantial change to the contribution of the greenhouse gases in the observed temperature.

This is the reason why IPCC has to use a considerable adjustment of data to compensate for the too small natural component. Further, scientists drafting reports for the IPCC have to leave out the strong negative feedback due to the clouds. Also, this paper proves that the changes in the low cloud cover fraction practically control the global temperature.

Kauppinen and Malmi explain:
“The climate sensitivity has an extremely large uncertainty in the scientific literature. The smallest values estimated are very close to zero while the highest ones are even 9 degrees Celsius for a doubling of CO2. The majority of the papers are using theoretical general circulation models (GCM) for the estimation. These models give very big sensitivities with a very large uncertainty range. Typically sensitivity values are between 2-5 degrees.

IPCC uses these papers to estimate global temperature anomalies and climate sensitivity.

However, there are a lot of papers, where sensitivities lower than one degree are estimated without using GCM.

The basic problem is still missing experimental evidence of the climate sensitivity.

Low cloud cover controls practically the global temperature. It turns out that the changes in the relative humidity and in the low cloud cover depend on each other. So, instead of low cloud cover, we can use the changes in the relative humidity in order to derive the natural temperature anomaly. According to the observations, a 1 % increase of the relative humidity decreases the temperature by 0:15°C.

The IPCC climate sensitivity is about one order of magnitude too high because a strong negative feedback of the clouds is missing in climate models. If we pay attention to the fact that only a small part of the increased CO2 concentration is anthropogenic, we have to recognize that the anthropogenic climate change does not exist in practice. The major part of the extra CO2 is emitted from oceans, according to Henry`s law. The low clouds practically control the global average temperature.

the last hundred years, the temperature is increased by about 0:1°C because of CO2 therefore:

The human contribution was about 0:01°C.”

The J. Kauppinen and P. Malmi report is the latest of many reports from research projects which provide evidence to challenge the scare tactics pushed by the purveyors of the climate change hypothesis and politicians seeking to use the climate change scare to erode our rights and liberties.

The facts show the climate models that have been proven wrong at every step, the Earth’s climate is much more complicated than the algorithms that can be programmed into a computer application could deal with, simply because there are so many unquantifiable effects acting on the climate. The CAGWARTs (Carbon- driven Anthropogenic Global Warming Alternative Reality Trolls still haven’t raised teir heads from their computer screens long enough to work out why the satellite temperature data says, Earth hasn’t warmed in twenty years , why there is still snow in winter, cool spells in summer, why Polar Bear numbers are incresing and where the 50 million people who were due to be displaced by rising sea levels by 2015 have disappeared to, (clue: they’re not hiding under harry Potter’s cloak of invisibility.)

READ a translation of the whole report (.pdf)

RELATED POSTS:

EXPLORE RELATED POSTS:

Some clear thinking on climate change
Climate change: CO2 comparison
Climate effect of CO2 overstated
Climate and the IPCC Agenda

Explore the Greenteeth Digital Publishing network

Greenteeth UK ] … [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Greenteeth & Daily Stirrer on YouTube ] … [ It’s Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] … [ Minds ] … [ <a href=https://medium.com/@greenboggartIan on Medium ] … [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … [ Latest Posts ] … [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [Latest Posts] … [ Tumblr ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Roundup]
… [ Boggart Network News ]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

The Dark Story Behind Global Warming aka Climate Change

By F. William Engdahl via Information Clearing House

The recent UN global warming conference under auspices of the deceptively-named International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) concluded its meeting in South Korea discussing how to drastically limit global temperature rise. Mainstream media is predictably retailing various panic scenarios “predicting” catastrophic climate change because of man-made emissions of Greenhouse Gases, especially CO2, if drastic changes in our lifestyle are not urgently undertaken. There is only one thing wrong with all that. It’s based on fake science and corrupted climate modelers who have reaped by now billions in government research grants to buttress the arguments for radical change in our standard of living. We might casually ask “What’s the point?” The answer is not positive.

The South Korea meeting of the UN IPCC discussed measures needed, according to their computer models, to limit global temperature rise to below  1.5 Centigrade above levels of the pre-industrial era. One of the panel members and authors of the latest IPCC Special Report on Global Warming, Drew Shindell, at Duke University told the press that to meet the arbitrary 1.5 degree target will require world CO2 emissions to drop by a staggering 40% in the next 12 years. The IPCC calls for a draconian “zero net emissions” of CO2 by 2050. That would mean complete ban on gas or diesel engines for cars and trucks, no coal power plants, transformation of the world agriculture to burning food as biofuels. Shindell modestly put it, “These are huge, huge shifts.”

The new IPCC report, SR15, declares that global warming of 1.5°C will “probably“ bring species extinction, weather extremes and risks to food supply, health and economic growth. To avoid this the IPCC estimates required energy investment alone will be $2.4 trillion per year. Could this explain the interest of major global banks, especially in the City of London in pushing the Global Warming card?

READ MORE >>>

 

Mark Steyn – IPCC Official Admits Global Warming Is A Lie To Redistribute Wealth Wake UP People!

If you needed any more evidence that the entire theory of manmade global warming was a scheme to redistribute wealth you got it Sunday when a leading member of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change told a German news outlet, “[W]e redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy.”

Such was originally published by Germany’s NZZ Online Sunday, and reprinted in English by the Global Warming Policy Foundation today (we link to a much shorter summary in The Blaze):

(NZZ AM SONNTAG): The new thing about your proposal for a Global Deal is the stress on the importance of development policy for climate policy. Until now, many think of aid when they hear development policies.

(OTTMAR EDENHOFER, UN IPCC OFFICIAL): That will change immediately if global emission rights are distributed. If this happens, on a per capita basis, then Africa will be the big winner, and huge amounts of money will flow there. This will have enormous implications for development policy. And it will raise the question if these countries can deal responsibly with so much money at all.

(NZZ): That does not sound anymore like the climate policy that we know.

(EDENHOFER): Basically it’s a big mistake to discuss climate policy separately from the major themes of globalization. The climate summit in Cancun at the end of the month is not a climate conference, but one of the largest economic conferences since the Second World War. Why? Because we have 11,000 gigatons of carbon in the coal reserves in the soil under our feet – and we must emit only 400 gigatons in the atmosphere if we want to keep the 2-degree target. 11 000 to 400 – there is no getting around the fact that most of the fossil reserves must remain in the soil.

(NZZ): De facto, this means an expropriation of the countries with natural resources. This leads to a very different development from that which has been triggered by development policy.

See Mark Steyn video commentary – YouTube:

RELATED POSTS:
Climate lies
Climate change and evolution
Climate fraud exposed
IPCC real agenda behind climate change propaganda
Climate change index

Drinking Carbon Dioxide In The Last Chance Saloon, Paris

Climate Armageddon (Warmageddon) Forecast (image source)

There are a lot of Last Chance Saloons it seems, this past fifteen years they have been popping up all over the planet according to the Warmageddonist Lobby, those CAGWARTs (Carbon – driven Anthropogenic Global Warming Alternative Reality Twats). The latest is Paris where, we are being warned by the usual suspects, humanity is drinking in the last chance saloon and if a deal to reverse climate change is not reached, will will all be fried by absolutely static temperatures … erm … soon.

Well climate predictions.org have put together a directory of all the last chance saloons humanity has been drinking in over the years since 2000. They include Lima, Cancun, Copenhagen, Bali, Doha and exclusive five star resort hotels in Places like Bonn,Poznan, Durban and Montreal. Nice little two week jollies, all of them and official delegates do not have to pay a penny for all the goods and services on offer to help them think clearly, things like gourmet food, fine wines, world class entertainment and beautiful, claean prostitutes who actually pretend they enjoy being in bed with boring, ugly climate scientists with personal hygiene issues.

And those kind people at climate predictions have added a list of predictions made by the infallible priests of climate science that should all have happened by now but haven’t, like ice free poles, snow being a think of the past and fifty million refugees, displaced from their homelands by rising sea levels.

(There was a recent attempt to link Europe’s current migrants crisis to CO2 driven climate change by claiming the Syrian civil was had been caused by rising Carbon Dioxide levels – nothing to do with the Obama Administration sponsoring terrorists to overthrow the Assad regime then? – but it was laughed out of court)

Anyway its a long post and to reproduce snippets here would not do it justice, so if you like a good laugh, read the whole thing:

RELATED POSTS:
Confusion Reigns As Paris Climate Conference Draws Near
The carbon dioxide driven climate change scam is back on the agenda as yet another monstrously expensive and fossil fuel gobbling jolly for politicians, scientists, freeloaders and general wankers gather to eat, drink, talk a lot and do nothing about a problem that exists in mathematical models but not in the real world.

Climate Conference Agreement My Arse: Germany To Build Forty New Coal And Gas Power stations

Latest Posts

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]…[Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [ Ian at Minds ] … [ The Origninal Boggart Blog] … [ TSU ]

Temperature Was Not Rising But Climate Chief’s Cock Was

Now we know a man’s sexual misdemeanours do not necessarily reflect on his ability to do a job, but given the self righteousness of the Warmageddon lobby we think it fair to point out that the moralising, patronising, head of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC), didn’t exactly have his mind on the job when we was analysing the data and telling us all we should be in carbon purdah.

Climate chief Rajendra Pachauri faces more sex claims

by Amanda Hodge, The Australian (h/t Graham Lear)

RAJENDRA Pachauri, until this week one of the world’s most influ­ential climate politicians, has been grounded in India and barred from the Delhi institute which provided the springboard for his chairmanship of the International Panel on Climate Change, as a third woman came forward alleging sexual harassment.

The railway clerk trained economist and engin­eer resigned as chairman of the Geneva-based climate scientists’ panel on Tuesday after alleg­a­tions of sustained sexual harassment made by a 29-year-old research assistant of The Energ­y Research Institute became public, though he has strenuously protested his innocence.

(Sustained eh? Well that’s probably an achievement at his age …)

A Delhi lower court extended Dr Pachauri’s bail on Thursday to March 27, on the conditions that he co-operate with police investig­ations, seeks permission before leaving the country and stays away from TERI offices, employees or witnesses.

Dr Pachauri was hospitalised earlier this week with cardiac stress, (no wonder after all that sustained sexual harassment) and his lawyer told the court the TERI director-general was to undergo open heart surgery.

It appears that since he was allowed bail he made a miraculous recovery but is expected to suffer a relapse as the trial date nears.

(TERI, the Tata Environmental Research Institute, is a front for Tata Industries, the Indian conglomerate that has become one of the biggest players in the carbon credits trading market and while at the IPCC, Pachuri constantly pushed carbon credits trading as a ‘solution to global warming’. You might say that is a conflict of interest, we could not possibly comment.)

Two other former TERI female employees have made similar claims of workplace sexual harassment by the 75-year-old, who holds 23 honorary doctorates and numerous influential board positions including with UNESCO, the Asian Development Bank and Bill Clinton’s Climate Initiative.

Neither woman has yet lodged a formal complaint. But if he’s a friend of Bill Clinton that’s not going to help his case. Wonder does he know Prince Randy Andy as well.

Acting for the two women, human rights lawyer and women’s activist Vrinda Grover said: “Presently there are three (women making allegations) but I would not close the list as there are many that are not speaking out.”

Really? I though he same from India, not Rotherham

Dr Pachauri faces charges of outraging a woman’s modesty, stalking, sexual harassment and criminal intimidation and a potential five-year jail sentence.

The original complainant’s police report, seen by The Weekend Australian, alleges that harassment by the TERI chief began within days of him joining the organ­isation in September 2013 and quickly escalated.

“On many occasions”, and despite her continued resistance, he would forcibly grab her, hug and kiss her, hold her hand and make sexual overtones, it claims.

The report contains several dozen pages of toe-curling text, email and WhatsApp correspondence allegedly from the former climate tsar, as well as self-written odes of love and self-flagellation under such titles as My Classical Indian Beauty, I Shall Withdraw and Evil and Sinful Idiot.

The woman, who cannot be named under Indian law, told The Weekend Australian the level of harassment from Dr Pachauri was so “intense” she became consumed by working out how to spurn his advances.

“I would deal with this every day; how to shake him off during the day, through the evening, on the weekends. I tried everything, everything I knew.

“I used to think: ‘How can someone like him, who does not even have the basic decency of respect­ing his colleagues, be in such a position?’ ”

In much of the alleged correspondence, Dr Pachauri acknowledges the unrequited nature of his ardour.

Read full article at The Australian

RELATED POSTS:
Beyond Big Bang: The Idea Of An Infinite Universe Is Fashionable Again
Climate alarmists cheating
IPCC scaremongering based on lies
The real agenda behind the United Nations IPCC climate change scare
Climate scam exposed
Science is a religion and climate change its fundamentalism
Scientists hate free speech
Science and ecocide
Climate change index

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]…[Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [Boggart Abroad]

APRIL FOOLS review 2014

Things are so dire this year that the April Fool jokes in the news papers are uniformly lame.

The Times’ spoof that the Duke of Saxony, a German tarot fooldescended from the James 1 and the Stuart dynasty, sees the prospect of Scottish independence as a chance to claim the throne of Scotland. The clue, however, lies in quotes attributed to an academic Amadan Giblean, whose name is a Gaelic translation of April Fool.

The Guardian takes its usual internationalist line, expressing hopes that Scotland will align itself with mainland Europe by switching to driving on the right, relabeling the road signs so that the M8 motorway becomes the S8 and constructing huge, spiralling “direction reversal” systems to avoid accidents when cross-border motorists become confused by the lane switch.

First Minister Alex Salmond’s head would replace that of the Queen on a pound coin named the “Salmond Sterling”, according to the Daily Telegraph’s “Flora Poli.” Really? I would think Mel Gibson’s head would be more appropriate after “freedom”.

The Daily Mail says it’s snapped a ministerial aide accidentally revealing the design for a “Scot-free Union Jack”, minus the blue of the saltire. It quotes “Avril McTickle” complaining that there’s “no constitutional need to change the flag”.

Meanwhile, away from Scotland, The Currant Bun’s Avril Fuel (you gotta spoonfeed Sun readers) reports that the Queen has approved fracking in the grounds of Buckingham Palace in a bid to reduce “rocketing” palace utility bills of £3.1m.

And the Daily Express says British farmer Ian Hatchett’s hens are laying square eggs at his “Flair Loop” farm, in Suffolk. That one is worth a groan.

One story I thought was a prank concerned a convict who has become a grandfather at 27 after the daughter he fathered when aged fourteen gave birth herself, aged only thirteen. Why did I think this true story was a joke? Well I haven’t been watching enough Jeremy Kyle obviously.

The United Nation Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) had the lamest April Fools joke this year:

Under the headline Climate Scientists Have The Courage To Tell It Like It Is the Daily Telegraph’s Geoffrey Lean tells it like it isn’t by misrepresenting as courageous, the cowardice of climate scientists in telling it exactly like the Rothchild banking cartel ordered them to.

The IPCC report care-in-the-community case Lean is waxing lyrical about is the 2,000 pages of Apocalyptic catastrophes for the next 1,000 years;
including fire and brimstone classics such as ….

Biblical scale tsunami’s rolling up the Thames, 150°C heatwaves causing fire-storms every second tuesday in London, Global famine giving rise to Mad Max style cannibal tribes throughout the UK, and finally …

Climate change derived Genetic Mutation bringing on the “end of times” Zombie Apocalypse !!

(Well OK, I might have made up a few of those)

With a concluding chapter along the lines of: repent repent ye sinners for the end days are upon us, The Great Whore Babylon riding on a seven headed beast is come among us !!! Prepare ye for The Rapture .. buy carbon credit offsets from your local Goldman Sachs broker.

Now what sort of numpty would fall for that tosh? Oh sorry Dave, Gideon, Nick, Ed …

the end of days by hieronymus boschDon’t know the title of this painting by Hieronymus Bosch but it fits the bill

BBC Neo Fascists Suck Up To Rothschild New World Order

ipcc climate change
“Those are some effing potent diuretics the United Nations are handing out”

I don’t think anybody would have expected an honest, critical and objective report and analysis of the latest United Nations IPCC scaremongering exercise on the climate. The Beeb cherry picks paragraphs from the report that suggest the situation is a lot worse than it is. For example, of the fifty million refugees displaced from their homes by climate change we were promised by 2012, only a few hundred actually turned up, and it’s arguable that the events they were displaced by (tsunamis, freak weather, volcanic eruption, slum clearance projects etc.) were not actually climate change related.

There is no mention of the fact that in the last seventeen years, despite CO2 levels on the slopes of Mauna Loa, the Hawaiian active volcano which is the site of the sampling station that measures the global average CO2 concentration (yeah, great innit?)

Then they go on to say that even though we have seen no significant economic or humanitarian effects of climate change yet, things will be many times worse in future. Yeah well ……… a million times zero is zero. Big deal.

Read more Hysterical politically correct scaremongering at BBC news

Or why not just wait for the predictable response from mainstream politicians of all parties, “What we need to save the planet is more public spending, more immigration and more gay rights.”

RELATED POSTS:
Kerry stops Short Of Saying Climate Science Scepticism Is a Crime But …

Ignore Scarmongering IPCC, science confirms CO2 cools the earth

The big news today is the scaremongering report issued by scientists working for the Rothschild Fear and Panic To Justify Theft Of Punters Money foundation also known as the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change. Despite containing statements that the impacts of climate change are not likely to be as severe as predicted and the predictions of mathematical models used exclusively by the Rothschild climate scientists have so far differed wildly on the alarmist side from observed reality, the fearmongering must go on to persuade people around the world to accept global totalitarian government by Rothschild appointed technocrats.

Science was ever fascism’s whore.

Do not forget however that one of the designated joint authors of the report refused to be associated with it because of the fearmongering, exaggerations, deceptions and lies it contains.

UK professor refuses to put his name to ‘apocalyptic’ UN climate change survey .

Little Nicky Machiavelli @ 2014-03-26

A UK academic has refused to put his name to the ‘apocalyptic’ UN climate change survey that he claims is exaggerating the effects of climate change.

A climate scientist has accused the United Nations of being too alarmist over global warming – and demanded his name be removed from a crucial new report.

Professor Richard Tol, an economist at the University of Sussex, said fellow UN academics were exaggerating climate change and comparing it to the ‘apocalypse’.

His comments are a blow to the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which on Monday will publish its first update in seven years on the impacts of climate change.

Previous IPCC reports on climate impact have been plagued by errors that damaged the body’s credibility

Continue reading:

And now to add to the woes of the Rothschild scientists, the Rothschild influenced Supranational bureaucracies, the Rothschild owned central banks and the Rothschild lackeys in governments of the world’s great nations, there are still some independent researchers out there doing real research on things that relate to the real world, rather that using the system known as the Rothschild Scientific Method which involves starting from an answer and working backwards to build a case to support it. People like these guys:

Science Confirmed: Carbon Dioxide & Water Vapour Cool Earth’s Atmosphere

Mexican study affirms a 1951 finding by top American scientists that
carbon dioxide (CO2) cannot cause global warming. Applying known scientific values, more eminent scientists are coming forward to confirm
that atmospheric CO2 mixes with clouds and water vapour to cause only
cooling. As such, the credibility of “consensus science” claims about
man-made global warming being caused by rises in CO2 levels are left in
serious doubt.

Professor Nasif Nahle (Monterrey, Mexico) provides a peer-reviewed paper,
‘Determining the Total Emissivity of a Mixture of Gases Containing Overlapping Absorption Bands,’
that uses known and well-established values from the results of experiments performed previously by H. C. Hottel, B. Leckner, M. Lapp,
C. B. Ludwig, A. F. Sarofim, et al, showing that the combined
effect of overlapping absorption bands of water vapour with CO2 causes a
reduction on the total absorptivity of the mixture of those gases in
earth’s atmosphere. As such, water vapour and CO2 are proven to combine
to cause global cooling, not warming.

Nahle’s paper affirms the long-forgotten findings of the eminent former head of Britain’s Met Office, CEP Brooks, and the American Meteorological Society (AMS) that also revealed that CO2 in the atmosphere could not cause warming. Brooks, Britain’s top climatologist at the time, along with America’s best meteorologists agreed that the idea that CO2 could warm the climate:

“was never widely accepted and was abandoned when it was found that all the long-wave radiation [that would be] absorbed by CO2 is [already] absorbed by water vapour.”
[see:“Geological and Historical Aspects of Climatic Change.” In Compendium of Meteorology, edited by Thomas F. Malone, pp. 1004-18 (at 1016). Boston: American Meteorological Association]

Scientists at Principia Scientific International(PSI), who peer-reviewed Nahle’s paper, are currently advising colleagues that the most reliable data available now confirms that CO2 is shown to act as a coolant in earth’s climate. As such, the notion of a so-called ‘greenhouse gas’ warming effect may be regarded as refuted, while environmental measures by governments and individuals to reduce “carbon emissions” to combat climate change are, in turn, rendered pointless.

For those interested in reading Professor Nahle’s full paper (revised April
2011), we publish it below:

Abstract
According to anthropogenic global warming (AGW)
theory, carbon dioxide increases the potential of water vapour to absorb and emit IR radiation as a consequence of the overlapping
absorption/emission spectral bands. I have determined the total emissivity of a mixture of gases containing 5% of water vapour and 0.039% of carbon dioxide in all spectral bands where their absorptivities/emissivities overlap. The result of my calculations is that carbon dioxide reduces the total absorptivity/emissivity of the water vapour, working like a coolant, not a warmer of the atmosphere and the surface …

Continue reading at Principia Scientific International

So you see, what the IPCC are trying to scare you with is not Climate Science, it’s Rothschild magic money science(i.e. we need those carbon taxes so the monster can grow because it it does not grow it dies, so the science is settled, naa naa na naa naa.)

Don’t you think its suspicious that as the desperation to get those carbon taxes implemented so governments can pay the interest on the obscene sums they have to borrow every month to make ends meet, just as governments create the illusion of economic recovery by using rigged markets to inflate another housing bubble and using that to drive a consumption led boom just ahead of the next planned crash is all a bit suspicious.

Greenteeth climate change menu

Effing Unbiased, Right?

The IPCC’s full and final findings on the state of the planet’s climate have been published and the report, which was put together for the UN, says that limiting climate change will require ‘substantial and sustained’ reductions of greenhouse gas emissions. (h/t David Icke)

‘Global warming is unequivocal and human influence has been the dominant cause since the mid-20th century, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The IPCC’s full and final findings on the state of the planet’s climate have been published and the report, which was put together for the UN, says that limiting climate change will require ‘substantial and sustained’ reductions of greenhouse gas emissions.

The findings of the report, which includes the comment that global warming is ‘almost definitely’ caused by humans, were approved by the member governments of the IPCC in September.

The final report, at first viewing, seems to be a lot less equivocal that the draft complied by environmental researchers, reviewed by environmental researchers and leaked by environmental researcher and leading AGW sceptic Donna Laframboise last year.

Here are a few key points from the latest 3000 page IPCC Report:

World temperatures have barely risen in the past 15 years. (True – in spite of all the Warmageddonist hysteria)

Temperature rises have dropped from 0.12°C per decade since 1951 to just 0.05°C per decade since 1998. (So according to the IPCC’s own statistics the warming trend is slowing?)

The slowdown is great enough to be termed a ‘pause’ or ‘hiatus’ by scientists. (True, although it can only really be called a pause after it starts again)

Sea levels have risen by 19cm on average since 1901, with the rate of increase higher than in the previous two millennia. (Again true, although it would be more honest to mention that sea levels have been rising for the past 20,000 (approx.) years, since the last glacial maxium and will continue to rise until we reach the interglacial minimum)

Over the long term, from 1951, climate models have matched what has happened to global temperatures, the report said. (As climate models have only existed since the 1980s this must be regarded as a very dubious claim)

It is ‘extremely likely’ – with at least 95 per cent certainty – that humans are the main cause of rising temperatures since the 1950s. (But humans affect the environment in many ways, notice they avoid giving a specific reason? So that’s a definite maybe then?)

It is worth noting that the IPCC accepts and includes findings from people such as John Mitchell, Principal Research Scientist at the UK Met Office, who is on record as saying “People underestimate the power of models, observational data is not very useful“. Seems that scientific research based on empirical data is no longer needed by the IPCC, all contradictory physical observations can be ignored because it is easier to make stuff up and say “The computer cannot be wrong.”

You couldn’t make it up.