What A Wonderful Result

Forget the World Cup (well done Germany though) the big result of the weekend is another great win for the conspiracy theorists as former appeal Court Jude and Cover – Up artist par excellence Baroness Butler – Sloss is forced by a torrent of public outrage to step down as chair of the official whitewashing of inquiry into sexual high crimes and misdemeanours among the elite.

With allegations that have been simmering since the 1980s now coming to the boil, and Butler – Sloss having been involved in a previous cover up while her brother, former Attoney General to Margaret Thatcher’s government Sir Michael Havers having been accused of cronyism for his failure to prosecute diplomat and known paedophile, the late Sir Peter Ancram andgoing way beyond his job description in his efforts to prevent Tory MP Geoffery (honourable-but-dim) Dickens using Parliamentary privilege to name Ancram, surely David Cameron’s decision to appoint Butler – Sloss for her expertise in covering up investigating allegations of sexual abuse committed by members of the elite must be an indication of complicity in the cover up rather than pure and simple incompetence.

Whichever way you look at it, the way all this has at last expoled in the establishments face (and driven another million or so votes to UKIP) is a great result for those of us who have been talking about corruption at all levels of the establishment for thirty years now (I was doing jokes about Havers and Ancram, Jimmy Savile and Stuart Hall, Leon Brittan and hush puppies (any a numberr of Labour figures) in the early 1980s (and getting pulled offstage for going too far over the line on one occasion).

But forget the establishment and their cover ups, let’s do a bit of examining the evidence of our own:

Butler-Sloss ‘kept allegations of bishop’s abuse quiet because she she ‘cared about the Church

Why Do The Left Love Paedophiles

Judge Butler – Sloss Best To Head Elitist Paedophile Cover Up Inquiry – Cameron

No Conspiracy Of Silence On Elitist Paedophiles

Organising a Cover Up to Cover Up a Cover up? Just call The Establishment

Conspiracy: What Has Induced The BBC paranoia about paedophiles

RELATED POSTS:
What Happened To Battling Barbara’s VIP Paedophile Dossier
The Greenteeth menu of conspiracies

The Arrogance Of The New Elite

In the last few days I’ve been busy winding up the Sheeple who always obey The Guardian and so have tried to brand UKIP a racist party. One of the memes has been “UKIP have no policies apart from quitting Europe”. This is pretty rich coming from people who are telling us we must vote for one of the three parties whose only policy is to smear UKIP with false accusations of racism.

It is of course typical of the new elite (and the Sheeple who follow them)to try to claim the moral high ground when dismissing the working classes as ignorant, violent drunken knuckle draggers who are incapable of thinking for themselves. Intellectuals have always despised the masses and I see no sign of change, if anything Politically Correct attitudes have made things worse.

By coincidence a perfect example of this growing but entirely synthetic gab between the elitists of Tony Blair’s meritocracy and ordinary people who can’t gain advantage by playing identity politics was widely reported today. Constance Briscoe, Britain’s most senior black woman judge, has been sentenced to 16 months in jail after being found guilty at the Old Bailey of lying to police investigating the Chris Huhne speeding points scandal.

constance briscoehuhne pryce
Pictures Constance Briscoe outside The high Court: Chris huhne and Vicky Pryce

from The Daily Telegraph
“Briscoe, of Clapham, South London, was found guilty of trying to pervert the course of justice in connection with the investigation into how disgraced cabinet minister Mr Huhne passed speeding points to his then-wife Vicky Pryce a decade ago.

Jailing her, judge Mr Justice Baker told Briscoe that if she and Pryce shared anything in common it was “arrogance by educated individuals who considered respect for the law was for others”.

He said the conviction was a “personal tragedy” for a woman who had been “something of a role model for others”.

The 56-year-old had been suspended since her arrest in October 2012 and could now be barred from sitting as a judge.”

Bag o’shite, Judges perverting the course of justice? Whatever next?

Before she became embroiled with the Huhne case Ms. Briscoe had been something of a darling of the left wing media. This article in digitaljournal.com chroncles her rise and fall. No need for me to rewrite any of the points made, the article illustrates perfectly the attitude I am talking about.

These meritocrats of the new left wing, ‘progressive’ elite see nothing wrong in interpreting the laws of the nation as applying differently to their own class that they would if supporters of an opposing politcal position or a different social class committed the same offence. And does anyone really think Constance Briscoe would have put her career on the line if Nigel Farage and his wife or Boris Johnson and his other half had been in trouble. my guess is the learned lady would have taken great delight in twisting the knife.

These despicable double standards are filtering down through society however. In another item I remarked that while UKIP are quick to expel or suspend members for comments that are even slightly off colour, the Labour Party is full of racists like Diane Abbott and David Lammy whose intentionally incendiary remarks are calculated to heighten inter racial tensions and the lefties don’t say a world.

So let’s get this straight, to oppose uncontrolled immigration as UKIP have is not racist. To encourage mass immigration with the aim of changing the ethnic balance of Britain (as Labour have admitted they did between 1997 and 2010) is a policy designed to bring about the genocide of English, Scottish and Welsh ethnicity and therefore IS racist.

And if you belong to those ethnic groups and support the genocide of that group it does not mean you are not racist, it means you are an incredibly stupid racist. Blair, like The Rent Boy President Obama might have dreamed of creating a Rainbow Nation but with only four characters to work with it’s hard to see how they would keep a developed nation running …

rainbow cast
Rainbow: Jeffrey, Bungle, Zippy and George – which would you be an a Rainbow nation? (source: Wikimedia commons)

RELATED POSTS:

White Girl Is Burned Alive, 17 Black Gang Members Arrested. Mainstream Media Blanks The Story
Remember how the Social Justice Warriors of the politically correct ‘left’ screamed when a young black man named Trayvon Martin was shot by Hispanic George Zimmerman, because it was assumed someone named Zimmerman would be white? Remember how they wailed and stirred up civil unrest when a black man was shot by white cops in Ferguson, Missouri, automatically assuming the the killing was racially motivated. more >>>

Threat to free speech
Genocide of ideas
Humanitas

Legal and indecent?

QC Anthony Arlidge, 75, has been accused of being “bonkers” after he abandoned his long term partner, Judge Constance Brisco for an law student a third of his age.

Mr Arlidge who has worked on some of Britain’s most high profile court cases jilted Ms. Briscoe as they celebrated her daughter’s birthday. (This actually sounds like a plot line from a soap opera.) The Cambridge-educated barrister announced he was moving out of their marital home in Clapham, south London. He is now sharing his central London apartment and Kent country house with the 27 year-old, understood to called Heather.

His decision occurred as the couple were discussing how he would spend his time during his impending retirement and had bought a house together in the South of France.

Obviously ‘Tony’ had his own plans which did not include quiet evenings with his 55 year old other half.

Ms Brisco commented: “I just thought the whole thing was a bit ridiculous and I still think it is, I feel sorry for him and I feel sorry for her. He is charming and engaging and I am sure that any female of any age would be attracted to him.”

Mr. Aldridge is far too old for a mid life crisis so we will not mock. Instead we wish him every happiness with his new, young, horny lover and will write a nice obituary for him which we expect to post sometime next week.

Fascist Judge Should Be Taken Outside And Shot.

In one of the most gobsmackingly biased politically motivated ruling ever to come from a leftie judge, a left wing piolitoical activist judge who should not even be on the bench because of his political bias ruled that the saying of prayers at the start of council meetings because is unlawful in a case brought against Bideford Council.

Now though a non believer myself I am a liberal and a libertarian and will always defend the rights of people I don’t agree with. And in a democracy the majority is always right no matter what self righteous lefties may feel. So I investigated.

In his written verdict the Judge actually admitted it is not actually unlawful to say prayers at the start of a meeting.

He said: “A local authority has no power under section 111 of the Local Government Act 1972, or otherwise, to hold prayers as part of a formal local authority meeting, or to summon councillors to such a meeting at which prayers are on the agenda.”

I was pretty sure this clause undermined the politically biased ruling on the case which was brought by Cllr. Waddac Hunt and the National Secular Society (or National Socialists as they are now known) and also I was nauseated by the quasi religious rejoicing of lefties who think they have won “a victory for human rights” by depriving others of certain rights and freedoms for the sake of their own self righteousness. (lefties rejoicing would make rat nauseous so you can imagine I was well revolted) So I IMd my mate Colin LLB who said.

“The Judge is talking bollocks. The crux of this case is the word ‘summoned’. Telling someone the meeting is about to start may be interpreted by people of ill will as issuing a summons but as long as nobody is compelled to attend the first few minutes it is not ulawful. Telling someone ‘If you don’t get your arse in the chamber and say prayers you will be thrown in the oubliet,’ would be. This is a political verdict.

Then I phoned another friend who was a councillor for many years and an MP. He said “We used to say prayers at the start of meetings, nobody felt their human rights were being violated. Atheists and Muslims just used to stand outside the chamber until it was done.

And the Lords and Commons have always said prayers but nobody is compelled to take part. Being told prayers are about to begin is not being summoned to prayers but a warning that the session is about to start”.

So there we have it. The Judge should be taken outside and shot for being incompetent and partisan. Members of the National Secular Society should be taken outside and shot for wasting taxpayers money on a case like this and for being small minded, mean spirited bigots intent on imposing their narrow minded view on an overwhelming majority of those who like to say prayers and those who don’t give a flying fuck so long as nobody makes us join in. And because they are a bunch of boring little tits as well.

The Councillor who brought the case should be banged up in a padded cell for the safety of himself and others. But mostly himself.

And bigoted, fascistic lefties whose minds are so FUBAR they think this kind of thing is important when the world is falling apart around us should be taken outside and shot because it’s the only humane thing to do.

RELATED POSTS:
Equal Rights Conflict
More faith related posts
The Daily Stirrer – February 2012

Randy Judges’ Rumpy Pumpy Video Goes Unpunished

Two senior Judges in the Immigration Court, Mohammed Khan and “Judge J” whose identity is protected by a court order (would any other married woman caught doing a bit of illicit shagging be treated with such consideration we wonder?) have been reprimanded for injudiciously employing an illegal immigrant as a cleaner and triggering a sex scandal.
The Judge’s lack of judgement came to light when the cleaner, Roselane Driza, stole two sex videos the pair had made and tried to blackmail them.
Judge Khan (61) and Judge J who is in her fifties (both old enough to know better then) refused to pay which led to the Brazilian cleaner making public allegations about their sex life.
After a lot of legal wrangling the case has now been quietly swept under the carpet. Khan has retired and Judge J is on extended sick leave.
So what could possibly have been on those video tapes that the Home Office feel the need to keep them out of the news and in the closet alongside the two judges’ collection of whips, second skin body suits, gimp masks and assorted fetish gear?
Boggart Network News dispatched our “airy spirit” ace investigative reporter to find out. He reports back that as we hoped, the legal lovers were at it in their judicial robes and wigs.

No Dodgy Syrups in Civil Court Cases.

We’re not sure whether the news that soon judges in civil law cases will no longer be required to wear those ridiculous horsehair wigs is a good thing or not.
The question is will the change pressure judges into abandoning also their silk stockings, suspenders and waspie waist-cincher. Or, will the end of this anachronism make them feel liberated enough to choose some entirely more fetching headwear in auburn or blonde from one of those specialist shops we find in the seedy part of town.