Why You Will Soon Be Sorry You didn’t Vote UKIP

The EU is anti democracy, the unelected bureaucrats of the EU Commission (the guys who really run things) regard the European parliament as irrelevant. And yet the members of the pro integration Social Democrat – Christian Democrat alliance that has a safe majority believes it has the right to select the next President of the EU Commission.

Here’s a brief note on the three leading candidates:

from The Daily Stirrer, How Can Mainstream Politics Respond To The Anti EU Surge Across Europe?:

… the next president of the EU executive branch, the European Commission, will be appointed soon after the elections. In the EU administrative structure, the commission is largely in charge of what goes on. Bizarrely, because of the Lisbon Treaty, that fine example of EU democracy which was a rehashed version of the European Constitution vetoed by voters in France, The Netherlands and Ireland, but which the EU bureaucracy went ahead and adopted anyway (sic), no one knows who ultimately decides who becomes the president, although the EP claims that it, somehow, has the democratic right to determine the appointment.

The three leading candidates the EP has proposed make current president, the Stalinist billionaire José Manuel Barroso who has said that for the Europe project to succeeed individual nations must cease to exist and that the European Parliament is irrelevant and if the MEPs do not approve a recommendation, the bureaucrats “just go ahead and do it anyway”.

Against the candidates to replace him however, Barosso looks like a raving Eurosceptic: for the socialists there is Martin Schulz, who thinks it’s “possible and necessary” to have a United States of Europe; the liberals offer Belgian Guy Verhofstadt, who has likened Cameron to a “mad man threatening to blow himself up”; and, for the EPP, the uninspiring Jean-Claude Juncker, for 18 years the prime minister of Luxembourg, infamous for saying important EU decisions should be taken “in dark secret rooms”.”

“When it becomes serious, you have to lie,” Junker once offered as an excuse when a European Commission answer to a query by a political leader in one of the member states was expose as a fabrication.

So the fresh faces of European democracy are all 55-plus men owing their careers to the dated notion of “ever closer union” that led to the big gap between voters and Brussels in the first place. Even in Germany, only 17 per cent of voters can identify their compatriot Martin Schulz as a lead candidate, according to a recent poll.

Feeling outraged at the contempt these smooth faced pen pusher and bean counters have for us? Or maybe your dream of a utopian future fearures a the military boot stamping down on a human face forever, that George Orwell foretold. Here’s what the BBC Europe correspondent Chis Morris reported today:

Parliamentary leaders are waiting to see whether their cunning plan to nominate the next president of the European Commission will actually bear fruit.

The centre-left Socialist group has, somewhat reluctantly, backed the bragging rights of the candidate from the centre-right European People’s Party (EPP), Jean-Claude Juncker.

“The EPP – despite substantial losses – remains the largest group in the European Parliament,” said Johannes Swoboda, the head of the Socialist group in the outgoing parliament.

“Its candidate for commission president therefore has the clear right to start negotiations to seek a majority in the European Parliament.”

When I asked Mr Juncker last week if he could direct me to the clause in the Lisbon treaty that gives him the “clear right” to be nominated, he looked at me with barely concealed distaste.

“You see it from your perspective,” he said, “and I see it from mine. It’s about democracy.”

Let’s (briefly) be clear. The Lisbon Treaty says EU leaders must take the results of the European elections into account when they decide whom to nominate.

The parliament gets to vote on the nomination, but it has also interpreted the treaty language to mean whichever parliamentary group wins the elections should automatically win the nomination as well.

Continue reading on BBC News

OK, that’s a little peep at how things get done in Europe, bitter and acrimonious infighting kept out of public view and secret deals made by sleazy political operators behind closed doors.

That is why you should have voted UKIP, that is why we should get out and that is why those left wing Nazis, particularly the self congratulating idiots who are too politically illiterate to understand what they are supporting is fascism, should be marginalised and subjected to ridicule at every opportunity.

Will Anti European Union Feeling Lead To More Integration
Human Rights – A Straitjacket On Liberty.

How To Destabilize A Nation

orange revolution ukraine
The Orange Revolution 2004 – 5 (Ukraine get’s Tangoed)

Remember the last revolution in Ukraine, it hapened a few years ago, was called the colour revolution and there was a lot of orange involved but no bowler hats or liliburlero.

With the recent destabilization having taken place inside Ukraine and the ongoing destabilization of Venezuela currently playing out in South America, it’s time to step back from the emotions (especially people on the left of the political spectru8m whose knee jerk reaction is always to assume those trying to overthrow the legitimate government are the good guys even if they are human organ noshing Syrian religious fanatics or neo Fascist Ukrainian gangsters, and look in an objective way at the bigger picture. The first thing to stike us ought to be the manner in which the destinies of seemingly independent nations are controlled by a world oligarchy, for example have you noticed how the rebels (insurgents as the media insist on calling them though they are usually natives of the country they are trying to take over and so aren’t surging in from anywhere) always seem to be a rag bag of political factions, tribal minorities and and religious extremists? There are no coherent rebel groups with a set of demands, a manifesto or even an ideology.

The traditional methods of regime change consist of balkanization (see above), and the weakening of nation-states for political and/or geopolitical purposes. These however are too lengthy and uncertain for the New World Order whose global kleptocracy agenda is nothing to do with nation building and everything to do with enslavement through debt.

This reduces the options for destabilization somewhat. The open war method favoured by the Bush administration 2000 – 2008 in the USA is costly, usually a PR disaster and relies on opponents being gangsters, dupes, fanatics, warlords, suicide jockeys or followers of a criminally insane messianic cult leader . Such people can easily be provoked into committing atrocities that justify a regime chnage campaign.

The Brzezinski method, named for bill Clinton’s hit man Zbigniew Brzezinski. This is favoured by Liberal Fascists like the Clinton Andministration and Tony Blair’s New Labour. The technique is to shaft the economy of the target nation, cause as much social stress as possible, undermine the government, and in some cases allow the gangsters, dupes, fanatics, warlords, suicide jockeys or followers of a criminally insane messianic cult leader to directly seize power and set about a genocide. Then it is possible for the caring, sharing, Kumbaya singing liberal do gooders to declare they are launching a humanitarian mission before starting to bomb and shell the crap out of some third world failed state.

Lastly, there is the strategy of the “color revolution” modelled on the 2004 – 2005 unrest in Ukraine in which, after an unpopular election result, people took to the streets en masse, wearing orange armbands or waving orange flags. Though largely nonviolent in terms of destruction of life or property and is often made up of the genuinely disillusioned the movement is directed by the most disingenuous agents of powerful interests, the banking cartel. The aim is to make sure the new regime takes over a ruined economy so it will need a massive injection of cash loans which will be secured with bonds. And thus the nation is enslaved until the next revolution.

Color revolutions have been more successful in the Baltic states and Eastern Europe than in the Middle East where human organ noshers and mad mullahs tent to intimidate the flag wavers it is important to understand, that the NGOs (Non-Governmental Organizations), Foundations, and “Human Rights” organizations are always active in the countries where revolution happens, acting as political advisers, educators, trainers, development officers, and community organizers.

So we see that the global terrorist organisation is not Al Qaeda but the United Nations.

World On The Brink – USA And Russia Square Up In Ukraine
Former US Presidential nomination runner Dennis Kucinich says US instigated Ukraine Crisis