BBC and Savile: Phrases like ‘Tip of the iceberg’ come to mind

Boggart Blog has not done a lot on the Jimmy Savile scandal, it seemed everybody else (except the mainstream media and the government’s propaganda ministry national broadcaster, The BBC of course.

It seems we were remiss in bypassing this story and leaving it to others. Two years after first breaking the Savile /BBC paedophile scandal is still making news and still producing new shocks. And I will never forgive myself for commenting to my family, on hearing Rolf Harris was being question, “Not dear old Rolf, he might have had dubious reasons for tying his Kangaroo down but kiddie fiddling, surely not.”

Well its time to play catch up on this aspect of a much bigger scandal that now looks set to have a major influence on the outcome of the General Election in May as ongoing revelations of malfeasance, corruption and cover – up expose how thoroughly rotten and corrupt the establishment is.

We have reported the Westminster Paedophile Ring allegations quite fully so to get readers up to speed on the Jimmy Savile affair, there’s a comprehensive summary to be in The Coleman Report. Here’s a taster:

from The Coleman Experience:

(scroll past a gallery of newspaper front pages to get to the story – and please don’t assume I agree with the writers’ conclusions or political positions, the idea is you look at the information and make up your own mind about how valid it is. I find this works well for most people except those silly scienceheads and university lecturers who have a binary mindset and are incapable of filtering information, thus only being able to believe a thing totally or dismiss it completely)

The BBC And The Paedophile Ring

If you thought for one minute that the BBC is, in anyway, as it appears to be, you’re very sadly mistaken.

Behind the comforting British TV façade, lies a paedophile network ,so vast and sordid it literally beggars belief.

Don’t be fooled into thinking that Jimmy Savile was a lone pervert stalking the broadcast centre.

He wasn’t.

Savile was, in fact, working as a VIP pimp, procuring children to be abused and often murdered, by Royalty, Government and showbiz entertainers.

He managed to hoodwink the British public for over 50 years due to his close links to Prince Philip, the Secret Services and Margaret Thatcher, who were themselves up to their necks in filth of the highest order.

In 2013, reports emerged of a paedophile ring on the set of Eastenders:

Police are investigating allegations of a paedophile ring operating around the set of the popular BBC soap EastEnders.

Police say that former members of the show’s staff may have abused their jobs to groom vulnerable underage youngsters, who flock to the set hoping to catch a glimpse of its stars.

Arrests are said to be imminent, according to the Sun.

“Police are shocked at what they have unearthed,” a source told the tabloid. “Arrests are very likely. This is bigger than anyone imagined. (h/t Ben Pursglove)

RELATED POSTS:

The Public Interest to Protect Powerful Paedophiles
The Director of Public Prosecutions has decided that it would not be in the public interest to prosecute serial paedophile Greville Janner, for many years the leader of the Zionist lobby in the UK. I presume that his convenient senility is the reason for non-prosecution …

The Public Interest to Protect Powerful Paedophiles
The Director of Public Prosecutions has decided that it would not be in the public interest to prosecute serial paedophile Greville Janner, for many years the leader of the Zionist lobby in the UK. I presume that his convenient senility is the reason for non-prosecution …

BBC Democracy Day: Europe ‘faces political earthquakes’
We can’t prove sex with children does them harm’ says Labour-linked NCCL

Advertisements

BBC Marginalises Truth Tellers

Its good to see the left in disarray and various left wing propaganda merchants at each others throats.

For the second time this month (and it’s only the 8th today) The Guardian is attacking those cover up kings at the BBC.

Jimmy Savile advertizes Stoke Manderville Hospital, from where he operated a brothel for celebrity necrophiliacs and famous people who like to have sex with basket cases (image source)

from The Guardian:

Nobody from John Humphrys in the morning to Evan Davis at night dares mention the tide of scandal that is swamping the BBC. It undermines their reporting of every abuse whistleblowers reveal. It reinforces the dirty common sense of British life that you must keep your head down and not tell the truth if you want to keep your job.

The scandal is simply this: the BBC is forcing out or demoting the journalists who exposed Jimmy Savile as a voracious abuser of girls. As Meirion Jones put it to me: “There is a small group of powerful people at the BBC who think it would have been better if the truth about Savile had never come out. And they aim to punish the reporters who revealed it.”

Jones was one of the BBC’s best investigative producers. He had suspected that Savile was not the “national treasure” the BBC, NHS, monarchy and public adored, ever since he had seen Savile take girls away in his car from an approved school his aunt ran in the 1970s. He broke the story which showed that Savile was one of the most prolific sex abusers in British history, and handed the BBC what would have been one of its biggest scoops. If it had run it. Which, of course, it did not. The editor of Newsnight banned the report. Thus began a cover-up which tore the BBC apart.

Read full article at Guardian online

While it is satisfying to see the walls of fortress Establishment crumbling, what is really irritarting at the moment in the number of libertarian bloggers (people who really should know better) clinging to the “move along now, nothing to see here, it all happened a long time ago so there’s no evidence.”

Well yes, right, let’s be a nation of smug, prissy, bourgeois twats like the 1950s and early 60s Britain I grew up in. Never talk about anything embarrassing, just pretend it didn’t happen.

Well no thanks because right up to recently the rich and famous were literally getting away with murder, their peers would close ranks and protect them. Look at the case of Lord Lucan, murdered their working class nanny having mistaken her for his wife, but his friends (as they admitted a few years ago) obstructed the murder investigation and helped him get away. We can only hope he lived out his years in abject misery.

Much the same happened with Savile, the paedophile, necrophile, crippleophile, retardophile, everyfuckingthingelseophile, glorified DJ and professional weirdo. The BBC covered for him for years. When I was doing bits of broadcasting for BBC local radio in the 1980s it was well know you didn’t leave the kids who volunteered as runners etc. alone with Savile. His proclivities were a running joke, sick I know but as he was so well protected by senior management it was impossible to do anything other than mock him.

Everyone knew. And as for the smug twats who now say, “There’s no evidence,” there is actually plenty of evidence that complaints about the pervy old bastard (and good old Uncle ‘two little boys’ Rolf, and Sturart Hall were simply ignored by those creepy, self righteous, self satisfied Marxist shits at the BBC, you know the ones, they want to import more foreign paedophiles to ‘culturally enrich’ young girls who are living in council care homes and who want to tell us all what we can and cannot think.

It’s time we rebelled. A vote for Lab, Con or LD is a vote for paedophiles, for cover ups, for accepting the fact that the government does not give a shit about the masses, so long as enough votes can be bought with state benefit payments to preserve the status quo.

RELATED POSTS:
Free Speech: Reporters Without Borders unblocks access to censored websites
It is surprising in view of what we now know about the collaboration between internet technology corporations and government security agencies that many people still think og the internet as a bastion of freedom. This page shows how easy it is for governments and corporations to censor web content.

Don Hale: Leon Brittan’s fingers were in everything relating to the Westminster child abuse scandal.

Don Hale after overturning a miscarriage of justice in The Bakewell Tart case (image source)

Don Hale, former editor of The Bury Messenger, close friend of (Baroness) Barbara Castle and eventual exposer of a miscarriage of justice in the ‘Bakewell Tart’ case has been frustrated by official efforts to keep the lid on the Westminster Paedophile Ring case and the role played by former Home Secretary Leon Brittan in covering up allegations of child abuse in which senior politicians, judges and civil servants were named as abusers.

Now that Brittan is dead he is no longer protected by British libel law, and Hale has been talking to US online news site The Daily Beast.

Previously Mr. Hale has alleged that former future Prime Minister Brittan was actively involved in a cover up of child abuse by a paedophile ring including prominent Westminster MPs.

In the Daily Beast interview he returns to the subject of a dossier on the abuse handed to him by Labour peer and then Cabinet Minister Barbara Castle, and later seized by Special Branch officers. The newsman says the content of that dossier was suppressed by Brittan. He says the then Home Secretary “was mentioned in everything you picked up, his fingerprints were over everything, he was the instigator”.

Brittan who passed away in January following a long battle with cancer had for several years faced growing questions over what he knew about allegations that a network of paedophiles had operated in Westminster during the 1980s.

He admitted receiving a file from Geoffrey Dickens, then a Conservative MP, regarding the allegations but insisted that he had acted properly in passing the documents over to officials for examination. A review in 2013 supported his claims. The dossier however had been lost.

Hale’s latest allegations put the spotlight back on Westminster as the scandal continues to grow. Days after Brittan’s death, Labour MP Tom Watson who has been pivotal in bringing the case back into the public domain said he spoke to several people who claim they were raped by the late politician. One male victim was a child when he was allegedly raped by Brittan.

“Many have urged me over the past two years to reveal allegations against Brittan using parliamentary privilege,” Watson told The Daily Mirror. “This allows MPs to say things that are not subject to libel laws. Some will ask why I’ve waited until his death to speak out. The reason is simple. I didn’t want to prejudice any jury trial he might one day face.”

It is unfortunate that many authority worshippers on both the right and left have now decided to take the like that “it was all a long time ago and there is now no reliable evidence on which to prosecute the accused, let’s just forget it.

While it’s true that a fair trial would be difficult, it is not so much the named individuals, who are mostly very old, sick men, who are on trial but the establishment, the culture of closing ranks and covering each others’ arses when difficult questions are asked, and the question of whether we want to be ruled by an unaccountable elite.

Boggart Blog says it is the British political system that is on trial. And its conviction and execution for treason are long overdue.

Paedophila is normal in human males? Is it really, Professor?

University Professors settle into their new, purpose built faculty on Devils Island
(Steve McQueen and Dustin Hoffman in Papillion – Image Source)

Regular readers of this blog will not need to be reminded that we don’t have much time for academics. For the most part they tend to be useless individuals who couldn’t hold down jobs as shelf stackers or burger flippers were they forced to live in the real world.

Due to the bizarre way our education system assess human intelligence however, i.e. by the ability to memorise information from books and repeat it ad infinitum rather than real problem solving abilities, they tend to be very well rewarded for being part of the intellectual elite, in spite of the fact that they contribute little of value to society but instead live lives of idleness and self indulgence.

Thus I was not surprised to see amid all the recent kerfuffle about paedophiles, some professor trying to justify paedophila as normal. Well why not, that motherfucker Freud built an entire scientific discipline around justifying his pervey desires.

Pervey desires are common among academics it seems. “Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” according to a presentation given at a Cambridge University conference last year.

It went on to claim, “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”

Well normal University Professors maybe, but while I loved my children and love my grandchildren in a way that is healthy and normal in a parent of grandparent, I tend to think of children as whinging, screaming little snot factories who should be kept far away from normal human males. And that goes for all the adiult males I count as friends. To all of us children are about as sexually alluring as cold pea soup.

Back in the Seventies or early Eighties, the era of ‘live like you wanna live’, hippy cod philosophy and Kinsey bollocks, touchy feely celebrities and the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange and all-join-hands-and-sing-kumbaya people were always coming out with such shite.

In fact several young political activists who are now senior figures in the Labour Party supported PIE’s bid to have the age of consent lowered from sixteen to FOUR. Equal rights for Paedos and all that.
again.

The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers.

Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.” (a sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds)

Now I defend the idea that universities ought to be places where all ideas can be given a hearing and if all ideas were being treated fairly I would say discussing this stuff is fine. But when many Universities, Cambridge prominent among them, are denying a platform to those wishing to speak against the global warming scam, take issue with the denial of free speech to opponents of feminism or those who have evidence of the harm dome to humans and animals by the consumption of GM organisms, or who wish to argue against uncontrolled immigration then I start to veer towards the view that it is time we closed most of our universities and banged up the creepy, pervy, self interested academics in safe refuges modelled on the old Devils Island penal colony.

RELATED POSTS:
Elite abuse scandal: Former MI6 agent admits giving big names to sex dossier MP
Tony Holland, a former British secret service agent has admitted passing names of ‘sexual deviants’ to Geoffrey Dickens, the Conservative MP who compiled dossiers on the paedophile activities in Westminster, which were inexplicably lost after being passed to Leon Brittan, who was Home Secretary in the Thatcher’s government.
Former IMF Chief On Trial For Pimping
High Class Prostitutes Are Used As Bribes In Business Deals.
Love For Sale (with loyalty points)
Sleeping With Conservatives
Sex Education Kerfuffle
Practical Sex Education

And now they’re covering up the cover up of the coverup.

Fair play to The Daily Mail, I know mere mention of that paper’s title is enough to send some of our readers into a hissy fit, but the Mail and The Daily Mirror are the only mainstream media publications that to the Westminster Paedophile scandal seriously before the Jimmy Savile story broke and both have stayed on the case.

The latest development in the blocking of an inquiry into the cover up of the fudged cover up of the original scandal is run by The Mail On Sunday today.

The Mail reports:

The troubled inquiry into historic child abuse is facing fresh criticism after it emerged that panel members were told what to say to MPs by a long-serving Home Office official.
Experts and abuse survivors were given a 23-page document advising them how to answer ‘difficult questions’ when they appeared before a high-profile committee, prompting fears that the huge Government-ordered investigation is not independent.
It can also be revealed that the woman in charge of administration for the inquiry was seconded from the Home Office, where she has worked for 36 years – even though the department is at the centre of many of the allegations of cover-ups and VIP paedophile rings.

Last night critics said it was yet another blow to the reputation of the inquiry, which has barely begun work more than six months after it was announced.
Baroness Butler-Sloss and Fiona Woolf both had to quit as chairman over conflicts of interest, with the replacement due to be announced this week.
Keith Vaz, chairman of the Home Affairs Select Committee, told The Mail on Sunday: ‘We are concerned that members of the secretariat, who have been seconded from the Home Office, have told witnesses what to say.’

Many commentators say the establishment have been desperate to prevent this inquiry getting started before the election as what is revealed with blow apart the cosy political clique of the Westminster village. We think the cover up of the cover up of the cover up of the paedophile sexiry allegations has become so ludicrous it would actually be less damaging to let the inquiry go ahaed.

As out great war leader (no, not him, the other one) once said, “Publish and be damned.”

ADDENDUM
from The Sunday People, a Mirror Group newspaper:

Russian and US spies compiled their own secret dossiers on paedophile MPs and other VIP abusers , it has been claimed.

Police are investigating missing files put together by UK campaigners which allege a powerful network at the heart of Westminister in the 1970s and 80s.

The Sunday People can reveal that agents from the Russian KGB and the American CIA were also said to have compiled their own intelligence in search of “dirt” on key individuals at the height of the Cold War.

One source close to the KGB said: “These were troubled times and my task was to identify people who could perhaps help us with information.

“We knew of some MPs who loved rent boys, and others who were active paedophiles.

“We were also aware of some unusual activities at Westminster and the work of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE).

“Several regular names emerged and we wanted to make contact and use this to our advantage.

“In those days, MPs were protected by Special Branch and anyone with a chequered history, or an unhealthy appetite for young children, was soon flagged up by them.

“They had a difficult job but were fully aware that we knew what they knew, and they tried hard to suppress any possible leaks.”

Former Home Secretary Leon Brittan, who died last week, was named in the historical sexual abuse scandal after claims he was handed a dossier containing details of the abuse allegations in the 1980s.

Click Here to read full article

RELATED POSTS:
Child abuse among the Westminster Elite
Birmingham leads the rest in child abuse by immigrants scandals
The Rochdale immigrant child abuse scandal
Rotherham grooming and abuse case sees immigrant men convicted
Why do the left love paedophiles
Elitist paedophile proves one law for them, another for the masses

So Who’s Making Up Innuendos About Leon Brittan

The rumor mill has gone wild since the death of alleged dossier – shredder Leon Brittan. Bizarrely his friend Lord Deben seems to think the various allegations raging from Brittan’s role in covering up the activities of a Westminster paedophile ring, to his actual involvement in sexual abuse of children only originated recently.

Politicians who have used Twitter to make “innuendos and insinuations” about Lord Brittan are “wicked” and should “shut up”, a friend of the late peer has said.

Lord Deben, a former cabinet minister, accused MPs of maligning Lord Brittan’s reputation “in order to make themselves look as if they know something when they don’t”.

Brittan was also also accused of “improper conduct with children” by Labour MPs in the Commons in October last year, sparking a row over parliamentary privilege.

Two dossiers submitted to the Home Office, one by Geoffrey Dickens, the late Tory MP, the other by Former Labour Cabinet Minister Baroness (Battling Barbara) Castle but no record of any subsequent criminal inquiry has been found and both dossiers have disappeared.

Earlier this week another secret government file on ‘the unnatural sexual behaviour’ of politicians and public servants at Westminster was found by an academic carrying out research at the Government’s National Archive in Kew.

Is it too much of a very coincidence that the government figure whose name featured most prominently in the case died just a day after the ‘unnatural sex’ folder was handed to the authorities and news of its existence was leaked to the media? You may say that, we could not possibly comment.

RELATED POSTS:
Child abuse cases, Birmingham, Bristol, Nottingham
The 30 year cover up of elitists unnatural sexual activities
The Rochdale grooming and sex abuse scandal
The Rotherham grooming and sex abuse scandal
Why do the left love paedophiles

Well he Would Wouldn’t He

Some time ago we were all busy speculating about which member of the  Royal family was named in the elite sex abuse scandal. Well now the name is in the Public Domain the Boggart Blog bookie is congratulating himself on having declined to take bets. his money was on creepy Edward you see. But the name thrown up by the media today is that of Fat Andy, Prince Andrew, the one we all reackoned was quite close to normal if you overlook his habit of demanfing an RAF helicopter to take him the couple of miles from Windsor Castle to his favourite golf course. 

After a report from the USA named him as an associate of American billionaire banker and San Quentin Quail merchant Jeffrey Epstein (wich prompted another of Andy’s American friends, Bill Clinton to comment “Andrew, yeah he used to be a good friend til he got found out but now I never knew him) who kept several very young girls as sex slaves to service his pervy mates, buckingham Palace took the news seriously enough to publish Prince Andrew’s denial.

This only prompted us to thenk of the lady pictured below, who sadly shuffled off this mortal coil recently, and whose famous uip in response to being told some posh bloke had denied ever having had anything to do with her, “Well he would, wouldn’t he?” will earn her a little place in history.

                                                                        Mandy Rice Davis