Weinstein scandal: What it tells us about celebs, American politics & Hollywood

The Harvey Weinstein sexual harassment scandal which has rocked the Hollywood establishment and shocked America to its core, according to mainstream media should not have surprised anyone (if fact much of the shock and horror being expressed is typical Hollywood liberal hypocrisy.) And now the story has broken, it seems that as well as a few who were actually victims of this man, all the usual suspects are jumping on the bandwagon and shouting, “me too, me too.”

To them we can only say,”Honestly, you celebrity sheeple, we in the real world know what goes on in showbiz, the fashion game, politics and all other areas where fame and fortune are in the gift of venal individuals, you people are not as unique and amazing as you think. There have always been both women and men who would disrobe and ‘assume the position’ for the sake of short term gain. You are mummers for fuck’s sake, players in a farce, stop believing your own publicity.”

Weinstain (!) has been known as a sexual predator for years and the history of rich, powerful old men in Hollywood using their position to extort sexual favours from good looking young actors and actresses is as old as Hollywood itself. We have reported it in our blogs, HERE, HERE, AND HERE.

The latest Hollywood scandal (plus a few linked in the previous paragraph,) and the corruption endemic in Washington, isn’t only an indictment of the celebrity culture, but of America’s moral decay as well.

The story of Weinstein, the uber-powerful film producer, co-founder of Miramax Films, friend and major donor to Democratic politicians (including Hillary Clinton whose mock outrage in her condemnation of him for doing what she could not have been unaware of when he was useful to her, and behaviour similar to that she has tolerated and defended in her husband Bill for decades,) is the story of America’s moral decay in the second half of the twentieth century and on into the twenty first.

Sure Harvey was fired from his job as co-Chairman of The Weinstein Company after the New York Times ran an article exposing his serial sexual harassment of female employees, is such a perfect storm of corruption, depravity and hypocrisy that it exquisitely encapsulates the moral decay of America. Prior to that article however, the great and not o good of show business and politics had obviously known of this proclivities but had closed ranks to protect one of their own.

The New York Times piece revealed that Weinstein has, over the years, settled at least eight sexual harassment lawsuits out of court. We are told the settlements included gagging clauses. What the article reported just the tip of a really grotesque iceberg, for in its wake a plethora of other claims has surfaced.

In a New Yorker article, written, ironically enough, by Ronan Farrow, son of alleged pedophile Woody Allen, even more claims emerged of Weinstein’s predatory behavior. One of the many lowlights from that article includes Italian actress/filmmaker Asia Argento and two other women claiming that Weinstein raped them.

The most famous women among the sea of those claiming harassment at the hands of the movie mogul are Gwyneth Paltrow, Angelina Jolie, Ashley Judd, Rose McGowan and Rosanna Arquette. Thereare of course many condemning Weinstein who had no direct dealings but are vicariously shocked and offended by the scandal.

https://www.rt.com/shows/crosstalk/406317-weinstein-scandal-hollywood-hypocrisy/video/

The repugnance of the Weinstein scandal i overwhelming, and nearly every public person is going through the pantomime of denouncing Harvey and his lecherousness, but this comes over as disingenuous at best. All the movie stars, media members, and politicians now publicly expressing their disgust at Weinstein have previously displayed nothing but admiration for his genius as a producer and promoter during the time he could influence their careers, or give them credibility as they campaigned for votes.

What strikes us is the many similarities with a showbiz scandal that shook Britain in 2014 when DJ and television presenter Jimmy Savile, about whom there had been rumours for decades but who, like Weinstein had been protected by the establishment (allegations of his bizarre and perverted behaviour were routinely deflected by reminders that he “did a lot for charity,” but as stories emerged that had been covered up for years it turned out even that had an ulterior motive.

So how do people like Harvey Weinstein and jimmy Savile get escape exposure for so long? The main reason is the deification of fame; both were shameless self promoters, Savile’s schtick was a man of the people act, the charity work was part of this, his TV shows specialised in putting members of the public centre stage for a few minutes. And he was a valuable asset to his main employer, the taxpayer funded public broadcaster The BBC. Weinstein had a knack of producing films have been nominated for Oscars for Best Picture 26 times in the last 28 years and have been nominated overall for over 300 Academy Awards. In other words, Harvey could make people rich and famous, which is why so many in Hollywood found enough felixibility in their moral compass to ignore his alternative career as a rapist and sex abuser. To quote Upton Sinclair, “It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”

Blind ambition isn’t the only reason Hollywood looked the other way regarding Weinstein, political expediency played a part as well. Weinstein has been a long time supporter of Democratic candidates, Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in particular, and has donated a lot of money to their campaigns. And so both those hypocrites, who had shamelessly played on their politically correct credentials when campaigning were quite happy to turn a blind eye to misogyny when the money was rolling in from a misogynist

A perfect example of someone making a devil’s bargain with Weinstein for political reasons is Lena Dunham, a vociferous and vocal Clinton supporter and devout feminist, who has consistently attacked Donald Trump for a crude, but private, conversation that took place years ago. Duham admitted she knew of Weinstein’s predatory reputation in regards to women, but still shook his hand and performed at a fundraiser he held for Clinton’s campaign. Dunham said she betrayed her feminist values because “she so desperately wanted to support Clinton.” Yeah, right Lena, the end justifies the means when the end is to advance your agenda.

Hollywood liberals were quick to denounce Evangelical Christians for supporting Trump despite his alleged moral turpitude and misogyny, calling them hypocrites. Well in the case of hypocrites, I guess it takes on to know one.

Scottish poet Robert Burns wrote in the seventeenth century, “Wad some power the giftie gie us, tae see ourselves as others see us, (from Ode To A Louse).

Burns was an inveterate womaniser but he knew how to behave (and it’s likely those Scottish farm girls knew how to handle a man who didn’t.) The life of a Scottish farmer and tax collector would not require the decorous manners of a Royal court, but anyone who stepped out of life could expect a visit from the father and bothers and uncles and cousins of the young lady he had offended. Perhaps we need a return to such rough justice to persuade the likes of Fat Boy Weinstein that he might be a rich and powerful movie mogul but that does not give him droit de siegneur over atttractive young women whose careers he can influence.

It is difficult to admit, but if we could find the courage to see ourselves as others see us, to borrow the line from Burns, we would recognize that Harvey Weinstein and Jimmy Savile and all the others are the story of democratic civilisation’s decline. Both are or were in Savile’s case, totally self centred, amoral, entitled, corrupt, impervious to criticism, blindly ambitious, lacking self awareness, and willing to use power and fame to exploit the weak and indulge their darker impulses and insatiable desires. The sooner we recognize that, and recognise our own shortcomings in having been so besotted by wealth and fame we tolerated it, the faster we can try to arrest the moral decay that threatens out way of life.

Advertisements

London’s Black Cab Drivers Take On Uber Cancer

A few blocks behind the Tate Modern and Shakespeare’s Globe theater is a place few tourists, or even Londoners, ever see. Keep going past the Tesco Express and through an unmarked driveway to reach a car park jammed with black cabs.

In the  well hidden places around London where drivers of the city’s iconic Black Cabs can have a rest, a cup of tea and a bacon sarni in a cash-only cafe fashioned from a double-wide mobile home. Open 24 hours, the Great Suffolk Street Taxi Cafe is a place for comfort food and conversation.

London cabbies are notorious for having strong opinions. About everything. These days however, Uber is a popular topic.

After Transport for London (TfL), the British capital’s transport regulator, refused on Sept. 22 to renew Uber’s license to operate, we visited the cafe to see what cabbies thought of the news. One might have expected elation, but the reality was a mix of defiance, quiet resignation and “bring it on.” To many of the drivers, Uber, which arrived in London in 2012, is destroying a proud and historic tradition that plays a vital and iconic role in the city’s life. Competition is fine, they say, but fair competition is not what this is.

Sean Paul Day, a taxi driver for 18 years, says Uber is destroying a proud and historic local culture. He's also a co-founder of a taxi-hailing app called TaxiApp.
Sean Paul Day, a taxi driver for 18 years, says Uber is destroying a proud and historic local culture. He’s also a co-founder of a taxi-hailing app called TaxiApp.

 

Drivers socialize in the patchy afternoon sun and a steady stream of cabs (officially called Hackney carriages) arrive and park at the disused gas pumps of an old service station.

There’s not a lot to capture your attention inside the spartan cafe, with its hard plastic chairs and bare tables. A TV plays Sky Sports. The menu is equally spartan: instant coffee for £1, a full English breakfast (served all day) for £5, and a selection of classic British desserts like sticky toffee pudding, jam roly-poly and spotted dick. We’re only minutes from some of London’s poshest restaurants, but this feels miles away. (The Taxi Cafe is open to the public.)

Around several of the tables, groups of cabbies enjoy their lunch with few moments of silence. It takes a while to break into the conversation at the next table, but just a brief mention of Uber wins us an invitation to sit and share a cuppa and a chinwag.

Sean Paul Day, a driver of 18 years, has the table’s center seat. Tall and animated, he speaks rapidly and gets straight to the point. “The KGB would have given their right arm to have Uber’s power,” he says while eating a large plate of fish and chips (at £9, one of the pricier dishes on the menu). Uber “is a global, heavily financed profiteer going against a local taxi trade. As big as the taxi service is in London, it’s still local.”

Uber has appealed TfL’s decision and will be allowed to operate normally during that process. On Oct. 3, the company’s new CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, who had already apologized to Londoners for “messing up,” visited London to hold talks with the city’s transit officials. In a tweet that same day, he said he was “determined to make things right in this great city!” TfL also released a statement on Tuesday characterizing the talks as “constructive” and said that more discussion would continue in the coming weeks.

The global versus local debate is hardly unique to Uber, but it exemplifies a common theme we heard over and again. None of these taxi drivers is angry at Uber’s drivers; rather, their beef is with Uber as a company. George Vyse, who’s been driving for 47 years and buying and selling used black cabs for 40 years, is outraged at how little Uber pays its drivers, describing it as “slave labor.”

Black-cab drivers are self-employed, meaning they can keep all the money they earn from fares. Uber, on the other hand, takes up to 25 percent of every fare. The company doesn’t openly speak about average earnings, but last year union GMB won a case against Uber because one driver was found to be earning less than minimum wage after the company had taken its cut. With a £2.60 flat-rate base fare for any cab ride, black-cab drivers need to pick up only three passengers an hour to earn the national minimum wage of £7.50.

It has always been the case that women felt perfectly safe riding in a licenced cab when alone. There were cases of assault but they were rare, largely because it is very difficult to qualify as a licenced cab driver and the god living that qualification brings is not lightly thrown away.  Transport for London’s main beef was Uber’s attitude to passenger safety, the company omitted to report sex crimes committed by its drivers and did not even discipline drivers whose sexual misdemeanours with female passengers were the subject of complaints. This has resulted in widespread anger, not just in London, similar situations have arisen in other European cities and Uber have already been banned in Barcelona and several German cities. There have been more reported sexual offences against cab passengers in the last two to three years by Uber drivers than by licenced cabbies in the 50 years preceding Uber’s arrival in the city.

Thirty two Uber drivers were accused of rape or sexual assault in the 2016 alone, according to freedom of information data obtained by The Sun newspaper. Earlier this year, existing fears about Uber were exacerbated when the Metropolitan Police Force accused the company of failing to report sex attacks. Now TfL has piled on, accusing Uber of being careless with Londoners’ safety by failing to institute proper background vetting.

But as with the minimum wage law and other national laws, Uber, like most silicon valley tech giants seems to have a free pass to ignore them. It may have met its match in London’s voluble cab drivers however.

Men Menstruate? Latest Dickheadedness From The Legion Of The Dickless

toni-the-tampon
Toni the Tampon (left) and friend. The one on the right looks like the child of an onion ring that mated with a hedgehog (picture source)

Yes you read that headline right, the GayBLTQetc. lobby propagandists are now pushing the most preposterous idea yet in their determination to make unequal things equal. A colouring book aimed at children in the age range that use colouring books floats the idea that men can have periods. The book, which invites kids to colour in images of Toni the Tampon, Marina the Menstrual Cup and Sebastian the Sponge explains to the five to eight year olds that men who have once been ladies and have decided to keep their baby making kit even though they sport facsimile of a man’s dangly bits created by surgery rather than nature, but nontheless are real women, can have periods just like ladies who wear skirts and brassieres and high heeled shoes and lipstick. The narrative such as it is also explains that ladies who were originally men get – well I suppose you’d have to call them virtual periods really, quite how this happens is not clear but I hope these is no tomato ketchup involved. Milo Yiannopoulis reports on this latest insanity from the politically correct brigade .

After giving us the basic, shocking details of this latest display of self regarding stupidity from those who ‘identify’ as left wing, the alt_right movement’s favourite gay man then goes on to explain that the creators of this book were concerned that when the time came to learn about reproductive biology (science, right?)  biological process involved in the female menstrual cycle and how they felt it was important that little boys did no feel left out when the subject was being covered.

If you have been around internet comment threads as long as I have you will have noticed that the people who promote this transgender shite are the same ones who, when anyone raises the topic of the very obvious flaws in climate science that have led to all the predictions of catastrophe being wrong, will call us ‘science deniers’ and scream that people who are not scientists don’t understand how science works so cannot question science or post that quote from the world’s worst scientist Neil DeGrasse Tyson, “science is true whether or not you believe in it,” are the same as those who now try to tell us that somebody who was born male can have peroids, calling it ‘transphobic’ when anyone points out the truth that such a person is not a real biological woman and cannot ever have periods. Likewise these science believers (who are as deluded as Scientologists) tell that someone who has had an imitation penis fashioned from a bit of fat and gristle and takes lots of hormones so she can grow a bit of bumfluff on her chin is a real man even though he/she/zi/it cannot ever produce sperm.  I’m not an expert on biology but my understanding is that the cause of a woman’s period is the breaking down of the NATURAL lining of the NATURAL uterus . Turning a penis inside out does NOT create a NATURAL uterus, with a NATURAL lining to  shed. For the university brainwashed and those who believed the liar, embelzler, fraud, traitor and war criminal Hillary Clinton could have been an adequate President of the United states, no natural uterus means NO BLEEDING!No bleeding equals a very young female, a female past the first flush of middle age or something other than a female.

It’s fucking science you idiots.

RELATED POSTS:
Science & Technology menu
Science & Technology menu
Transgender Oxford University
Transgender Ladies First
Transhumanism omnibus
Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [ It’s Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [Latest Posts] … [ Tumblr ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer Headlines]

[ Ian at Facebook ]

The University Formerly Known As Cardiff Polytechnic Published List Of Forbidden Words

Cardiff Metropolitan University formerly known as Cardiff Polytechnic may not be a seat of learning on a par with Oxford, Cambridge, Heidelberg, The Sorbonne or Princeton but when it comes to politically correct idiocy it is at the right up there with Harvard, Uppsala, University of California or The London school of Economics. The University has banned lecturers from using any sexist or insensitive words, lest they should ‘trigger’ Cardiff’s special snowflake’ students to an emotional crisis. The list of banned words is more far reaching than you might think. Here are few examples (source: Zero Hedge)

banned-words

And please, try to avoid words like “mother” and “father” unless you can say “mother and father” together. Yes, the article states that.

Gee, is there an order for this? Yes, there is. It better be random. Always saying mother first could get you in trouble. The article did not say but the phrase “ladies and gentlemen” clearly has to go.

banned-words3

According to the guide, Mrs. and Miss are considered offensive. Clearly, it’s best to avoid gender-identifying terms altogether.

What happens When these culturally-trained “snowflakes” hit the real world outside of their safe-space university?

Hmm. Am I allowed to use the word “snowflake” like that? Apologies offered for my unsportspersonslike conduct.

The limitation on language is a TOOL of OPPRESSION, by the elite against white people. Because if you can’t use the words you naturally would use then your mind adapts, and not in a good way. Why do you think the Jews, blacks and Muslims in our legal systems are in favour of HATE SPEECH laws?

SPLC Hate Crime: Female University Professor Who Accompanied Charles Murray Away from Protests Attacked

Patrick Stewart applying for US citizenship to ‘fight’ President Trump

Cuck Island: University Bans Terms “Mankind,” “Right-Hand Man” and “Gentleman’s Agreement” as Sexist

As we have noted, democracy was the plausible and, to the anaesthetised British people, morally unanswerable ideal whereby the destruction of British Africa was initially engineered. Yet the failure of this near-insane liberal experiment has in no way given pause to the systematic — or rather, precipitate — hand-over of power to the black inhabitants, no matter how incompetent, corrupt, blood-splattered and Marxist they might be. It is thus impossible to avoid the conclusion that this democratic idealism was never more than a cover for something entirely different but much more to the political point – namely the subjugation of the civilised white man.

It seems to be impossible to get people in Britain and America to realise that the capitulation of the West is due entirely to pressures exerted from within, not to pressures exerted from without. There is nothing ‘inevitable’ about it as we are taught to repeat. The ‘march of events’ is being paced out to the tune of Western ‘fiddlers’.
White Man Think Again! by Anthony Jacob, Johannesburg 1965

Is not our role to stand for the one thing which means our own salvation here but with which it will also be possible to save the world, and with which Europe will be able to save itself, namely the preservation of the white man and his state? Hendrik Verwoerd

I question the morality of forced assimilation or absorption of peoples. If we were to apply that principle of assimilation as it were the only moral solution for our problems, what would happen to the white man whose heritage this South Africa is, settled by his forefathers, built by them throughout three centuries and more, a home for its people, drenched with their sweat and blood of these three centuries?
Dr Hendrik Verwoerd

What are we in South Africa going to do in that future? My answer is that this will depend on the question of whether we will be able to maintain our anchors. For me this means that we should keep our identity as a people, that we should not become international, that we should not consider ourselves wise or learned or big when we abandon our people. But secondly – and this is the most important – this anchor must ensure that we keep our faith. If we can stay anchored in our faith and thus in our Church, those big changes can do nothing that spells danger to us as a people who hold fast to God and his Word.

–Dr Hendrik Verwoerd

 

 RELATED POSTS:

Death of Democracy (omnibus)
UK University Offers Tutorials On ‘Dealing With Right-Wing Attitudes in Class’
Free Speech murdered (omnibus)
The Importance Of Freedom Of Speech and Information
The masses and the intellectually bankrupt left
Threat to Free Speech
Thumpa And The Tyranny Of Human Rights
The imporance of Free Speeech
The Wisdom Of Crowds
Politically Correct Threat To Press Freedom
A Chronicle of Decay
Sheeple Take Over Higher Education
Nobody Expects The Politically Correct Inquisition
Did Billionaire Thiel Save Free Speech On The Web
Free Speech Under Attack Online
Ignorance Is Strength: European Parliament Ready To clamp Down On Free Speech
Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [ It’s Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [Latest Posts] … [ Tumblr ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ]

Snowflake Special: Snowflake Professor blasts students for walking out of patronising lecture.

by Arthur Foxake
Story is a bit out of date but I sent it to drafts instead of live posts.

Students Walk Out of ‘Patronising’ Sexual Consent Class

We have been planning to start a run of posts on the plague of special snowflakism currently suppressing free speech and attacking the individials right to hold opinions that diverge from the dogmas of politicall correct fascism. Better late than never, so brace yourselves snowflakes, we’rew going to give you a rough ride.

In October 2016 the ‘Women’s Officer’ (Mother Hen) at the University of York labelled students “dangerously naive” after they responded to the imlementation of sexual consent classes, walking out en mass because they felt they were being “patronised”.

Students Union officers argued the “gender neutral” lessons were necessary to protect first-year students’ “physically and mental wellbeing”, following the nationwide moral panic concerning a supposed campus “rape crisis”. This rape crisis is not like the rape crises in Sweden and Germany where victims are gang raped by immigrants of a certain religion and lef bloody and broken, not is it like the mass rape cases in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, Birmingham and many other large town where young girls living in council; care were targeted by men of a certain religion and used as sex slaves. No, some of these university rapes involve young women going to be with men, having sex and then any time from the morning after up to several months later deciding they did not want to do it after all. Needless to say these stupid slappers are supported by feminist groups.

Around a quarter of the 5,000 youngsters summoned defiantly decided to leave the event, arguing that they did not need the lecture or wish to be framed as “potential rapists” by the feminist Women’s Officer.

“We’re Women’s Officers at the University of York. Earlier this year, we were elected after a cross-campus ballot in which we pledged to run consent talks. On Tuesday 27 September, we did just that”, wrote furious Student Union official Lucy Robinson, responding to the protest.

“If you’ve eaten a lasagne, would you automatically consider yourself an expert on Italian cuisine? Probably not. So why then, do we assume that 18-year-olds are experts on sexual consent, just because a number of them will have had sexual experiences?” she argued. Some one should have told her, “Calm down dear, Italian cuisine is a tad more complex than sexual consent.” In fact the act of eating a lasagne may render one knowledgeable about the item you have just eaten, but not knowledgeable on all Italian cuisine. Osso buco, Spaghetti alle Vongole , Cioppino or Chicken Cacciatorere all very different things to lasagne, just as missionary position, blow job, tie and tease or a bit of mild S & M are all different types of sex (and just don’t go anywhere near The Dutch Reverse Steamboat).

Third-year activist Ben Froughi did not agree. He distributed flyers outside the event, informing students that they had no obligation to sit through the classes, and encouraging them to take a stand. Quite right, if she says yes you are OK to keep going until she says no. On the other hand she cannot reasonable claim rape if she only says, No, stop! after you have stopped.

“When handing out the flyers to the final group of the day, one fresher stood beside me and shouted towards the group waiting to enter, ‘We don’t consent to consent talks!’ which got a laugh,” Mr. Froughi told York’s student paper Nouse.

Screen Shot 2016-10-01 at 17.23.31

“Consent talks are patronising; if students really need lessons in how to say yes or no then they should not be at university”, he argued.

“There is no ‘correct’ way to negotiate getting someone into bed with you. In suggesting that there is consent talks, perhaps most damaging of all, encourage women to interpret sexual experiences that have not been preceded by a lengthy, formal and sober contractual discussion as rape.

“Consent talks propagate the backward message that all women are potential victims and all men potential rapists”, he said.

However, the National Union of Students (NUS) guidelines state that universities have a duty to tell freshers the legal definitions of rape and sexual assault, citing wolf-whistles, heckling and jokes about rape as common examples of harassment. Well yes, but where does wise advice stop and self righteous stupidity start? In California there have been moves by the politically correct clueless cunts who run the US state to make men obtain written consent before they get down to serious business. This only made California and the politically correct paskudniaks who run the state governmen an even bigger laughing stock than when they tried to extend full human righs to goldfishes.

The National Union of Students commissioned a report in 2014 claiming that one in five students will experience some form of sexual harassment during their first week of term.
The stats were widely discredited, however, when it was revealed that to the warped, bigoted misandrious mindset of fat, ugly lezzas feminists “unwanted sexual advances”, such as asking a girl to dance, or offering to buy her a drink were classed as harassment .

York’s Feminist Students Union has hit the headlines before after they banned events marking International Men’s Day less than 24 hours after a male student at the University killed himself.
Around 200 staff, students and alumni described the idea of “equality for everyone” as “misogynistic rhetoric” and argued that a Men’s day was wrong “because women are structurally unequal to men”.

Well yes girls, you are structurally unequal to men because we are genetically programmed to take the bullet or blade, fight the monster or swin across the raging torrent to save your lives, so shut the fuck up or in future buy your own drinks and fight your own monster. Oh and if you decide to do a bit of prick teasing for fun, you may be lucky and only encounter gentlemanly types, but don’t always rely on a good outcome.

RELATED POSTS:

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [ It’s Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [Latest Posts] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]
[ Ian at Facebook ]

A Mob Of ‘Foreign Youths’ Assault 35 Females At Swedish Music Festival

The number of sexual assaults in Europe as a result of the refugee crisis has been something that we have covered extensively, notably the <a href=”http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-01-06/eyewitness-account-monstrous-migrant-attacks-germany-its-civil-war”>”monstrous&#8221; attacks by men “of Arab or North African origin”</a> that occurred on German women in Cologne during a New Year celebration (that led to the members of left wing parties in Germany’s ruling coalition actually <a href=”http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-05-03/german-coverup-scandal-ministry-urged-erasing-rape-monstrous-cologne-migrant-attack-“>trying to have the word “rape” removed</a> from internal reports, because multiculturalism.

Since then there have been other instances, such as <a href=”http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-26/another-sexual-assault-gets-refugees-banned-pools-austria”>an assault by a “dark skinned” man on a 13 year old girl at a busy public swimming pool</a> in the town of Mistelbach, Austria. Now we learn that a mob of “foreign youths” sexually assaulted 35 females as young as 12 years old at a Swedish music festival.

At least 35 females aged between 12 and 17 reported being attacked during the Party in the Park festival in Karlstad on Friday and Saturday night, and some of the alleged victims reported being ‘kissed and groped’ in a situation reminiscent of the <a href=”http://edbutt.blogspot.com/2016/06/six-months-on-from-cologne-outrage.html”>Cologne New Year attacks</a> according to supporters of the Sweden Democrats prepared to defy the diktat of Sweden’s neo – Nazi government which states that telling the truth about immigrant lawlessness and violence is a hate crime.

17 year old victim Alexandra Larsson waived her right to anonymity to describe in detail how an attacker targeted her while Larsson was watching the event. Larsson tells how boys that “were not from a Swedish background” started groping her, and threatening her by saying “you will die, b***h.”

Fr&ouml;ken Larsson told a Swedish online news site:<br />

‘Everything was okay at the beginning of the evening. But things got out of hand during the last concert with John de Sohn that started at midnight.

‘We managed to walk away from those boys after a while and started watching the concert. That was when I felt the first touch against my bottom.

‘Then someone took the liberty of grabbing my butt really hard. I turned away and said to the group of boys behind us that this was not okay, but I did not know who had done it. After a while, I felt someone running his fingers between my legs touching my genitals. Luckily, I had jeans on me.’

After the harassment, she turned around and said to the group of young men standing next to her that they should stop what they were doing. But everyone around her claimed to be innocent. It then happened again, she said.

‘I turned around and screamed right out that “whoever it was – you’re a pig!” I told my friends what had just happened and they were all shocked. Me and my girlfriends decided to leave the concert, because we could not see who it was. It was just a sea of ??people.’

Ms Larsson described a feeling of powerlessness as the festival she and her friends had been looking forward to was completely destroyed.

‘It was creepy. Someone stood around me and groped me and I had no idea who it was. It was sick. We had come there to have fun, but the festival only lasted 20 minutes for us because it was so uncomfortable.

‘The groping was at first a bit innocent. Just a touch on the bottom. Something that you can do by mistake in a big crowd of people. But it became worse and worse after that. The one touching me was becoming more and more rough every time.

She said that the boys around them were about 17 or 18-years-old but ‘those standing behind me were not from a Swedish background.’

‘They were probably immigrants. I hate to say it. But it is the truth,’ she said.

Another young Swedish woman recalled seeing a friend crying from the audience, and by the time they left the concert she could see crying girls everywhere. She told a reporter she believes that the attackers behave this way because they believe that the government will not allow the police to prosecute immigrants.

We believe these scum suckers behave they way they do because they are pigs

 
RELATED POSTS:
White genocide engineered by Swedish government
Sweden plagued by immigrant riots
Sweden’s crazy immigrant laws
Swedish government threatens free speech is news organisations tell the truth about immigrant crime and violence

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … Daily Stirrer …[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Somali Rapist Was Not Deported: Rapes Again. This Is Why Teresa May Should Not Be Prime Minister

migrants-610085

Wannabe Prime Minister Theresa May, soft on immigrant crime, soft on the causes of immigrant crime (picture source: Daily Express)

As she campaigns to be elected leader of The Conservative Party and thus Prime Minister, Theresa May glibly promises to be firm in maintaining law and order and to address the problems caused by mass immigration by reforming immigration laws and enforcing border controls. But can she be trusted?

May is a peerless self promoter but as Home Secretary, the government minister who oversees both law and order and immigration, she has not only presided over the greatest infux of illegal immigrants ever (many of them lacking even basic travel documents) and has established a track record for giving in to the shrill voices of the ‘open borders’ lobby and being soft on immigrant crime.

Here’s just one example of what has happened on May’s watch, this is one of many individual crimes, quite apart from the cases in Rotherham, Rochdale, Oxford, Birmingham, reading, Blackburn, Sheffield, Nottingham and London of organised gangs of Muslim immigrants abusing vulnerable young women.

A rapist from Somalia who successfully fought deportation, on grounds that his ‘human rights’ would be abused if he was sent back to Somalia, following his first jail term for rape has now been jailed for ten years for the rape of two women in Birmingham. His lawyer had argued “he had a lack of understanding of what is acceptable in the UK”.

Dahir Ibrahim, 31, was jailed in 2005 for ten years for the rape of a prostitute in Birmingham’s Edgbaston district, with the judge recommending he be deported following his sentence. Obviously he is either not very bright or a habitual rapist if he did not learn from his first spell in jail what isn’t acceptable in Britain or anywhere else in the civilised world.

Ibrahim’s lawyers successfully appealed that deportation order, and was given leave to remain in the UK.

Now he has been convicted of the rape of two vulnerable women in 2014, for which he has been handed a second decade-long sentence. It is understood that he will be deported at the end of his sentence, The Times has reported.

Thay may be the judge’s intent but if Theresa May is Prime Minister I reckon the stupid, politically correct bint will find a way to keep this Sewer Slime in the UK.

Steven Bailey, prosecuting at Birmingham Crown Court, said the first victim was looking to buy cannabis on the night of September 5th when she was approached by Ibrahim who persuaded her to follow him down an alleyway by offering to sell her drugs. There he threatened her with a Stanley box-cutter knife and raped her.

The second victim was sleeping rough when she was attacked by Ibrahim on the night of October 18th, threatening her with a pair of pliers and a screwdriver.

He was eventually tracked down by police through a combination of DNA, forensic and CCTV evidence.

Jabeen Akhtar, defending, argued that his client had come from a country where he had witnessed many atrocities and consequently lacked understanding of what was acceptable in the UK.

“It was more opportunistic than pre-planned,” he said, adding: “No long-term physical injury was sustained by the victims.”

But the judge, Justice Murray Creed disagreed. Passing sentence he said: “There was abuse and humiliation. There was severe psychological hurt and harm done. There was degradation. They were sustained incidents and the victims were targeted.”

Detective Constable Gavin McGrath from West Midlands Police, said: “The evidence against Ibrahim was indisputable and, in desperation, he tried to claim that it was a ‘fit up’. But a few days before he was due to stand trial, he changed his plea to guilty.

“I am pleased that he has spared these women the further ordeal of a trial and he will now be behind bars and no longer a danger to the public.”

The judge is on the right track. The politicians however are more concerned with sucking up to left wing media and the chatterati to ever put justice ahead of politically correct snivelling cowardice.
RELATED POSTS:

German Justice Minister Runs From Stage As Angry Audience Members Yell “TRAITOR!”

Failed Immigration Policy Threatens Press Freedom In Sweden

Immigrant criminals and Swedish criminals are viewed differently in the eyes of Swedish law.

Germans Cheer As Refugee Center Burns

Labour MP Says Cologne Sex Attacks ‘Very Similiar’ to Normal Weekend in Birmingham
Watch two Finnish shopgirls out a couple of male Muslim shoplifters.
Islamification Of Germany: Regensburg City Council Considers ‘Women-Only’ Transportation
Are The Ruling Elites waking Up At Last To The Problems Cause By Mass Muslim Immigration?

German Feminist Says Authorities Covered Up Muslim Sex Crime For Twenty Years
Women Fear To Go Out Alone In Danish Town Due to Migrant Assaults
Thousands Flood The Streets In Germany As Fury Over Refugee Sex Assaults Reaches Boiling Point
New Year’s Eve, Germany: 1,000+ Migrants Brawl, Rape, Sexually Assault, And Steal At Cologne Railway Station
Many may have forgotten because of all this – if only temporarily – about Europe’s biggest crisis at the moment: the onslaught by over one million refugees, who are desperate to escape from the political disaster that are the result of western interference in the domestic politics of middle eastern countries like broken states of Syria and Iraq.

Sweden’s Migrant Crackdown Could Spell The End Of Open Borders Across Europe

EU Report Reveals Continent Being Changed By Migration
London Cop Confirms Donald Trump UK Radicalisation Claims
European Governments Hold “Secret” Meeting To Dismantle Borderless Travel

Europes Immigration Crisis (July / August / September 2015)

Merkel Hit By German Citizens Backlash As Her Anti – German, Pro – Immigration Policy Introduces Violence, Rape and Third World Lawlessness To Germny’s Muslim Ghettos
Labour Elite Thinks Northerners Are Thick – I Told You So

Mass Immigration Marginalises White Working Class Says Soros Think Tank

Muslim Sex Abuse Gangs Rotherham

Muslim Sex Abuse gangs nationwide

The Greenteeth immigration omnibus

Muslim immigrants establish Muslim only, Sharia Law zones. Authorities fail to act

Here’s How Working Class Organisations Out Of Which the Labour Movement Grew Were Hijacked By Elitist Control Freaks

The International Elite’s Contempt For National Sovereignty

Ersatz Culture Created By World View Theorists To Undermine Western Values

New World Order War On free Speech Comes To Britain – Guardian editor accused of treason

Is It Lack Of Diversity That Drives Liberal Hate And Intolerance

Captive Minds, Conformity and Cowardly Intellectual

Populist Authoritarianism

Broken Societies

Equal Rights Campaigners Not Christians Are Imposing Their Belief On Others

A Liberal’s Dilemmas

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … Daily Stirrer …[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]