This has to be the funniest and most ridiculous story I’ve seen for months, (Category: Only in America)
I present the image with no further comment, we must let the virtue signallers decide for themselves whether it is racist or sexist.
This has to be the funniest and most ridiculous story I’ve seen for months, (Category: Only in America)
I present the image with no further comment, we must let the virtue signallers decide for themselves whether it is racist or sexist.
Cardiff Metropolitan University formerly known as Cardiff Polytechnic may not be a seat of learning on a par with Oxford, Cambridge, Heidelberg, The Sorbonne or Princeton but when it comes to politically correct idiocy it is at the right up there with Harvard, Uppsala, University of California or The London school of Economics. The University has banned lecturers from using any sexist or insensitive words, lest they should ‘trigger’ Cardiff’s special snowflake’ students to an emotional crisis. The list of banned words is more far reaching than you might think. Here are few examples (source: Zero Hedge)
And please, try to avoid words like “mother” and “father” unless you can say “mother and father” together. Yes, the article states that.
Gee, is there an order for this? Yes, there is. It better be random. Always saying mother first could get you in trouble. The article did not say but the phrase “ladies and gentlemen” clearly has to go.
According to the guide, Mrs. and Miss are considered offensive. Clearly, it’s best to avoid gender-identifying terms altogether.
What happens When these culturally-trained “snowflakes” hit the real world outside of their safe-space university?
Hmm. Am I allowed to use the word “snowflake” like that? Apologies offered for my unsportspersonslike conduct.
Death of Democracy (omnibus)
UK University Offers Tutorials On ‘Dealing With Right-Wing Attitudes in Class’
Free Speech murdered (omnibus)
The Importance Of Freedom Of Speech and Information
The masses and the intellectually bankrupt left
Threat to Free Speech
Thumpa And The Tyranny Of Human Rights
The imporance of Free Speeech
The Wisdom Of Crowds
Politically Correct Threat To Press Freedom
A Chronicle of Decay
Sheeple Take Over Higher Education
Nobody Expects The Politically Correct Inquisition
Did Billionaire Thiel Save Free Speech On The Web
Free Speech Under Attack Online
Ignorance Is Strength: European Parliament Ready To clamp Down On Free Speech
Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [ It’s Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [Latest Posts] … [ Tumblr ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ]
If you are not yet familar with the name Walter Palmer, this fiftysomething dentist from Minnesota is currently the most hated man in the
universe, galaxy, solar system, on the planet, north American continent, Facebook. Well among liberal and leftie sheeple on Facebook.
Why? you might well ask. Did he abort babies eighteen months into the pregnancy and serve their sauteed bodies to his friends for lunch like Dr. Kermit Gosnell? No but the liberals and lefties campaigned to keep Gosnell out of jail.
Did he start wars that killed thousands of innocent people in Libya, Syria, Yemen and a few other places like Barack Hussein Obama did? No, yet the liberals and lefties want to give him an unconstitutional third term.
Did he start riots in support of a mugger who when challenged by gun wielding police, bull rushed the officers causing one to discharge his weapon in a not unreasonable way in the circumstances? No he didn’t.
What Walter Palmer did to upset the Yooman Rights crowd was he shot a lion. A nasty, vicious, smelly, dangerous lion (these terms apply to all lions, especially the males) with a cutesy-pie name, Cecil.
For that you would think the Yooman rights screechers would lionise him (boom boom). Male lions you see are sexist and you know how the lefties would react if a libertarian blogger said women are neurotic and lesbians are fat and ugly.
Yes, the screechometer would be turned up way past eleven. Yet Cecil treated his wives like dirt, was probably guilty of marital rape (you don’t think lions seek written consent do you?) and whacked the cubs when they pissed him off.
I’m not defending big game hunting, its nasty and cruel, all I’m looking for is a bit of consistency and less of the hypocritical double standards from lefties. OK, Cecil might be a gay name and we’ve heard all the stupid, fatuous arguments about gay animals from lefties, but Cecil was not gay and did not call himself Cecil. He probably called himself “Mighty – superfeline – with – razor – sharp – claws – that – could – disembowel – a – puny – metrosexual – with – one – slash – so – fuck – off (or in Swahili, Simba). Lions are neither gay, metrosexual not liberal – especially big, alpha males like Cecil, in fact they are the most sexist of creatures so the feminists and their fellow travellers should be singing the praises of Walter Palmer and celebrating the demise of Cecil the sexist lion.
There is something a bit scummy and cowardly about luring a lion from its hunting grounds with bait, botching its dispatch with a bow-and-arrow and then having to stalk the wounded creature for 40 hours before finally putting it out of its misery, as Palmer did (allegedly)
This is how alpha male lions live their lives; they laze around preening themselves like the winner of a David Beckham lookalike contest while the females in the pride do all the hunting, childcare and so on. Then, when it’s dinner time, they amble over to the still warm corpse of the buffalo, warthog, antelope etc. that the harem has killed and take the choice bits because, hey, they’re the daddy and that’s their prerogative. If you’re a man of a certain age (between 14 and 95) this lifestyle can look very appealing but feminists ought to hate it. So why are they staging hate attacks against a dentist who struck a blow against Leonine sexism.
The real crime here was that of the animal rights dickhead who gave a lion, a species that are surely the Nephilim of the Savanna, a wussy, limp wristed name like Cecil.
Bahar Mustafa, the student union political correctness officer who notoriously banned white people and men from an event promoting equality and then tweeted on a hashtag ‘killallwhitemen’ has claimed she “cannot be racist” because she is an ethnic minority woman.
The Goldsmiths University’s student union welfare and diversity officer sparked a backlash when she told white people and men they should not attend an event on “diversifying the curriculum”.
She posted on Facebook: “Invite loads of BME Women and non-binary people!! Also, if you’ve been invited and you’re a man and/or white PLEASE DON’T COME just cos I invited a bunch of people and hope you will be responsible enough to respect this is a BAME, Women and non-binary event only.
(WTF is a non binary person, is the silly tart referring to people who don’t own a computer or smartphone?)
Her comments were branded “laughable” and “patronising” by fellow students.
And Goldsmiths University (??? – when did Goldsmiths University set up shop and what former Woolworths store does it occupy) said it had written to the union to “express concern” at the comments, and added: “We are proud of our diverse community and do not tolerate any form of oppression, including racism, sexism or any other form of bigotry.
But Ms Mustafa, 27, has hit back in the row, describing the backlash over her Facebook post as “only one in a series of attacks upon minority women on campus.
In a statement read out to fellow students, she accused the media of embarking on a “witch hunt and shameful character assassination”. The evil, racist bastards went too far when they told the truth about her.
She said: “There have been charges laid against me that I am racist and sexist towards white men.
“I, an ethnic minority woman, cannot be racist or sexist towards white men, because racism and sexism describe structures of privilege based on race and gender. Therefore, women of colour and minority genders cannot be racist or sexist, since we do not stand to benefit from such a system.(OMFG, she’s illiterate as well as stupid and bigoted.)
We can only reply, “If all the minority females at Goldsmiths are sexist bigots like you dear, it is any wonder people insult them? And while we are at at is your name suggests you are a Muslim, does your husband know you are involved in this lezza / Trotskyite shite when you should be at home cleaning and cooking for him?
BBC’s Poldark costume drama series main female suporting actor Heida Reed has said the national obsession with her co-star Aidan Turner’s well formed torso is reverse sexism. Reed added that she’s a supporter of international movement Free The Nipple, which sees women baring their breasts on social media to prove that men and women should both be allowed to be walk around topless.
Turner, who plays Ross Poldark and numbers a Vampire named Mitchell (Being Human), a Hobbit (or dwarf perhaps) named Killi (The Desolation of Smaug and The Battle of the Five Armies) and Dante Gabriel Rosetti (Desperate Romantics) among his credits, has attracted millions of viewers to the hit BBC drama every Sunday night and his regular topless appearances on the programme have made headlines.
Icelandic actress Reed, who appears as Elizabeth, the wife of Poldark’s useless cousin said I think there should be the same standard for both sexes when it comes to things like this.”
Well us lads might be all for Poldark’s female characters going topless so long as its Eleanor Tomlinson (Demelza Poldark – left) who gets ’em out for the boys and not the frigid, simpering Elizabeth who has all the sexual allure of cabbage soup.
And FFS don’t mention that women might actually like seeing the body of a physically attractive a male, oh no! Women are just so far above that kind of thing, a puritanical spinster who has never worked in a factory or large office might think. To suggest women might like to look at attractive men and enjoy a little fantasy as much as men like seeing attractive females is unthinkable. Because that could mean women are guilty of sexism and lets face it, sexism is racism!!!.
By the way, how is it, the human race hasn’t become extinct yet? Could it be anything to do with the fact that most of us (the ones whose genes we want to survive anyway) like a bit of totty?
Do these whining, emotionally constipated women ever take a break from their screeching to actually think about what they are saying? “Free the Nipple” campaign is about inequality, apparently. Women should be allowed to walk around topless because men are free to do so – but half naked women on Page 3 of The Sun or in lad mags like Loaded or Nuts are male chauvinist piggism? Appreciation of the male is “reverse sexism” – not being able to get your tits out in church or the supermarket is “gender inequality”. Typical double standards from the hypocritical left.
It’s hard to know whether feminists are surreally stupid, so shallow they’d evaporate on a warm day, or simply so full of hatred for all things male they have lost their reason.
And while they are screeching about ‘equality’ do they ever stop to think that in a truly equal society, lefties would be constrained by their own ‘hate speech’ laws to stop spouting irrational shite like this?
BBC scandal Breast beating, politically correct broadcaster has links to gangters, banksters and the arms trade
As news leaks out from the inner sanctums of the BBC about cronyism and corruption in the corporations management structure, people are starting to wonder if the Clarkson fiasco was engineered to deflect attention from the way the BBC has been infiltrated by corporate business, and the linked issue of political bias in its news coverage of the election campaign.
Britain is ridiculously PC, anything you say, any thought you think is liable to upset the politically correct screechers, whether you offence is sexist, racist, homophobic, islamophobic or simply off message (the message being that defined by The Frankfurt School or their Marxist, authoritarian fellow travellers in the carriages reserved for the elite, The Fabian Society.
With that in mind and given the screeching of feminists and limp wristed metrosexual males about domestic violence, one might think making a woman stay in contact with the man that beat eight shades of shit* out of her and slashed her throat is the last thing a British court would do?
Lefties rules are like Harry Potter magic… apply them to one case, they work a treat, apply them to the next and poof, they disappear in a cloud of greasy smoke.
Take the case of Natalie Allman for example. This woman was severely beaten and slashed (see above)by her ex fiance Jason Hughes.
During a recent interview with The Sunday People, Allman graphically recounted the horrific series of events that left her battered, bruised, and emotionally scarred.
“He’d never been aggressive before, just controlling and he drank too much. We’d been separated a few weeks but he was still staying in the house until he found somewhere else, she said. “I woke up in the middle of the night and he was kneeling over me, beating me repeatedly in the face. At first I thought he was punching me and then I realized he was using his weights. He was smashing them into my face over and over. There was blood everywhere but he didn’t stop. It was midnight and then the next thing I knew I was coming round and it was 3 a.m.”
because Hughes lawyers invoked the Euopean Human Rights Court ruling to argue for the woman-beater’s ‘right’ to family life, the judge used UK law on child access to order Ms. Allman to stay in contact with the man who put her in hospital. and keep him up to date on the progress of their children.
Perhaps this is a good time to remind you that off all the UK national parties with MPs at Westminster, UKIP are the only one that would take us out of the EU, free us from the tyranny of Brussels and place the right of those who live decent lawful lives above those of croiminals, rapists and violent thugs. The rest, we may surmise, support the right of thugs to do this to women.
*This shows how extreme the violence was because medical science only recognises seven shades of shit.
You’ve heard them screaming often enough, the left wing bourgeoisie, jumping on every ism and phobia bandwagon that passes, accusing everybody who strays even slightly from the Politically Correct straight and narrow. UKIP are racist, people who read Nuts or Loaded are sexist, anyone who thinks same sex marriage is a joke is homophobic, anyone who says we don’t need sharia law in the UK is Islamophobic.
Strangely there is one prejudice and it is a real, deep-seated hatred rooted in fear, that these people find perfectly acceptable. It is the hatred the left wing bourgeoisie, for all their blether about fairness and equality, direct at the real working class.
Hatred that leads to this irrational attack on high street pie shop Gregg’s. This graphic, which originated on the Uncyclopedia website, appeared on Google search results for Gregg’s after a hacker attack.
I don’t know why Gregg’s in particular attract such hatred from the pretentious left, but I’ve noticed quite a few of the current generation of painfully unfunny posh boy comedians categorizing Gregg’s customers as ignorant, drunken, knuckle dragging neanderthals. Which obviously makes it OK to deride what these nasty little bigots see (incorrectly) as a shop that caters to the hated working class.
Why? Nothing wrong with Gregg’s stuff – their sandwiches are better than stuff from the trendy Subway chain, their coffee does not taste much like coffee but it tastes better than Starbucks dish water and their sausage rolls may be filled with lips and arseholes but as my brother will tell you, on a cold day on Whitehaven Market a Gregg’s patsy just what you need (I’ve enjoyed them too but not in such extreme circumstances).
I suppose the people who think Greggs have built their success on supplying shit to scum would have us all eating vegetable samosas that taste as if they are made from ground up rat turds bought from the Waitrose deli counter.
One again we see that the people who scream and shout about ‘diversity’ don’t know what the word means.
The middle class twatocracy whose twitterings dominate social media, seem to think that while the favoured ethnic, sexual and religious minorities are beyond criticisms or satire, but having find some outlet for their natural anger and resentment somewhere, targets the working class in general and Greggs in particular. Yes, the Labour voting luvvies think, let’s have a good snort at Greggs, with its customers in high-vis vests, its steak bakes and unsophisticated chocolate eclairs. Greggs is seen as being fair game because it’s old-fashioned and blue collar: the very antithesis of organic, hand-reared, home-style, pretentiously labelled, overpriced food.
Makes you realise what nasty, illiberal bigots these lefties are.
The Genocide Of Ideas
Interviewed on UK Television the director and former Monty Python Flying Circus member Terry Gilliam said he did not like anything among the recent output from Hollywood. “I don’t know what they are about,” he complained, “there is a car chase, a few fights, a threat to civilisation and the hero saves the world.” Continuing to critique the formulaic Hollywood blockbuster genre Gilliam said films, books and plays ought to be about ideas.
The Strange Case Of The Footballer And The Witch Hunt.
Kick Political Correctness Out Of Football
What drives the left’s irrational hate
The Politically Correct left runs on hate and hypocrisy
The left assume they have a monopoly on virtue
Why do the left love paedophiles
Backlash against left’s smears helps UKIP
When did the liberal left become authoritarian
Politically Correct index
It’s all so predictable really. No sooner was the ink dry on Pope Benedict’s resignation letter than the lefties politically correct lefties of the Anglosphere were screaming that the next Pope must be black (political correctness is a phenomenon unknown outside the English speaking nations.) Why not? And while we’re at it, the next King or Queen of England should be black and also the next Emperor of Japan, President of Russia and Chief of the chuffing Eskimos.
PR isn’t really modern Catholicism’s strong point however which could save the lefties from the most embarrassing exposure of their collective stupidity ever. Pity really, the religion of Political Correctness poses a far greater threat to civilisation that any Crusades, Jihads or Evangelical revivals.
In a few weeks time they’re going to establish a new Papal Conclave. If the leaders of the Catholic Church have any sense they will dispense with the usual secrecy and mysticism and ask Simon Cowell to organise the process. With Graham Norton presenting the televised voting rounds – though all things considered perhaps Graham would not be the best front man. Pity they feel so strongly about homosexuals, I love to see the Cardinals being put in ‘The Red Chair.’
Technically the selection of a Pope is supposedly a reflection of God’s will. Given that last time they picked a guy who had been in the Hitler Youth perhaps God needs a good PR man too. Catholicism needs a game changer rather than a gesture Pope. The leftie Black Pope lobby are saying in effect “It’s an anachronistic, reactionary religion and oh a black Pope will change all that at a stroke (of an altar boy?)
A Black Pope could turn out to be the left’s worst nightmare. Catholicism is a conservative religion, African tribal societies are deeply conservative because that is the nature of tribal societies. So a Black Pope could bring a double dose of homophobic, sexist, condom hating conservatism to his chair as head of the world’s billion Roman Catholics.
Bookies Paddy Power are quoting odds already. Cardinal Marc Ouellet of Canada at 3-1 and Cardinal Peter Turkson of Ghana at 7-2, (with Richard Dawkins a rank outsider at 666/1).
If the Black Pope lobby got their way, Turkson would be home and hosed now. but if he did get the job it could sink the left’s negrophilia forever. A black Pope is the liberal establishments worst nightmare. I remember left wing feminists in Britain screaming for a woman Prime Minister. Then they got Margaret Thatcher, still spiritual leader of global laissez faire conservatism.
If moral relativism is the Left’s Achilles heel, then racial moral relativism is the Left’s broken spine. Dine out in north London, and you find yourself tripping over veterans of the protests against Apartheid in South Africa. Seek out veterans of the protests against the Mugabe regime or protests against punishment beatings and stonings of homosexuals in Uganda and executions in Malawi, and you’ll be disappointed.
Pope Turkson would mess with the Left’s head. A Ghanian becomes the most influential black man on the planet (far more influential than Barack Obama) HOORAY!. But he also rejects the use of condoms to fight the spread of HIV BOO!. He’s a fierce critic of global capitalism, and a strong advocate of banking reform HOORAY!. But he’s also dismissed African homophobia as “commensurate with tradition BOO!. Asking lefties what they thought of him would be like putting the proverbial idiot on a circular room and asking him to piss in a corner.
Even if the liberal intelligentsia, the chatterati, overcome their fear of being thought racist and fight it, they cannot influence the outcome and as the election of Pope Benedict showed the Catholic Church is not influenced by the squawking of outraged lefties in Britain, New York and California. If Turkson’s Papacy comes to pass, when it is revealed what kind of Roman Catholic lies beneath his sacramental skin tone the left will have to eat their words. Words like these: “The young tearaway who’s in the running to be the next Pope The Independent’s 2010 billing of the “handsome, modest and very intelligent Turkson back in 2010. “A renowned champion of the poor and marginalised was the description on the Left Foot Forward web site which was down when I tried to get the link to the article.
The Red Chair on The Graham Norton Show – Perfect for electing a new Pope?
A rather unsurprising admission from The Department of Education, Science and Silly Walks informs us that in the secondary school phase of education, which children embark on around the same time as they sprout hairs in funny places and drown in unfamiliar hormones, girls do better in single sex schools. It has been known for many years that at this point in their academic lives girls forge ahead of boys in terms of achievement but it now turns out that relieved of the stress of fighting off spotty little chavs who are only interested in getting inside their knickers girls do even better.
One of the first triumphs of Politically Correct Fascism was the almost total abolition of single gender education in the state sector. It was bad for children to be segregated by gender, reinforced sexist attitudes and condemned women to spend their lives barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen claimed the strident feminists as if co-education was wisdom handed down from the high towers of academia carved on tablets of LSD. Sharing classrooms with girls would help boys overcome their macho, testosterone fuelled tendencies and get in touch with their feminine side. Girls were not allowed to skip metalwork classes while boys were forced to study cooking and sewing. The male allies of the combat suit clad feminists in advancing this agenda were pasty faced, matchstick thin academics who had formulated their theories, tested them and knew beyond doubt such an approach would work. Education must be approached scientifically if pupils full potential was to be achieved.
The co-educational approach has not worked.
Far from flourishing in the non sexist, non racist egalitarian atmosphere of co-ed schools the kids took over. Adolescent boys, already distracted by obsessing about the size of their willies, trying to delude themselves and their mates that the crop of dark specks on their chin were whiskers and not blackheads and hoping mum did not discover their pyjama pants had developed the ability to stand up unaided, were suddenly confronted by the most delightful, fascinating, frightening thing in the world. Girls.
Adolescence is a desperate stage in human development, no less so perhaps for girls than boys but I can only speak from personal experience. Every fourteen year old boy thinks every other boy in his class except the obligatory nerd is cooler than himself. So all the boys try very hard to be cool and only succeed in being even bigger dorks than they imagine themselves to be. At that age boys are also fearful that they are freaks because they have more / less body hair, bigger / smaller nipples or more and much more toxic zits that anyone else. And if they squeeze the zits the wound will fester and flies will lay eggs in it and the maggots will eat their brains and if they dont squeeze the pustules their head will become a giant carbuncle and if they masturbate they will go blind / stammer / get zits / drain the fluid from their spinal cord and lose the use of their legs. They also worry about their trainers not being as good as anyone elses, whether they will be ostracised if their mates find out mum only buys Rola Cola instead of The Real Thing and whether they might be gay because a guy in a pink shirt smiled at them.
On top of all this, plus the constant stress of trying to avoid Pignose Dimmock the school bully, in a mixed school they have to worry about keeping their end up (oops, pardon) in front of the girls. The average fourteen year old has no idea how to go about getting inside a girls knickers and even less idea about what to do if he does get there. That aside, the boys secretly find the idea of doing it as frightening as it is desirable. Everybody knows at that age vaginas have teeth and a game of hide the sausage with the class slut could be the nightmare that ends his dreams.
For girls the process is no easier. Diverted from the girlish business of excelling in class and dreaming up fiendishly cruel, non physical ways of humiliating each other by the constant attention of strutting, posing little boys with permarections and by pretending they are having love affairs with thirty five year old billionaires and are thus too sophisticated to ever bother with the spotty little oiks who are constantly trying to help with their cookery classes by putting a bun in the oven for them, the girls fail academically, get pregnant, end up as single parents trying to bring up three or four kids, all different colours in a near derelict house with mildew coloured walls on a forlorn sing estate where the green spaces have more dog turds than blades of grass.
Of course girls do worse in mixed sex schools as do boys. The only people who benefit from politically correct education policies are the ever expanding army of bureaucrats who administer it all.
More humour every day at Boggart Blog