National Security damaged if elities crimes investigated?

I’ve written before (not here for quite a log time) about how the incidence of sociopaths within a group of humans becomes greater the higher you you look in the social hierarchy. At the highest levels of political power then, obviously, we would expect to see those who take the greatest delight in inflicting misery on othrs, simply “because they can”. This tendency is greatest it seems among those who crave political power (Humanity is Rising).

Why is this, why must the most privileged in society abuse the least privileged, the most powerless. What happens to our humanity in sich cases?

Those with the sickest minds, and who wish to act upon their destructive fantasies, sem to instinctively understand they can most easily get away with their deeds if they are protected by an aura of power and ostensible respectability. They believe that as a result of their status, no one would dare accuse them of horrific activities, and if it ever came to that, they could use their power quash any investigation. Unfortunately for us all, this has been shown to be so in th e Jimmy Savile scandal, the cyril smith affair, the loss of dossiers on a paedophile ring operating within government,compiled by Labour MP Barbara Castle and conservative MP Geoffrey Dickens (both now dead unfortunately).

Now we have evidence of yet another case.

The Guardian reports that:

The security services are facing questions over the cover-up of a Westminster paedophile ring as it emerged that files relating to official requests for media blackouts in the early 1980s were destroyed.

Two newspaper executives have told the Observer that their publications were issued with D-notices – warnings not to publish intelligence that might damage national security – when they sought to report on allegations of a powerful group of men engaging in child sex abuse in 1984. One executive said he had been accosted in his office by 15 uniformed and two non-uniformed police over a dossier on Westminster paedophiles passed to him by the former Labour cabinet minister Barbara Castle.

Ah, national security. Remember that the next time you are lectured that we need to give up our civil liberties in the name of “national security.” Think about what that really means and, if you have not already done so read Steig Larssons Millenium Trilogy (The Girl With A Dragon Tattoo etc.)yiu should do so NOW.

The invocation of ‘National Security’ really means the security of the status quo to continue to behave like insane criminals with zero accountability.

RELATED POSTS:
The Elm Guest House: How an Establishment paedophile network was covered up for 31 years
The New World Order Paedophile
Why do the left love paedophiles
New World Order Paedophile appointed to investigate his own crimes