‘White Racism’

For too long the neo – Fascist left have been allowed to get away with dividing all of humanity into two racial groups, black and white. This has allowed those extremists who support the idea of an authoritarian, global government to dub white people generally as racist, because we have (again generally)been more successful throughout human history at building ordered societies and living in civilised communities.

The lumping together of all the dark skinned races, Oriental, Australo – Indian, Asian, Asiatic, Arab, Moor, African Negro and the native tribes of South America as ‘black’ came from a ‘black’ man, a certain gentleman named Michael King, better know as Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King although he never changed his name legally, bought a degree in ‘divinity’ and ordained himself. He was also a serial plagiarist, claiming the works of Mohandas K Gandhi (The Mahatma or ‘great soul’) as his own, a hypocrite in that he preached ‘Christian values’ from the pulpit while he himself was a serial adulterer. He also credited himself for things done by less well known civil rights activists in the USA who were putting their lives on the line in the deep south while Rev. King was sucking up to elitists in Washington and New York.

This blog and its associates has long argued that it is time we ended the racism industry by acknowledging no human being was ever black and no human being was ever white, as a recent Twitter post and a reply to it demonstrate perfectly.

racism

Exactly. And ‘African’ isn’t a race either, there are many races on that huge continent, even if we exclude the Indo Caucasian tribes who occupy the lands north of The Sahara, to lump them all together is an insult to their diverse cultures.

 

RELATED POSTS:

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [ It’s Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [Latest Posts] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ] 

 

University Special Snowflakes Living In Fantasy World Says Prof.

Submitted by Kate Hardiman via TheCollegeFix.com,

‘People now experience the entire world as a form of bullying’

The political correctness movement that has swept college campuses, corporate America and mainstream life can be traced back to a few psychological trends.

Howard Schwartz, professor emeritus of Oakland University, has for years studied the psychology underlying political correctness, and in his new book Political Correctness and the Destruction of Social Order: Chronicling the Rise of the Pristine Self, he offers some clarity on why the term “snowflakes” is now synonymous with college students today.

Schwartz, who taught classes in social and behavioral science within its business school, said the term stems from what he calls “the rise of the pristine self.”

Schwartz writes in the book that “this is a self that is touched by nothing but love. The problem is that nobody is touched by nothing but love, and so if a person has this as an expectation, if they have built their sense of themselves around this premise, the inevitable appearance of the something other than love blows this structure apart.”

angry.Shutterstock

He added in his interview that “the oversensitivity of individuals today, including political correctness and microaggressions, all stem from this idea that people operating under the notion of the pristine self view you as evil because you are showing them something other than love.”

Schwartz points to the rise of helicopter parents and capitulating campus administrations as contributing to this phenomenon.

“People now experience the entire world as a form of bullying. The helicopter parent protects the children from real dangers but also fantasy dangers. These precious snowflakes are the children of political correctness, their parents and schools lead them to believe that the world is perfectly moralistic — they don’t live in the real world, it is a fantasy,” he said.

Schwartz said the pristine self is a sort of narcissism – individuals who regard themselves as pristine selves cannot handle the unlovingness of the world, even if it manifests itself in indifference rather than malice.

To them, everything is an act of offense.

Snowflake.Shutterstock

“The “Thuniversity is the setting in which this narcissism is nurtured and the university becomes a sort of protective figure. Universities have become maternal institutions in which the patriarchy, embodied within any authority, is hated,” he said. “This phenomenon is developing at corporations as well.”

Schwartz said political correctness issues will pose great difficulty for organizations in the future.

Read all >>>

 
RELATED POSTS:

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Daily Stirre.shtml ]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [Latest Posts] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

War On Politically Correct Idiocy: Shop Defends English Speaking Policy

Leon’s Frozen Custard’s English only policy is currently the cause of some controversy in Milwaukee, WI, per a Fox 59 report.

On Tuesday, customer Joey Sanchez overheard a conversation between a Leon’s Frozen Custard employees and a Spanish-speaking customer.

“She whispered to him in Spanish ‘I’m not allowed to speak Spanish to you,’” Sanchez said.

Sanchez added that he tried to order in Spanish as well, but was told the same thing.

Leon’s Frozen Custard owner Ron Schneider told reporters that his employees can only speak English on the job, and the policy has never been an issue before, despite being in place for a long time.

“Hey, c’mon! It is America. We’ve spoken English for a long, long time,” Schneider said of the policy. “Any foreign language is going to be a problem. What I’m trying to avoid is when people come up here, get waited on in a different language because there happens to be an employee who speaks that language.”

Schneider, who told Fox 59 his wife is Hispanic, said they have never turned away a customer.

“It’s going to get disruptive if we have to become bilingual, trilingual or anything else,” Schneider added.

 
RELATED POSTS:

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … Daily Stirrer …[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]
 

 

BBC Uses Shakespeare Event To Push Politically Correct Agenda, Sets Gay And Disabled Quota

If you are one of those bloody minded types who believes passionately in British Sovereignty and independence, welcome. No doubt you, like us will have been nauseated by the BBC’s grovellingly sycophantic coverage of the visit of the USA’s failed President, Barack Hussein Obama, invited here by the traitor David Cameron to use the usual US diplomatic tactics of threats and bullying to persuade us that our allies in Washington will make life very unpleasant for us if we do not act in America’s best economic and political interests  by voting to stay in the EU rather than acting in Britain’s interests and voting leave.

The BBC, under both Labour, Conservative and coalition governments has long been the government’s unofficial Ministry of Truth and so, not wishing to have its contract as the state broadcaster terminated the organisation never misses a chance to push the politically correct, globalist agenda. They are even politicising Shakespeare now:

The BBC has once again been slammed for its overt politically correctness, with critics claiming it used a celebration of Shakespeare’s life, broadcast live last night, to push a pro-immigration agenda, Breitbart London reports.

The criticism comes as the publicly funded Corporation reveals plans to ensure that one in six of its on-screen stars is either gay or disabled.

Last night the BBC marked the 400th anniversary of Shakespeare’s death with a live broadcast of a selection of scenes from his plays, performed by a line-up of left-wing luvvies including Benedict Cumberbatch, Judi Dench, Dame Helen Mirren, Meera Syal, David Suchet, Rufus Wainwright, Tim Minchin, Gregory Porter, Joseph Fiennes, and the English National Opera.

But rather than using the event to celebrate of his better known and better loved works, producers included in the program a pro-immigration speech which was never staged during the bard’s lifetime.

The exerpt, known as the Immigration Speech, appears in a play titled The Book of Sir Thomas More, by Anthony Munday, which contains a series of scenes depicting the May Day riots of 1517 when Londoners protested the arrival of Italian immigrants from Lombardy and wanted them expelled.

Shakespeare inserted 17 lines into a speech by Sir Thomas, asking the audience through the statesman: “Say now the king / Should so much come too short of your great trespass / As but to banish you, whether would you go?”

Conservative MP Peter Bone told the Mail on Sunday: ‘They’ve gone out of their way to find a piece of writing which fits the Left-wing establishment’s pro-immigration agenda and it’s a shame.

‘You’d have thought they could at least have found something which was published under Shakespeare’s name for a start.”

Meanwhile, the BBC has rolled out new diversity targets aimed at ensuring that, by 2020, one in six of all its on-screen roles are given to either LGBT or disabled people.

In fact the speech does not appear in versions of the play, now forgotten by all but medieval literature scholars, before the nineteenth century. There is no provenance of Shakespeare’s authorship and there are certain stylistic details that suggest it was written long after Shakespeare’s death (and yes I do have the academic qualifications to make such comments – what I lack, because hating the academic environment I studied independently for my qualifications ad thus escaped the brainwashing that typifies university education.)

The left control many of Britain’s institutions, media, the law and education among them, and they never rest from trying to impose their nightmare vision of a perfect world on us. Unfortunately most of us have been too busy getting on with our lives on planet reality to resist. We should not blame ourselves, not all of us can be self righteous, hypocritical obsessive compulsives who only motivation is to court peer approval by embracing the ‘pensee unique’ and following the politically correct sheeple. Shakespeare might have said of them:
“You common cry of curs! whose breath I hate
As reek o’ the rotten fens, whose loves I prize
As the dead carcasses of unburied men
That do corrupt my air – I banish” (Coriolanus)

It is time to take back our world and our Shakepeare. We can start perhaps by telling the stupid, sissified luvvies at the BBC that if the love migrants so much they are banished and seek some third world cesspit that is willing to take in useless people.

RELATED POSTS:

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … Daily Stirrer …[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Gypsy Boy, racist? What would they make of Leonard Cohen nowadays

leonard-cohen                                                       Gypsy boy? No, Leonard Cohen

The Islington screechers get more and more ridiculous in their quest for things to be offended by. Racism is their favourite offensive thing (which is sad because few of them understand what racism actually is.

The latest offensive incident involving racism took place during a rugby match between England and Wales, a fixture in which passions usually run high.

During the game, England prop Joe Marler was filmed shouting at Wales front-row Samson Lee: “Hey, gypsy boy.” Lee comes from a Traveller background, so it was perhaps an unpleasant thing for Marler to say. The video of Marler’s shout spread across the web and led to much Twittering about racist attitudes in rugby.

Marler apologised to Lee at half-time, Lee accepted his apology. Lee also accepted that Marler wasn’t being racist in his use of the G-word. End of story.

Unfortunately when the Islington Screechers  (aka The Loony Left) latch onto a racism story it isn’t over for them until someone has been crucified. You see these people are such hypocrites and capable of such extremes of moral relativism that when a black or Muslim person kills a white person they will find a way to justify the crime on the grounds that minorities have been marginalised by ‘White priviege,’ but if a white male utters a mildly offensive word or phrase in the heat of the moment, it is a crime on a par with the holocaust, the slaughter of orthodox Christians by The Ottoman Empire or The Albigensian Crusade.

And so nearly a week later it is still not over. Marler and Lee may have done the grown-up, gentlemanly thing of shaking hands and moving and moving on. But the lefties and Politically Correct Thought Police, whose raison d etre is taking offence on behalf of people who are not offended, or turning every utterance of an un-PC word into an occasion for national wailing and gnashing of teeth, is anything but grown-up or gentlemanly. They are emotionally retarded, attention seeking arrested adolescents.

I wonder what they would have made of Leonard Cohen.

Come over to the window, my little darling
I’d like to try to read your palm
I used to think I was some kind of Gypsy boy
Before I let you take me home
from So Long Marianne by Leonard Cohen (lyrics)(video)

I’d say there’s less change of that ever being played on a BBC radio station in the future than there is of them having a Gary Glitter tribute  day.

RELATED POSTS:

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … Daily Stirrer …[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

On The Subject Of Politically Correct Thinking

Observant readers will have noticed this blog does not really do politically correct, or fuckwittery as we like to call it. Under the old order as Boggart Blog at blog.co.uk we had fun in 2008 and since ridiculing those race obsessed people in Britain,  Europe, and the USA who were just so sure Barack Obama, America’s first black president (and based on his record probably its last) would be the greatest US President ever and a Messianic figure, the peacemaker and joybringer who would lead the world to an era of harmony and prosperity, basing their judgement solely on the colour of his skin because nothing in the little we knew of this alleged cocaine user and former rent boy suggested he was capable of running a tap (faucet) let alone the world’s most powerful nation.

With all that in mind, here’s an image post we felt we have to share for the benefit of those who hold up Martin Luther King as a hero, but forget that the ‘dream’ he had was of his grandchildren “living in a nation where a man is judged on the quality of his character rather than the colour of his skin.”

The identity of the fuckwit who originally posted this has been obscured as an act of mercy.

affirmative-bullshit

The Right To Tell Politicians To Eff Off In An Age Of Self Appointed Censors, and Compliant Media

“If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.”?    George Orwell

Free speech is the foundation of democracy. If we lose free speech we have lost everything because, to put it simply, we can no longer ask the questions that hold ruling elites to account.

no_free_speech

Free speech is not for the faint hearted, saying what YOU believe to be true can attract some robust responses, so those arrested adolescents who want everybody to like them should avoid exercising their right to it. Those who are easily offended, quickly intimidated or the snivelling little cowards on university campuses who feel they are entitled to live in a ‘safe space’ where they will never see or hear anything that offends their delicate, politically correct sensibilities should stay away from free speech (preferably by dressing in baby clothes, sucking on titty bottles and locking themselves in a pink furry bedroom with lots of cuddly toys for company (or they could try to GROW THE FUCK UP of course.

Free speech can sometimes get angry, shouty, foul-mouthed, obscene, intolerant, undignified, insensitive, cantankerous, bawdy and downright fucking offensive. The problem is that the scum sucking spawn of a pox whore’s scab louse has just as much right to express their opinion as you and your ‘right – on’ friends.

Unfortunately, our appreciation for a robust freedom of speech has worn thin over the years.

Fear of free speech (liberglossophobia?) afflicts many in the English speaking world which has been hit harder by the plague of politically correct thinking than most places other cultures. Americans have become fearfully polite, hardly daring to say “good morning” lest it should offend somebody who thinks it is not a good morning. We have become reluctant to mention personal preferences because people who hate what we like might be offended by our preference being different to theirs. So hateful and furious have the responses of the ‘progressive left’ to those who stray ‘off – message’ become, people are unwilling to be labeled racist, bigoted,  intolerant, hateful, closed-minded or any of the other toxic (but rarely correctly applied) labels that carry a badge of shame today. We’ve come to prize compliance over freedom.

Worse, too many people are held hostage by their screen devices and the talking heads on television, have lost the ability to think critically or form their own opinions. Those who spend a lot of time dicking about with their smartphones or tablets are having their opinions formed for them, not by ‘The Wisdom Of The Crowd‘ (there is no crowd, only software filters that control what you see on the internet.)

Truly democratic societies cherish free speech and controversy (the true diversity rather than a facistic gesture of forcing people of different skin tones, religions and cultures to live side by side) and thus produce a robust democracy which respects the rights of others within a shared moral framework and will stand against authoritarian government.

Free speech has always been the first target of tyrants, oppressive regimes have traditionally understood the value of controlling citizens by controlling ideas by suppressing open discussion. The power elites have a vested interest in suppressing debate and publication of the data that informs debate, such controls are essential to controlling how a people view their society and government.

All politicians have an insatiable appetite for power which is a drug thousands of times more addictive than heroin or cocaine.  If they can turn the two-way dialogue that is representative democracy into a one-way dictatorship in which questioning government policy is crminalised (a move which Barack Obama, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron in the UK, France’s Francois Hollande, Chancellor angela Merkel of Germany and various Eurpean Union and United Nations bureaucrats have spoken of in relation to mass immigration policy or climate change scepticism) their grip on power is consolidated. Instead of news we will have propaganda, and instead of freedom we will have serfdom.

Emboldened by theraputic phrases from the pseudo – sciences of sociology and psychology such as “hate speech,” “bullying,” “extremism” and “microaggressions,” the government and their collaborators in internet social media are whittling away at free speech, ensuring it does not challenge the status quo in any meaningful way or goes against  politically correct ideals, and muzzling it when it threatens the elite’s control.

Free speech is no longer free.

Nor is free speech still considered an inalienable right or an essential liberty, even by those government entities entrusted with protecting it.

We’ve entered into an egotistical, insulated, narcissistic era in which free speech has been caged; paraded in political speeches by the hypocrites who fear it most, (i.e.  when it reflects the values of the majority or beyond our political, religious and socio-economic comfort zones )and tolerated only so long as it sticks to what is anodyne and boring and does not start asking difficult questions or telling embarrassing truths.

RELATED POSTS:
The threat to free speech
Free speech being murdered by government friendly media
The Importance of free speech
Control freak politicians trying to abolish free speech
Death of democracy omnibus
Corpoate capitalism enemy of democracy
Them (poem with video)
Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Authorsden blog ]