Theresa May Warns Brexit Could Be Stopped As Draft Deal Faces Overwhelming Opposition

Aead of a “critical week” that will include a summit with EU bureaucrats in Brussels and culminate with a weekend session of the Cabinet to iron out the final details of the draft Brexit deal, Theresa May has run out of arguments and is reviving project fear threats and scare tactics to force Conservative MPs to support her supremely unpopular draft Brexit plan, which she insists is the “best deal possible” and “in the national interest” despite many Brexiteers and remainers alike describing it as a complete betrayal of her country.

In an interview with Sky News on Sunday May faced Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, and claimed that some of the concerns raised by opponents of the deal could be addressed with alternations to the draft for an agreement that is intended to create a ‘framework’ for the future trading relationship between the two sides.

And if this isn’t enough, she said MPs would be better off if they swallowed their doubts and trusted the process – at least, if they want Brexit to succeed. Because provoking a leadership change at this point would likely jeopardize the UK’s ability to reach any deal with the EU. And faced with the possibility of a “no-deal” Brexit, it’s likely that MPs would vote for a second referendum to would raise the possibility of Brexit being scrapped altogether. In other words this woman of zero talent and infinite ambition is telling our representative, “You’ve got to do as I say because I’m a woman and if you oppose me you are sexist.

“These next seven days are going to be critical, they are about the future of this country,” May told Sky News. “I am not going to be distracted from the important job.”

“A change of leadership at this point isn’t going to make the negotiations any easier…what it will do is mean that there is a risk that actually we delay the negotiations and that is a risk that Brexit gets delayed or frustrated.”

May’s suggestion that Brexit could still be cancelled comes as Scottish leader Nicola Sturgeon said her MPs would vote against the draft plan, while a poll of 505 Tory MPs found that more were against the deal than for it. This would add to the unanimous opposition from the DUP (the Northern Irish party propping up May’s government) and almost guarantee that the deal would lose by a staggering margin, given that most Labour MPs would also be expected to vote against.

 

Meanwhile, in an interview on the Andrew Marr show, May’s former Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab offered his most detailed explanation yet about why he decided to resign this week. As Raab explained, with “two or three points” being changed, Raab said he would be able to support the deal. But instead of pushing for these changes, Raab said May is “being bullied, I do think we are being subjected to what is pretty close to blackmail frankly.”

“This is a manageable problem,” Raab said. It is, if those cheese eating surrender monkeys and the sausage scoffers are trying to push us around we should send Type 45 Destroyers into the Rhine, The Elbe and The Seine and from there vapourise Brussels, Berlin and Paris and remind them who has always been the major power in Europe.

The Guardian commented:

Compared with a month ago, the Conservatives have dropped five points to 36% while Labour has gained three to stand on 39%. The proportion of Leavers backing the Tories has dropped by 10 points in one month.

And as if the domestic opposition wasn’t enough of an obstacle, Brussels on Sunday deepened May’s predicament by declaring in a seemingly arbitrary way that any extension to the Brexit transition period last at least a year, and be accompanied by an additional 10 billion euro payout (in addition to the 39 billion euros the UK would be expected to pay under May’s plan, according to the Guardian.

But the European Research Group, the umbrella group of Brexiteer Torys who have ferociously opposed May’s deal, released on Sunday a concise accounting of its criticisms of May’s plan. After reading, the 585 page document they conclude it seems to undercut May’s insistence that her deal is a “good deal” that was negotiated on the “UK’s terms.” The ERG accuses May of abandoning her promise, made in January 2017, that she would not accept any deal that would leave the UK “half in, half out” of the EU. But by allowing for the possibility that the UK could be bound by EU rules set by the ECJ, as well as customs union rules over which the UK would have no say, May is accepting that UK will become a “vassal state” beholden to the EU’s rules, with no say in deciding them.

How The Establishment Destroyed Britain’s Free Press

 

When one considers press censorship, it is tempting to take an anachronistic view that Britain is a bastion of press freedom, with newspapers of left and right expressing diverse opinions and flourishing.

The story in mainland Europe is different. In continental German, French, Iaian and Spanish governments don’t have any ethical problems about censoring the press as the British establishment always has, and in most smaller EU nations, the press is owned by political parties. Europe of course, does not have Britain’s long tradition of democracy and freedom of speech, either actual or illusory.

Since the Second World War, there has existed in Germany, France, Austria, Spain, Netherlands, Italy and so on, numerous laws restrict in some way what the press may or may not print particularly when it comes to criticizing government policy, and lately of course, new laws preventing criticizm of Islam have been introduced.

Laws that were originally intended to prevent or restrict the promotion of fascism and holocaust denial are now being expanded to include ever greater spheres of political discourse (i.e. hate speech,) – which, by the way, demonstrates   why even nazis must be allowed to argue their case if they can find a patform. Banning any single idea is always the thin end of the wedge. This is not comparable with Great Britain, where it is still legal in principle to promote fascism or deny the holocaust in national newspapers.

Where legislation is absent, however, as in Britain, “soft censorship” is strongly present. Through various laws which govern, ostensibly, how we must act towards one another in society, the government has effectively controlled what we may say to one another. This was achieved through “Race Relations” laws which were drafted and passed by Britain’s Jewish community.

Jewish Home Secretary Jack Straw passed the Malicious Communications Act last decade which pertained to the internet in theory, but in practice governments what media outlets may say also – they are, after all, communications. Without referring to the media by name, British governments have managed to institute censorship by the back door. Ironically straw would be unlikely to be considered for high office now, his party, Labour, desperste to pick up the Muslim vote, has become the Jew hating party.

Britain’s notorious “right-wing press” has until recently avoided the establishment’s attempts to control it – until very recently. Politicians have long bemoaned the influence of ‘far right’ daily newspapers such as the Daily Mail and the Daily Express, for both of these papers have been outspoken against mass-immigration and multiculturalism in recent decades. They also led the successful campaign for an EU referendum and Britain’s subsequent vote to leave. Even politicians over in Brussels have derided these two newspapers for their persistence in printing a critical view of what goes on in the the EU’s behind-closed-doors policy making sessions.

These two papers have now fallen under establishment control and are edited by people sympathetic to the globalist, cultural marxist, anti – democratic world view of Britain’s major political parties, the EU, the United Nations, and the banking cartel. This can be clearly seen in their recent about-turns in political alignment.

Earlier this month, the the long serving editor of the Daily Mail, Paul Dacre,  was replaced as Editor-in-Chief by former Guardianista George Greig. Greig is a known for his ultra left positions and has immediately shifted the Mail’s stances on key issues, including just this week denouncing opponents of Theresa May’s disgusting Brexit sellout as “saboteurs”. (Sabotaging the establishment’s plan to integrate our nation into a European federal superstate?) The Mail has also, almost immediately scrubbed any discussion of immigration from their pages. Greig’s appointment is widely believed to have been orchestrated by the British establishment to censor the Mail by proxy.

Earlier this year the Daily Express’ owner, soft porn baron Richard Desmond announced that the paper was to be sold. The purchaser was Trinity Mirror, the publisher of the Daily Mirror and Sunday Mirror. The Mirror papers are Britain’s most widely read left-wing newspapers although to call them left wing is understatement, they are Maoist.

Their political allegiance lies firmly with the Labour Party, not respectable old Labour, the party of the working class, but Jeremy Corbyn’s Islamophiliac loony left that thinks importing ten million illiterate, uneducated Muslim peasants to britain will somehow culturally enrich us. Interestingly, the long-term Editor-in-Chief of the Express, Hugh Whittow, was ‘retired’ almost immediately after the acquisition and replaced with former Daily Mirror Editor Gary Jones. Needless to say, the Express has now conveniently dropped its reporting of issues pertaining to immigration and is soft peddaling on its support for Brexit.

Not long ago these takeovers would have been referred to the monopolies commission and the Trinity Mirror aquisition of the Express almost certainly rejected. There now remains not a single daily newspaper critical of mass-immigration, nor any realistically Eurosceptic ones, although news websites such as Breitbart or The Anti Media are going from strength to strength.

Anybody who believes there hasn’t been some collusion involved in the acquisitions and appointments that have occurred at both of the right of centre papers in the same year is clearly not paying attention. Without having to pass a single law to this effect, the British government has succeeded in neutering the only newspapers which had remotely stood up for the interests of the Silent Majority.

Now it’s down to us citizen journalists.

Will old Swedish parties trigger constiutional crisis to stop anti-migrant Sweden Democrats?

Sweden’s establishment parties are hoping for a miracle and playing a game of chicken to keep power after an election brought deadlock. But whatever coalition they stitch together, they risk damaging the country – and themselves. The Riksdag, the Swedish Parliament, has narrowly voted down a proposal to invite centrist politician Ulf Kristersson, leader of the Moderate Party to form a government.
The news came on Wednesday that after former PM Stefan Lofven was rejected by a vote of the Riksdag –  a historic first of a potential prime minister rejected by his peers – Sweden wil continue without a government. This has been in force since voters across the country cast their ballots on September 9.

Any path the mainstream parties choose now, the Sweden Democrats – the anti-migrant, anti-Islam outcasts that have shattered Sweden’s political consensus – stand to be the beneficiaries.

The Sweden Democrats did not win that election but their 17.5 percent of the vote meant that for the first time since World War II, neither the right nor the left bloc had a majority, or even a support base for a minority government. To rule, either faction would have to either cooperate with what is now the third-biggest party in the Riksdag, or with each other.

Lofven’s incumbent Social Democrats and their Green backers lost votes from 2014, leaving them dozens short of the 175 mandates they needed in the single 349-seat chamber that controls all of Sweden’s federal politics. Despite presiding over a four-year term when the migrant crisis, escalation of crime, and widening political rifts have shaken the country’s faith in itself, Lofven presumptuously volunteered himself as the continuity figure. His ego bubble was burst when the majority of deputies voted him out.

READ MORE on Sweden’s crisis at RT

 

 

Company Wants To Implant Microchips In “Hundreds Of Thousands” Of Workers

Not so long ago the idea that thousands of people would volunteer to have microchips implanted into their hands seemed like something out of a TV series about a dystopian future society, but it is already becoming a reality.  Thousands of fanatical technology worshippers, as crazily devoted to their deity as any medieval religious cult it seems, have already had microchips implanted, by a Swedish company. There is a near stampede to get chipped and the company behind the scheme claims it is now working with very large global employers to implement RFID chipping on the corporate level.

Jowan Osterlund, CEO of the company, Biohax, recently told a UK newspaper The Daily Telegraph  that they have been talking with a “major financial services firm” that has  “hundreds of thousands of employees”

from The Daily Telegraph:

Biohax, a Swedish company that provides human chip implants, told the Telegraph it was in talks with a number of UK legal and financial firms to implant staff with the devices.

One prospective client, which cannot be named, is a major financial services firm with “hundreds of thousands of employees.”

Global corporations face increasing criticism of their authoroitarian management cultures and cavalier attitudes to  ethical and human rights issues. And with horror stories about hacking and cyber attacks constantly in the news, the corporate paranoia of these security-obsessed corporations is driving a rush to adopt this sort of technology.  If all of your employees are chipped, you will always know where they are, and you will always know who has access to sensitive areas or sensitive information. Current RFID technology is not like GPS however, it has limited range and cannot be used to track people outside the workplace. But emplyees smart phones and other internet enabled devices are designed to do that.

According to Osterlund, Biohax, the procedure to implant a chip takes “about two seconds”, and it is usually implanted in the hand

A syringe is used to place the chip in an area between the thumb and forefinger, according to the report. Osterlund said the procedure is similar to ear piercing and takes “about two seconds.” The microchips operate via “near field communication” technology, similar to what is used by no-contact bank cards.

“In a company with 200,000 employees, you can offer this as an opt-in,” Osterlund told the Telegraph.

Right now, many companies use security badges, and many of us are familiar with working in organisations that issue chipped identity cards. Biohax and tech fans say implanted chips are no different except that unlike security badges, which can be lost, stolen or forged,  or taken off and locked in a desk drawer, an implanted chip is much more permanent and much more secure, and that is one of the big selling points.  The following is what the chief medical officer of Biohax recently told Fox News

“The chip implant is a secure way of ensuring that a person’s digital identity is linked to their physical identity. It enables access management in a way that protects individual self-sovereignty and allows users to control the privacy of their online activity,” Dr. Stewart Southey, the Chief Medical Officer at Biohax International, told Fox News.

Of course once this technology starts to be implemented, there will be some workers, and one would hope, almost 100% of trade union leaders that will object. But if it comes down to a choice between getting the implant or losing their jobs, how many workers do you think will choose to become unemployed?

(Subversive types might be interested to know if they obtain a circular neodymium magnet about 15mm diameter and atach it with the north pole next to the skin with surgical tape, leaving it in place for 48 hours, it will effectively neutralise the chip. Doing this might get you fired of course so make sure your union will support you)

Some people will sacrifice their jobs before they will accept this return to medieval serfdom, but given the ease with which corporate propaganda has persuaded people to accept Microsoft’;s ‘not-fit-for-purpose’ operating system, shift so much of their personal data to an electronic networking medium that offers less security than a prison without walls or use a search engine or a social media platform that will not just track users around the web after they leave those sites, but also invade your personal files and mine data from them that can be used to build ‘psychological profiles’ of us and enable people who buy that information to ‘target’ us more efectively with advertising, persuading the masses to accept being chipped is not going to be a hard sell..

Personally, I will never let anyone embed a chip in my body.  But just like with so many other things (sic), most of the population will simply choose to accept the “new technology” because everybody else is doing it. We have already accepted contactless payment cards. Initially we were told the contactless feature on newly issued cards was only for payments up to £30 in Britain, but on holiday in Europe recently I noticed restaurant staff were trying to used it for bills of over €100, and a car hire clerk tried to use it for a €400 payment. And as a former IT professional who worked on securing systems for years, I can tell you this technology is highly insecure. My bank gives me the option of not enabling the feature but many banks are now insisting contactless is the preferred method of use. It’s the future, they chorus in a bid to make us feel inadequate.

OK, if you are affluent and are only buying a sandwich for lunch and end up paying for the tuna and mayo wrap and diet coke the person behind you at the till is having, it doesn’t hurt much but consider what could happen if somebody on a tight budget had their contactless card details skimmed. The equipment needed to ‘skim’ these cards and steal account details is very cheap and easy to obtain.

Here’s a query that was posted on a tech forum earlier this year: When my old debit card expired and a new one was sent, it came with this new feature. I wanted a way to disable it since each time I was scanning my RFID access card in my wallet, the detectors at work were picking up the debit card too. They’d beep twice and sometimes get confused. Not only this, but while my bank promises it’s secure, I’d rather not have a feature I don’t intend to use on the off-chance that it’s not.

Most methods of disabling the contactless feature on a debit or credit card involve physically mutilating the card, which I don’t like the idea of. A less destructive method is to locate where the rfid chip is positioned in your card and put a half inch square of copper tape (available from gardening stores or websites) over it on the back of the card.

In my experience when corporate businesses, the banks or technology companies tell us some innovation is for our benefit, either making life more convenient, or our finances more secure, in reality it is for their benefit. In my omnibus page Cashless Society I have reported many times on moves to eliminate the use of coinage and banknotes in the developed nations. It is claimed the reasoning behind this is to reduce crime and make financial activity more convenient. In fact a big part of the push to dump cash is to enable the electronic tracking of even our smallest purchases, the better to divine our habits and lifestyle choices from collected data.

Nothing is ever what it seems to be and RFID chip implants are no different. Apart from privacy issues and the principle of personal liberty, we must ask, as Marcus Tullius Cicero did two thousand years ago, Cui Bono. Who benefits? I’ll give you a clue, it isn’t people like you or me.

‘Unbiased’ Facebook Fired Executive For Pro – Trump Political Beliefs

image
Zuck plays with one of Luckey’s gadgets but denies Luckery the right to his own opinions.

Mainstream media and left wing politicians like to show how they are up with modern trends and developments by heaping praise on psychopathic Silicon Valley, virtue-signaling, shadowbanning, conservative – censoring, fake news generating social media billionaires. Thus, though the political bias towards the left / liberal parties and causes is blatantly obvious, they are allowed, when they appear before US Congressional committees to answer questions on abuse of privacy, or respond to accusations of bias by devising  PR campaigns to show to the world they are truly impartial, with zero liberal bias. Unfortunately, every time they try to pull such a stunt, it backfires as their true ideological face quickly emerges from behind a fake, hypocritical mask.

A case in point is that of former Facebook executive, Oculus co-founder and virtual-reality wunderkind Palmer Luckey, who was a rising star of Silicon Valley when, at the height of the 2016 presidential contest, he donated a modest $10,000 to an anti-Hillary Clinton group. His donation sparked a backlash from his colleagues, which then led to him being put on leave, and six months later he was fired.

What stinks about Luckey’s termination, is that when testifying before Congress about data privacy earlier this year, Mark Zuckerberg denied, or rather lied that the departure had anything to do with politics. In fact, neither Facebook nor Mr. Luckey ever gave a reason why he left the social-media giant.

Now however, disgusted perhaps by Zuckerberg’s continued hypocrisy in claiming Facebook is a totally neutral platform politically: according to a report from the WSJ, Luckey revealed to asociates the reason for his termination from that bastion of apolitical impartiality Facebook, was his support for Donald Trump and the furor that his political beliefs sparked within his employer, and Silicon Valley, some of those people say.

We should perhaps remind you here that support for Trump does not necessarily imply agreement with Trump’s policies or admiration of his abrasive style. Post election analysis showed many people supported Trump because they were horrified at the prospect of corrupt, crooked, warmongering, morally dysfunctional Hillary Clinton, who in her campaign had effectively promised war with Russia by committing herself to attacking the Assad regime in Syria as soon as she took office.

Luckey’s attack on Facebook and Zuckerberg is not just sour grapes either:leaked  internal Facebook emails suggest the matter was discussed at the highest levels of the company. In the fall of 2016, as anger over his modest political donation to a candidate the boss didn’t like simmered, executives at Facebook – which according to Open Secrets has spent over $60 million on lobbying in the past decade – including Zuckerberg pressured Mr. Luckey to publicly voice support for libertarian candidate Gary Johnson, despite Mr. Luckey’s years long support of Trump.

At that point Luckey, 26, allegedly hired an employment lawyer who argued to Facebook that it had violated California law in pressuring the executive to voice support for Johnson and for punishing an employee for political activity.

Which, we have to say is pretty typical behaviour among Silicon Valley billionires. Go against the ‘corporate culture’ as dictated by the billionaire boss, and you are dead

Luckey and his lawyer are not as stupid as Zuckerberg is arrogant and megalomaniacal, and negotiated a payout of at least $100 million, representing an acceleration of stock awards and bonuses he would have received through July 2019, plus cash, according to the people familiar with the case. The stock awards and bonuses were a result of selling his virtual-reality company, Oculus VR, to Facebook in 2014 for more than $2 billion, a deal that netted him a total of about $600 million.

In other words, Facebook can claim it was Trump’s “fault” that a $10,000 donation resulted in a $100,000,000 payout just a few months later. What a bunch of wankers.

RELATED POSTS:

In Private Meeting, Top Facebook Exec Threatened News Outlets That Do Not Coperate With Censorship Policy

During a meeting held behind closed doors last week, top Facebook executive Campbell Brown, acording to several people who were present, warned news publishers that refusal to cooperate with the tech behemoth’s efforts to “revitalize journalism” (i.e. ensure nothing …

Facebook Hamstrung In France; India Outlaws Its Free-Net Service
France’s privacy authority has ordered that internet social media monster Facebook must stop collecting French users’ information without their consent, and transferring data to the US. A decision published by the French commission for information protection underlined how Facebook’s practice of tracking non-users’ Internet activities failed to comply with EU privacy regulation.

Commerzbank, Mozilla, Suspend Facebook Ad Campaigns As Advertisers Start Pulling Out

As we reported yeserday, the backlash against Facebook over the Cambridge Analytics data harvesting story continues to grow. At first it seemed fairly innocuous, some crazy scientist had developed an app that tricked people into granting access to their personal details and activity records. Then it emerged that even though the guy had been naughty, …

Google, Facebook and Twitter Yield to German Govt Demand to Censor Anti-Migrant ‘Hate Speech’ (aka Free Speech)

Over the past couple of days we, and many other New Media outlets reported the horrific incident in Cologne, Germany at New Year, in which a crowd on male, recently arrived immigrants, all of Arab or North African appearance according to witnesses carried out a mass attack on German women who were simply trying to use the railway station.

Facebook Is Falling Apart so Fast We Can’t Keep Up

Facebook Is Falling Apart so Fast We Can’t Keep Up Anyone who reads The Daily Stirrer regularly will know we have never been fans of Facebook, Google or any of the other multi – billion dollar internet corporations which operate business models based on abusing users privacy. We have always predicted retribution would one day …

How Internet Companies Like Google and Facebook Have Helped The spread of extremism

Although the Westminster terror attack is still filling the print and broadcast news and the usual conspiracy theories about it’s being a false flag incident start to circulate, attention is turning to the role of technology companies such as Google, Facebook and Twitter in the process of radicalisation. Google stands accused of providing easy access …

Philanthropic” Mark Zuckerberg Will Place Facebook Shares In A For-Profit LLC

Sorry to seem the The Grinch Who Stole Christmas, but somebody has to blow the whistle on the latest self serving stunt of the self server in chief, Mark Zuckerbugger but the great act of philanthropy with which the Inyaface Datatheft Book chief celebrated the birth of his child is, like everything else billionaire philanthropists do, not quite as straightforward as it has been presented in mainstream media.

Who Runs America? US Federal Trade Commission Takes Orders From Google

Barak Obama runs America surely, you might well be thinking. We would argue that no US President since Eisenhower has truly run the USA. But the latest revelation of how cosy the Obama Administration has become with corporate business, to the extent that government departments are taking instruction from Google will shock even the most cynical Americans

Fuck Facebook, It has been taken over by prudes

OK, we’ll be honest, the only thing anyone at this site thought Facebook was ever any use for is getting new content picked up by search engines. With the new content being added to the site hundreds of times every second, Search Engine spirder swarm all over it. But like all tech firm bosses, Zuckerbugger and his merry little band of fascists are incapable of critical thinking and so prefer to leave decision making to algorithms.

Facebook boss Zukerberg Wants To Own The Internet

Facebook’s latest acquisition Whatsapp cost $19bn, that’s $40 per user. Whatsapp charge their users $1 per year. That means it will take Facebook 40 years to recover their outlay. And people are buying shares in this company? Insane.

The Threat To Our Brains Posed By The Internet by Ian R Thorpe.

The Daily Stirrer along with many other commentators who are not easily brainwashed by corportate and government propaganda has reported many times on the dangers posed by the internet and yet people become more obsesed with the wor;ld wide web, social networking and online gaming. Now neurologists are starting to express concern.

The WiFi revolution that could take traffic off our roads and control of our lives away from us

The science and technology worshippers are getting crazier the nearer they feel they are to being able to turn us into humandroids, unthinking automatons controlled by central computers. Here’s a report on their latest Dr. Evil style insanity; Using the internet to control our lives. You are a human being, you don’t need an iPhone or an X Box to think for you.

The WiFi revolution that could take traffic off our roads and control of our lives away from us

The science and technology worshippers are getting crazier the nearer they feel they are to being able to turn us into humandroids, unthinking automatons controlled by central computers. Here’s a report on their latest Dr. Evil style insanity; Using the internet to control our lives. You are a human being, you don’t need an iPhone or an X Box to think for you.

So Tim Berners Lee Is Upset About How The Internet Turned Out FFS what did he expect?

We hear the man (falsely) credited with inventing the World Wide Web is disappointed at the way his brainchild has turned out. having been so naive and ignoirant of human nature as to believe that a free and unregulated internet would encouage everybody to join hands and sing Kumbaya, the man who made internet technology the friend of freaks, fascists and fraudsters really has no right to complain

Facebook’s Privacy Piracy

Once again Facebook are in trouble over their contempt for users privacy. It is quite astounding that this upstart corporation that is quite open about its ambition to control the internet does not seem to understand there are lines that cannot be crossed when it comes to broadcasting or “sharing” details of users private lives.

Internet Evil Empire Games – The Facebook Fourth Reich
Microsoft might be “the sick man of technology” a spent power desperately trying to cling to its former glories as The Ottoman Empire was in 1914, Google are The Evil Empire, consistently evading regulators attempts to curb their ambition to control all the information in the world and quite prepared to trample on our individualism, privacy and civil rights in order to do so. Where does that put Facebook then?

EU Heading for Breakup and Conflict Warns Former French P M.

A former Prime Minister of France, Dominique de Villepin has made a speech warning that the European Parliament election next year could be trigger a major political crisis for the 27 member Union (Britain will be gone before the election takes place), adding that attacking anti – integration or nationalist parties as “extremeists” in the way current French President, Emmanuel Macron repeatedly has  recently, could help the Eurosceptics win votes.

The EU election has been framed by leaders favouring Europe’s progressive integration as an opportunity to push for more political leagislative and economic union, while the bloc’s far right populists hope a surge in the number of European Parliament Members, (MEPs), will hamstring the ruling elite of unelected bureaucrats in Brussels of its authortirian power.

We are witnessing the early stages of “an extremely serious political crisis,” M. de Villepin said in a joint interview with the TV station CNews, Europe 1 radio and newspaper Les Échos. He added tensions between Europhiles and Eurosceptics would likely reach boiling point in the coming months.

De Villepin also warned Macron is folish to engage in a political “arm-wrestle” with the extremes. “I think he [Mr Macron] is being a little bit presumptuous. The president is trying to highlight the deep gulf between progressives and nationalists… But polarisation inevitably leads to, in times of crisis, the victory of the toughest candidates.”

He also called on Europe’s so-called progressives to avoid lumping together all types of nationalism.

Macron overestimates his ability to wage a war against forces which have become extremely powerful because they are, in the eyes of voters, more effective and efficient. That’s the problem with populism,” he said,  adding a further warning that surges in support for anti-EU, radical right parties in the May election was highly likely.

Mr de Villepin also dismissed Mr Macron’s calls for a ‘true European army’ to defend the bloc against threats from powers including the US as stupid.

US President Donald Trump slammed Macron’s call for an EU army as “insulting” soon after landing in Paris for a weekend of events to mark the end of World War One on Friday. that he published a fiery tweet criticising his French host over his proposal.

RELATED:
Europe Unglues (omnibus)

What NPCs Don’t Understand About Britain’s New £50 Note Campaign

npc meme
NPC meme – satirising the ‘leftie intellectuals’ who celebrate diversity by all parroting the same left wing propaganda

 

A few weeks ago The Bank of England announced it will be issuing a new £50 note. The new note will be coated in plastic like our current £5, £10 and £20 notes, for better durability and, it is claimed, lower money laundering opportunities (although this in nonsense, it is no different in that respect to the current paper note, and of course electronic money is a far safer bet for money launderers if they are a bit tech savvy.) The current £50 note features Matthew Boulton and James Watt, industrial revolution figures who developed a commercially viable steam engine in the 1700s (they didn’t actually invent the first steam engine, that was Thomas Newcomen in 1712 but his design was por and inefficient,) and engineered many machines that used steam power in industrial processes.

Suggestions of who will feature on the new £50 will be put forward by the public. What could possibly go wrong? Anyone remember when the public were asked to name a new polar exploration research ship and the most popular suggestion was Boaty McBoatface? So who should go on the new £50 note? Cue the suggestions of unheard of Black scientists, Muslim doctors and Shamanistic Animist mathematicians. The University brainwashed NPCs will go for any name the leftist propaganda machine throws up.

And why not? The boatloads of scientists and entrepreneurs that wash up on our our shores on a weekly basis hoping to culturally enrich undr age girls and take up professions related to the science of claiming banefits have help us enormously in our efforts to advance science and technology. Of course, the British Government could never make such a suggestion themselves, but if they pass it over to the public to decide, well hey, we chose it ourselves, right?

It took mainstream media just one day to jump on the bandwagon, promoting the claims of compete nonentities on the basis of skin colour and religious affiliation rather than metic.

The Daily Mail, who many oddly label as a “right wing extremist newspaper”, promoted the idea of having Noor Inayat Khan on the note. Khan was a female, Indian, Muslim Nazi fighter. The only thing that surprises me at this stage is that she didn’t have a previous lesbian, pansexual relationship too. The Independent promoted the suggestion of Mary Seacole; a mixed-race woman from Jamaica who was a nurse and businesswoman during the Crimean War. Labour MP, Wes Streeting, suggested Nelson Mandela. The fact that none of these people are British seems a completely overlooked fact.

Would any of these been suggested had they been born white? They may have but pigs might fly too. Why does it matter? Those of us who find the whole thing stupid and point out there is no good reason why the current occupants should not remain on the note. we will no doubt be assailed by “gammon”-shouting NPCs claiming we can’t stand the thought of that eminent scientist ummm* being on a banknote because we don’t like the look of brown people. Their myopic way of inventing a race issue is belief that who is on the £50 note is the actual issue here. The £50 note is almost irrelevant, how many of us know without looking it up who is on any banknote (apart from The Queen.) While these people see a single, harmless matter and easily categorise any criticism of it as racism, we see the bigger picture. We understand why this is being done, we understand who is doing it, and we understand where this is heading.

Official figures show that Britain was 87% “White British” at the time of our last census in 2011, there are huge tracts of the country away from the big cities where brown faces are still a rarity. This, according to those who demand absolute equality in all things means, apparently, that we should have around 13% of people in government, on TV, in the professions and in every walk of life to be non-White too. If calls for racial equality are anything more than political guilt tripping, the results must reflect the true demographics of our country. The British are expected to become a minority in our own country by the year 2066, and then Parliament and our TV shows will have to be 51% non-White to continue reflecting the demographics of our country.

But even if that happens, it still would not mean somebody who camaigners claim was “The first black chemistry teacher at Manchester Grammar School” has stronger claims to be put on the £50 note that, for example, Joseph Priestly, Michael Farrady, Alan Turing, Ernest Rutherford, Frank Whittle or Francis Crick (whose DNA discoveries were made in collaboration with an American biologist. This determination among the university brainwashed supporters of cultural Marxism, to big up the minor achievements of people who can claim minority status is purely political and is intended to disrupt and divide society.

*I looked for prominent black or Asian British scientists but had never heard of any that appeared in the search results and also discovered of those listed, the main achievement claimed for them usually began with the words, “The first black person to …” or “The first British Asian to …”

EU Parliament Passes Resolution On Ban Of ‘Neo-Fascist’ Groups, Lists Identitarian Movement
The most undemocratic democratically elected body in the world, The European Union Parliament this week passed a resolution demanding that member-states ban ‘neo-fascist’ parties and groups and co-operate with ‘anti-racism’ NGOs […] The motion, which was introduced at the request of Italian MEP Eleonora Forenza, was passed by a vote of 355 MEPs. Many MEPs were not present in the 751-seat chamber for the vote.

Lord’ Sugar Sugar called ‘racist’ for Senegal World Cup team tweet (but it was funny)
Alan Sugar (one of Blair’s dodgy ‘lords’ and front man of the UK version of ‘The Apprentice’ TV show, has come in for a shitstorm of criticism online after tweeting a typical market traders gag about the Senegal World Cup team. Sugar posted a photoshopped image of the Senegal players standing over a row fake designer sunglasses and handbags and gave it the caption “I recognise some of these guys …”

White Privilege Now Inculdes The Privilege Of Being Fired For being White

Its should be obvious by now that the politically correct left, insaniac sociopaths that they are, have only one emotion at their disposal; hate. Bizarrely the hatered of these predominantly white, middle class people, while of themselves, is mostly racist in nature but directed at members of their own race.

Ten Truths You Can’t Tell In Britain Without Being Accused Of Racism.

by Arthur Foxake The screenshot below is from an article written by Trevor Phillips, former head of the Equalities and Human Rights commission for The Daily Mail (or Mail On Sunday) Trevor Philips home truths on racism. Image source Finally, we?re having that open and honest debate about immigration and race everyone has been calling … Continue reading

White Girl Is Burned Alive, 17 Black Gang Members Arrested. Mainstream Media Blanks The Story
Remember how the Social Justice Warriors of the politically correct ‘left’ screamed when a young black man named Trayvon Martin was shot by Hispanic George Zimmerman, because it was assumed someone named Zimmerman would be white? Remember how they wailed and stirred up civil unrest when a black man was shot by white cops in Ferguson, Missouri, automatically assuming the the killing was racially motivated. more >>>

Politician Blasts Conviction For Speaking The Truth On Anti-Semitism In Europe

A Danish politician has been reprimanded for posting comments on Twitter about the resurgence of anti semitism in Europe. Apparently while hand wringing and breast beating about violent attacks on Jewish people is fine, stating the obvious by linking the Europe migrant crisis to this new wave of anti Semitism is a criminal offence …

15 More Men of South Asian Descent Charged With Child Sex Offences

West Yorkshire Police have charged 14 men and a 16-year-old boy with sex offences including the rape of a girl under the age of 16 in Keighley, a small town in the old Woollen Industry distict of the county. The offences centre on one female victim, with one allegation involving a second who was also under 16 at the time.

Racist Student Union Officer says ‘I Can’t be Racist’

We have often made points about the hypocroisy of the left, but a Student Union diversity officer from London beats all comers. Having tweeted ‘kill all white men’ she justifies herself by saying that as an ethnic minority woman she cannot be racist or bigoted.

Multi-Cultural England: Are You Feeling The Progressive Diversity That’s Enriching Your Life
Visit some parts of most British cities with large immigrant populations and you will be hard pressed to recognize it, certainly my granparents would struggle to recognize the towns they knew. Appeasement of foreigners has destroyed the character of our communities but as usual the political left advise solving the problem by doing over again the things that caused it.

US Soldiers Forced To Sit Through P C ‘White Privilege Presentation. Not Happy Bunnies
The U.S. Army is investigating an unauthorized diversity training presentation on “white privilege” shown to hundreds of Georgia soldiers, USA Today reported, citing an Army spokeswoman. The Equal Opportunity training presentation was shown to about 400 soldiers of the 67th Signal Battalion at Fort Gordon on Thursday, according to Captain Lindsay Roman.

If a black person acts like a twat is it racist to say he’s a twat.

Examples of US rapper Kayne West behaving in ways that show what a cupid stunt he is occur to frequently for mainstream media to report them any more it seems. Or maybe it’s just that because Kayne is an African American those mainstream journos were afraid of being called racist if they report his latest fuckwittery.

The British Jihad, Islamism And The Curse Of Multiculturalism.

As the world recoils in horror at images posted on the internet of an American journalist being cruelly and brutally beheaded by an (allegedly) British terrorist fighting for the extremists of the Islamic State in northern Iraq, we ask is the left wing folly of multiculturalism coming home to roost.

Shock; horror. Human Barbie Doll has her own opinions

The human Barbie girl Valeria Lukyanova has become something of an online phenomenon and is regarded as a sex symbol by many young men of the kind who have more computers than friends. Personally I find her apearance bizarre and about as sexually alluring as cold porridge. Still each to there own, where would we be without diversity of opinion.

Immigration – the elephant in the political debating chamber

‘White Racism’
For too long the neo – Fascist left have been allowed to get away with dividing all of humanity into two racial groups, black and white. This has allowed those extremists who support the idea of an authoritarian, global government to dub white people generally as racist, because we have (again generally)been more successful throughout … Continue reading

Even Left Wing News Sites Are Turning On The Bigots Who Screech Racism
The backlash had to come. With the leftie screechers getting so ridiculous in the way they tried to find ‘waycism’ in every utterance of white conservatives, non aligned voters and non voters, anyone who did not have ‘I love blacks, gays and rapists so long as they are foreigners’ tattooed across their forehead’ even the … Continue reading

Mass Immigration Marginalises White Working Class Says Soros Think Tank

Here’s How Working Class Organisations Out Of Which the Labour Movement Grew Were Hijacked By Elitist Control Freaks

The International Elite’s Contempt For National Sovereignty

Ersatz Culture Created By World View Theorists To Undermine Western Values