Cameron Begged Obama ‘On Bended Knee’ To Help Bully Britons Into Staying In EU

During his long stint as Minister For Work And Pensions, Ian Duncan Smith or IDS as he is know because it sounds like an affliction of the lower digestive tract became the most hated politician in Britain. Now he might also be the politician David Cameron hates most.

Europhile might see this as a Shakeaspearean betrayal. But has IBS IDS really done us, and future generations of Briton’s a great favour by revealing David Cameron is willing to betray his country, and has probably already done so, so desperate are the dark forces of globalism to keep Britain in the EU and thus keep the global government project on the rails.

Today it has been revealed by IDS that Cameron begged the globalist and warmonger in chief, the crack addicted arse merchant who is President of The United States Of Perpetual War to intervene in the referendum campaign and help bully ?British voters into keeping us in the authoritarian, socially disintegrating, financially insolvent United States of Europe. Today Breitbart London reported:

 The revelation comes as eight former U.S. Treasury Secretaries write an open letter claiming the UK is too poor and inward looking to succeed outside of the EU, and one day before Mr. Obama is due to visit Britain to make similarly fantastical warnings.

“Let’s cut all the rubbish out of the way, he’s doing it because the Prime Minister has gone on bended knee to him and said, ‘come over and help us bully the British people into making a decision. Everyone tells them and lectures them and it would be great if you could do it’”, Mr. Duncan Smith told the Telegraph.

The former Tory leader, who supports Brexit, resigned as Work and Pensions minister in March ostensibly to protest cuts to welfare, but perfectly timing his departure to heap pressure on the Tory government as the referendum campaign began.

He also argued that the U.S. was hypocritical and would never “pool” its sovereignty with other nations by joining a supranational institution like the EU.

So Cameron has enlisted Obama, whom we are told is Britain’s greatest friend in international politics, but if we look at the evidence we see is our greatest enemy in the world, to help sell us out to The New World Order.

While we have despised the former Work And Pensions Minister will future generations say of him:

This was the noblest Tory of them all;
All the conspirators save only he
Did that they did in envy of Cameron;
He, only, in a general honest thought
And common good to all, made one of them.
His life was gentle, and the elements
So mixed in him that Nature might stand up
And say to all the world, ‘This was a man!’ (paraphrased from Julius Caesar, act 5 scence 5)

RELATED POSTS:
US Threat to Businesses Scares EU Members As Summit On Continued Sanctions Nears
Obama’s Farewell – The World Breathes A Sigh Of Relief

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … Daily Stirrer …[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer News Aggregator]

Poland Warns Cameron Not To Con Voters

EU bureaucracy (image source)

When I read the headline about a Polish minister, Rafa? Trzaskowski, telling David Cameron he must warn British people about the dramatic consequences of leaving the European Union, I was somewhat offended.

Who does this beetroot-soup-slurping little oik think he is, I said to myself, my dear old Dad’s generation went to effing war because this guy’s useless little third world country could not defend itself.

But them I though about it, and he has a point. Cameron should warn the British people about the consequences of leaving the EU. We’d be £56 million a day better off for a start, we would not be obliged to get involved in America’s wars and we would not be at risk of being reduced to a province in a neo – Nazi pan European bureaucratic dictatorship ruled by committee’s of faceles pen pushers in Brussels.

We would be able to make mutually beneficial trade deals with whoever we liked rather than being bound by trade deals negotiated by the aforementioned pen pushers for the benefit of whichever cartel of corporate businesses or financial institutions had offered the biggest kickbacks to corrupt EU officials.

In the event of a Brexit, Britain would no longer be an important player, in Europe or the world if it left the EU, Trzaskowski said. He then demonstrated his insanity by claiming that the ability of British people to travel as freely as they do now, and to work and buy homes in other EU countries, would also be lost, and that UK businesses would suddenly face new problems, as the country would no longer be able to influence the rules of the internal market.

This is bollocks, people travelled freely before we went into the EU, I visited the USA, Italy, Spain, France, Holland, Belgium and Norway before we joined the EU, only needing a visa for the USA. People could buy homes so long as they could afford them. And as we have no problem dealing with non – EU countries now, why should we have any problem dealing with EU countries were we to leave. In fact we have more problems trading with EU nations because of the bureaucracy inposed by the pen pushers of Brussels.

Trzaskowski, reflecting growing fears in the EU that the UK referendum could go against staying in the EU says all European leaders want Britain to stay in the UK, but not if it means undermining EU principles.

Well of course they want us to stay in, think of all the bungs the political leaders of broke third world countries like Poland, Romania, Bulgaria and traditional cesspits of political corruption like Italy and Spain can give themselves and all the jollies and vanity projects that can be funded from our £56 million a day.

Miliband Loses His Balls

Best election moment since Portillo went down in ’97

But as Oscar Wilde might have said, to lose one party leader is unfortunate, to lose two looks like carelessness, but to lose three is hostile action.

I was quite taken with this extract from a blog reposted on Zero Hedge. Not too sure the words ‘conservative landslide’ in the title are appropriate, it was the SNP landslide that gave Cameron a very small majority, but the rest is good reading.

Saxo Bank CEO Lars Seier Christensen reacts to the Conservative landslide victory in the UK.

When you, like me, are used to a proportional representation system, it feels bizarre that the third largest party hardly gains a seat, but still, Nigel Farage has had a lot of beneficial influence on Britain’s EU policy.

Hopefully, Brussels also gets the message but I doubt it. The EU never rolls anything back. It continues to amass more and more control in all areas.

The bureaucracy in Brussels has no self-criticism. No regrets. No matter how much and how often it fails. It just continues the roll out of its powers, and it will continue unabated, until someone says enough is enough. Until someone says stop.

The election outcome in Britain is our one chance to say stop!

YEAH!

War In Iraq: Confused? You Will Be

Picture Source: tpnn                                                                               
 

I’m always a bit wary about referring to The Daily Mail because mere mention of that rather sensationalist but immensely popular newspaper (compare its circulation figures with those of The Guardian or The Independent) is likely to attract a Two Minutes Hate session from Britain’s biggest fascist movement, Unite Against Fascism, Britain’s biggest Nazi movement, The Anti Nazi League and all the left wing Sheeple who unthinkingly follow their rabid attempts to prevent intelligent conversation.

Many of us are confused about what is going on in the Middle East however, and The Mail has run an article that sums it up perfectly. I don’t read The Mail myself but sometimes follow links to specific items of content and unlike our Labour and Lib Dem supporting neo -fascist friends I’m open minded enough to know that the fact something has been published in The Daily Mail does not necessarily mean it is wrong.

So as clueless Dave prepares to follow Obama into yet another unwinnable war (lets hope Parliament kicks him in the balls again) and I know my leftie readers are too bigoted to follow a link to the Mail I’ll summarise the article for you.

We support the Iraqi government in it’s fight against Islamic State (IS/ISIL/ISIS/Alky Ada/The Silent Three/The Famous Five/whatever they are called this week). Our leaders say IS poses an existential threat to the west (now where have we heard something like that before?) but IS is supported (i.e. funded) by Saudi Arabia whom we do like (because they have oil, lots of oil.)so even though they are a bunch of fanatical Islamist theocrats we are their allies.

We don’t like President Assad in Syria because he only has a bit of oil, but our leaders can’t fight him because he’s best mates with Putin (who has oil AND gas and threatens to turn off the tap if we attack his friends).

IS are fighting Assad. We support their fight against him by giving them weapons and sending military advisers to train up human organ noshing terrorists on how to use them. But though we don’t want to fight the IS terrorists who are trying to overthrow the Syrian government because assad is our enemy, we do (we are told) have to fight the IS terrorists who are fighting the Iraqi government who are our puppets friends.

We don’t like Iran because like Saudi Arabia they are a bunch of Islamist Theocrats except they are the wrong sort of Islamists, but the Iranian government supports the Iraqi government against IS and we support the Iraqi government against IS.

Therefore some of our friends are our enemies and some of our enemies are our friends, and some of our enemies are fighting our other enemies, and some of our friends are fighting our other friends. We don’t want our friends to lose unless they are fighting our other friends, and we don’t want our enemies to win unless they are fighting our other enemies.

If we respond to Obama’s demand for support we will not know if we are fighting our friends or our enemies because they change their names more often than they change their shirts.

If we join Obama’s coalition of the terminally confused and help our friends defeat our enemies we may find our friends are even more repugnant than the enemies we helped them defeat (remember what happened in Libya)

What more obvious reason could there be for going to war.

The Public Face Of ISIS – The Daily Mail

RELATED POSTS:

Obama and FUKUS Axis Air Strikes On ISIS Will Make Things Worse
The Third Gulf War Has Started – Should Britain Get Involved
Disaster Dave’s Latest Screw Up On The International Stage






Lawless, Leaderless Libya Becoming Terror Hub
The U.S. Government Is Creeping Into Syria
Work With Assad To Combat ISIS? Laugh, I Nearly Shat
Islamic State Threatens UK Says Cameron. Have We Heard Anything Similar Before
Syrian Rebels Say West Is Already Aiding Thier Uprising.

Dutch Intellectuals Apologise to Putin for Lies on MH17, Syria, Ukraine

Dash for war: The real problem? (
image source
)

When someone waves his academic qualifications at me and expects me to give a damn, it pisses me off. Since the blog started it has worked on the principle that everybody is entitled to their opinion and everybody’s opinion is worth equal respect.

Thus the kind of cupid stunt who tries to hide arrogant stupidity behind a qualification or a job title is not going get very far, neither is the type of dipstick whose idea of logic is to assume that because I don’t believe anything Barack Obama, David Cameron, Francois Hollande or any other western leader say, I must therefore believe everything Vladimir Putin says. I don’t believe anything he says either although it is amusing to observe how much better he is at playing politics than his western counterparts.

Again we get back to the failure of logic on the part of those who back up claims of intellectual superiority with bits of paper. The ineptitude of western leaders at lying and deception is not the proof of integrity, only of inadequacy. Not all academics are so closed minded and bigoted however, come are prepared to consider evidence and judge a case on its merits. Like these guys for example:

Dutch Intellectuals Apologise to Putin for Lies on MH17, Syria, Ukraine.

A large group prominent Dutch academics and intellectuals led by Professor Cees Hamelink has sent an open letter to Russian president Vladimir Putin apologising for the way Russia has been unfairly accused of warmongering. Although unreported in UK media it has attracted a lot of attention in Europe.

Part of the letter reads:

“Dear Mr. President Putin, Please accept our apologies on behalf of a great many people here in the Netherlands for our Government and our Media. The facts concerning MH17 are twisted to defame you and your country.”

It continues;

“You have saved us from a conflict in Syria that could have escalated into a World War” and “Russia is wrongly accused, without evidence or investigation, of delivering the weapons systems that allegedly brought down MH17. For this reason Western Governments claim they have a right to economically pressure Russia.

“It’s unfortunately true, that our media have lost all independence and are just mouthpieces for the Powers that Be. Because of this, Western people tend to have a warped view of reality and are unable to hold their politicians to account.”

Read a full transcript at:

Dutch Intellectuals Apologize to Putin for Lies on MH17, Syria, Ukraine…

(Also available at many other sources, several in English most most in major European languages of the host publication’s home nation.)

Consider that phrase, “Western people tend to have a warped view of reality” Reading the warped and war wishing views of some here at blog.co.uk who think of themselves as left wing intellectuals, the truth of that statement is absolutely clear.

How sick must a person be to wish for the deaths of millions of people and suffering of probably billions in the global conflict that the USA under W and Obama has been pushing for. Russia is historically an inward looking nation, they don’t need territory, there are vast tracts of Siberia that are not populated. What they always have been however is paranoid about invasion, which is why they have become increasingly tetchy about the EU / NATO trying to seduce former soviet republics in violation of a 1981 treaty.

RELATED POSTS:

MH-17 Report False Flag Exposed After Revelation Passenger Was Wearing Oxygen Mask

Obama’s Jihad in Syria
Obama and Kerry Shills For War
How Putin can win World War Three Without Firing A Shot
Obama wants to untite Europe
Elite’s plan to control the world
Globalism threatens democracy
American Warmongering
America’s paranoia
Flight MH17 posts
Ukraine revolution US led
Ukraine the focus of economic war
US General Breedlove admits: NATO did foment war in Ukraine

The West not bombing Iraq for humanitarian reasons

tornado bulk grain carrier
RAF Tornado, not an ideal bulk grain carrier (source: flickr.com)

The involvement of Britain’s Royal Air Force in delivering humanitarian aid in Iraq t has triggered speculations that the UK, may join the US in launching targeted air strikes against the Islamic State (ISIS). The RAF Tornados deployed Tornado are two seat fighter planes capable of low level supersonic flight but not ideal for delivering large payloads of bagged rice or bottled water. They could possibly be useful for dropping medicines however.

Though British military leaders were insistent that the aircraft would only be used in Iraq as part of humanitarian operations, the choice of Tornados, described by military aviation publications as described as “a two-seat, all-weather, day/night attack aircraft” for a humanitarian mission has led to speculation that Britain might quickly be dragged into an escalating regional conflict by a the United States government that shows every sign of being committed to triggering global war.

It would be more logical to assume that David Cameron is showing totally unacceptable devotion to his bum-boy buddy Barack Hussein Obama at whose bidding the UK is now being dragged back into the unwinnable struggle to keep the very large oilfields around Irbil (aka Erbil) under western control. Oil from the Ibril fields supplies a significant amount of energy to Europe.

Does that make a little more sense? When you step back and look at the bigger picture, it always comes back to oil.

RELATED POSTS:
Will new clean energy process make coal the fuel of the future
Secrets And Lies And Oil In Scottish Referendum Cover Up
Klondike 2: The Great Arctic Oil Rush
We were bullied into buying diesel cars to help the environment. Now experts admit this ‘green’ fuel is killing thousands of us
Wind farms: Is Common Sense Breaking Out In The Warmageddonist Industry?
Scalar wave enery: Forgotton science of free electricity
Iceberg Alley Blues

Secrets And Oil In Scottish Referendum Cover Up

massive oil find
Massive oil find off Scottish coast hushed-up until after independence referendum? (source)

Stumbled across this in a site titled Oil and Gas People dot com my peregrinations but the story seems to have cone viral around the Scottish diaspora since (not because) I mentioned it in Little Nicky Machiavelli. The Yes campaign, supporting a vote for full independence have latched onto it and are playing it for all it’s worth.(hence picture from Yes (Highlands) web site. Could the story be a game changer I wonder?

Speculation has been growing in the Oil Industry, the political circus and public bar debating chambers that there was more to the Prime Ministers recent secret visit to Shetland than has been released.

The Facebook page of YES Highlands and Islands has released an article that unfortunately we cannot link to but which was shared by thousands and entered the blogosphere through cut and paste. It reported:

David Cameron came to visit Shetland under the tightest secrecy ever seen in Shetland last week and the national press knew nothing about it. Nor the local press.

Mr Cameron came to Shetland to say absolutely nothing about anything and allowed the local media 6 minutes of questions – Which he did not answer.

Why the PM made a very rushed, and hugely expensive trip to the Shetland Oils, missing his cabinet meeting, and just making it back to Glasgow for the Games? The speculation in the industry is that there has been a huge oil find and this is not to be made public until after the Scottish independence vote next month.

Is there any substance in this rumour? We don’t actually know, but like Flight MH17 false flag story, the Syria gas attack story, the revelations that the US / EU sponsored rebellion in Syria would spill over into a wider conflict, the prediction that Ukraine’s coup d’etat would turn out to be another CIA regime change scandal and so much much more, the blogosphere has a mightily impressive record on getting things right, while tile aft er time the official propaganda so eagerly passed on by tax eaters and sucked up by authority worshippers has turned out to be a great big steaming pile of bullshit.

Is there more detail on this? Not yet, if there was it wouldn’t be secret. I did manage to find this however:

oil-secret,
Sorry, its a bad screen capture Twitter did not like my software’s ‘capture region’ feature

Here’s a link to that Twitter account

And a good place to start your own research

RELATED POSTS:
Huge North Sea oil find enough to produce for over thirty five years. Media silence
The Duchess Of Kate Baby Referendum Scam Exposed