The UN’s Global Compact for Migration sets out nonbinding guidelines for an integrated approach to international migration. DW looks at the agreement and at why some nations are vehemently against it.
The text of the agreement was finalized by UN member states on July 13, 2018, without being offered for public debate and is scheduled to be adopted at a December intergovernmental conference in Marrakesh, Morocco.
The compact is based on the recognition that the entire world needs to cooperate if current and future massive migration flows are to be managed in a humane manner, while still taking account of the values of state sovereignty. This may sound innocuous enough but as is usual when international committees of unelected bureaucrats that aspire to become global governments are involved, the devil is in the detail, precious little of which has been reported by mainstream media.
Read more: Follow the money: What are the EU’s migration policy priorities?
Leaked Document: United Nations Says Immigration Is Always Good And Should never Be Restricted
Only days after the European Court Of Human Rights (ECHR) gave a judgement with effectively reintroduced the notion of criminal blasphemy to Europe, but only for criticism of Islam (you can say what you like about Judaism and Christianity, and the more hateful and threatening the better,) a news reporter for German independent TV station RTL reported on details leaked from United Nations document which reveals that corrupt bunch of Cultural Marxist paskudniaks plan to use immigration from third world shithole countries to destroy western civilisation. If you don’t believe me just read the subtitles of the embedded video.
This blog has been telling you for fifteen years we are at war, not with Russia, China or Iran as mainstream media would have you believe but with the ruling elites of our own nations.
The UN’s Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration marks the first time the world body has agreed on a list of global measures to tackle the risks and challenges involved in migration for individual migrants, and at the same time to maximize benefits for the countries taking in immigrants.
The agreement comes as huge numbers of people across the world, often driven by conflict and poverty, are leaving their countries of origin to seek refuge elsewhere.
But not all countries agree with the compact’s basic tenets and have been vocal in their opposition. Though some have already rejected it, he most significant player, the USA has not committed itself one way or the other. It is likely of course that President Trump has simply wanted to avoid this red herring from becoming a distraction in the run up to the mid – term elections in his country. Russia and China have also declined to reveal their positions as yet, but it is fairly certain thse two global powers will go their own way, and neither is keen on mass immigration.
Read more: Czech PM questions UN migration pact after Austria exit
Some resistance is coming from surprising sources, in Germany for example, where Hausfrau Volksfuhrer Merkel’s love of dark sskinned foreigners is even greater than her hatred of native Germans, independent media reports are ensuring Germans, who have already seen working class suburbs in theior cities turned into third world shitholes thanks to Merkel’s ‘open doors’ immigration policy, know exactly what the UN plan to use mass migration to destroy civilisation really means for them.
from Gates of Vienna
An RTL Commentator Utters Blasphemy Against the UN Migration Pact
RTL is the only major independent broadcaster in Germany. In the following clip from RTL, the commentator Jörg Zajonc expresses doubleplus ungood thoughts about the United Nations’ proposed migration pact.
Many thanks to MissPiggy for the translation, and to Vlad Tepes for the subtitling:
Video transcript:
| 00:00 | The U.N. Migration Pact, a wish-list detached from reality. Convolutedly | |
| 00:04 | written, difficult to read and even more difficult to understand except for one claim: | |
| 00:08 | Migration is good. It is always good and should never be restricted. Why? | |
| 00:12 | No answer is given. The doubters are assured that it is just a consensus paper, | |
| 00:16 | not legally binding. Officially that might be the case, but it IS binding — in a political and | |
| 00:22 | moral sense. That can have legal consequences. That would mean anyone | |
| 00:26 | can make a claim based on the Pact and take their case to court. What judge would | |
| 00:30 | dare make a decision against the consensus? It comes from the U.N. | |
| 00:34 | Additionally, it is noted in the pact that national laws should be taken into account, | |
| 00:38 | but also encouraged that these national laws be adapted according to the interests | |
| 00:42 | of the U.N. Then there’s the matter of “information”. There should be an open, | |
| 00:47 | Fact-based discussion concerning this matter, but I ask how? | |
| 00:51 | If the results are already established, the perception to be created should be more | |
| 00:55 | realistic, humane, and more constructive. The media should involved in steering the | |
| 00:59 | immigration. It says that — literally. And those who don’t play along, they will have | |
| 01:04 | their financial support taken away. That’s written in there too! | |
| 01:08 | There one thing that’s not explained in the Pact. If immigration is so great, then why | |
| 01:12 | does it require a controlled information campaign or such a pact? |
