How Internet Companies Like Google and Facebook Have Helped The spread of extremism

Although the Westminster terror attack is still filling the print and broadcast news  and the usual conspiracy theories about it’s being a false flag incident start to circulate, attention is turning to the role of technology companies such as Google, Facebook and Twitter in the process of radicalisation. Google stands accused of providing easy access to online terror manuals while Boris Johnson demanded social media platforms crack down on “corrupting and polluting” messages.  (Daily Telegraph

These companies are not ignorant of the dangers of unmoderated access to internet publishing facilities. All three have claimed their efforts to eliminate ‘hate speech’ have been increased and the response to violent and extremist material on their platforms in recent years – deleting posts, working with law enforcement and generating “counter-narratives”.

This is bollocks of course, what they have done is set up censorship of posts which criticize Islam, question the mainstream narrative on controversial issues like climate change, uncontrolled mass immigration or globalisation.  There has never been any effort to moderate the  incitement of Muslim hate preachers or thecalls by Muslim religious fanatics for a jihad to exterminate the infidels (that’s you and me) yet  people have been banned for asking why the police forces of secular nations are told by government to take no action on immigrant crime for fear of raising inter – racial tensions.And the internet companies have entered agreements with governments to take action against “Islamophobia” (whatever than means), “homophobia”, “transphobia” and so on, while critics of these politically correct idiocies can face online bullying and death threats simply for having opinions that differ from what the ‘liberal’ fascists are willing to allow.

All this has been done in collaboration with the regime of US President Barack Hussein Obama. And far from opposing the spread of extremism, furthering understanding of science and promoting tolerance and cooperation between nations and cultures, it actually achieves the opposite effect.

So what could internet companies be doing?

First, they could introduce identity verification requirements to deter users from publicly sharing violent and hateful material. Facebook and Twitter don’t demand users’ real names, while Google lets them use services such as Youtube without any account at all. Mandating that consumers create profiles using their actual identity and home address (with a legal requirement that this information is never published, sold or shared) would be controversial, but would dampen the spread of extremism by making anonymity more difficult. And finally, instead of being racist towards fair skinned people of European ethnicity, they could try experimenting with that most liberal of all principles and having one set of rules which apply to all equally. No special cases.

Or Google’s semi – autistic twins Page and Brin, Cocksuckerberg of Facebook, Bill Gates (the philanthropist who wants to eradicate poverty by reducing the population to ten per cent of its present level), Spiegel, Murphy and Brown of Snapchat and all the other Silicon Valley social media wankers could simply admit they are greedy, selfish, power crazed, misanthropic cunts who have happily collaborated with the CIA, NSA and GCHQ global surveillance projects and then fuck the fucking fuck off.

RELATED POSTS:

a name=”http://www.dailystirrer.com/2017-may.shtml#170605-google”>Google’s New Ad Blocker? Here’s What’s Really Going On
Google is not a search engine company, the search engine is just window dressing. Google is a data mining company that steals users’ personal information to advertisers. When web users learned of the extent of Google’s data gathering (spying) and invading our privacy they started to use ad blockers. This hit Google’s revenue of course, until they hit upon a neat idea to consolidate its already-dominant business: block competitors from appearing on its platforms.

Elsewhere: [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Daily Stirrer.shtml ]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [ It’s Bollocks My Dears, All Bollocks ] [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … [ Latest Posts ] [Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [Latest Posts] … [ Tumblr ] … [ Authorsden blog ] … [Daily Stirrer Headlines]
[ Ian at Facebook ]
 

Advertisements

Facebook begins Europe-wide censorship campaign against free speech.

Facebook Inc (FB.O) has commenced the Europe-wide censoring of posts and comments the ruling elite do not like, thus making good the promise given to Hausfrau – Volksfuhrer Merkel by the social media and data theft site’s founder Mark Zuckerberg. The campaign began on Monday 18 January to prevent ‘extremist’ posts on social media, after German extremist anti – European politicians raised concerns about a rise in public opposition to a policy of uncontrolled mass immigration their critics claim is aimed at destroying German ethnicity and culture and turning Germany into an Islamic theocracy.

The left wing coalition politicians have also suffered a public backlash over their efforts to conceal the truth about the increased level of rape and sex crimes committed by Muslim immigrants against European women and directly linked to the influx of refugees from uncivilised parts of the middle east and Africa where women are still though of as chattels.

Facebook launched its pretentiously and dishonestly named “Initiative for Civil Courage Online” in Berlin, pledging over 1 million euros (1 million pounds) to support non-governmental organisations in their efforts to promote pro – Islamic, anti – European propaganda and any posts defending free speech opposing the politically correct cowardice of the ruling elite and corporate fascists like Zuckerberg and his Thought Police organisation.

Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg said hate speech “has no place in our society”, including in the Internet. In Facebook’s wrapped world view something like “I think there should be some limit on the number of migrants we let in,” or “It is known there are many jihadists trying to enter western nations to do harm, so making sure new arrivals have proper travel documents and entry visas”. Far from being hate speech, such comments are aimed at preventing those who carry hate in their should from harming innocent people in civilised society.

Facebook’s ground rules forbid bullying harassment and threatening language, except by Zuckerberg and his fascist staff, but critics say it does not enforce them properly. The critics are wrong here. The nerd Zuckerberg is so completely out of touch with reality he believes computer intelligence is equal to human intelligence, so any subtly worded post that avoids the ‘racist’ or ‘xenophobic’ words defined by Facebook’s sad little script kiddies is going to get past the software apps they employ as censors.

In November, prosecutors in Hamburg launched an investigation into Facebook on suspicion of not doing enough to prevent the dissemination of hate speech. German politicians and celebrities opposed to democracy and free speech have expressed concern about the rise of ‘anti-foreigner’ comments on Facebook (like, “a bunch of foreign guys shouting Allahu Akbar raped and sexually assaulted women on News Years Night in Cologne, which Hausfrau – Volksfuhrer Merkel thinks people should not be allowed to write even though it is true. Merkel’s neo Nazi government are also going after other social media sites where they fear Germans may learn the truth about what is going on in their country in order to cover up the government’s failure to cope with a tide of new migrants that amounted to 1.1 million last year alone.

Chancellor Angela Merkel has urged social networks and Internet service providers to do more to identify criminal posts (i.e. those which question or criticize government policy, more quickly and taking them down.
Here’s an example of the kind of criminal posts Merkel, Obama and Zuckerberg would criminalise. You will see it is not racist, xenophibic or offensive in any way other than in the way it exposes a lie told by Barack Obama.

Source: pando.com
The rejoinder in question appeared on my own Facebook page in a thread about my recent Pando article. That piece looked at President Obama’s blatant lie about his power to reschedule marijuana under federal law. I was responding to an Obama apologist who mindlessly repeated the lie, and insisted that “you know damned well the Republicans would accuse him of being an Imperial President” if he does anything on any issue.

This agitprop is standard — and infuriatingly mindless — apologism from die-hard Democratic Party loyalists. To them, every instance of overt hypocrisy or dishonesty from their preferred politician is justified because the GOP inevitably will criticize him. Of course, the GOP will criticize Obama no matter what he does, which means that this tautology is designed not to make a factual point, but instead to rationalize anything and everything the White House does regardless of the facts.

It means, in other words, that yes, those who use this self-serving crap to deliberately distract from inconvenient truths are being willfully stupid and are, hence, willful ignoramuses.

Soi there you have it, under The New World Order we are no longer allowed to question our leaders or their governments. And that suppression of free speech is one of the basic tools of fascist regimes from Ancient Rome to modern Germany and Obama’s USA.

 

RELATED POSTS
Facebook’s evil empire
The Facebook Megalomaniac
Facebook Privacy Piracy
Google being evil
Google apponits itself The Ministry Of Truth
Google Governing The USA
Internet denies right to privacy online
Internet censorship has arrived

Politician Blasts Conviction For Speaking The Truth On Anti-Semitism In Europe
A Danish politician has been reprimanded for posting comments on Twitter about the-much-commented-on-in-mainstream-media resurgence of anti semitism in Europe. Apparently while hand wringing and breast beating about violent attacks on Jewish people and vandalising premises of Jewish owned businesses is fine, stating the absolutely effing obvious by linking the Europe migrant crisis to this new wave of anti Semitism is a criminal offence.

Elsewhere: [Boggart Blog]…[Little Nicky Machiavelli]… [ Ian’s Authorsden Pages ]… [Scribd]…[Wikinut] … [ Boggart Abroad] … [ Grenteeth Bites ] … Ian Thorpe at Flickr ] … [ Tumblr ] … [Ian at Minds ] … [ The Original Boggart Blog] … [ Authorsden blog ]

My Heart Bleeds For Those Who Built Businesses Online

Heartbleed: A Security Flaw Or A Deliberate Move Towards Government Control of the Internet

On the other side of my face I’m laughing however at those nerds and geeks who spent years wetting themselves everytime PC Wanker reported someone had discovered a bigger prime number. “Oooooooohhhhheeeeeeee, better security, they squealed. Sadly not because where the security keys generated by SSL start to protect is just about the lat place anyone who understands the technology would try to catch your account numbers, passwords etc.

What I find amazing is this vulnerability in the Open SSL system, which was supposed to give total security for online transactions was known of almost as soon at the system was launched. It now seems very likely that the developers knew the system was useless before they launched it on an unsuspecting public. And you can bet the cybershits knew about it long before the good guys found it.

Anyone out there still think I’m a dinosaur for refusing to do online banking etc.

from Infowars

Dire warnings about Heartbleed, a serious internet security risk affecting millions of websites, is echoing across the internet today. Described as a flaw in OpenSSL, the open source encryption technology used by the vast majority of web servers, Heartbleed is said to put HTTPS e-commerce websites at risk.

The bug “can give hackers access to personal data like credit card numbers, usernames, passwords, and, perhaps most importantly, cryptographic keys—which can allow hackers to impersonate or monitor a server,” writes Lily Hay Newman.

The risk was discovered by a Google researcher at Codenomicon, a Finnish company specializing in the development of “fuzzing tools” to ensure computer network security. The Codenomicon client base includes government and the defense industry and, as noted below, has suspicious connections to Obama, DHS, and the FBI.

Continue reading:

Heartbleed Internet Bug: Pretext For Web Lockdown?

‘The Heartbleed bug is being described as the most critical security flaw to hit the web since its inception, a crisis that could lay the groundwork for massive government regulation and censorship of the Internet.

“Millions of websites may have been leaking critically sensitive data for the past two years, thanks to a devastating flaw in the OpenSSL software many sites use to encrypt and transmit data,” reports Yahoo Tech, as experts warned web users to change all their passwords immediately in a bid to protect themselves from a vulnerability that could have allowed hackers to infiltrate millions of email accounts, sensitive tax records and a myriad of other private data.

“Catastrophic is the right word. On the scale of one to 10, this is an 11,” said security expert Bruce Schneier in a blog post which explains the implications of the flaw.

from BBC News

The major security flaw at the heart of the internet may have been exposing users’ personal information and passwords to hackers for the past two years.It is not known how widely the bug has been exploited, if at all, but what is clear is that it is one of the biggest security issues to have faced the internet to date.

The BBC has attempted to round up everything you need to know about Heartbleed in this very helpful page.

Carry On Up The Amazon

A current kerfuffle about Amazon’s selling kindle books featuring incest, rape, bestiality and violence, with some hand wringers asking “does Jeff Bezos have any morals?” and others calling for Amazon to censor certain content posted by self publishers of Kindle books.

Criticizm is unfair really as conventional booksellers have been selling The Bible for hundreds of years.

And aren’t the Politically Correct Thought Police being hypocrites again. If they want to attack Amazon all they have to do is look at the company’s employment policies

WHAT?

You don’t believe be about bestialityu in the Bible?

Ezekiel 23:20
There she lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses.

RELATED POSTS:
Amazon slave labour
Amazon Humandroids
Is Jeff Bezos a cockfish